Possibly interesting:
This kind of idea came up w/in ICANN when they were first considering
the idea of adding 1000+ new generic and internationalized TLDs. Will
it cause a melt down?
Money was allocated, studies and simulations were done, reports were
tendered.
The conclusion was: Not likely
On Wed, 10 Aug 2022 at 07:54, Pascal Thubert (pthubert) via NANOG
wrote:
> On a more positive note, the IPv6 IoT can be seen as an experiment on how we
> can scale the internet another order of magnitude or 2 without taking the
> power or the spectrum consumption to the parallel levels.
I
On a more positive note, the IPv6 IoT can be seen as an experiment on how we
can scale the internet another order of magnitude or 2 without taking the power
or the spectrum consumption to the parallel levels.
For that we turned protocols like ND and MLD from broadcast pull to unicast
push in a
ROTFL!
Yes, every time I’ve run into Bob at a conference he always introduces himself
this way: “I’m Bob Metcalfe, the inventor of Ethernet.”
-mel
> On Aug 9, 2022, at 9:20 PM, Fred Baker wrote:
>
>
>
>> On Aug 9, 2022, at 8:06 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
>>
>> Robert Metcalfe, InfoWorld
> On Aug 9, 2022, at 8:06 PM, Mel Beckman wrote:
>
> Robert Metcalfe, InfoWorld columnist and the inventor of Ethernet, also in
> 1995:
> “I predict the Internet will soon go spectacularly supernova and in 1996
> catastrophically collapse.”
In 1998 I invited Mr Metcalfe to address the
How do you propose to fairly distribute market data feeds to the market if not
multicast?
Shane
> On Aug 9, 2022, at 10:19 PM, Masataka Ohta
> wrote:
>
> Matthew Huff wrote:
>
>> Also, for data center traffic, especially real-time market data and
>> other UDP multicast traffic,
On Tue, Aug 9, 2022 at 7:23 PM Christopher Wolff
wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Has anyone proposed that the adoption of billions of IoT devices will
> ultimately ‘break’ the Internet?
>
> It’s not a rhetorical question I promise, just looking for a journal or
> other scholarly article that implies that
LOL! You’re not the first person to underestimate the resilience of the
Internet:
“There is no reason anyone would want a computer in their home.” – Ken Olsen,
CEO of Digital Equipment Corporation (now defunct), 1977
"I see little commercial potential for the internet for the next 10 years,"
Dave Taht wrote:
But as fair queuing does not scale at all, they disappeared
long ago.
What do you mean by FQ, exactly?
Fair queuing is "fair queuing" not some queuing idea
which is, by someone, considered "fair".
See, for example,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_queuing
"5
Hi folks,
Has anyone proposed that the adoption of billions of IoT devices will
ultimately ‘break’ the Internet?
It’s not a rhetorical question I promise, just looking for a journal or other
scholarly article that implies that the Internet is doomed.
Matthew Huff wrote:
Also, for data center traffic, especially real-time market data and
other UDP multicast traffic, micro-bursting is one of the biggest
issues especially as you scale out your backbone.
Are you saying you rely on multicast even though loss of a packet
means loss of large
Saku Ytti wrote:
With such an imaginary assumption, according to the end to end
principle, the customers (the ends) should use paced TCP instead
I fully agree, unfortunately I do not control the whole problem
domain, and the solutions available with partial control over the
domain are less
Saku, I have forwarded your questions to Sharada. All, For this week – at 11:00am PST, Thursday 08/11, we will be joined by Guy Caspary (co-founder of Leaba Semiconductor (acquired by Cisco -> SiliconOne)https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=GDthnCj31_Y For the next week, I’m planning to get one of main
Greetings NANOG, a rare request here, I apologize that it is distanced from
the usual network routing/design/administration areas of focus... posted on
AFMUG too but NANOG seems to have many more people knowledgeable in the
upstream manufacturing of devices. If there's anywhere else where there is
14 matches
Mail list logo
