Re: SRv6

On 14/Sep/20 22:42, aar...@gvtc.com wrote: > Oh snap! Hey hey, that's good, thanks Nick. I had to go into the locator > service of the remote pe and find a sid that would respond to ping. > > This is apparently an OAM Endpoint with Punt (End.OP) > > https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ro

Re: how would draft-ymbk-opsawg-finding-geofeeds work in noam

> Radb only supports again, north america is a special snowflake. radb is a routing registry, not an allocation registry. inetnum: and NetRange: are allocation objects. if you get your address space from arin, you have to use their webby stuff to add the Comments: to the allocation object.

Re: how would draft-ymbk-opsawg-finding-geofeeds work in noam

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 6:00 PM Randy Bush wrote: > > Would your arin approach of netrange work in all regions? > > > > no. to the best of my knowledge, other regional registries and > > independent irr registries use rpsl; i.e. inetnum: and remarks:. > Radb only supports route -route6 -aut-

Re: how would draft-ymbk-opsawg-finding-geofeeds work in noam

> Would your arin approach of netrange work in all regions? no. to the best of my knowledge, other regional registries and independent irr registries use rpsl; i.e. inetnum: and remarks:. randy

Re: how would draft-ymbk-opsawg-finding-geofeeds work in noam

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 5:53 PM Randy Bush wrote: > >> the edit buffer, yet to be published, has > > >> > > >>Currently, the registry data published by ARIN is not RPSL; > > >>therefore, when fetching from ARIN whois, the "NetRange" attribute/ > > >>key must be treated as "inetnum" an

Re: how would draft-ymbk-opsawg-finding-geofeeds work in noam

>> the edit buffer, yet to be published, has >> >>Currently, the registry data published by ARIN is not RPSL; >>therefore, when fetching from ARIN whois, the "NetRange" attribute/ >>key must be treated as "inetnum" and the "Comment" attribute must be >>treated as "remarks". >> >> co

Re: how would draft-ymbk-opsawg-finding-geofeeds work in noam

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 3:02 PM Randy Bush wrote: > the edit buffer, yet to be published, has > > > >Currently, the registry data published by ARIN is not RPSL; > >therefore, when fetching from ARIN whois, the "NetRange" attribute/ > >key must be treated as "inetnum" and the "Comment"

Re: IP addresses on subnet edge (/24)

On 9/14/20 2:25 PM, Andrey Khomyakov wrote: > TL;DR I suspect there are middle boxes that don't like IPs ending in > .255. Anyone seen that? Yes. We'd every so often get random complaints that "my friend can't reach my website but I can", etc., with not enough detail to track it down. The problem

why not use dns for draft-ymbk-opsawg-finding-geofeeds?

[ am i going to regret cross-posting? ] a friend raised in private the question of whether the dns could be used instead of rpsl. essentially, dns does not search down-tree for you. it only answers exact specific queries. for some reason lost in time, well at least lost in my mind, rpsl servers

Re: IP addresses on subnet edge (/24)

You may want to do traceroute using syn/ack packets to find the offending piece of equipment (may require modifying traceroute to set the syn and ack). > On 15 Sep 2020, at 07:25, Andrey Khomyakov wrote: > > TL;DR I suspect there are middle boxes that don't like IPs ending in .255. > Anyone se

Re: IP addresses on subnet edge (/24)

Peacez On Tue, Sep 15, 2020, 12:26 AM Andrey Khomyakov wrote: > TL;DR I suspect there are middle boxes that don't like IPs ending in .255. > Anyone seen that? > Also .0 and .1. Yes, there was some kind of a strange behavior with those addresses before. We excluded those from rotation back in

Re: SPAM: Re: Cogent emails

On 14/09/2020 18:13, Simon Lockhart wrote: > We gave in and just bought a small amount of transit from them. Aha! You're the reason they don't stop! :p -- Tom

Re: IP addresses on subnet edge (/24)

On 14/09/2020 22:25, Andrey Khomyakov wrote: > TL;DR I suspect there are middle boxes that don't like IPs ending in > .255. Anyone seen that? Yes, but not for many, MANY years. I would expect that this service might not like addresses ending in .0 either? It was ca. 2010, when I started receiving

Re: IP addresses on subnet edge (/24)

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 5:28 PM Andrey Khomyakov wrote: > > TL;DR I suspect there are middle boxes that don't like IPs ending in .255. > Anyone seen that? Windows XP/Windows 2003 both had an issue where addresses ending in .255 wouldn't work, regardless of the mask. It seems unlikely that there

Re: how would draft-ymbk-opsawg-finding-geofeeds work in noam

the edit buffer, yet to be published, has Currently, the registry data published by ARIN is not RPSL; therefore, when fetching from ARIN whois, the "NetRange" attribute/ key must be treated as "inetnum" and the "Comment" attribute must be treated as "remarks". comments appreciated ra

Re: Cogent emails

i get 50 times as many emails bitching about cogent spam as i get cogent spam. and my spam filter is trained to take care of the latter. randy

Re: curious spam...

> On Sep 14, 2020, at 5:04 PM, John Levine wrote: > > In article > you > write: >> I moved to Seattle. Today I found my grmail box subscribed to a >> congressman's list from a nearby Washington jurisdiction. Not some >> random congressman. And not any of the addresses I give out; my gmail >

IP addresses on subnet edge (/24)

TL;DR I suspect there are middle boxes that don't like IPs ending in .255. Anyone seen that? Folks, We are troubleshooting a strange issue where some of our customers cannot establish a successful connection with our HTTP front end. In addition to checking the usual things like routing and interfa

Re: curious spam...

In article you write: >I moved to Seattle. Today I found my grmail box subscribed to a >congressman's list from a nearby Washington jurisdiction. Not some >random congressman. And not any of the addresses I give out; my gmail >box's address which I don't. ... It's strange but I think it's not t

RE: SRv6

Oh snap! Hey hey, that's good, thanks Nick. I had to go into the locator service of the remote pe and find a sid that would respond to ping. This is apparently an OAM Endpoint with Punt (End.OP) https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr9000/software/asr9k-r7-0/segment-routing/configu

Re: Cogent emails

All I did was express interest a few years ago and ever since then they’ve called and emailed me pretty regularly. Just got one yesterday. I’m probably on the fourth sales guy now since I first asked. Ryan Wilkins > On Sep 14, 2020, at 3:00 PM, Jesse DuPont > wrote: > > We started getting

Re: SRv6

aar...@gvtc.com wrote on 14/09/2020 20:03: Thanks Nick, I only see the following layers... I see no extension headers behind the ipv6 header. I sent you the wireshark sniff directly so you can see what I'm seeing. you should see extension headers if you're doing more complex stuff? E.g. if y

Re: Phoenix-IX Contact

> On Sep 14, 2020, at 9:31 PM, Kate Gerry wrote: > > Does anybody have a contact who works at Phoenix-IX? I have been attempting > to reach somebody there for a while now without any luck. > > Attempts to each out to peer...@phoenix-ix.net as well as Ninja-IX have been > without any luck. We

Phoenix-IX Contact

Does anybody have a contact who works at Phoenix-IX? I have been attempting to reach somebody there for a while now without any luck. Attempts to each out to peer...@phoenix-ix.net as well as Ninja-IX have been without any luck. We also tried reaching out to Paul

RE: SRv6

Thanks Nick, I only see the following layers... I see no extension headers behind the ipv6 header. I sent you the wireshark sniff directly so you can see what I'm seeing. Ethernet - Type 0x86dd Ipv6 - Next Header IPIP (4) Ipv4 Icmp -Aaron

Re: Cogent emails

We started getting emails the moment we got our own AS (earlier this year).  Jesse DuPont Owner / Network Architect email:

Re: curious spam...

Here in Florida the self-preservation interests of the two party system have resulted in all voter registrations being made public, including email, d/o/b, phone, home address (since you can't legally register any other), party affiliation. If you used your private email for any state governmen

Re: curious spam...

Yes. I get spammed about once a week from Jaime Herrera Beutler. Never looked at the headers though. It's entirely possible someone is either pranking me by signing me up to political lists or they harvested my well-known address from somewhere. I'll check the headers next time. -A On Mon, Sep

Re: SRv6

aar...@gvtc.com wrote on 14/09/2020 18:57: But rather, shows my L3VPN v4 traffic riding v6 and that’s it. that is how SRv6 works. IPv6 + extension headers (+ a bit extra which is incompatible with ipv6). Let me know if I’m seeing an SRH and just don’t know it, LOL. Check out the IPv6 Ext

curious spam...

Howdy, I've noticed something odd. When I lived in Virginia, I started receiving email directly to my gmail box from my U.S. Representative. Unsolicited spam from Congressmen is nothing new but it was a little odd that they found my gmail box (which I don't give out) and not one of the hundreds of

Re: SPAM: Re: Cogent emails

I manage three networks. All three have transit from Cogent. I get assaulted non-stop by Cogent sales reps. - Mike Hammett Intelligent Computing Solutions http://www.ics-il.com Midwest-IX http://www.midwest-ix.com - Original Message - From: "Simon Lockhart" To: "David G

SRv6

I have what seems to be a good SRv6 test in my lab running XRv9k 7.0.2 But I'm wondering why the sniffer doesn't show the much-spoken-of SRH (Segment Routing Header).. But rather, shows my L3VPN v4 traffic riding v6 and that's it. Let me know if I'm seeing an SRH and just don't know it, LOL.

Re: SPAM: Re: Cogent emails

I tell them to hit me up once they have direct peering with HE.net. Haven’t heard from them since. -Mike > On Sep 14, 2020, at 10:15, Simon Lockhart wrote: > > We gave in and just bought a small amount of transit from them. The sales > emails stopped. Seems to be about the only effective met

Re: Cogent emails

The question is if they are back to contacting the names on whois or they magically found our emails "another way" and they have plausible deniability. On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 1:07 PM David Guo wrote: > Yes, every week > > > > Proof > > > > https://vip1.loli.net/2020/09/15/bq3lHGuvNRkW9YS.jpg >

SPAM: Re: Cogent emails

We gave in and just bought a small amount of transit from them. The sales emails stopped. Seems to be about the only effective method. Simon On Mon Sep 14, 2020 at 05:07:28PM +, David Guo via NANOG wrote: > Yes, every week > > Proof > > https://vip1.loli.net/2020/09/15/bq3lHGuvNRkW9YS.jpg

RE: Cogent emails

Yes, every week Proof https://vip1.loli.net/2020/09/15/bq3lHGuvNRkW9YS.jpg From: NANOG On Behalf Of Dovid Bender Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 12:46 AM To: NANOG Subject: Cogent emails Is anyone starting to get the "cogent emails" again?

Cogent emails

Is anyone starting to get the "cogent emails" again?

Re: sr - spring - what's the deal with 2 names

On 10/Sep/20 21:09, aar...@gvtc.com wrote: > Thanks for the heads up Mark... I see docs showing SRv6 not supported until > XR 6.6, I put XR7 in my lab to start testing it... I wasn't talking about SRv6... I am talking about SR-MPLS, signaled via and supported for IPv6, in the IGP. Mark.