or comments regarding this incident, please
contact n...@ripe.net.
Regards,
Andrei Robachevsky
Chief Technical Officer, RIPE NCC
anonymized.
This is a 6-month effort. After the project is successfully completed we
will publish a report presenting the findings, statistical data and
trends. We'll also be happy to present the results at one of NANOG meetings.
We hope you will join this effort.
Thanks,
Andrei Robachevsky
Internet
Jared Mauch wrote on 1/28/14 10:11 PM:
192.168.0.1 has a rule that says send UDP/53 packets I process to 172.16.0.1.
Since i'm outside it's NAT, the rule ends up taking the source IP, which
isn't part of it's NAT set, and ends up copying my source IP into the
packet, then forwards it to
Hi,
Jared Mauch wrote on 1/28/14 9:03 PM:
I'd rather share some data and how others can observe this to determine how
we can approach a fix. Someone spoofing your IP address out some other
carrier is something you may be interested to know about, even if you have a
non-spoofing network.
, and now we open it for a more detailed
review. Please note that this is very much a work in progress.
Please review the document and provide your feedback and text
suggestions online or via routingmanife...@isoc.org by 31 August 2014.
Regards,
Andrei Robachevsky
Internet Society
Nick Hilliard wrote on 02/10/14 12:28:
This shouldn't stop us from finding, then naming and shaming operators
who don't use bcp38, but we also need to maintain realistic expectations
about how successful it's going to be.
This feels indeed like boiling the ocean, but what are the alternatives,
Rich Kulawiec wrote on 03/10/14 00:47:
We've been down this road before. Unless there is prompt, concerted,
collective action (as there was AGIS) then there is zero reason for those
behind such operations to do anything but keep collecting dirty money.
There is, please join:
Hello,
Following up on my lightning talk at NANOG77
(https://pc.nanog.org/static/published/meetings/NANOG77/2147/20191030_Robachevsky_Lightning_Talk_Next_v1.pdf),
here is the draft MANRS action set for CDN and Cloud operators:
https://www.manrs.org/cdn-cloud-providers/cfc-draft-action-set/
Your
Hi,
MANRS is looking for volunteers to join a new working group to explore the idea
of creating a second, elevated tier of MANRS participation for organizations
that comply with more stringent requirements and auditing. We’re calling this
MANRS+ at the moment, though that’s only a working
9 matches
Mail list logo
