/nanog46/
--
Chip Marshall c...@2bithacker.net
http://weblog.2bithacker.net/ KB1QYWPGP key ID 43C4819E
v4sw5PUhw4/5ln5pr5FOPck4ma4u6FLOw5Xm5l5Ui2e4t4/5ARWb7HKOen6a2Xs5IMr2g6CM
not giving you back the
decimalized string?
--
Chip Marshall c...@2bithacker.net
http://weblog.2bithacker.net/ KB1QYWPGP key ID 43C4819E
v4sw5PUhw4/5ln5pr5FOPck4ma4u6FLOw5Xm5l5Ui2e4t4/5ARWb7HKOen6a2Xs5IMr2g6CM
pgpXgIGWgwfyD.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On 2013-04-08, Andrew Latham lath...@gmail.com sent:
Maybe http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cacti_(software) would do what you want.
www: http://www.cacti.net/index.php
If we're talking SNMP counters, Observium might be worth a look.
http://www.observium.org/
--
Chip Marshall c
not really that there is less crime, there's just less chance of
a particular person being the perpetrator or victim.
Also, my population numbers are based on 2006 data provided by
Wikipedia, and therefore are not to be trusted.
--
Chip Marshall
System Administrator
Dynamic Network Services, Inc.
http
On 2013-06-12, Phil Fagan philfa...@gmail.com sent:
Speaking of Splunk; is that really the tool of choice?
I've been hearing a lot of good things about logstash these days
too, if you prefer the open source route.
http://logstash.net/
--
Chip Marshall c...@2bithacker.net
http://2bithacker.net
for allocation sizes in IPv6?
--
Chip Marshall c...@2bithacker.net
http://2bithacker.net/
pgplU52TRFvXb.pgp
Description: PGP signature
of cases.
--
Chip Marshall c...@2bithacker.net
http://2bithacker.net/
pgpDfvwQUlHki.pgp
Description: PGP signature
it should only
be able to see x 3356 33517 or maybe x 3549 3356 33517.
(Due to Renesys policy, I can't know what x is)
--
Chip Marshall c...@2bithacker.net
http://2bithacker.net/
pgpUcrBhQwmHj.pgp
Description: PGP signature
though. With things like NoVNC and Guacamole out there
now, it seems like a HTML5 based remote KVM should be possible
and not a nightmare to work with.
--
Chip Marshall c...@2bithacker.net
http://2bithacker.net/
pgp86f06gDycO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
t; >> however.
> >>
> >> My application is to run some small things that I feel is missing in my
> >> switches/routers. Plug in this imaginary "SFP computer" to enhance the
> >> switch with a small Linux. The SFP slot provides both networking and power
> >> to the device.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Baldur
> >
--
Chip Marshall <c...@2bithacker.net>
http://2bithacker.net/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
t; there. But we also still use MRTG for some local bespoke measurements
> >
> > PS you can get a free Eval of statseeker. Obnote, don't work for them just
> > a fairly happy customer
> >
> > alan
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Anurag Bhatia
> anuragbhatia.com
--
Chip Marshall <c...@2bithacker.net>
http://2bithacker.net/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
.9.9.9 and several others public DNS resolvers.
I think the real question is "when are we going to get some memorable
IPv6 public recursive DNS servers?"
2001:4860:4860:: or 2620:fe::fe just aren't quite as catchy as
8.8.8.8 or 9.9.9.9.
--
Chip Marshall <c...@2bithacker.net>
http://2bithacker.net/
tacks-from-port-11211/
>
> Also, policer all UDP all the time... UDP is unsafe at any speed.
Hi, DigitalOcean here. We've taken steps to mitigate this attack on our network.
Also, we've only seen udp/11211 being a problem. I'd be interested to
hear of anyone seeing tcp/11211 att
there
> any standard convention for community numbering (*:666 for RTBH for
> example)? I’ve looked at some examples from other carriers and it looks
> like everyone does their own thing.
>
> -Matt
>
> --
> Matthew Crocker
> Crocker Communications, Inc.
> President
>
--
Chip Marshall
http://2bithacker.net/
On 2019-09-06, Stephen Stuart sent:
> Do you see the same behavior when you execute your dig query without
> the trailing dot?
Yes. dig adds on the trailing dot to make it an FQDN anyway, so the on-wire
qname is the same either way.
--
Chip Marshall
ng the answer, as there's no linkage between www and www-anycast.
Is this broken, or is this just some weird DNS trick I've not come across
before?
--
Chip Marshall
IN 2001:4860:4802:32::75
www-anycast.google.com. 300 IN 2001:4860:4802:34::75
www-anycast.google.com. 300 IN 2001:4860:4802:38::75
www-anycast.google.com. 300 IN 2001:4860:4802:36::75
;; Received 167 bytes from 216.239.38.10#53(n
17 matches
Mail list logo