On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 at 20:31, wrote:
Hey LJ,
> Disclaimer: I work for Cisco on a bunch of silicon. I'm not intimately
> familiar with any of these devices, but I'm familiar with the high level
> tradeoffs. There are also exceptions to almost EVERYTHING I'm about to say,
> especially once
Please reach out to me.
Ryan Stephenson
Defense Information Systems Agency
DoD NIC IE721
UE: ryan.m.stephenson2@mail.mil
Two current experiences . . .
I still do work with an ILEC that gets requests for waves to Cogent. Cogent
has a data center in the market but won't allow the ILEC to build in. So
Cogent burns ports in another data center where Cogent pays for space and
power. Cogent reps says no one gets
I think that was Dennis :)
On Fri, Aug 5, 2022 at 4:31 PM Dovid Bender wrote:
> It's not just you. I saw a social media post with the exact format posted
> by someone who got a similar email.
>
> On Fri, Aug 5, 2022, 16:20 Dennis Burgess wrote:
>
>> So we just got an email from cogent, we
Today while negotiating with Cogent for connectivity in the WOW 226
Datacenter I sent a copy of the original email and told them I will NEVER
use Cogent for my customers due to this kind of activity.
Imagine if everyone else follows suit.
When they go low - make sure others know you are
He has to do that to show there is activity on the account otherwise another
rep can challenge it.
Best regards
August Yang
> On Aug 5, 2022, at 4:20 PM, Dennis Burgess wrote:
>
> So we just got an email from cogent, we have told them time and time again to
> stop calling and stop emailing.
It's not just you. I saw a social media post with the exact format posted
by someone who got a similar email.
On Fri, Aug 5, 2022, 16:20 Dennis Burgess wrote:
> So we just got an email from cogent, we have told them time and time again
> to stop calling and stop emailing. We tell them are good
I think they call me around once a week right now. Even after I've told them
we're not interested. Every once in a while they switch the numbers they're
calling from, just to keep things interesting.
Shawn
-Original Message-
From: "Dennis Burgess"
Sent: Friday, August 5, 2022
Cogent getting involved in absolutely obnoxious and shady sales tactics
that they'll seemingly never address or do anything about? Why I never
On 8/5/2022 4:20 PM, Dennis Burgess wrote:
So we just got an email from cogent, we have told them time and time
again to stop calling and stop
So we just got an email from cogent, we have told them time and time again to
stop calling and stop emailing. We tell them are good on bandwidth and we
don’t need any of their services.. They then sent us a e-mail stating that they
saw us coming though one of their customers networks from us,
This is an automated weekly mailing describing the state of the Global
IPv4 Routing Table as seen from APNIC's router in Japan.
The posting is sent to APOPS, NANOG, AfNOG, SANOG, PacNOG, SAFNOG
TZNOG, MENOG, BJNOG, SDNOG, CMNOG, LACNOG and the RIPE Routing WG.
Daily listings are sent to
I’m not entirely certain these are problems that operators necessarily concern
themselves with. Datacenters and specialized service networks, perhaps, but not
internet service providers. Mainly because the internet is a relatively lossy
beast with several performance inhibitors that constantly
On 8/5/22 11:16 AM, Justin Wilson (Lists) wrote:
> I have a network that is all Mikrotik and the route targets are messing with
> them.
Can you describe this a bit more? I'd like to add it to my list of stuff
broken on mikrotik.
--
Bryan Fields
727-409-1194 - Voice
http://bryanfields.net
Disclaimer: I work for Cisco on a bunch of silicon. I'm not intimately
familiar with any of these devices, but I'm familiar with the high level
tradeoffs. There are also exceptions to almost EVERYTHING I'm about to say,
especially once you get into the second- and third-order implementation
Hello,
I'm Matthew Nance-Hall (Matt), a PhD Candidate at the University of Oregon
working with Prof. Ram Durairajan (UO), Prof. Paul Barford (UW-Madison) and
Prof. Klaus-Tycho Foerster (TU Dortmund).
I was hoping someone could shed operator perspective on a research question
we're exploring.
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 11:16:03AM -0400, Justin Wilson (Lists) wrote:
> Whats the availability of two byte asns look like? Anyone able to
> obtain one recently?
Yes, at $work we obtained one recently (without hassle, thank you ARIN
hostmasters!).
So, I recommend to follow normal procedure and
Hi,
if I check this site it shouldn't be problem to purchase a 2Byte ASN.
https://auctions.ipv4.global/
The ASN are at the end, but it seems that there are some available.
Is there any reason you need to use your AS in the route target instead
of using a private 2 Byte AS Number for the route
We've never had an issue requesting a 2-byte ASN from ARIN. Our last
request was, maybe, a month ago.
Aaron
On 8/5/2022 10:16 AM, Justin Wilson (Lists) wrote:
Whats the availability of two byte asns look like? Anyone able to
obtain one recently? I have a network that is all Mikrotik and the
Whats the availability of two byte asns look like? Anyone able to obtain one
recently? I have a network that is all Mikrotik and the route targets are
messing with them. They can’t use communities with their 4 bytes asn. It’s
one of those it really isn’t a big deal but I thought I would ask.
Hi Chris,
ch...@noskillz.com (Chris) wrote:
> I'd personally recommend logging into the portal and opening a case,
I've done that in parallel, of course. (Also, as expected, they don't use their
own documentation, you have to point your finger to it when they want to "find
a physical
Can anyone from Cogent hit me up off-list? Having an issue in South America
getting packets to our site in Brazil. Traceroute shows route though a
Cogent router, then RFC1918 replies. So not sure if problem is Cogent or a
peer of theirs. Two hosts in the 177.10.168.124/30 are acting
I'd personally recommend logging into the portal and opening a case, this
will give you the fastest result. If you really want to email
servicedesk...@eu.equinix.com should be right assuming you're using the
fabric in Germany like your email address suggests. Otherwise, check
Thank you for this.
I wish there would have been a deeper dive to the lookup side. My open questions
a) Trio model of packet stays in single PPE until done vs. FP model of
line-of-PPE (identical cores). I don't understand the advantages of
the FP model, the Trio model advantages are clear to me.
23 matches
Mail list logo
