Re: Active Directory requires Microsoft DNS?

2010-09-24 Thread Darren Pilgrim
Phil Regnauld wrote: Darren Pilgrim (nanog) writes: Tom Mikelson wrote: Presently our organization utilizes BIND for DNS services, with the Networking team administering. We are now being told by the Systems team that they will be responsible for DNS services and that it will be changed over

www.eftps.gov contact

2012-12-18 Thread Darren Pilgrim
The hostname www.eftps.gov has both A and records, but the site is only reachable via IPv4. Worse, the IPv6 connectivity is broken in such a way that Firefox and Internet Explorer do not fall back to IPv4. Tracing is broken for both protocols. The 10-net addresss in the IPv4 path were

Re: www.eftps.gov contact

2012-12-18 Thread Darren Pilgrim
On 2012-12-18 07:36, Christopher Morrow wrote: On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Christopher Morrow it's probably also fair to point out that ... it seems to be working. ( and A) so, what's broken? The end-user machines I tested on are behind 6in4 tunnels (MTU 1480). They open the TCP

Re: www.eftps.gov contact

2012-12-18 Thread Darren Pilgrim
On 2012-12-18 07:52, Christopher Morrow wrote: see, now we're getting information that FDC/IRS could actually use! :) This looks like an MTU issue then? I believe so.

Re: www.eftps.gov contact

2012-12-18 Thread Darren Pilgrim
On 2012-12-18 08:08, Christopher Morrow wrote: On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Darren Pilgrimna...@bitfreak.org wrote: On 2012-12-18 07:52, Christopher Morrow wrote: see, now we're getting information that FDC/IRS could actually use! :) This looks like an MTU issue then? I believe so.

Re: Comcast Launches IPv6 for Business Customers

2013-04-29 Thread Darren Pilgrim
On 2013-04-29 15:38, Brzozowski, John wrote: FYI for folks that are interested: http://corporate.comcast.com/comcast-voices/comcast-launches-ipv6-for-business-customers I hope opening up IPv6 support to Comcast's higher-end customers is an indicator Comcast really is close to enabling IPv6

Re: Comcast Launches IPv6 for Business Customers

2013-04-29 Thread Darren Pilgrim
On 2013-04-29 21:26, Christopher Morrow wrote: we have always been at war with your cisco-ians... No worries, the good folks at Hurricane Electric helped me dig a tunnel to freedom long ago. :)

Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size

2013-09-26 Thread Darren Pilgrim
On 9/26/2013 1:52 AM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: sounds just like folks in 1985, talking about IPv4... The foundation of that, though, was ignorance of address space exhaustion. IPv4's address space was too small for such large thinking. IPv6 is far beyond enough to use such

Re: minimum IPv6 announcement size

2013-09-26 Thread Darren Pilgrim
On 9/26/2013 1:07 PM, joel jaeggli wrote: On Sep 26, 2013, at 12:29 PM, Darren Pilgrim na...@bitfreak.org wrote: On 9/26/2013 1:52 AM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote: sounds just like folks in 1985, talking about IPv4... The foundation of that, though, was ignorance of address space

Re: Open source hardware

2014-01-03 Thread Darren Pilgrim
On 1/3/2014 2:05 AM, Daniël W. Crompton wrote: Good point Jimmy, there is a world of hurt involved, although it may be slightly less painless when you realize that the alternative is: *the NSA [who] has modified the firmware of computers and network hardware—including systems shipped by Cisco,

Re: gmail.com - 550 error for ipv6/PTR ?

2014-01-15 Thread Darren Pilgrim
On 1/14/2014 4:06 PM, Brandon Applegate wrote: Just saw this in a message tonight. No idea if this is a transient error or not. --- host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com][2607:f8b0:4002:c01::1a] said: 550-5.7.1 [2607:ff70:11::11] Our system has detected that this

Re: gmail.com - 550 error for ipv6/PTR ?

2014-01-15 Thread Darren Pilgrim
On 1/15/2014 10:14 AM, Franck Martin wrote: On Jan 15, 2014, at 10:05 AM, Darren Pilgrim na...@bitfreak.org mailto:na...@bitfreak.org wrote: On 1/14/2014 4:06 PM, Brandon Applegate wrote: Just saw this in a message tonight. No idea if this is a transient error or not. --- host gmail-smtp

Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion

2014-06-22 Thread Darren Pilgrim
On 6/18/2014 11:49 AM, TJ wrote: Yeah, Verizon and VZW are not the same animal ... FiOS *needs* to get their IPv6 house in order. Anyone have any information on that front ...? For FiOS, the ONTs do transparent muckery at the IP level and aren't yet capable of equivalent IPv6 muckery.

Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion

2014-06-22 Thread Darren Pilgrim
On 6/22/2014 6:56 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: On Jun 22, 2014, at 6:41 PM, Darren Pilgrim na...@bitfreak.org wrote: For Comcast business services, the SMC box on my demarc panel isn't IPv6 capable and neither are any of Comcast's other business CPE. Not true. The Netgear CCB tried to install here

Re: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion

2014-06-22 Thread Darren Pilgrim
On 6/22/2014 7:16 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: On Jun 22, 2014, at 7:07 PM, Darren Pilgrim na...@bitfreak.org wrote: On 6/22/2014 6:56 PM, Owen DeLong wrote: OTOH, you can supply your own Motorola Surfboard DOCSIS 3 modem and it works just fine with Comcast Business. Have you tried using

Fw: new message

2015-10-25 Thread Darren Pilgrim
Hey! New message, please read <http://zoomincinema.in/rather.php?fuj> Darren Pilgrim

Fw: new message

2015-10-25 Thread Darren Pilgrim
Hey! New message, please read <http://doctorcatherinebarry.com/getting.php?sdnl> Darren Pilgrim

Fw: new message

2015-10-25 Thread Darren Pilgrim
Hey! New message, please read <http://shoroqpress.com/feelings.php?z0cq7> Darren Pilgrim

Fw: new message

2015-10-25 Thread Darren Pilgrim
Hey! New message, please read <http://jitconsultancyzm.com/living.php?uo4> Darren Pilgrim