Re: Tier1 BGP filter generation data sources & frequency

Hi Jon, (and anyone with similar issues) > BTW...speaking of MANRS, if there's someone on-list who can help out with > some questions, I'd appreciate the contact. For $work, I'd been talking > to Kevin Meynell about our joining. It fell through the cracks and > recently popped back up. Recent

Re: Tier1 BGP filter generation data sources & frequency

Hello Jon , On Mon, 24 May 2021, Jon Lewis wrote: On Mon, 24 May 2021, Job Snijders via NANOG wrote: On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 02:04:32PM -0400, Luca Salvatore wrote: Curious if anyone is aware of other Tier1s deprecating support for RADB? Rather than deprecating RADB, I think the

Re: Tier1 BGP filter generation data sources & frequency

On Mon, 24 May 2021, Job Snijders via NANOG wrote: On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 02:04:32PM -0400, Luca Salvatore wrote: Curious if anyone is aware of other Tier1s deprecating support for RADB? Rather than deprecating RADB, I think the industry would be better off if either RADB or the Tier1s (in

Re: Tier1 BGP filter generation data sources & frequency

On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 02:04:32PM -0400, Luca Salvatore wrote: > Curious if anyone is aware of other Tier1s deprecating support for RADB? Rather than deprecating RADB, I think the industry would be better off if either RADB or the Tier1s (in their local caching layer) deploy IRR database

Re: Tier1 BGP filter generation data sources & frequency

On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 4:29 PM Laura Smith via NANOG wrote: > I thought everyone was supposed to be migrating to MANRS. ;-) > > ...if you aren't cracking a joke about the 15th of 14 standards... MANRS is an umbrella project that is supposed to (depending on where you fit in the ecosystem, but

Re: Tier1 BGP filter generation data sources & frequency

Curious if anyone is aware of other Tier1s deprecating support for RADB? On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 4:29 PM Laura Smith via NANOG wrote: > I thought everyone was supposed to be migrating to MANRS. ;-) > > > > > Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email. > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > On Saturday,

Re: DDoS attack with blackmail

I can also name one recent instance in which a client of mine was without doubt DdoS'd by a mitigation provider they were getting a quote from, and sadly this didn't even end up being the worst of the behavior we had to deal with from them before ultimately terminating our contract with them. It's

Re: DDoS attack with blackmail

Jim, While I don't envy those who put in long hours to mitigate DDoSes at the 11th hour, the security industry as a whole, DDoS mitigation included, doesn't have a perfectly clean track record. Public court records offer plenty of evidence, and convictions from foul play while trying to win bids.

Re: DDoS attack with blackmail

While I have no design to engage in over email argument over how much latency people can actually tolerate, I will simply state that most people have a very poor understanding of it and how much additional latency is really introduced by DDoS mitigation. As for implying that DDoS mitigation

Re: DDoS attack with blackmail

DDoS Attack Preparation Workbook https://www.senki.org/ddos-attack-preparation-workbook/ > On May 20, 2021, at 12:26 PM, Baldur Norddahl > wrote: > > Hello > > We got attacked by a group that calls