I think an important point for pre-wire and residential real estate
developers to consider is also the conflicting needs of keeping things
"neat and tidy" and last mile CPE location vs wifi coverage.
Your typical new build residential construction will have something like
this in it for telecom
On Wed, Dec 6, 2023 at 3:45 AM Sean Donelan wrote:
> U.S. NEC does not require any mechanical protection for fiber cables. You
> can run "bare" fiber cables through most residential spaces (with a few
> exceptions for jacket material, i.e. direct burial cable not allowed
> inside habital
Most of the early public fiber was swept up in the later 2009 BTOP buildout to
schools, cop shops, and fire stations
https://www.ntia.gov/other-publication/btop-fact-sheet and is now run by each
county or sometimes states, who usually manage and allocate it to customer
projects with tools
The PeeringDB contact info was very useful for us. Granted, we were pulling a
substantial amount from them over transit, over 20gb at peak, so they have a
huge incentive to peer with us.
On Dec 6, 2023, at 12:31, Justin Wilson (Lists) wrote:
We have sent them some inquiries in markets we
We have sent them some inquiries in markets we are with no reply. Just figured
they weren’t interested.
Justin Wilson
j...@mtin.net
jus...@fd-ix.com
Https://www.fdi-ix.com
> On Dec 5, 2023, at 4:14 PM, Peter Potvin via NANOG wrote:
>
> Looking for someone on the Fastly peering team to
On Tue, Dec 5, 2023 at 5:09 PM Tom Beecher wrote:
>>
>> i would expect that google announces the /16 at least from 'everywhere', yes.
>
>
> I see the specific /18s Drew asked about initially. Didn't check for the
> covering /16.
>
sure, good enough :) (I have not looked at our config in a bit
6 matches
Mail list logo
