I have two thoughts in relation to this:
1) It's amazing how many threads end up ending in the (correct) summary
that making an even minor global change to the way the internet works
and/or is configured to enable some potentially useful feature isn't likely
to happen.
2) I'd really like to be
It appears that Chris J. Ruschmann said:
>-=-=-=-=-=-
>How do you plan on getting rid of all the filters that don’t accept anything
>less than a /24?
>
>In all seriousness If I have these, I’d imagine everyone else does too.
Right. Since the Internet has no settlements, there is no way to
Jon Lewis wrote:
Yeah, but in another couple years we'll breach the 1M mark and
everybody will have fresh routers with lots of TCAM for a while. If
that were the only issue, it'd be a matter of timing the change well.
Everybody will need them. Not all will get (or be able to get) them.
On 2023-01-25 00:10, Chris J. Ruschmann wrote:
How do you plan on getting rid of all the filters that don’t accept
anything less than a /24?
In all seriousness If I have these, I’d imagine everyone else does
too.
Allow someone to advertise a covering /24 (and route onward to the
longer
How do you plan on getting rid of all the filters that don’t accept anything
less than a /24?
In all seriousness If I have these, I’d imagine everyone else does too.
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Justin
Wilson (Lists)
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2023 9:19 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Smaller
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023, William Herrin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 11:04 AM Jon Lewis wrote:
The "other problem" is, every day more gear receiving full routes gets
closer to (or farther past) the point where the resources to hold either
the FIB or RIB just aren't there. For those using these
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 11:04 AM Jon Lewis wrote:
> The "other problem" is, every day more gear receiving full routes gets
> closer to (or farther past) the point where the resources to hold either
> the FIB or RIB just aren't there. For those using these devices, lowering
> the bar and bringing
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023, William Herrin wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:19 AM Justin Wilson (Lists) wrote:
Have there been talks about the best practices to accept things smaller than a
/24?
Hi Justin,
The short version is: it could happen but it won't. There's no
technical obstacle. It's
On Tue, Jan 24, 2023 at 10:19 AM Justin Wilson (Lists) wrote:
> Have there been talks about the best practices to accept things smaller than
> a /24?
Hi Justin,
The short version is: it could happen but it won't. There's no
technical obstacle. It's purely administrative. Tens of thousands of
Hi,
On Tue, 24 Jan 2023, at 6:19 PM, Justin Wilson (Lists) wrote:
> Have there been talks about the best practices to accept things smaller than
> a /24? I qm seeing more and more scenarios where folks need to participate in
> BGP but they do not need a full /24 of space.
Yes, I think one of
Have there been talks about the best practices to accept things smaller than a
/24? I qm seeing more and more scenarios where folks need to participate in BGP
but they do not need a full /24 of space. Seems wasteful. I know this would
bloat the routing table immensely. I know of several
Jorge Amodio wrote:
You, seemingly, do not have much knowledge on UUNET.
Of course I don't :-)
atina agomar(DAILY), antar(DAILY), biotlp(DAILY), cab(HOURLY),
cedro(EVENING), cenep(DAILY), cneaint(DAILY), cnea(EVENING),
cnielf(DAILY), colimpo(DAILY), confein(DAILY),
12 matches
Mail list logo
