On Wed, 12 Aug 2020, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
At what point do commercial ISPs upgrade links in their backbone as well as
peering and transit links that are congested? At
80% capacity? 90%? 95%?
Thanks,
Hank
Caveat: The views expressed above are solely my own and do not express the
When I worked for an ISP, it was about 70%, not sure if that is the case
with the other ones.
On 8/12/2020 3:31 AM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
At what point do commercial ISPs upgrade links in their backbone as
well as peering and transit links that are congested? At 80%
capacity? 90%? 95%?
Just my curiosity. May I ask how we can measure the link capacity loading?
What does it mean by a 50%, 70%, or 90% capacity loading? Load sampled and
measured instantaneously, or averaging over a certain period of time
(granularity)?
These are questions have bothered me for long. Don't know if I
Hi Max,
If you're continuing to receive unsatisfactory support on this issue,
please reach out to me directly.
mc
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:42 AM Max Tulyev wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> is there anyone from Netflix?
>
> We have a strange problem: our customers also customers of Netflix when
>
Hi all,
We've also simplified our webpage:
https://afrinic.net/rpki/tal
And the URL to the TAL:
https://rpki.afrinic.net/tal/afrinic.tal
Cheers,
Amreesh Phokeer
AFRINIC
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 4:59 PM Randy Bush wrote:
> > https://tal.rpki.ripe.net/ripe-ncc.tal (preferred)
>
> looks great
> From: Mark Tinka
> Sent: Tuesday, August 11, 2020 7:45 PM
>
> On 11/Aug/20 17:55, adamv0...@netconsultings.com wrote:
>
> > Can you elaborate?
> > Apart from licensing scheme what stops one from redirecting traffic to
> > one vTMS instance per say each transit link or per destination /24
> >
On 12/Aug/20 17:08, m.Taichi wrote:
> Just my curiosity. May I ask how we can measure the link capacity
> loading? What does it mean by a 50%, 70%, or 90% capacity loading?
> Load sampled and measured instantaneously, or averaging over a certain
> period of time (granularity)?
>
> These are
On 12/Aug/20 17:08, m.Taichi wrote:
>
> Just my curiosity. May I ask how we can measure the link capacity
> loading? What does it mean by a 50%, 70%, or 90% capacity loading?
> Load sampled and measured instantaneously, or averaging over a certain
> period of time (granularity)?
>
> These are
> We've also simplified our webpage:
> https://afrinic.net/rpki/tal
>
> And the URL to the TAL:
> https://rpki.afrinic.net/tal/afrinic.tal
thanks! wfm
randy
On 12/Aug/20 10:50, Etienne-Victor Depasquale wrote:
> This point plays straight up the path of the argument I recounted.
>
> Yes, I agree that there's a relational problem inherent to the
> situation I described.
> Wouldn't any wise employer playing the relationship game ensure that
> he's
>
> Moreover, an employer doesn't have to give in to the whims of a
> conceited employee; and most do not.
>
This point plays straight up the path of the argument I recounted.
Yes, I agree that there's a relational problem inherent to the situation I
described.
Wouldn't any wise employer playing
On 12/Aug/20 09:44, Saku Ytti wrote:
> Personally if the link is in a growth market, you should upgrade
> really early, 50% seems late, cost is negligible if you anticipate
> growth to continue. If it's not a growth market cost may become less
> than negligible.
The problem you have is "what
On 12/Aug/20 09:49, Etienne-Victor Depasquale wrote:
> Two more bits' worth ...
>
> About a year ago, during a discussion with a local network operator's CTO,
> I was told that dependency on the operator's employees
> for production of software gave the employees too much leverage over
> their
On 12/Aug/20 09:31, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> At what point do commercial ISPs upgrade links in their backbone as
> well as peering and transit links that are congested? At 80%
> capacity? 90%? 95%?
>
We start the process at 50% utilization, and work toward completing the
upgrade by 70%
Two more bits' worth ...
About a year ago, during a discussion with a local network operator's CTO,
I was told that dependency on the operator's employees
for production of software gave the employees too much leverage over their
employer (the operator, here).
Perhaps industrial standardization
On Wed, 12 Aug 2020 at 10:35, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> At what point do commercial ISPs upgrade links in their backbone as well as
> peering and transit links that are congested? At 80% capacity? 90%? 95%?
I've worked for employees where policy has been anywhere from 50% or
80%. And I know
At what point do commercial ISPs upgrade links in their backbone
as well as peering and transit links that are congested? At 80%
capacity? 90%? 95%?
Thanks,
Hank
Caveat: The views expressed above are solely my own and do not
17 matches
Mail list logo
