On Tue, 7 Sept 2021 at 19:51, Owen DeLong wrote:
> Hopefully this idea that “you need to do IPv4 anyhow” will die some day soon.
Fully agreed, I just don't see the driver. But I can imagine a
different timeline where in 2000 several tier1 signed mutual binding
contracts to drop IPv4 at the edge
> On 8 Sep 2021, at 12:51, Masataka Ohta
> wrote:
>
> Niels Bakker wrote:
>
>>> As for well known port, we can specify non-default port numbers
>>> in URLs (I'm not sure whether it works for mailto: or not) or.
>>> in the future, things like DNS SRV RRs should be helpful.
>> This absolutely
Niels Bakker wrote:
As for well known port, we can specify non-default port numbers
in URLs (I'm not sure whether it works for mailto: or not) or.
in the future, things like DNS SRV RRs should be helpful.
This absolutely doesn't work.
Thank you very much for your emotional and unfounded
comm
Hello,
I’m looking for someone at 9500 that can look into why you started announcing
some IP space starting on August 25th intermittently that is causing an
operational network issue.
Can you please contact me off-list?
Thanks
- jared
It appears that Niels Bakker said:
>Is there even any IETF work being done on getting port forwards on a
>device behind your immediate LAN at home?
Have you looked at RFCs 6887 and 6970?
R's,
John
According to news reports, Cox communications has restored 85 percent of
service in the Greater Baton Rouge area, but 60 percent of Greater New
Orleans customers are still without internet. They assessed nearly 65
miles of damages to their network infrastructure in the New Orleans area.
Cox st
Is that outside->in, inside->out, or middle-out?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
http://www.ics-il.com
Midwest-IX
http://www.midwest-ix.com
- Original Message -
From: "Lukas Tribus"
To: "Kevin McCormick"
Cc: Nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 7, 2
Hello Kevin,
On Tue, 7 Sept 2021 at 16:57, Kevin McCormick wrote:
>
> HBO did respond to contact form page on website.
>
>
> They referred us to Digital Elements.
It's IP geolocation done right, as per the white-paper [1]:
- distrusting WHOIS data
- distrusting ISP provided data
- not providin
> On Sep 6, 2021, at 3:55 PM, Matt Palmer wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 08:38:44AM +0200, Xavier Beaudouin via NANOG wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>> I absolutely HATE testing, developing and supporting IPv4+IPv6, more
>>> than doubling my time, adding 3rd stack would actually not increase
>>
* mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta) [Tue 07 Sep 2021, 18:36
CEST]:
As for well known port, we can specify non-default port numbers
in URLs (I'm not sure whether it works for mailto: or not) or.
in the future, things like DNS SRV RRs should be helpful.
This absolutely doesn't wor
> On Sep 6, 2021, at 12:27 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 10:20, Bjørn Mork wrote:
>
>> Adding new access infrastructure of any sort (Fixed Wireless is the
>> hype...)? Why would you want to continue being stupid even if you
>> implemented dual-stack for all your fibre, hfc
Michael Thomas wrote:
I looked up CGN's this morning and the thing that struck me the most was
losing port forwarding. It's probably a small thing to most people but
losing it means to get an incoming session it always has to be mediated
by something on the outside.
So, to receive mails at h
On 9/7/21 17:25, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
The vast majority of LTE based last mile users in developing nation
environments (where maybe less than 5% of people have residential
wireline broadband to their residence) are already behind a cgnat.
Our mobile carriers in Africa, for example, will happ
The vast majority of LTE based last mile users in developing nation
environments (where maybe less than 5% of people have residential wireline
broadband to their residence) are already behind a cgnat.
In many places it's actually an anomaly and weird for a person to desire,
or be able to afford, b
HBO did respond to contact form page on website.
They referred us to Digital Elements.
Hope that helps other people having the same issue.
Thank you,
Kevin McCormick
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Kevin
McCormick
Sent: Friday, September 3, 2021 2:43 PM
To: Nanog@nanog.org
Subject: HBO Max Contact
15 matches
Mail list logo
