Karin, Opinions regarding leasing vary throughout the industry. In my opinion, since the shift to provider assigned addresses during the CIDR efforts in the mid 1990s, the majority of addresses have been leased in one form or another. The only thing novel here is the leasing of addresses independent of connectivity services. However, once the RIRs and their communities normalized the sale of addresses through directed transfer policies, I think this was an inevitable next step in the devolution of IPv4 into a monetized asset. It doesn’t help that the earliest and most prolific adopters of this form of leasing have been snowshoe spammers. However, there are leasing agencies that insist on getting proper justification from their customers and have strong anti-abuse policies. I would strongly encourage you to seek out such an organization to partner with if you choose to lease your addresses as there are a number of pitfalls you can encounter otherwise. Owen On Jul 3, 2023, at 08:25, Noah <n...@neo.co.tz> wrote:
|
- IP range for lease KARIM MEKKAOUI
- Re: IP range for lease Noah
- Re: IP range for lease Owen DeLong via NANOG
- IP range for lease Sylvain Baya
- Re: IP range for lease Tom Beecher
- Re: IP range for lease Rubens Kuhl
- Re: IP range for lease Delong.com via NANOG
- Re: IP range for lease John Curran
- Re: IP range for lease Owen DeLong via NANOG
- Re: IP range for lease John Curran
- Re: IP range for lease Owen DeLong via NANOG
- Re: IP range for lease John Curran
- Re: IP range for lease Owen DeLong via NANOG