Anyone on the list from Zayo NOC who can assist with removing a couple of
/24's from their table that isn't actually being advertised to them?
Dave Browning | dlbNetworks
0413 579 391 | 07 3088 2274
It's more likely to be someone in the area. Friend of mine who runs a small
WISP has had similar problems with other companies who haven't been able to
upgrade equipment to Part 96 capable, yet still operate and walk all over
everyone else in the area.
The only somewhat sketchy licensing up your
Have you tried the contact information on some of their FCC Part 101 (PTP
microwave) licenses? All public data in the ULS, you can even download the
whole thing (12-14GB pipe delimited CSV file, last I checked).
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 2:43 PM Sean Heskett wrote:
> I realize this isn’t an RF
I've noticed something similar on two networks, however it appears to be trying
to scan port 80:
13:30:26.387183 IP6 2620:96:a000::5. > 2620:135:5005:71::b0c.80: Flags [S],
seq 2063829402, win 65535, length 0
13:30:26.393445 IP6 2620:96:a000::5. > 2620:135:5006:7::703.80: Flags [S],
Is there anyone here with a relationship with the Hotstar streaming service? We
recently launched a new IP block and it's being blocked by them.
Eric
Hello Joel
Far from widely available but:
- we updated IPv6 ND for P2MP with RFC8505
- address ownership can be protected with RFC 8928
- early work is available for eVPN with
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-thubert-bess-secure-evpn-mac-signaling-00
All this is IPv6 only and not
6 matches
Mail list logo
