Re: Router ID on IPv6-Only

Hey, > Well, now there is no IPv4. But BGP, OSPFv3, and other routing protocols > still use 32-bit router IDs for IPv6. On the one hand, there are plenty of > 32-bit numbers to use. Generally speaking, router IDs just need to be unique > inside of an AS to do their job, but (a) for humans or

Router ID on IPv6-Only

During some IPv6 numbering discussions at work today, someone had a question that I hadn't really considered before. How to choose 32-bit router IDs for IPv6-only routers. Quick background. We have a requirement to convert a significant portion of our network to IPv6-only over the next few years.

Re: End of Cogent-Sprint peering wars?

On Thu, 8 Sept 2022 at 01:06, Jawaid Bazyar wrote: > $1 deals usually come with an operation in the red, or assumption of > significant debts. To me this looks like a continuation of the game of attrition for infrastructure players. No one seems to know how to capitalise infrastructure, and

Re: End of Cogent-Sprint peering wars?

> Yes, and the new administration will force more depeering for those > that peers with Sprint but not with Cogent. So the net result will be > negative. if i was as good as you at predicting the future, i would bet on the horses not work on the internet. randy

Contacts for AT Postmaster, AWS WAF, Azure WAF

Hi All, We recently obtained our first /24 from the ARIN waiting list. We've been testing it out the past few weeks, and we're finding that it's blocked in a couple places. Geolocation data has already been updated with the major providers, and the range is not listed in any known blocklists.

Re: End of Cogent-Sprint peering wars?

My comment while was intended to a joke , sadly my concern is that Sprint has been a great provider . - Responsive staff - Functional Looking Glass Server - Clear BGP Community documentation Cogent in my experiences from different employers is that Cogent has been inconsistent . It’s a large

Re: End of Cogent-Sprint peering wars?

Yes, and the new administration will force more depeering for those that peers with Sprint but not with Cogent. So the net result will be negative. Rubens On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 5:47 PM Sean Donelan wrote: > > > Are Sprint AS1239 and Cogent AS174 finally going to settle their peering >

Re: End of Cogent-Sprint peering wars?

> Is there a hotline for those of us who have Cogent and Sprint….. sighs not a pots type, but i find email to the usual addresses works well. two reputable top tier providers. been using one or t'other for decades. but it seems popular for folk with no real skin in the game to diss them.

Re: End of Cogent-Sprint peering wars?

1-800-FTC-HELP (Doesn't exist but should) -Adam Get Outlook for Android From: Lou D Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2022 5:49:25 PM To: Adam Thompson Cc: Dave Taht ; Jawaid Bazyar ; NANOG ; Sean Donelan Subject: Re: End of Cogent-Sprint

Re: End of Cogent-Sprint peering wars?

Is there a hotline for those of us who have Cogent and Sprint….. sighs On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 6:17 PM Adam Thompson wrote: > Well, yes, that goes hand-in-hand with "...expects hefty charge". > To me, this just says T-Mobile wants out of the POTS business at almost > any cost. > All those poor

RE: End of Cogent-Sprint peering wars?

Well, yes, that goes hand-in-hand with "...expects hefty charge". To me, this just says T-Mobile wants out of the POTS business at almost any cost. All those poor people stuck with Cogent now, I feel sorry for them! Adam Thompson Consultant, Infrastructure Services MERLIN 100 - 135 Innovation

Re: End of Cogent-Sprint peering wars?

$1 deals usually come with an operation in the red, or assumption of significant debts. On 9/7/22, 2:55 PM, "NANOG on behalf of Dave Taht" wrote: On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 1:48 PM Sean Donelan wrote: > > > Are Sprint AS1239 and Cogent AS174 finally going to settle their peering

Re: End of Cogent-Sprint peering wars?

On Wed, Sep 7, 2022 at 1:48 PM Sean Donelan wrote: > > > Are Sprint AS1239 and Cogent AS174 finally going to settle their peering > disputes? > > T-Mobile sells legacy Sprint wireline business to Cogent for $1, expects > hefty charge >

End of Cogent-Sprint peering wars?

Are Sprint AS1239 and Cogent AS174 finally going to settle their peering disputes? T-Mobile sells legacy Sprint wireline business to Cogent for $1, expects hefty charge https://www.reuters.com/markets/deals/cogent-communications-acquire-t-mobiles-wireline-business-2022-09-07/ 1,400

Re: AS15960 abuse contact?

On 9/7/22 13:09, Tim Burke wrote: Anyone have an abuse contact at AS15960 / bluehornet / mapp.com that doesn't go to /dev/null? I have been getting a ridiculous amount of political spam from them, and despite repeatedly unsubscribing and submitting abuse complaints, the garbage increases

RE: AS15960 abuse contact?

Might as well send it to their upstream abuse contacts and state their customer is unresponsive. Ryan From: NANOG On Behalf Of Tim Burke Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2022 1:10 PM To: nanog@nanog.org list Subject: AS15960 abuse contact? Anyone have an abuse contact at AS15960 /

AS15960 abuse contact?

Anyone have an abuse contact at AS15960 / bluehornet / mapp.com that doesn't go to /dev/null? I have been getting a ridiculous amount of political spam from them, and despite repeatedly unsubscribing and submitting abuse complaints, the garbage increases exponentially. V/r Tim