Re: Juniper hardware recommendation

2021-05-16 Thread Sander Steffann
Hi! On Sat, 2021-05-15 at 11:38 +0300, Saku Ytti wrote: > Juniper has worked like this since day1 and shockingly the world > doesn't care, people really don't care for accuracy. CLI and SNMP are > both L3. If you want to report L2 'set chassis fpc N pic N > account-layer2-overhead'. > > However,

Re: TLD .so Partial Outage?

2021-05-16 Thread Mark Tinka
On 5/16/21 17:24, Bill Woodcock wrote: Our staff contacted AfriNIC staff and got an acknowledgement that they were in process of resolving it at the time. Yes, got the same back from them as well. Mark.

Re: Juniper hardware recommendation

2021-05-16 Thread Jon Lewis
On Sun, 16 May 2021, Colton Conor wrote: Looks like its replacement is the 5120 series. The question is does the 5120 have the same limitations and similar chipset?  Severly limited TCAM makes use of ACLs challenging. --

Re: TLD .so Partial Outage?

2021-05-16 Thread Bill Woodcock
> On May 15, 2021, at 9:05 PM, Tom Daly wrote: > > Hello NANOG'ers! > > I'm observing a near global outage of DNS services from d.nic.so. This > appears to be an AfriNIC anycast DNS service. > > Does anyone have contacts at AfriNIC for their DNS systems available? > > e.nic.so seems to be

Re: Juniper hardware recommendation

2021-05-16 Thread Mark Tinka
All sounds like a bit of Broadcom to me :-). Mark. On 5/16/21 14:56, Colton Conor wrote: Looks like its replacement is the 5120 series. The question is does the 5120 have the same limitations and similar chipset? On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 7:06 AM Jason Healy

Re: TLD .so Partial Outage?

2021-05-16 Thread Mark Tinka
On 5/15/21 21:05, Tom Daly wrote: Hello NANOG'ers! I'm observing a near global outage of DNS services from d.nic.so. This appears to be an AfriNIC anycast DNS service. Does anyone have contacts at AfriNIC for their DNS systems available? e.nic.so seems to be responding (hosted behind

Re: Juniper hardware recommendation

2021-05-16 Thread Colton Conor
Looks like its replacement is the 5120 series. The question is does the 5120 have the same limitations and similar chipset? On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 7:06 AM Jason Healy wrote: > To echo Alain's comments earlier, the Juniper QFX 5100 series is stable, > once you figure out all the shortcomings of

Re: TLD .so Partial Outage?

2021-05-16 Thread sthaug
> I'm observing a near global outage of DNS services from d.nic.so. This > appears to be an AfriNIC anycast DNS service. >From my vantage point in Oslo, Norway, d.nic.so works just fine using IPv6 but not IPv4. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sth...@nethelp.no

TLD .so Partial Outage?

2021-05-16 Thread Tom Daly
Hello NANOG'ers! I'm observing a near global outage of DNS services from d.nic.so. This appears to be an AfriNIC anycast DNS service. Does anyone have contacts at AfriNIC for their DNS systems available? e.nic.so seems to be responding (hosted behind PCH, thanks Woody!). Tom -- Tom Daly

Re: Juniper hardware recommendation

2021-05-16 Thread Jason Healy
To echo Alain's comments earlier, the Juniper QFX 5100 series is stable, once you figure out all the shortcomings of the chipset. We aren't doing anything fancy, but have certainly bumped into our share of issues that have no workaround because it's a limitation of the physical hardware.