Hello -
The whois.radb.net service is now mirroring the LACNIC IRR.
- - Mitchell
& The RADb.net Team
r...@merit.edu
supp...@radb.net
- Original Message -
From: "job"
To: nanog@nanog.org, routing...@ripe.net
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 3:14:39 PM
Subject: [routing-wg] Fw:
Hundred Meg, Ten Gig, One erm...?
Maybe harder to create vernacular for.
> On 2020-11-23, at 14:35, Mark Tinka wrote:
> […]
>
> Given that Tbps is still relatively uncommon in many operator networks, it's
> not uncommon to hear people say Megabit and Gigabit with no problem, but say
>
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 8:21 AM Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 11/23/20 18:14, Thomas Scott wrote:
>
> "Terrorbits" sounds like a 3 year old unplugging a router - over and over
>
>
> Because of dead wi-fi, or just for giggles :-)?
>
> Mark.
>
Pets. I'm pretty sure the cat was the culprit for a tech
Warren Kumari wrote on 23/11/2020 16:05:
They are better than terrorbits, which is what happen when anyone in
the family says "My Internet is broken, can you fix it?"
best to approach incidents like this with gigglebits, e.g. the sort of
response that accompanies replies like "you did WHAT??
On 11/23/20 18:14, Thomas Scott wrote:
"Terrorbits" sounds like a 3 year old unplugging a router - over and over
Because of dead wi-fi, or just for giggles :-)?
Mark.
"Terrorbits" sounds like a 3 year old unplugging a router - over and over
until which point it then had to be relocated to a top shelf with a UPS.
Telling this from a friend's experience, not my own. Promise.
- Thomas Scott | mr.thomas.sc...@gmail.com
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 11:09 AM Warren
On Mon, Nov 23, 2020 at 10:22 AM Andy Ringsmuth wrote:
>
>
> > On Nov 23, 2020, at 12:35 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
> >
> >> 8tbps (8 terrabits per second).
>
> Terrabits? That’s a new one to me. Would that be akin to an “earthbit” or
> something like that?
They are better than terrorbits,
> On Nov 23, 2020, at 12:35 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote:
>
>> 8tbps (8 terrabits per second).
Terrabits? That’s a new one to me. Would that be akin to an “earthbit” or
something like that?
-Andy
With Comcast, the subscriber can disable the public WiFi hotspot gateway
through their on-line portal (at least when I had a comcast gateway you
could do this). Of course when you go to a customer-provided cable modem
and/or CPE WiFi AP the hotspot no longer exists as the MSO no longer
controls
Ah, okay. All good!
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Tinka"
To: "Mike Hammett"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Monday, November 23, 2020 8:17:58 AM
Subject: Re: A letter from the
>It shares the aggregate bandwidth of the HFC but not your contracted
bandwidth
That's how I remember them being provisioned, they were on the same modem,
but using their own timing slots, so essentially the subscriber at their
own premises was never using the channels at the same time as the
On 11/23/20 15:50, Mike Hammett wrote:
I eagerly await a more substantive response. This is from a position
of inquiry, not a position of combat. I'm new to the world of hardware
that has those capabilities, so if there's something better, I'm all
for hearing about it.
What I meant was
It is a lifesaver. It is a good back up to have if primary services fails as my
telco service did Friday. Transmission rates up and down vary dramatically from
as high as 40 megs down to as low 500K down. It is definitely shared bandwidth
in the Last Mile.
-R.
On Nov 22, 2020, at 12:42, Lady Benjamin PD Cannon wrote:
>
> Rod, that’s exactly how they are delivering it. Unclear wether it’s over a
> separately provisioned bandwidth channel, or wether it shares the aggregate
> capacity of the HFC.
It shares the aggregate bandwidth of the HFC but not
I am impressed that you stepped up, admitted the mistake, and apologized. Thank
you for taking responsibility.
Anyone reading this who can say they never made a mistake can continue to
criticize you. As I am about as far from that standard as one can be, I will
consider this penance enough for
I eagerly await a more substantive response. This is from a position of
inquiry, not a position of combat. I'm new to the world of hardware that has
those capabilities, so if there's something better, I'm all for hearing about
it.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
On 11/23/20 14:40, Mike Hammett wrote:
I've been looking at some deployments in areas with sketchy political
forces and I was looking to use MACsec.
How underwhelming :-)...
Mark.
On 11/23/20 09:52, Carsten Bormann wrote:
I know most people here don’t care (because they don’t have to(*), literally),
but there are standards for these things, and there are reasons for the way
that they have turned out to be. If you want to taste a little treatise from
engineers who
I've been looking at some deployments in areas with sketchy political forces
and I was looking to use MACsec.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Bush"
To: "Lady Benjamin PD
The dual purpose does explain why the gateways are so big relative to what the
incumbent phone companies provide. It is great redundancy. My telco DSL
Internet went down and I hopped onto free wireless cable service that I am
entitled since most of properties have cable Internet.
-R.
20 matches
Mail list logo
