Re: Dormant space on blacklists, how can I resolve this?

https://thebrotherswisp.com/index.php/geo-and-vpn/ On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 6:51 AM Matthew Crocker wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I run Crocker Communications (AS7849) and have ARIN allocations of > 161.77.0.0/16 & 66.59.48.0/20. The 66.58.48.0/20 space was used for our > datacenter which shutdown

Looking for sales from comcast

Hello guys, Our company is looking for a way to get IP Transit from comcast, can someone give me the email of their sales team? Also, does anyone know about whether AT-Tand T-Mobile provide IP Transit or not? Best wishes,

Re: BGP Books

On Tue, Apr 25, 2023 at 7:20 PM, Steven G. Huter wrote: > On 4/25/23 3:55 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM) wrote: > > It has been a couple of decades since I've done any BGP in anger, but it > looks like I will be jumping into the deep end again, soon, and I > desperately need to get up to

NWS service assessment on 2021 Hurricane Ida

Just published, buried in the after-action report on 2021 Hurricane Ida Commodity internet access is now part of life-safety. National Weather Service Service Assessment August-September 2021 Hurricane Ida April 2023

Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question

On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 09:51:36AM -0400, Chuck Church wrote: > Hey all. Question about standard 4 post racks. We bought some that are > adjustable. Unfortunately, the posts are very flimsy, as these are some > fancy cabinets with spacing on the sides for vertical patch panels, etc. We > found

RE: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question

On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 2:38 PM, Adam Thompson wrote: > Fascinating. I’ve never had an ASR-1001 come with two sets of ears, and I > also note that the text of the instruction manual doesn’t reference the > rear set at all. I’ve never seen rear ears on any Cisco gear of my own, > nor on

RE: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question

Fascinating. I’ve never had an ASR-1001 come with two sets of ears, and I also note that the text of the instruction manual doesn’t reference the rear set at all. I’ve never seen rear ears on any Cisco gear of my own, nor on anything the local ILEC has installed either. I think the diagram

Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question

> It's super annoying, and somewhat terrifying to be banging on a rack > containing a bunch of spinning rust, but all too often it's necessary we just moved a rack's content from the westin to komo plaza [0] and only had one questionable drive. terrifying is the right word. randy [0] - we may

Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question

On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 2:21 PM, Randy Bush wrote: > "small mounting shelf" > > we use mounting shelves for all sorts of recalcitrant devices > Yah, and for recalcitrant screws [0] , one of these: https://amzn.to/41Z0YQq . It's super annoying, and somewhat terrifying to be banging on a rack

Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question

> "small mounting shelf" we use mounting shelves for all sorts of recalcitrant devices randy

Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question

A bunch of devices (eg Juniper MX240) come with a "small mounting shelf" — see Figure1, Figure 2 at https://www.juniper.net/documentation/us/en/hardware/mx240/topics/topic-map/mx240-installing-the-router.html#id-installing-the-mx240-router-mounting-hardware-for-a-rack-or-cabinet Their theory is

[NANOG-announce] Upcoming Event: ABQNOG + New ISOC Course

*Register Now for ABQNOG! * ABQNOG will take place next Thursday 4, May 2023 in Albuquerque, NM. ABQNOG allows industry professionals to network with others in the region and learn more about the latest technology trends. *REGISTER NOW* *New ISOC

Upcoming Event: ABQNOG + New ISOC Course

*Register Now for ABQNOG! * ABQNOG will take place next Thursday 4, May 2023 in Albuquerque, NM. ABQNOG allows industry professionals to network with others in the region and learn more about the latest technology trends. *REGISTER NOW* *New ISOC

Re: Dormant space on blacklists, how can I resolve this?

I’ll help you off-list. - Jared > On Apr 27, 2023, at 9:46 AM, Matthew Crocker wrote: > > > Hello, > > I run Crocker Communications (AS7849) and have ARIN allocations of > 161.77.0.0/16 & 66.59.48.0/20. The 66.58.48.0/20 space was used for our > datacenter which shutdown a couple

RE: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question

Hey all, sorry I did mean to say ASR1001 (an X model to be exact). The 4 post mounting they show in a hardware mounting doc uses front and back ears, which I’ve never done:

RE: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question

We have used these with great luck. Might be able to find some 1U rails instead of the standard 2U. https://www.amazon.com/APC-SU032A-4-Post-Rackmount-Rails/dp/B7L3MX Thanks Travis From: NANOG On Behalf Of Chuck Church Sent: Thursday, April 27, 2023 8:52 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject:

Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question

Lucky you with a 19" data rack. All I have are 23" telco racks but I will say, the 23" extension ears from Cisco are serious and my router chassis' don't sag. Mark On 4/27/2023 10:04 AM, Chris Marget wrote: On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 9:53 AM Chuck Church wrote: for a Cisco ASA1001,

Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question

On 2023-04-27 16:05, Dobbins, Roland via NANOG wrote: > There isn’t a standard for rack depth, AFAIK, but one typically sees > anywhere from 27in/69cm – 50in/127cm, in my experience. 42in/106.7cm > & 48in/122cm are quite common depth dimensions. You are talking about the depth of the entire

Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question

On 27 Apr 2023, at 20:51, Chuck Church mailto:chuckchu...@gmail.com>> wrote: Is there a ‘standard’ distance between front and back rails that devices usually adhere to? There isn’t a standard for rack depth, AFAIK, but one typically sees anywhere from 27in/69cm – 50in/127cm, in my

Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question

On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 9:53 AM Chuck Church wrote: > for a Cisco ASA1001, there aren’t rails, but rather front and back ‘ears’ > you use to hit both front and back posts. > Front *and* back ears? I'm not sure what an ASA 1001 is (ASR?) but my experience with these boxes is that they have a

Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question

We use shelves rather than hanging all the weight of racked gear on the ears. That rarely works well, but a 4-post shelf for every half-dozen or so devices works wonderfully. These shelves are usually quite adjustable. -mel beckman On Apr 27, 2023, at 6:54 AM, Chuck Church wrote:  Hey all.

Re: Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question

I have not seen a standard on cabinets. I have gear in a wide variety of racks. Some of are real shallow. Some are deep. I use these to generically solve the sagging issue. https://www.amazon.com/dp/B00XXDJASY?ref=nb_sb_ss_w_as-reorder-t1_k1_1_11==EFCM0EZP8BMA==navpoint+ra NavePoint

Standard DC rack rail distance, front to back question

Hey all. Question about standard 4 post racks. We bought some that are adjustable. Unfortunately, the posts are very flimsy, as these are some fancy cabinets with spacing on the sides for vertical patch panels, etc. We found that 2 post mounting of most Cisco devices (namely Cat 9500 1RU

Dormant space on blacklists, how can I resolve this?

Hello, I run Crocker Communications (AS7849) and have ARIN allocations of 161.77.0.0/16 & 66.59.48.0/20. The 66.58.48.0/20 space was used for our datacenter which shutdown a couple years ago. The space has mostly been dormant for the past couple years. I’m now starting to assign

Re: [External] Spectrum networks IPv6 access issue

I’m in the northeast and I can confirm on a Spectrum Enterprise connection I have issues tracerouting to 2604:1380:4641:c500::1. Gets to e0-33.core1.nyc7.he.net and then packets just disappear: Host Loss%

Re: Questionnaire on building real network configuration dataset

It might be a better option for you to un-signin this survey... Just a suggestion. On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 01:46:49PM +0800, 徐惠三 wrote: >Dear NANOG community members, > >We are post graduate students majoring in computer network and we are now >conducting a research project aimed

Questionnaire on building real network configuration dataset

Dear NANOG community members, We are post graduate students majoring in computer network and we are now conducting a research project aimed at setting up an open dataset of real network configurations for experiment needs. We think it will be a contributing work for network verification

Re: [External] Spectrum networks IPv6 access issue

For what it's worth, on Spectrum Residential here in LAX and I can reach ip6echo.net and Google's public ipv6.google.com sites via residential service...  I have my own modems and routers, which may make the difference in my case... Spectrum does indicate that IPv6 my need to be enabled on