On Jun 28, 2010, at 7:42 PM, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:
Is unidirectional transport (monitized video streams) the rural service most
absent and most valued, or are other characteristics of networks competitive
with, or superior to, that service model?
If you drive around rural central
On Aug 11, 2010, at 1:13 PM, John Lee wrote:
MCI bought MFS-Datanet because MCI had the customers and MFS-Datanet had all
of the fiber running to key locations at the time and could drastically cut
MCI's costs. UUNET merged with MCI and their traffic was put on this same
network. MCI went
On Sep 16, 2010, at 12:15 AM, George Bonser wrote:
I believe a network should be able to sell priotitization at the edge,
but not in the core. I have no problem with Y!, for example, paying a
network to be prioritized ahead of bit torrent on the segment to the end
user but I do have a
On Sep 29, 2010, at 7:26 AM, John Peach wrote:
With IANA?
It's common knowledge that 465 is smtps, whatever else IANA might say.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4409.txt
Here's what they've had to say over time:
On Oct 26, 2010, at 2:45 PM, George Bonser wrote:
But how do they multihome without an ASN?
If they have an ASN, how did they get it without going to an RIR and
paying a fee?
I beleive Jack said that they have redundant connections to his network. I
took that to mean that they did not
On Nov 1, 2010, at 11:48 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
And FDDI and X.25 and every single legacy protocol
Are there still any commercial X.25 nets in operation? I had some peripheral
involvement with Tymnet in the MCI/Concert conversion, and hear it shut down
sometime in 2003-4.
--Chris
On Dec 8, 2010, at 9:33 AM, Arturo Servin wrote:
Yes, but all of them rely on your upstreams or in mirroring your
content. If 100 Mbps are reaching your input interface of 10Mbps there is not
much that you can do.
Hmm. What would be really cool is if you could use Snort,
On Jan 9, 2013, at 8:58 PM, Julian DeMarchi wrote:
This is the first RBL I have seen list a /24 for lack of PTRs. Not for
sending spam, but just PTRs alone. How do you explain this to your
customer?
We're small shop, but our policy is not to accept email from addresses without
PTRs. And we
On Mar 31, 2013, at 8:46 PM, Jared Mauch wrote:
Many thanks to everyone that is treating this as a critical issue to close
these hosts.
Just back to the office, and started checking my networks. Found one of the
resolvers is a Netgear SOHO NAT box. EoL'd, no new firmware available.
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 10:59 -0400, ML wrote:
1) Do nothing - They're supposed deliver any and all bits
(Disregarding
a DoS or similiar situation which impedes said network)
2) Prefix filter - Don't be a party (at least in one direction) to the
bad actors traffic.
3 - Deliver all packets
On Oct 22, 2009, at 6:14 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX) wrote:
My experience is that port 587 isn't used because ISPs block it
out-of-hand. Or in the case of Rogers in (at least) Vancouver, hijack
it with a proxy that filters out the AUTH parts of the EHLO response,
making the whole
On Oct 23, 2009, at 12:15 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX) wrote:
As for outright blockage of port 587, I get this complaint from many
of
my clients while they are on the road. It seems hotels love to block
it.
I travel a bit (used to a lot) and only found one place that proxied
it.
On Mar 7, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
Try: http://www.fixedorbit.com/search.htm and do an ASN search.
-Hank
Is that info supposed to be current? It's wildly out of date for us (35970).
bgp.he.net has all the correct information.
--Chris
On Jun 11, 2012, at 8:04 PM, Ray Qiu wrote:
Hi,
Could someone please share the SDN slides that Google presented at
NANOG55? It is still not on the web. Thanks!
Please post a link to the list. Thanks!
+1
--Chris
On Jun 13, 2012, at 10:56 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Is his upstream, or the upstream of his hosting provider, on NANOG or IETF?
My sample came via GoDaddy:
Return-Path: scott.whit...@iptechlabs.com
Received: from p3plsmtps2ded01-02.prod.phx3.secureserver.net
On Aug 6, 2012, at 9:08 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
I'm curious as to your number... where is that from?
Marhsall had noted a number of 'small businesses' in the US at ~1.4m
as of ~2006ish?
Speaking as someone who does a lot of work supporting small business IT, I
suspect the number is
On Sep 13, 2012, at 9:29 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
If not, do any of the people who've already done have 5 minutes to chime in
on what they did and what they learned?
I have not done any that size/duration but I have done some where the scale is
1000s of attendees over a long weekend event,
On Sep 13, 2012, at 11:32 AM, Tim Franklin wrote:
Chris Scribbled:
You'll need a beefy NAT box. Linux with Xeon CPU and 4GB RAM minimum.
Or not. The CCC presentation is showing *real* Internet for everyone, unless
I'm very much mistaken...
If you know of an ISP in Central Texas that can
Oddly, none of the courses in the event discuss IPv6.
http://www.intelembeddedevent.com/
Intel® Embedded eVent We’re standing at the forefront of the Embedded
Internet Era. The opportunities are yours.
The networked world is growing at a tremendous pace. In just six
years, it’s expected
We've got a couple of the (beta test) mini goose climate monitors
installed. Takes up less space than the big APC boxes we've been using.
http://www.itwatchdogs.com/
--Chris
On Sep 3, 2008, at 4:36 PM, Frank Bulk wrote:
I would like to point my customers to port 587, but that kind of
configuration is still in its infancy.
We're a small managed services provider, and we started doing
authenticated SMTP with TLS on port 587 six years ago. It's at least
in
On Feb 17, 2010, at 10:33 AM, Mike Lyon wrote:
Don't forget the Salt Lick...
BBQ lovers should go to House Park BBQ. Most of the time the sign out front
says you don't need no teef to eat my meef
http://www.yelp.com/biz/house-park-bar-b-q-austin
Cash only!
If you want to make a short drive
On Feb 17, 2010, at 2:04 PM, Will Clayton wrote:
Maudi's on Lake Austin and Taco Deli are always on my menu. We just got some
Buffalo Wild Wings in town if you are in to that. If you make it to NXNW get
the Calimari. If you wind up ordering pizza, shop local and get the best
pizza for the
On Feb 17, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
which raises the critical question, where is the nearest decent
(i.e. not fourbucks) coffee to the venue?
https://auth.lessnetworks.com/v099/app?service=direct/1/Home/hotList_col3sp=0sp=SDESC
Has a list of some hotspots. The Schlotzky's across
On Mar 5, 2010, at 3:33 PM, Zachary Frederick wrote:
We have been having a problem emailing to a customer whose server is hosted
by The Planet (http://www.theplanet.com/). Our mail server is hosted in-house
on a comcast business connection.
I don't know what's going on in the Comcast
On May 4, 2010, at 7:27 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote:
I am not sure what the point is in mixing in speed of light latency. If your
typical sites are, say,
Indian cricket blogs, you will typically have a high latency from the US.
What does that tell
you about your DSL or Cable system, except
On May 4, 2010, at 8:42 AM, isabel dias wrote:
Is cable better for gamming?
All the LAN party places I know of use Metro Ethernet solutions. Gamers like
low ping times to their servers, and are willing to spend $$ to get them. So
if your target market includes people who play a lot of
On Sep 7, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Drew Weaver wrote:
Just wondering,
Is anyone aware whether there is already an active mailing list/group for
datacenter facilities folks to discuss power, cooling, physical
infrastructure, etc, etc...?
There was one at shorty.com, but that's now a paintball
On Sep 7, 2011, at 3:09 PM, Drew Weaver wrote:
dc-...@puck.nether.net thanks Jared =)
+1, beat me to it. Thanks!
--Chris
On Sep 7, 2011, at 8:03 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
Probably with all air removed from the environment, and a sound
thermal medium such as oil
pumped in in its place (make sure to use SSDs for all storage and no
mechanical devices).
There are ways to submerge spinning disks.
On Sep 19, 2011, at 8:49 PM, Richard Barnes wrote:
And if they turn up the voltage on the fence high enough, dinner could be
cooked by the time the crew gets there!
Nah, they are high frequency and high voltage, but very low current. It's
uncomfortable and may cause local burning similar to
On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 16:36 -0700, Roy wrote:
On 7/17/2013 1:59 PM, Alex Harrowell wrote:
On 15/07/13 01:09, Tony Patti wrote:
TWELVE years ago (press release March 20 2001), Comcast deployed
Linux-based
Sun Cobalt Qube appliances as CPE with their business-class Internet
service,
On Jul 31, 2013, at 10:26 AM, \tei'' oscar.vi...@gmail.com
oscar.vi...@gmail.com wrote:
- Have I read it correctly. Can then break into a vpn connection,
then leach documents that a german in pakistan is sending to his
office in germany?
I would guess that it's becasuse many VPN services
On Fri, 2013-09-06 at 23:03 +, Paul Donner (pdonner) wrote:
Great opportunity for a country like Brazil (for example) to become a
place of business for many of these services which are subject to
Calea (and such) in the US. This type of behavior is certainly a
motivator for folks in other
On Dec 31, 2013, at 7:05 AM, Ray Soucy wrote:
I think there needs to be some clarification on how these tools get used,
how often they're used, and if they're ever cleaned up when no longer part
of an active operation. Of course we'll never get that.
But that's exactly what we need.
Look
On Jan 24, 2014, at 8:36 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
You haven’t been able to get GTT/nLayer/TINet to track the traffic back?
Details are welcome, either here or in private. There are plenty of people
who will chase and fix this stuff when they’re aware of it.
When OpenResolver Project was
On Mar 13, 2014, at 2:30 PM, James Downs wrote:
On Mar 13, 2014, at 12:24 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
I'm afraid my google-fu doesn't reach back to the 1960's. You don't
happen to have a handy reference do you?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hacker_%28term%29
I'd like to propose a new ICMP message type 3 code --
Communication with Destination Network is Financially Prohibited
--Chris
On Apr 28, 2014, at 2:27 AM, Andy Davidson wrote:
now aggregate it back down again, please. :-)
I'm in the middle of a physical move. I promise I'll take the 3 deagg'd /24s
out as soon as I can.
--Chris
On Jul 21, 2014, at 1:38 PM, William Herrin wrote:
The only exception I see to this would be if localities were
constrained to providing point to point and point to multipoint
communications infrastructure within the locality on a reasonable and
non-discriminatory basis. The competition that
On Jul 29, 2014, at 10:23 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
If law enforcement comes along without port numbers then you give them a list
of subscribers behind that IP at the time. Use port block allocation and keep
track of the blocks to reduce logging load.
There's probably going to be some
On Jul 29, 2014, at 11:54 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Tue, 29 Jul 2014 11:42:31 -0500, Chris Boyd said:
There's probably going to be some interesting legal fallout from that
practice. As an ISP customer, I'd be furious to find out that my
communications
On Dec 29, 2014, at 11:51 AM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
Ok. But the interface to which the cablemodem is attached, in the general
single-DHCP-IP case, is a /24, is it not?
No, I've seen multiple IPv4 /21s assigned to a single customer interface on a
CMTS. The newer CMTS are
On May 6, 2015, at 5:24 PM, Colton Conor colton.co...@gmail.com wrote:
I am worried as most tech's know Cisco and Juniper, so going to ALU would
be a learning curve based on replies I am getting off list.
It’s not that hard to learn if you know the basics of IP routing. I just did
an
On Mon, 2015-05-11 at 14:36 -0700, Peter Baldridge wrote:
I don't know how to do the math for the 'vat of oil scenario'. It's
not something I've ever wanted to work with.
It's pretty interesting what you can do with immersion cooling. I work
with it at $DAYJOB. Similar to air cooling, but
Can we please get back to the original topic?
So far we have had one interesting and useful suggestion that I've seen -- Paul
S. mentioned SIR https://github.com/dbarrosop/sir
Have I missed any other solutions other than the prefix length filtering?
--Chris
On Apr 9, 2015, at 3:01 PM, Matt Olney (molney) mol...@cisco.com wrote:
In response to Sameer Khosla's comment that we should work with the entire
service provider community:
Talos is the threat intelligence group within Cisco. We absolutely
welcome discussions with any network operator
On Aug 12, 2015, at 7:53 AM, Oliver O'Boyle oliver.obo...@gmail.com wrote:
I missed the subscription info. Can you repost please? I can be #100 :)
http://lists.nadcog.org
Welcome aboard.
—Chris
On Aug 15, 2015, at 12:13 PM, Martin Hannigan hanni...@gmail.com wrote:
There is reasonable demand for a forum. It might need a little marketing
to get a list with traction going.
There seems to be some traction, with 268 members on the NADCOG list so far.
—Chris
Is there a mail list that’s analogous to NANOG, but focused on the data center
infrastructure and operations? The shorty.com hosted list is defunct.
Thanks, and apologies for the tangential topic.
—Chris
> On Sep 9, 2015, at 11:13 PM, John Levine wrote:
>
> The placement may be suboptimal, but free wifi away from home is nice.
> CableWifi really is a consortium, T-W customers can use Comcast's
> hotspots and vice versa.
If it were truly free and open access I’d be more tolerant
> On Sep 23, 2015, at 7:33 AM, Joe Greco wrote:
>
> Passive cooling typically translates to lower performance but also can
> be more expensive.
$DAYJOB uses an immersion cooling system so it’s higher performance and much
quieter.
—Chris
> On Jun 5, 2016, at 11:31 AM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
>
> Would you mind sharing some of the telecommunications focused law firms? I
> am about to start a company that is going back into the CLEC/ISP/VoIP
> Business and I am going to have to establish relationships with a
I too am having a similar problem. Used the remediation link at
https://support.google.com/websearch/contact/ip and it’s only partially
corrected. Users who log in to Google are seeing the US google.com page after
they select the preferred country and languate, but everyone else is still
Dear list readers, please forgive the noise, but if there's anyone here
from Google who can fix a geolocation issue I'd appreciate a reply.
208.81.245.226 is not in the UAE, it's in Austin, Texas. Yes, I have
filled out the form to request a fix, but the AI or whatever that's
supposed to fix it
Interesting article.
http://fusion.net/story/287592/internet-mapping-glitch-kansas-farm/
An hour’s drive from Wichita, Kansas, in a little town called Potwin,
there is a 360-acre piece of land with a very big problem.
The plot has been owned by the Vogelman family for more than a hundred
> On Jul 14, 2016, at 9:21 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote:
>
> Is this list having issues? The last message I received was late Tuesday.
You didn’t get a message from your router vendor(s) that it’s time for the
biennial cleaning of the intartubes and emptying of the bit buckets?
> On Oct 26, 2016, at 6:40 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette
> wrote:
>
> Point: I have a DSL line which is limited to 6Mbps down and 756Kbps up.
> My guess is that if any typical/average user is seen to be using more
> than, say, 1/10 of that amount of "up" bandwidth in any one
> On Oct 22, 2016, at 7:34 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> "taken all necessary steps to insure that none of the numerous specific types
> of CCVT thingies that Krebs and others identified"
>
> Serious question... how?
Putting them behind a firewall without general Internet
> On Oct 25, 2016, at 3:10 AM, Ronald F. Guilmette
> wrote:
>
> An IoT is -not- a general purpose computer. In the latter case, it is
> assumed that the owner will "pop the hood" when it comes to the software
> configuration.
Ah, but they are. In many cases you can
> On Oct 24, 2016, at 11:37 PM, b...@theworld.com wrote:
>
> Just curious but one wonders what most here would do with an abuse
> complaint sent to them in Chinese?
I’ve received a few of these, and if the email included an IP address or domain
name on our networks, I’d run the thing through
Sorry for the noise, but I need to find a company similar to ServerMonkey.com
or Teksavers.com that’s based in France or Switzerland. My google-fu seems to
be weak on this.
Thanks!
—Chris
> On May 8, 2018, at 11:19 AM, Stephen Satchell wrote:
>
> (Not useful for those of us not on Facebook.)
LIKE
> On Jul 26, 2018, at 12:09 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
>
> Do those use a frequency band that's suitable for cellphones to monitor
> (antenna
> size, power, etc)? Because your best chance of getting my attention in an
> emergency
> is to make my phone start shrieking.
VHF, on 7
> On Jul 26, 2018, at 11:54 AM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
>
> People in tornado areas seem to be the most aware that alert radios already
> exist. No internet access required.
For those interested in more info, http://www.nws.noaa.gov/nwr/
Pretty popular service in rural Texas.
—Chris
Sorry for using the white paging phone, but I have an IPv4 reachability ticket
that I opened back in January that’s stuck in limbo.
Ticket number is either 26088938 or 18444951. Users on T-Mobile data can’t
reach services in 208.89.64.0/21, specifically 208.89.64.154.
—Chris
> On Jan 17, 2019, at 7:17 AM, Colton Conor wrote:
>
> Besides mikrotik, I haven't found anything that doesn't require me to build a
> solution. Like OpenWRT with ipef3, or something like that.
>
> Seems like a commercial solution would exist for this. I though CAF
> providers have to
> On Jul 11, 2019, at 10:29 AM, Mike Hammett wrote:
>
> I'm looking for a device that can receive GPS inside a building without the
> assistance of an external antenna (Frontier says they no longer allow
> external antenna), will provide traditional NTP services, and will provide a
>
There’s also this gem from 2005 or 2007 days. I’ve heard Cisco staff was
involved in its creation.
http://www.mattzrelak.com/mp3/t1down.htm
—Chris
> On Sep 5, 2019, at 8:14 AM, Ca By wrote:
>
> See below for high value of the list, both items are very pleasing
>
> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at
> On Sep 6, 2019, at 1:18 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
>
> This site is blocked due to a security threat that was discovered by the
> Cisco Umbrella security researchers.
Here’s a YouTube link. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9k6A0ZlhTyw
—Chris
Since people on here like to talk about the generatorn run time on cell towers,
I thought y’all might like to see an ATT microcell in downtown Austin, TX. No
apparent generator or battery on it.
https://imgur.com/a/RY9Tg7h
—Chris
> On Mar 16, 2020, at 3:15 PM, Alexandre Petrescu
> wrote:
>
> Please tell me about your city: do you know the numbers in your city? How
> did you get the info?
Austin’s health department has a web page with the current confirmed infection
count, as well as a bunch of recommendations for
> On Oct 8, 2020, at 10:55 AM, wrote:
>
> JunOS is so linux based
Um, my MX-204 says FreeBSD amd64.
: <202009211918.08ljimld018...@lenny.gizmopartners.com>
Received: from [161.132.101.74] (unknown [161.132.101.74])
by cross4.lu-visp.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 54FDC8808
for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2020 21:13:53 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 14:15:49 -0500
From: "NANOG"
To: "Chris Boyd&
> On Sep 30, 2020, at 3:42 PM, Warren Kumari wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 4:33 PM Nick Hilliard wrote:
> Chris Boyd wrote on 30/09/2020 21:24:
> > My old Test-Um Lanscaper died, and I was curious what people liked
> > these days. Don’t need throu
My old Test-Um Lanscaper died, and I was curious what people liked these days.
Don’t need throughput testing or anything like that, just basic wire map
testing, cable ID, cable length, PoE voltage, and DHCP client.
What do y’all like?
—Chris
> On Feb 1, 2021, at 5:26 PM, Kevin McCormick wrote:
>
> Nearly all of those seem to error out.
>
> Is that a wishful thinking list?
Those that do answer to anyone who asks are flagged "recursion-yes,” but I
don’t know how often it’s updated.
—Chris
> On Feb 1, 2021, at 12:19 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
>
> Randy Bush wrote on 01/02/2021 18:16:
>> is there a list of public resolvers? e.g. 1.1.1.1, 4.4.4.4, 8.8.8.8,
>> etc.?
>
> https://public-dns.info/
There’s also a list of interesting resolvers at
> On Mar 11, 2021, at 5:06 AM, Matt Harris wrote:
>
> There are plenty of effective options besides environmentally-destructive
> Halon, dangerous-to-equipment water sprinkler, or dangerous-to-personnel CO2
> for fire suppression these days. Some of the most common today are foam
> systems
> On Feb 16, 2021, at 11:51 AM, Michael Thomas wrote:
>
> You'd think that mid-summer Texas chews a lot more peak capacity than the
> middle of winter. Plus I would think a lot of Texas uses natural gas for heat
> rather than electricity further mitigating its effect on the grid.
>
> Mike
> On Feb 18, 2021, at 5:19 PM, Louie Lee wrote:
>
> Hey Chris,
>
> Thanks for reporting this. We had an issue that caused emails to addresses in
> that domain to not be recognized.
>
> The email is no longer bouncing back, and emails to other googlefiber.net
> addresses are confirmed
Can someone at ARIN tell them they need to fix this?
From whois 136.32.164.64:
OrgAbuseHandle: GFA32-ARIN
OrgAbuseName: Google Fiber Abuse
OrgAbusePhone: +1-650-253-
OrgAbuseEmail: ab...@googlefiber.net
OrgAbuseRef:https://rdap.arin.net/registry/entity/GFA32-ARIN
Email response:
> On Aug 25, 2021, at 1:30 PM, b...@theworld.com wrote:
>
>
>
> Except maybe that one guy at Harvard who came to replace what turned
> out to be a 100+ year old, home made, "breaker" which fed our machine
> room which was hidden in a narrow dark hallway winding around our
> machine room
> On Sep 10, 2021, at 9:31 AM, Jason Kuehl wrote:
>
> For whatever reason Comcast Xfinity is blocking my VPN URL. I've started the
> process to unblock, and I'm trying to get a hold of their security team to
> resolve this. I've been bounced around all morning.
>
> Does anyone have a
> On Sep 20, 2023, at 2:46 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
>
> skype uses Silk
> (maybe teams too?).
We run Teams Telephony in $DAYJOB, and it does use SILK.
https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/platform/bots/calls-and-meetings/real-time-media-concepts
> On Apr 4, 2024, at 2:06 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
> On 4/4/24 08:25, Mike Lyon wrote:
>
>> I use it for config backups, diffs, etc. Love it.
>>
>> Theres others such as Rancid but im not sure if it works on anything other
>> than Vendor C.
>
> RANCID works perfectly for Cisco, Juniper,
86 matches
Mail list logo