RE:Getting pretty close to default IPv4 route maximum for 6500/7600 routers.

On May 6, 2014 12:32 PM, Darin syn...@live.com wrote: And since those puppies are going to need a reload after adjustment make sure your not exposed to the component decay issue for cards manufactured between 2005-2010 or you could have a interesting night. We've hit that issue on three

Re: level3 dia egress filtering?

On May 12, 2014 6:53 PM, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote: On Mon, 12 May 2014, Bob Evans wrote: Ahh, Yep, same thing port and/or protocol for an address range. I haven't seen that accomplished via BGP. I know ATT will do it - they want about 2K more per month for that

Re: Observations of an Internet Middleman (Level3) (was: RIP

On May 16, 2014 12:21 PM, Matthew Petach mpet...@netflight.com wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 11:52 AM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 2:47 PM, Blake Hudson bl...@ispn.net wrote: in the context of this discussion I think it's silly for a

Re: NAT IP and Google

On May 21, 2014 4:04 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:21:12 +1200, Tony Wicks said: Deploy v6... yes its very easy to replace every CPE device that every home user has... really ? come on, back in the real world that is just not going to happen until by default

Re: NAT IP and Google

On May 21, 2014 4:17 PM, Ca By cb.li...@gmail.com wrote: On May 21, 2014 4:04 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Thu, 22 May 2014 09:21:12 +1200, Tony Wicks said: Deploy v6... yes its very easy to replace every CPE device that every home user has... really ? come on, back

RIPE Atlas data parsing

Folks, Yes, RIPE Atlas is great. It generates output as JSON. Is there dummy tool for summarizing this JSON data and possibly visualizing it? I could write my own, but i imagine someone has already done this somewhere. No? CB

Credit to Digital Ocean for ipv6 offering

I have not tried it out, this makes it look like DO beat Azure to market on ipv6 http://venturebeat.com/2014/06/17/digitalocean-ipv6/ Speaking of Azure and ip adresses http://www.pcworld.com/article/2363580/need-to-move-to-ipv6-highlighted-as-microsoft-runs-out-of-us-address-space.html

Re: Peering Latency

4.69.158.65 31ms 30ms 29ms (L3) 10 4.69.153.22133ms 33ms 34ms 11 4.69.133.20532ms 32ms 31ms I am showing, typically at night, a 20-40ms jump when hopping from Level3 to Time Warner and back in Tustin, CA

Re: ESPN worldcup streaming traffic

On Jul 13, 2014 2:12 PM, Mehmet Akcin meh...@akcin.net wrote: Hi I can't be the only one watching world cup final on my roku espn app and wonder how many TBps is ESPN pushing right now. It would be interesting to see people who can share some network stats on their ISPs / IXPs. This very well

Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix

On Jul 18, 2014 5:55 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com My cells all operate as a single cohesive system with an actual central control (one brain). Nope; not really. Look up autonomic nervious system; your body makes

Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix

Question: does verizon wireless have a different capacity / peering practice from verizon broadband ? Or do verizon wireless customers also suffer the same performance issue?

Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix

market forces are making wireless a functional network without the peering brinksmanship while market failings are allowing landline to take advantage of a captive install base Sent via telepathy On Jul 22, 2014, at 9:01 AM, Ca By cb.li...@gmail.com wrote: Question: does verizon wireless have

Re: Connectivity issue between Verizon and Amazon EC2 (NTT issue?)

On Jul 23, 2014 12:34 AM, Dorian Kim dor...@blackrose.org wrote: On Jul 23, 2014, at 3:23 AM, Matthew Petach mpet...@netflight.com wrote: We don't have a direct customer relationship with NTT so am hoping someone on this list may be able to pass this information along or investigate on

Re: Carrier Grade NAT

On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote: In message CAMfXtQwmpEqBk9CKRq2MpW15tRcuicZ_3DoJUsTBAM4=503...@mail.gmail.com, Gary Buhrmaster writes: On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 5:22 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote: On Jul 29, 2014, at 4:13 PM, Mark Andrews

Re: Akamai charges for IPv6 support?

On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Aaron Hopkins li...@die.net wrote: Is it normal to bill for IPv6 service as a separate product? I was surprised to hear from from my Akamai rep they they do: Hi Aaron, We can add the IPV6 service to the contract at an additional cost of $XXX/month. Please let

Re: Prefix hijacking, how to prevent and fix currently

On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Doug Madory dmad...@renesys.com wrote: http://www.bgpmon.net/using-bgp-data-to-find-spammers/ This blog post furthers this discussion, but it would have been appropriate to cite my original analysis explicitly, rather than simply citing some discussion on

Re: Fwd: Interesting problems with using IPv6

On Sep 7, 2014 8:35 AM, Paul Ferguson fergdawgs...@mykolab.com wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 There's been a lot of on-and-off discussion about v6, especially about security and operational concerns about some aspects of IPv6 deployment, specifically regarding

Re: Book / Literature Recommendations

On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 1:48 AM, James Bensley jwbens...@gmail.com wrote: Hi All, What is the single best book you have read on networking? That's a wide topic so to clarify I'm talking about service provider networking but I do enjoy all aspects really and don't want to limit my self to one

socialsecurity.gov ipv6 routing loop

in case anyone can help resolve traceroute6 www.socialsecurity.gov traceroute6: Warning: www.socialsecurity.gov has multiple addresses; using 2001:1930:c01:: traceroute6 to www.socialsecurity.gov (2001:1930:c01::) from 2607:f2f8:a8e0::2, 64 hops max, 12 byte packets 1 2607:f2f8:a8e0::1

Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 81, Issue 7

www.socialsecurity.gov 77.590 ms 76.605 ms 76.981 ms 27 2001:1930:c01::2 77.710 ms 77.766 ms 78.306 ms On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 9:50 AM, Ralph Wallace wallac...@verizon.net wrote: Message: 25 Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 14:27:48 -0700 From: Ca By cb.li...@gmail.com To: nanog@nanog.org nanog

Re: Linux: concerns over systemd adoption and Debian's decision to switch

On Monday, October 20, 2014, Israel G. Lugo israel.l...@lugosys.com wrote: Hi, Not intending to start a flame war here. I have been referred to the website below, and believe they certainly raise some valid concerns. http://www.debianfork.org/ If you have the time, please take a moment to

Re: ARIN / RIR Pragmatism (WAS: Re: RADB)

On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote: you just happen to have the view from a third world country look at. http://archive.psg.com/141006.rpki-nanog.pdf slides 4 5 or http://certification-stats.ripe.net/?type=roa-v4 randy I agree with Randy. RPKI is

Re: Is it unusual to remove defunct rr objects?

On Friday, October 31, 2014, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote: On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 10:34:23AM -0700, Tim Howe wrote: I've since found a disturbing number of defunct objects that relate to my customers (and me) in a similar way, and I have mostly had success in getting them

Re: Zayo opinions

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 2:08 PM, Daniel Rohan dro...@gmail.com wrote: We've leased several 10G circuits from them and they perform adequately and NOC has been responsive. Pacific Northwest Region. -Dan +1 Zayo has been as good if not better than my other providers. I have service with

Re: ARIN's RPKI Relying agreement

On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Bill Woodcock wo...@pch.net wrote: On Dec 4, 2014, at 7:35 AM, Andrew Gallo akg1...@gmail.com wrote: In my informal conversations, what I got was that lawyers read the agreement, said 'no, we wont sign it' and then dropped it. If specific legal feedback

Re: OT - Verizon/ATT Cell/4G Signal Booster/Repeater

On Tuesday, December 16, 2014, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Alex Rubenstein a...@corp.nac.net javascript:; wrote: I just with Wifi calling was ubiquitous. isn't it in every android phone since ~1yr ago? For some usa mobile providers

Re: OT - Verizon/ATT Cell/4G Signal Booster/Repeater

On Sunday, December 21, 2014, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote: That is my understanding. Wifi calling is treated as on-net home calling. Jared Mauch Confirmed. Same for text messages. I have used in asia, south america, and Europe. Just works. For me this was a killer feature while

Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path?

On Wednesday, December 31, 2014, Marcin Kurek not...@marcinkurek.com wrote: Hi everyone, I'm reading Randy's Zhang BGP Design and Implementation and I found following guidelines about designing RR-based MPLS VPN architecture: - Partition RRs - Move RRs out of the forwarding path - Use a

Re: MPLS VPN design - RR in forwarding path?

On Thursday, January 1, 2015, Mike Hammett na...@ics-il.net wrote: Running various functions on a couple small VM clusters makes a lot of sense. I agree, it makes some sense, especially if you are control plane bound. But, nearly all my routers run between 1% and 10% cpu. Ymmv. I have

Re: Checkpoint IPS

On Friday, February 6, 2015, Roland Dobbins rdobb...@arbor.net wrote: On 6 Feb 2015, at 23:23, Darden, Patrick wrote: And when your opinion is an acknowledged universal constant, I will tip my hat to you. It's been a constant for the last couple of decades - I can't count the number of

Re: HTTPS redirects to HTTP for monitoring

On Sunday, January 18, 2015, Grant Ridder shortdudey...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Everyone, I wanted to see what opinions and thoughts were out there. What software, appliances, or services are being used to monitor web traffic for inappropriate content on the SSL side of things? personal use?

Re: HTTPS redirects to HTTP for monitoring

On Sunday, January 18, 2015, John Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote: So your idea is to block every HTTPS website? From my point of view, it is better than violate user privacy safety. Sneaky is evil. I expect your users would fire you when they found you'd blocked access to Google. And

Re: HTTPS redirects to HTTP for monitoring

text. My advice, dont do mitm, you cant afford it. It is only a matter of Time when the hackers get this info and steal the identity And drain the bank accounts of all your users. On 18 Jan 2015, at 6:48 pm, Ca By cb.li...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote: On Sunday, January 18, 2015, Grant

Re: DDOS solution recommendation

On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 5:07 AM, Mike Hammett na...@ics-il.net wrote: Why does it seem like everyone is trying to solve this the wrong way? Do other networks' abuse departments just not give a shit? Blackhole all of the zombie attackers and notify their abuse departments. Sure, most of the

FCC releases Open Internet document

For the first time to the public http://transition.fcc.gov/Daily_Releases/Daily_Business/2015/db0312/FCC-15-24A1.pdf Enjoy.

Re: Friday Fun: UK Government (Dept of Work Pensions) selling off an entire /8

On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:30 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Fri, 13 Mar 2015 18:46:31 -, Alec Muffett said: IPv4 Market Group, a global leader in IPv4 sales, has just announced the availability of up to 2.6 million top quality IPv4 addresses for purchase top quality?

Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET

On Monday, March 23, 2015, Ray Soucy r...@maine.edu wrote: I did a test on my personal server of filtering every IP network assigned to China for a few months and over 90% of SSH attempts and other noise just went away. It was pretty remarkable. Working for a public university I can't block

Re: Getting hit hard by CHINANET

On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 3:43 AM, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote: On Mon, 23 Mar 2015, Ca By wrote: Having your upstream apply a permanent udp bw policer, say 5 or 10x busy hour baseline, works well for this. Many upstreams will not do that, particularly on a permanent

Re: Wisdom of using 100.64/10 (RFC6598) space in an Amazon VPC deployment

On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Eric Germann ekgerm...@cctec.com wrote: Currently engaged on a project where they’re building out a VPC infrastructure for hosted applications. Users access apps in the VPC, not the other direction. The issue I'm trying to get around is the customers who

Re: Wisdom of using 100.64/10 (RFC6598) space in an Amazon VPC deployment

On Feb 23, 2015, at 07:52 , Ca By cb.li...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 7:02 AM, Eric Germann ekgerm...@cctec.com wrote: Currently engaged on a project where they’re building out a VPC infrastructure for hosted applications. Users access apps in the VPC, not the other

Re: BGP offloading (fixing legacy router BGP scalability issues)

On Wednesday, April 1, 2015, Frederik Kriewitz frede...@kriewitz.eu wrote: Hello, We've a lot of customers with Cisco 6500 routers (mostly with SUP720 supervisors) in operation. They are very popular with smaller ISPs in Africa/middle east due to their cheap price on the used marked and

Galaxy S6 is IPv6 on all US National Mobile carriers

Good news (that i have not personally verified) ! Verizon, T-Mobile, Sprint, and ATT all launched the Samsung Galaxy S6 with IPv6 on by default. Given the growth and importance of mobile to Internet, it is great to see this progress from the mobile carriers. Just for those keeping score, of

Re: Android (lack of) support for DHCPv6

On Tuesday, June 9, 2015, Michael Thomas m...@mtcc.com wrote: On 06/09/2015 08:37 PM, Karl Auer wrote: On Tue, 2015-06-09 at 23:09 -0400, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: How does the device ask for a *second* DHCPv6'ed address for tethering or whatever? RFC 3315 says you just chuck in

Thanks aws / gcc / azure

Since you have failed to achieve in the modest task that was your charge You now get this https://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1471 Or s/money/addresses/ http://youtu.be/pA8f-Nh5gRs

Re: eBay is looking for network heavies...

On Wednesday, June 10, 2015, Alex White-Robinson ale...@gmail.com wrote: Matthew Petach mpet...@netflight.com javascript:; wrote: On a slightly different note, however--while it's good to have an appreciation of the past and how we got here, I think it's wise to also recognize we as an

Re: Greenfield 464XLAT (In January)

On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 1:22 PM, Nicholas Warren nwar...@barryelectric.com wrote: Sincere apologies if this e-mail is inappropriate for this audience, We are (going to be) a startup ISP building a new network from the ground up. I was hoping I could get an opinion, or two, on how everyone

Re: Android (lack of) support for DHCPv6

Let's call off the witch hunt. Please. I get it, you want a DHCPv6 client. Star the project or whatever you think the right intake process is for an Android feature. On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Paul B. Henson hen...@acm.org wrote: From: Lorenzo Colitti Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2015

Re: Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4

On Wednesday, June 17, 2015, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote: On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 5:38 PM, Ricky Beam jfb...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote: I'll wait for Curran to pop up with various links to reasons why Class E was abandoned by ARIN. (short answer: too much broken crap thinks it's

Re: Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 2:07 PM, Luan Nguyen lngu...@opsource.net wrote: Is that safe to use internally? Anyone using it? Just for NATTING on Cisco gears... most things, including most cisco gear, will not forward those Class E packets or accept Class E as a valid address If you have

Re: Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4

On Wednesday, June 17, 2015, Jonas Björk mr.jonas.bj...@me.com wrote: Given how slowly IPv6 is deploying, this choice may prove to have been shortsighted. I doubt it. As you said, there is A LOT of crap out there that would have to be updated. Pulling a number out of the air, I'd guess

Re: Is it safe to use 240.0.0.0/4

On Wednesday, June 17, 2015, Ricky Beam jfb...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, 17 Jun 2015 18:38:32 -0400, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote: You may be confused. ARIN never possessed class E; it's held in reserve by IETF. As much as I enjoy a good ARIN bashing, they and John Curran are quite

Re: Android (lack of) support for DHCPv6

Yeh, we get it. Repeating yourself is not helpful. The horse is dead Please move your android feature request to a forum more fit for your request. On Thursday, June 11, 2015, Paul B. Henson hen...@acm.org wrote: From: Laszlo Hanyecz Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2015 4:42 PM from the

Re: Routing Insecurity (Re: BGP in the Washington Post)

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Mark Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote: On 1/Jun/15 17:04, Mike Hammett wrote: Actually, that's the level of attention given to all kinds of infrastructure just about everywhere. ;-) The difference is that there are standardized (global) guidelines for

Re: BGP in the Washngton Post

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 6:24 AM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote: Interesting story about BGP and security in the Washington Post today: http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/business/2015/05/31/net-of-insecurity-part-2/ -Bill The article left me with the feeling that there was a secure

Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Matthew Kaufman matt...@matthew.at wrote: On 6/1/2015 12:06 AM, Owen DeLong wrote: ... Here’s the thing… In order to land IPv6 services without IPv6 support on the VM, you’re creating an environment where... Let's hypothetically say that it is much easier

Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 7:34 AM, Luan Nguyen lngu...@opsource.net wrote: Hi folks, Anyone knows what is used for the AWS Elastic IP? is it LISP? AWS does not really talk about things like this, but i highly doubt it is LISP. Thanks. Regards, -lmn

Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture

On Monday, June 1, 2015, Tony Hain alh-i...@tndh.net wrote: Hugo Slabbert wrote: snip On this given point, though: Facebook -ne generic hosting platform True, but it does represent a business decision to choose IPv6. The relevant point here is that the NEXT

Re: AWS Elastic IP architecture

On Monday, June 1, 2015, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote: In message CAL9jLaYXCdfViHbUPx-= rs4vsx5mfecpfue8b7vq+au2hcx...@mail.gmail.com javascript:; , Christopher Morrow writes: So... I don't really see any of the above arguments for v6 in a vm setup to really hold water in the short

Re: How long will it take to completely get rid of IPv4 or will it happen at all?

On Saturday, June 27, 2015, Bob Evans b...@fiberinternetcenter.com wrote: When will the change happen then you might ask. Very simple. If the largest destinations like fb/twitter and others start to drop v4. Agreed, IPv4 will be here a long time, because, not one company will risk

Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion

On Saturday, July 4, 2015, Josh Moore jmo...@atcnetworks.net wrote: Traditional dual stack deployments implement both IPv4 and IPv6 to the CPE. Consider the following: An ISP is at 90% IPv4 utilization and would like to deploy dual stack with the purpose of allowing their subscriber base to

Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion

On Sunday, July 5, 2015, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote: On Jul 5, 2015, at 11:35 AM, Mel Beckman m...@beckman.org javascript:; wrote: I guess the WISPs I advise get better advice :) I think this is a key item for people to have in mind. We can all follow poor advice and add

Re: Dual stack IPv6 for IPv4 depletion

On Sunday, July 5, 2015, Baldur Norddahl baldur.nordd...@gmail.com wrote: MAP solves that by splitting NAT into a part that can be done without state (route a port range to a customer) and the actual NAT which is then done on the CPE. But you need special cpe, not sure that is in the op biz

Re: Multiple vendors' IPv6 issues

On Tuesday, May 26, 2015, David Sotnick sotnickd-na...@ddv.com wrote: Hi NANOG, The company I work for has no business case for being on the IPv6-Internet. However, I am an inquisitive person and I am always looking to learn new things, so about 3 years ago I started down the IPv6 path. This

Re: Production-scale NAT64

On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:36 AM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote: On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Jawaid Shell2 j...@forethought.net wrote: Who out there is using production-scale NAT64? What solution are you using? You used NAT64 and production in the same sentence. Good one.

Re: NTT-HE earlier today (~10am EDT)

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015, Mike Leber mle...@he.net wrote: On 6/30/15 3:02 PM, Tore Anderson wrote: * Mike Leber I was thinking that when I posted yesterday. These were announcements from a peer, not customer routes. We are lowering our max prefix limits on many peers as a result of

Re: UDP clamped on service provider links

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 2:04 PM, Ted Hardie ted.i...@gmail.com wrote: On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 1:45 PM, John Kristoff j...@cymru.com wrote: On Mon, 27 Jul 2015 19:42:46 +0530 Glen Kent glen.k...@gmail.com wrote: Is there a reason why this is often done so? Is this because UDP is

Re: UDP clamped on service provider links

On Thursday, July 30, 2015, Jason Baugher ja...@thebaughers.com wrote: Several months ago we had an issue with a customer whose IPSEC tunnels we manage. One of the tunnels dropped, and after troubleshooting we were able to prove that only udp/500 was being blocked in one direction for one

Re: ATT U-Verse Data Setup Convention

On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:02 AM, Keith Stokes kei...@neilltech.com wrote: I’m wondering if some can share their experiences or maybe there’s an ATT person here who can confirm policy. I work for SaaS provider who requires a source IP to access our system to businesses. That is probably a

Re: 20-30Gbps UDP 1720 traffic appearing to originate from CN in last 24 hours

On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org wrote: On Thu, 23 Jul 2015, Nicholas Warren wrote: How will the customer know the ISP is blocking the traffic? Does the FCC make ISPs disclose this information? If a customer is legitimately trying to reach

Re: another tilt at the Verizon FIOS IPv6 windmill

On Sunday, July 12, 2015, Paul B. Henson hen...@acm.org wrote: I think it's been about a year and a half since I last looked (and cried) at the status of FIOS IPv6. As far as I can tell, there's been no new official news since 2013. We're deploying IPv6 at the university I work at, so IPv6 at

Re: 20-30Gbps UDP 1720 traffic appearing to originate from CN in last 24 hours

Folks, it may be time to take the next step and admit that UDP is too broken to support https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-byrne-opsec-udp-advisory-00 Your comments have been requested On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Drew Weaver drew.wea...@thenap.com wrote: Has anyone else seen a massive

Re: 20-30Gbps UDP 1720 traffic appearing to originate from CN in last 24 hours

On Monday, July 20, 2015, John Weekes j...@nuclearfallout.net wrote: Ca, Folks, it may be time to take the next step and admit that UDP is too broken to support https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-byrne-opsec-udp-advisory-00 Your comments have been requested My comment would

Re: IPv6 Irony.

On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Yucong Sun wrote: > I don't understand the strategy here, how is that getting more traffic > going-through IPv6 help its adoption by the mass? IMHO it only helps > high-end, backbone type of network equipment producers sell more of > their

Re: IPv6 Irony.

On Monday, October 12, 2015, Donn Lasher wrote: > > Having just returned from NANOG65/ARIN36, and hearing about how far IPv6 > has come.. I find my experience with support today > Ironic. > > Oh wait.. > > Hi, my name is Donn, and I’m speaking for… myself. > > Irony is a cable

Re: Hotels/Airports with IPv6

On Thursday, July 9, 2015, Mel Beckman m...@beckman.org wrote: I working on a large airport WiFi deployment right now. IPv6 is allowed for in the future but not configured in the short term. With less than 10,000 ephemeral users, we don't expect users to demand IPv6 until most mobile devices

Re: Level3 routing issue US west coast

On Friday, July 10, 2015, Joseph Jenkins j...@breathe-underwater.com wrote: Level3 had an issue with one of their core routers in Los Angeles last night(7pm Pacific) and early this morning(1am Pacific). Last update to my trouble ticket had the issue still being reviewed by engineering, but

Re: NTP versions in production use?

On Sunday, July 12, 2015, Alistair Mackenzie magics...@gmail.com wrote: I’m currently running a scan of the internet and querying NTP versions. I’ll publish the results of it on Github and mail them in here :) Please don't. Please see http://openntpproject.org/ On 12/07/2015 15:15,

Re: Production-scale NAT64

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:59 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net wrote: On 26 Aug 2015, at 15:23 , Ca By cb.li...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 8:16 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 07:28:08 -0700, Ca By said: Another relevant metric

Re: Production-scale NAT64

On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 8:16 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Wed, 26 Aug 2015 07:28:08 -0700, Ca By said: Another relevant metric, less than 25% of my mobile subscribers traffic require NAT64 translating. 75+% of bits flows through end-to-end IPv6 (thanks Google/Youtube, Facebook

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 1:37 PM, David Hubbard < dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com> wrote: > Had an idea the other day; we just need someone with a lot of cash > (google, apple, etc) to buy Netflix and then make all new releases > v6-only for the first 48 hours. I bet my lame Brighthouse and Fios >

Re: wanted: tool for traffic generation / characteristics / monitoring

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Matthias Flittner < matthias.flitt...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > Currently we are looking for a magic tool with which it is possible to > generate specific (realistic) traffic patterns between client and server > to analyze (monitor) traffic

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

On Thursday, October 1, 2015, Todd Underwood wrote: > i'm still confused, to be honest. > > why are we 'encouraging' 'evangelizing' or 'forcing' ipv6 adoption. > > it's just a new addressing protocol that happens to not work with the rest > of the internet. it's unfortunate

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

On Thursday, October 1, 2015, Matthew Kaufman <matt...@matthew.at> wrote: > On 10/1/2015 5:16 PM, Ca By wrote: > >> >> I run a large 464xlat dominated mobile network. >> >> IPv4 bits are materially more expensive to deliver. >> > > Isn't that s

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

On Saturday, October 3, 2015, Owen DeLong wrote: > The majority of the large eyeball providers in the US are already doing > this to most, if not all, of their customers. > > Comcast I believe has 100% IPv6 availability to residential and I think > they are most of the way on

Re: How to force rapid ipv6 adoption

On Friday, October 2, 2015, Baldur Norddahl wrote: > Why are some people here asserting that IPv6 failed when it looks like it > is actually taking off pretty good right now? > > https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html > > Jan 2013 about 1% > Jan 2014 about

Re: Question re session hijacking in dual stack environments w/MacOS

On Saturday, September 26, 2015, David Hubbard < dhubb...@dino.hostasaurus.com> wrote: > Hey all, as we've slowly deployed IPv6 to our end users, it has begun to > cause some issues for those on Mac's specifically. Apple apparently has > an algorithm at some point in the network stack to decide

Re: ARIN Region IPv4 Free Pool Reaches Zero

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:34 AM, John Curran wrote: > (Apologies for redistribution, but need to insure that this is seen by all > in the region.) > > The IPv4 free pool for the ARIN region is now depleted; ISPs are > encouraged to utilize > IPv6 for additional customer growth

Recent trouble with QUIC?

On Friday, September 25, 2015, Cody Grosskopf > wrote: > a) yes, 56,000 students and any on Chrome failed. I immediately blocked > quic and told users to restart Chrome. Luckily the fallback to good ol' tcp > saved

Re: Recent trouble with QUIC?

On Wednesday, September 23, 2015, Sean Hunter wrote: > Hi all, > > I work for a 2500 user university and we've seen some odd behavior > recently. 2-4 weeks ago we started seeing Google searches that would fail > for ~2 minutes, or disconnects in Gmail briefly. This week,

Re: CPE that supports 464XLAT

On Thursday, January 7, 2016, Daniel Corbe wrote: > Anyone out there aware of any DOCSIS 3.0 cable modems that have a working > CLAT implementation? > > Not modems, but home gateway routers NEC has a product http://www.necat.co.jp/en/ipv6/index.html And it is supported

Re: Netflix stuffing data on pipe

On Tuesday, December 29, 2015, Josh Reynolds wrote: > Adaptive bandwidth detection. Yes, ABR video attempts to fill the entire channel This has been problematic as peak edge speeds have increased and pushed the statistical multplexing logic / plans. There is also

Re: VPLS Providers

On Thursday, December 31, 2015, Chris Burwell wrote: > Hi NANOG, > > I'm looking to solicit feedback on VPLS providers. The requirement is for > connectivity among about ten sites in North America, however feedback for > providers that also extend service to EMEA and APAC

Re: Binge On! - get your umbrellas out, stuff's hitting the fan.

On Saturday, January 9, 2016, Constantine A. Murenin wrote: > This is not a lossless 480p we're talking about, and most Android > phones have been through quite a few generations of having at least > 720p, if not 1080p or 1440p, and 5" displays. I wouldn't at all be so >

Re: Another Big day for IPv6 - 10% native penetration

On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 3:26 AM, Neil Harris wrote: > On 02/01/16 15:35, Tomas Podermanski wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> according to Google's statistics >> (https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html) on 31st December >> 2015 the IPv6 penetration reached 10% for the

Re: IPv4 shutdown in mobile

dent apps from the app store. Once the ipv4-only apps are bannished, i dont see any roadblocks for ipv6 on iPhone. While you say there is a religious war, i am saying Apple outlined a plan for ipv6-only and T-Mobile is likely to follow that plan from Apple. CB > > On Dec 22, 2015, at 04:

Re: IPv4 shutdown in mobile

On Friday, December 25, 2015, Mark Tinka <mark.ti...@seacom.mu> wrote: > > > On 22/Dec/15 14:45, Ca By wrote: > > > > At least in mobile, the change to ipv6 has been quick and the pace is > > increasing -- not just on ipv6 deployment but also on ipv4 shutdown. I

IPv4 shutdown in mobile

TL;DR version: the data shows you are negligent if your eyeball content (cdn, cloud, ...) does not support native ipv6. With the NAT and IPv4 leasing threads lingering on, i figured it was time for an update on how the other half live More than 1/3 of North America mobile traffic to the top

Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4

On Thursday, June 2, 2016, William Herrin wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Mike Hammett > wrote: > >> do we REALLY think it's still just /marketing problem/ that keeps v6 > >> deployment on the slow-boat? > > Yes. > > I have a confession:

Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4

On Thursday, June 2, 2016, Rubens Kuhl <rube...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 11:47 AM, Ca By <cb.li...@gmail.com <javascript:;>> > wrote: > > > > > > https://blogs.akamai.com/2016/06/preparing-for-ipv6-only-mobile-networks-why-and-how.html

Re: Netflix banning HE tunnels

On Tuesday, June 7, 2016, chris wrote: > it really feels alot like what net neutrality was supposed to avoid. making > a policy where there is different treatment of one set of bits over another > > "your ipv6 bits are bad but if you turn it off the ipv4 bits are just fine" >

  1   2   3   4   >