On 02/02/2021 19:08, Douglas Fischer
wrote:
Well... That is a point
of view!
And I must respect that.
Against this position, there are several companies, including
some tier 1, that sells this as an
This might be a long shot, but if there is anyone out there with a system
that has one of these in it, running a very recent Linux kernel:
https://www.broadcom.com/products/ethernet-connectivity/network-adapters/100gb-nic-ocp/p2100g
I'm looking for a copy of the output from 'dmesg' on boot and ou
>
> - If the network operator does it correctly, it should work correctly.
> - If the network operator deals with that without the needed skills,
> expertise, attention+devotion, wrong things will come up.
There have been a great many things predicated on "if someone does it
properly". While tha
Hey Rich!
I'm in love with this RFC...
It is not an easy one, so I did not understand it completely yet.
But It is almost what I was thinking...
Does anyone saw any docs about deploying it?
Any software that implements it?
Em ter., 2 de fev. de 2021 às 15:53, Compton, Rich A <
rich.comp...@cha
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 10:57 AM Warren Kumari wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 10:06 AM Casey Callendrello wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm part of a paper reading club, and the group's interest has turned to
> > BGP and Internet routing in general. As the only person in the group who
> > even
Hi, here is a Flowspec best practices document that I helped write that will
hopefully help folks from shooting themselves in the foot
http://m3aawg.org/flowspec-BP. As you stated, route policies can be applied to
restrict what type of flowspec rules can or can’t be accepted. For example,
onl
Can someone from the NOC or escalation path at Cogent reach out to me
privately?
Thanks
Mark
--
Mark William Davis
mda...@gmail.com
Well... That is a point of view!
And I must respect that.
Against this position, there are several companies, including some tier 1,
that sells this as an $extra$.
About the "Please break me at my earliest inconvenience." part:
I believe that the same type of prefix filtering that applies to
Down
Personally, I would absolutely, positively, never ever under any
circumstances provide access to a 3rd party company to push a FlowSpec rule
or trigger RTBH on my networks. No way. You would be handing over a
nuclear trigger and saying "Please break me at my earliest inconvenience."
On Tue, Feb 2
On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 10:06 AM Casey Callendrello wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I'm part of a paper reading club, and the group's interest has turned to
> BGP and Internet routing in general. As the only person in the group who
> even knows what an AS is, I've been tasked with finding interesting
> pape
Hi all,
I'm part of a paper reading club, and the group's interest has turned to
BGP and Internet routing in general. As the only person in the group who
even knows what an AS is, I've been tasked with finding interesting
papers on the subject. Any papers or presentations that you found
valua
On 2/1/21 17:13, Rod Beck wrote:
I think that report is a summary of the thinking that led to the new
higher count cables. In fact, those researchers work for the companies
that laid those cables.
The new cables are based on the ideas outlined in that paper? spacing
regen farther apart, pu
$ whois AS16589
No match found for a 16589.
* li...@benappy.com (Michel 'ic' Luczak) [Tue 02 Feb 2021, 14:48 CET]:
whois -r AS16589 # perhaps?
aut-num:AS16589
as-name:ELV-ANYCAST-NET
You skipped the most important line:
source: RIPE-NONAUTH
In other words, this ob
>
> $ whois AS16589
> No match found for a 16589.
>
whois -r AS16589 # perhaps?
aut-num:AS16589
as-name:ELV-ANYCAST-NET
OK, but do you know any company the sells de Flowspec as a service, in the
way that the Attack Identifications are not made by their equipment, just
receiving de BGP-FlowSpec and applying that rules on that equipments... And
even then give back to the customer some way to access those statistics?
15 matches
Mail list logo