> On 15 Feb 2021, at 17:25, William Herrin wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 8:27 PM Mark Tinka wrote:
>> Dropping a few feet from cloud nine, there, really, is no other thing
>> that will facilitate or hold back the adoption of IPv6, like money.
>
> Well actually, that's not entirely true.
On 2/15/21 08:25, William Herrin wrote:
Well actually, that's not entirely true. One thing holding back IPv6
is the unfortunately routine need to turn it off in order to get one
or another IPv4 thing back working again. Like the disney thing
earlier in this thread. Or like my experience yeste
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 8:27 PM Mark Tinka wrote:
> Dropping a few feet from cloud nine, there, really, is no other thing
> that will facilitate or hold back the adoption of IPv6, like money.
Well actually, that's not entirely true. One thing holding back IPv6
is the unfortunately routine need to
On 2/14/21 22:34, Sabri Berisha wrote:
You are 100% Correct. Perhaps we can get Jeff Bezos to give 25% extra off
at the next Cyber Monday event to those accessing amazon.com via IPv6.
That will not only drive IPv6 deployment at eyeball networks, it's a
feasible plan as well. IF good ol' Jeff
- On Feb 14, 2021, at 11:56 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
Hi,
> hint: that idea is from the late '90s. the next bright idea for what
> would help ipv6 take over the internet was 3gpp. it's been a long line
> of things which would make ipv6 take off.
You are 100% Correct. Perhaps we
On 2/14/21 21:56, Randy Bush wrote:
hint: that idea is from the late '90s. the next bright idea for what
would help ipv6 take over the internet was 3gpp. it's been a long line
of things which would make ipv6 take off. and at least ten million
messages on mailing lists such as this. and th
> Perhaps it's time that we made good friends with the folk accelerating
> pr0n, and did a deal with them where someone's fetish was only
> available over IPv6.
hint: that idea is from the late '90s. the next bright idea for what
would help ipv6 take over the internet was 3gpp. it's been a long
On 2/14/21 04:24, Mark Foster wrote:
So the business case will be the 'killer app' or perhaps 'killer service'
that's IPv6-only and that'll provide a business reason.
But chicken and egg.. who wants to run a service that's IPv6-only and miss out
on such a big userbase?
Perhaps it's time
On 2/14/21 02:00, scott wrote:
I would be looking for a new job and it is a much larger network than
2 routers is a big city. :) Sabri Berisha was correct: "The true
enemy here is mid-level management that refuses to prioritize
deployment of IPv6. What we should be discussing is how
9 matches
Mail list logo