Re: Uptick in spam

On 2015-10-27 13:08, Ian Smith wrote: But that's not how SPF works. In SPF, the domain of the envelope header sender address is checked against that domain's sender policy. Since jdlabs.fr has no policy specified, a strict SPF policy at the NANOG server would have prevented this small

Re: Does no one monitor the list on weekends?

On 2015-10-26 18:17, Jim Mercer wrote: On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 09:59:40PM -0400, Robert Webb wrote: This spam is ridiculous! it should be noted that it has been flowing all weekend, and nobody really complained or even commented on it until this morning. so, yeah, maybe the list is on

Re: Question re session hijacking in dual stack environments w/MacOS

On 2015-09-27 03:34, Dovid Bender wrote: But when you're seeing the same session being used from two wildly different places (in this case, IPv4 and IPv6) at the SAME TIME, that does seem rather suspicious in the absence of other information. iOS 9 has a new feature called "Wi-Fi Assist" that

Re: ARIN Region IPv4 Free Pool Reaches Zero

On 2015-09-26 22:56, Seth Mattinen wrote: What's worked for me is not signing or renewing or buying things that lack IPv6 support. While you're demanding better technology you may also want to include things like crypto in there. I've gotten proposals for things that support IPv6 but only work

Re: Extraneous "legal" babble--and my reaction to it.

On 2015-09-06 19:18, Scott Weeks wrote: It could be much easier. Folks that care about the mailing list rules, want to be courteous to list folks and want to use their company email, rather than one that inserts no disclaimer, could put 15 lines of blank as part of their signature. This would