- Original Message -
From: Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com
To: Michael Ulitskiy mulits...@acedsl.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 13 May, 2010 6:39:28 PM
Subject: Re: ipv6 transit over tunneled connection
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Michael Ulitskiy
iPhones (at the time of 2G) used to have a major issue, they would not fallback
to the secondary DNS if the first failed.
- Original Message -
From: Adam J. Henson (ARC-IO)[PEROT SYSTEMS] a...@nasa.gov
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, 19 May, 2010 11:28:32 PM
Subject: ATT Wireless
see www.pacnog.org or alternatively www.picisoc.org
- Original Message -
From: JoeSox joe...@gmail.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 27 May, 2010 8:58:04 PM
Subject: Guam
I am trying to gain some knowledge about setting up a T1 network in
Guam. I am in Washington State so I am not
CNN ran a mock up attack to the USA infrastructure with some reps of the
government.
The stuff was flawed in many ways, but I think the outcome of it, after each
representative of the government arguing what the president can do and cannot
do, was to solve the issue, the infrastructure
You forgot to talk about a tax on all of that too... ;)
Note the Great Firewall of Australia is slowly going down in flames...
Now, there are two options, fight these type of proposals (resources spent to
avoid something and make political enemies) or encourage the proposal by
Netherlands and
The question is because gTLDs operations are in the USA, does it mean that the
USA have control over all those domain names?
Can we trust solely the USA for such control?
This will come back with a vengeance in the JPA negotiations, ICANN, etc...
- Original Message -
From: Florian
On Jul 1, 2010, at 9:03 AM, Franck Martin wrote:
The question is because gTLDs operations are in the USA, does it mean that
the USA have control over all those domain names?
Can we trust solely the USA for such control?
This will come back with a vengeance in the JPA negotiations, ICANN
You forgot
-It is carrier grade, ISO certified and other certification program not worth
the paper it is printed on.
- Original Message -
From: Jon Lewis jle...@lewis.org
To: Patrick Giagnocavo patr...@zill.net
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 8 July, 2010 2:14:53 PM
Subject: Re:
I think the issue, is that don't expect to build your own router using
linux/bsd etc..
There are too many kernel parameters to tweak to make it optimal (unless a
suboptimal router is ok with your environment)
You need people that understand network and the appliance they sell you.
Why Cisco
- Original Message -
From: Karl Auer ka...@biplane.com.au
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 22 July, 2010 4:24:59 PM
Subject: Re: Looking for comments
On Wed, 2010-07-21 at 20:37 -0700, Owen DeLong wrote:
I can throw a COTS d-link box with
address-overloaded NAT on a
- Original Message -
From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: Karl Auer ka...@biplane.com.au, nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 22 July, 2010 5:35:24 PM
Subject: Re: Looking for comments
On Jul 21, 2010, at 9:58 PM, Franck Martin wrote
- Original Message -
From: Mark Smith
na...@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org
To: Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org
Cc: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org, Brian E Carpenter
brian.e.carpen...@gmail.com
Sent: Friday, 23 July, 2010 12:17:21 PM
Subject: Re: Looking for
- Original Message -
From: Tarig Yassin tariq198...@hotmail.com
I would like to issue a question here, who controls this Internet?
The elders of the Internet:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDbyYGrswtg
The question too, is which model is mitigating the best the presence of rogue
registrars (like domain tasting registrars, etc..)
- Original Message -
From: Joly MacFie j...@punkcast.com
To: Eric Brunner-Williams brun...@nic-naa.net
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, 27 July, 2010
Hmmm, from the interview of the British guy, the smart card seems to be in UK
(he did a lapsus on it), which differs from what you describe.
if all the smart cards are in the US in an individual safe deposit box in the
same location, this raise the concern that there is only one place the
- Original Message -
From: Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca, nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Friday, 30 July, 2010 3:49:04 PM
Subject: Re: Web expert on his 'catastrophe' key for the internet
On 07/29/10 20:23, Franck Martin
If it is a business, then accurate address does not seem to me an issue, if it
is a private address, I think a bit of fuzziness is helpful
- Original Message -
From: ML m...@kenweb.org
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, 4 August, 2010 11:07:47 AM
Subject: Question of privacy with
Nice to see this change
APAC has been obliged to pay the cost to peer with the US (long distance links
are expensive). Now that US wants to peer with Asia, pricing may become more
balanced...
- Original Message -
From: David Ulevitch da...@ulevitch.com
To: na...@merit.edu
Sent:
to the AP market at better cost?
- Original Message -
From: Benson Schliesser bens...@queuefull.net
To: Joel Jaeggli joe...@bogus.com, Franck Martin fra...@genius.com,
nanog na...@merit.edu
Sent: Thursday, 12 August, 2010 9:03:34 AM
Subject: Re: Cost of transit and options in APAC
On 11 Aug
+10
Once you pass a threshold of affordability (by breaking the monopoly), then the
network use explodes and other issues can be worked out by more or less by
consumer pressure (and economies of scale)... You need to reach Packet Storm
level.
- Original Message -
From: Patrick W.
It always amaze me how the word de-regulated is so misused.
When there is a monopoly the regulation is in fact very very light: Acme co is
the monopoly and government cash in dividends/license fees and just check they
don't do anything really silly.
When there is competition this is when you
Funny!
On one hand people talk about ARIN providing IP allocation at nearly zero cost
and on the other hand talking that ARIN goes after companies that use their
allocation for abuse (which has a non trivial cost and potential expensive
lawsuits)...
Do you know what you want?
I have the feeling that the systems is not able to understand at all IPv6 for
geolocation therefore default to foreign.
I'm not aware of anyone providing IPv6 geolocation at the moment? Anyone has
pointers?
- Original Message -
From: Harry Strongburg harry.na...@harry.lu
To:
I'm trying to debug a pesky PMTUD issue with IPv6 on Mac OS-X 10.6.
It happens only from home, on wireless, when connected to a mac aiport that
does an automatic tunnel (teredo) to IPv6 backbone. There are IPv6 web site
that I cannot browse until I lower the MTU to 1400. My Linux desktop in
What puzzles me, is that my linux machine on same network has no issues...
- Original Message -
From: Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, 21 August, 2010 9:34:23 AM
Subject: Re: IPv6 PMTUD and OS-X
On 2010-08-20 23:27
These are good news.
However, if Comcast provides native IPv6 to their customers, then the IPv6
native customers don't need these 6to4 relays?
Airport Extreme, Linksys and other user equipment, enable IPv6 by doing 6to4
tunnels, so what this press release says, is that there are many users who
As the 6to4 is an default option on Apple Airport Extreme to enable ipv6, I
would have thought that Apple would have provided a few gateways? Same for
Microsoft that has it in its OS?
Reminds me of the ntp servers issue built in on some devices...
Is there a list of 6to4 relays?
I'm curious.
Also, I'm also curious to know if ISPs in Europe (which are more advanced in
IPv6 deployment) have experienced the same issues?
found it:
http://www.bgpmon.net/6to4.php?week=4
Not what I call a big list, considering...
- Original Message -
From: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
To: John Jason Brzozowski john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com
Cc: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, 31 August, 2010 9:21:58 AM
Subject
to be a very good troubleshooting tool (once you know what
to do) and wish it would be on all OS, like traceroute and now tracepath is...
- Original Message -
From: Jack Bates jba...@brightok.net
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: John Jason Brzozowski john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com, NANOG
of troubles, I suspect most
just give up immediately...
- Original Message -
From: Jack Bates jba...@brightok.net
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: John Jason Brzozowski john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com, NANOG
nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, 31 August, 2010 10:14:39 AM
Subject: Re
I think this http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/13537
may answer some of the questions on how to make it work correctly.
I like the fact the 6to4 gateway should be on a separate machine that BGP with
the main router. If the gateway dies, the routes are withdrawn and clients go
and
Way to go! more! more! ;)
- Original Message -
From: John Jason Brzozowski john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com
To: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, 31 August, 2010 6:18:21 PM
Subject: UPDATED - Comcast enables 6to4 relays
Enabled two more 6to4 relays this morning. :)
John
- Original Message -
From: Mark Smith
na...@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org
To: Simon Leinen simon.lei...@switch.ch
Cc: Brzozowski john_brzozow...@cable.comcast.com, NANOG
nanog@nanog.org, John
Sent: Thursday, 2 September, 2010 9:50:28 AM
Subject: Re: ICMPv6
Blocking outbound port 25 in certain conditions (mainly anything with a dynamic
IPv4), is a recommended practice from MAAWG.org and others, they have a few
useful documents for ISPs to deal with their network.
- Original Message -
From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
To: Zhiyun Qian
Have you heard of the submission port?
Why Clients of an hotel would run a MTA anyhow?
- Original Message -
From: Jack Bates jba...@brightok.net
To: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Friday, 3 September, 2010 4:08:54 PM
Subject: Re: ISP port blocking practice
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
I asked around and got this presentation, but you can search for OP25B too:
http://www.anacom.pt/streaming/Honda.pdf?contentId=988141field=ATTACHED_FILE
Some non-anecdotal data about the effectiveness of blocking port 25.
In many countries, the presence of bots consume a non-trivial amount of
bandwidth. In developing countries, this is a non trivial amount of $$$
(http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/10/09/05/1620212/UN-Tech-Group-Finds-Most-Expensive-Broadband)
Blocking port 25 allows to help identify which hosts
- Original Message -
From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
To: Jon Lewis jle...@lewis.org
Cc: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Monday, 6 September, 2010 3:06:29 PM
Subject: Re: ISP port blocking practice
On Sep 5, 2010, at 6:18 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Sun, 5 Sep 2010, Claudio
As for online experience, any action game with players 200ms away from each
others, is not really playable.
By the time you aim, shoot, and the info register on the server and other user
player PC, it has moved far away from the shot...
This is not what the Team Cymru Bogons list for?
http://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Bogons/
List bad ASNs after proper investigation?
It then depends if you trust Team Cymru or not, like you would trust or not
Spamhaus...
- Original Message -
From: Heath Jones hj1...@gmail.com
To:
-
From: Heath Jones hj1...@gmail.com
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, 29 September, 2010 5:22:02 PM
Subject: Re: AS11296 -- Hijacked?
This is not what the Team Cymru Bogons list for?
http://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Bogons/
I just had a very quick
Because the path was broken everytime the bgp session was established and
rewriting the routing table with more specific routes?
- Original Message -
From: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com
To: North American Network Operators Group nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 30 September, 2010 2:37:43 PM
A yearly challenge response for legacy space contacts, could be useful. I think
there is a plan like this in some RIRs
- Original Message -
From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
To: George Bonser gbon...@seven.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Friday, 1 October, 2010 4:03:56 PM
Subject: Re: ARIN
How long do you keep a router in production?
What is your cycle for replacement of equipment?
For a PC, you usually depreciate it over 3 years, and can make it last 5 years,
but then you are stretching the functionality, especially if you upgrade the
OS, tho it is not uncommon to see
that routing/network appliance equipment have a life cycle similar to
a PC, despite the fact as someone pointed out, they will run fine for many many
years.
- Original Message -
From: Heath Jones hj1...@gmail.com
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, 2
From: Brandon Kim brandon@brandontek.com
To: fra...@genius.com, nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, 2 October, 2010 6:22:27 PM
Subject: RE: router lifetime
Well a lot of routers even 3 years ago support IPv6. You can dual-stack pretty
much any router today if you have
the right IOS. But
You need all to be part of the same Ethernet network. So if this UTM can act as
a bridge/switch you should be ok. Otherwise the RA broadcasts need to reach
your device so it guesses the network and add it's Mac address to the network
and make an ipv6 address.
I would say RA is a bit like DHCP
James Bio rju...@gmail.com
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Friday, 15 October, 2010 7:11:07 PM
Subject: Re: IPv6 Stateless Configuration
That's my setup right now. The problem is the machine is not configuring its
IPv6 address with RA already turned on. I'm guessing
but then, can't we use ip unumbered on p2p links on cisco?
- Original Message -
From: Mark Smith na...@85d5b20a518b8f6864949bd940457dc124746ddc.nosense.org
To: Zaid Ali z...@zaidali.com
Cc: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, 16 October, 2010 10:21:03 AM
Subject: Re: Choice of
You give a /64 to the end users (home/soho), and /48 to multi homed
organization (or bigger orgs that use more than one network internally) and get
a /32 if you are an ISP.
See also the discussion about what to use in p2p links.
- Original Message -
From: Brandon Kim
Nah...
Get IPv6 for your clients today, think about your servers for later...
Then you will be able to ask all the right questions and apply the right
pressure to your vendors, carriers, etc
- Original Message -
From: Jeffrey Lyon jeffrey.l...@blacklotus.net
To: Jens Link
So they can't run their own services from home and have to request premium
connectivity from you?
Beside the IPv4 scarcity mentality we have the Telco mentality to fight...
Happy days still ahead...
- Original Message -
From: Jack Bates jba...@brightok.net
To: sth...@nethelp.no
Cc:
- Original Message -
From: Joel Jaeggli joe...@bogus.com
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, 19 October, 2010 8:58:57 AM
Subject: Re: Only 5x IPv4 /8 remaining at IANA
On 10/18/10 1:38 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
I'm an IPv6 pioneer, because I did
to IPv6 (and your customers to IPv6 if you
are an ISP).
If you do that, you will see migration to IPv6 is made much easier, and much
faster.
- Original Message -
From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: Jonas Frey (Probe Networks) j...@probe-networks.de
- Original Message -
From: Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.net
To: Joel Esler joel.es...@me.com
Cc: North American Network Operators Group nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 21 October, 2010 10:00:25 AM
Subject: Re: ARIN recognizes Interop for return of more than 99% of 45/8
address
Putting a sunset clause will happen but when it won't matter much. We are not
there yet.
However, I could see it also coming from a vendor as a way to get customers to
upgrade (after that date we will not support IPv4 anymore and provide patches
for IPv4).
- Original Message -
From:
I think APNIC has a policy that defines the minimum IPv6 allocation based on
your current IPv4 allocation/usage. This would fix the problem?
- Original Message -
From: Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.net
To: Nick Hilliard n...@foobar.org
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, 27 October,
(Addresses in /56)-22)
http://www.apnic.net/services/apply-for-resources/check-your-eligibility/check-ipv6
http://www.apnic.net/services/become-a-member/how-much-does-it-cost
- Original Message -
From: Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.net
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
- Original Message -
From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.net, nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, 27 October, 2010 11:48:58 AM
Subject: Re: IPv6 Routing table will be bloated?
It's very interesting to me that wee
Yes, you need to be able to spell Hex backward ;)
- Original Message -
From: Jeroen van Aart jer...@mompl.net
To: NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, 30 October, 2010 2:06:32 PM
Subject: IPv6 rDNS
I battled for a few hours getting IPv6 rDNS to work. The following tool
proved to
My understanding was that there was a partial power outage that lasted only a
few minutes for some systems (not the entire facility). Generators kicked in
but a few UPS did not do their job correctly.
- Original Message -
From: Ravi Pina r...@cow.org
To: Ulf Zimmermann u...@alameda.net
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Oberman ober...@es.net
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: Jeroen van Aart jer...@mompl.net, NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, 23 November, 2010 12:31:47 PM
Subject: Re: IPv6 6to4 and dns
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2010 09:36:28 +1300 (FJST
- Original Message -
From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
To: John Levine jo...@iecc.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sunday, 5 December, 2010 2:54:43 PM
Subject: Re: How do you do rDNS for IPv6 ?
On Dec 5, 2010, at 2:13 PM, John Levine wrote:
When hosts self-configure their low 64
In the early 90's a friend of mine got a box of 10 HP cards with all the same
MAC address.
- Original Message -
From: Graham Wooden gra...@g-rock.net
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sunday, 2 January, 2011 4:33:46 PM
Subject: The tale of a single MAC
Hi there,
I encountered an interesting
• ipv6 41 IPv6 # IPv6
• ipv6-route 43 IPv6-Route # Routing Header for IPv6
• ipv6-frag 44 IPv6-Frag # Fragment Header for IPv6
• ipv6-crypt 50 IPv6-Crypt # Encryption Header for IPv6
• ipv6-auth 51 IPv6-Auth # Authentication Header for IPv6
• ipv6-icmp 58 IPv6-ICMP
What about an Airport Extreme? It has a wan interface that does PPPOE
The IPv6 feature seems working, with 6to4 or static tunnels and a basic IPv6
firewall.
- Original Message -
From: Mirjam Kuehne m...@ripe.net
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, 25 January, 2011 3:34:14 AM
Subject:
:13:26 PM
Subject: Re: IPv6 filtering
On Jan 26, 2011, at 12:03 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
Ok filtering ipv6 and ipv6-icmp is understood, it is like ipv4.
Be advised, ICMPv6 is *not* like ICMP in IPv4, and knowing what can be
filtered, what to filter, and where to filter it is considerably more
If I'm correct, in 2000 in Fiji, the main fiber optic cable from the national
provider to the international provider was sabotaged, cutting all
communications. Fortunately an Alcatel team was on the island (SCC
commissioning) with the right tools and could splice it back in a few hours,
Just make sure you don't shoot yourself in the foot by telling the best route
to the end of the tunnel is via the tunnel itself...
I use it too: http://www.avonsys.com/blogpost367 but because I have no other
choice.
- Original Message -
From: Robert Johnson fasterfour...@gmail.com
To:
You should do a rap song...
IPv6, IPv4, it is all my fault!
Internet was just an experiment
- Original Message -
From: Joly MacFie j...@punkcast.com
To: Ben McGinnes b...@adversary.org
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sunday, 30 January, 2011 6:36:21 AM
Subject: Re: Found: Who is responsible
and who is the upstream ISP that allows the AS to propagate?
http://bgp.he.net/AS36938#_graph4
aut-num:AS37004
as-name:SUBURBAN-AS
descr: Sub-Urban Telecom
organisation: ORG-ST1-AFRINIC
org-name: Suburban Telecom
org-type: LIR
descr: LIR Xtra Small
- Original Message -
From: Paul Graydon p...@paulgraydon.co.uk
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Friday, 4 February, 2011 8:39:09 AM
Subject: Re: External sanity checks
On 02/03/2011 08:04 AM, Philip Lavine wrote:
To all,
Does any one know a Vendor (NOT Keynote) that can do sanity
Any relation?
http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/11/02/04/0043234/Verizon-To-Throttle-High-Bandwidth-Users
- Original Message -
From: Joly MacFie j...@punkcast.com
To: North American Network Operators Group nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Friday, 4 February, 2011 4:30:27 PM
Subject: Fwd: You Tube
This is dual stack, my recommendation is disable IPv6 on your servers (so your
clients will still talk to them on IPv4 only), and let your client goes IPv6
first. Once you understand what is happening, get on IPv6 on your servers.
Alternatively, use someone else network to understand IPv6.
You missed the IPv6 hour at Nanog42:
http://www.civil-tongue.net/grandx/wiki/nanog42
https://wiki.tools.isoc.org/IETF71_IPv4_Outage
May be another one is needed?
- Original Message -
From: Mike Lyon mike.l...@gmail.com
To: Jack Bates jba...@brightok.net
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent:
that develop your applications and configure the servers,
get them to be familiar with it, give them a sandbox, and then when everyone
stop to run like headless chicken, plan your transition.
- Original Message -
From: William Herrin b...@herrin.us
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: nanog
- Original Message -
From: Jason Bertoch ja...@i6ix.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 10 February, 2011 9:09:16 AM
Subject: Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
On 2011/02/09 2:44 PM, Jens Link wrote:
No, IPv6 rollout is going to be extremely expensive and will likely
put
a
Looking at the recent exchange on the list re IPv6, it seems we are in the
whose fault is it?
• Denial (this isn't happening to me!)
• Anger (why is this happening to me ?)
• Bargaining (I promise I'll be a better person if ...)
• Depression (I don't care anymore)
•
I like that tool: http://bgp.he.net/AS55327
- Original Message -
From: Jack Bates jba...@brightok.net
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 10 February, 2011 3:41:41 PM
Subject: Re: Is your ASN advertising v6 prefixes?
On 2/9/2011 8:21 PM, Fred Richards wrote:
Mine is.
Well?
- Original Message -
From: Charles N Wyble char...@knownelement.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 10 February, 2011 3:57:23 PM
Subject: Re: IPv6 status
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/09/2011 06:35 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
Looking at the recent
http://www.marketingvox.com/under-the-microscope-what-the-end-of-ipv4-means-for-marketers-048657/
I can hear people, say oh no
Interesting to see that marketers do not like CGNAT.
- Original Message -
From: Fred Baker f...@cisco.com
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, 12 February, 2011 9:43:56 AM
Subject: Re: IPv6 is on the marketers radar
On Feb 11, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
http://www.marketingvox.com
- Original Message -
From: George Bonser gbon...@seven.com
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com, Fred Baker f...@cisco.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, 12 February, 2011 10:31:42 AM
Subject: RE: IPv6 is on the marketers radar
They missed an important point.
Who
- Original Message -
From: Michael Dillon wavetos...@googlemail.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Monday, 14 February, 2011 10:37:51 AM
Subject: Re: IPv6 is on the marketers radar
It's bad that home gateways need replacing
It's not neccessarily bad. There are a lot of older devices
- Original Message -
From: Martin Millnert milln...@gmail.com
To: Marshall Eubanks t...@americafree.tv
Cc: North American Network Operators Group nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 17 February, 2011 8:28:22 AM
Subject: Re: NYTimes: Egypt Leaders Found ‘Off’ Switch for Internet
On Wed,
- Original Message -
From: Joe Abley jab...@hopcount.ca
To: Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us
Cc: John Curran jcur...@arin.net, NANOG na...@merit.edu
Sent: Thursday, 17 February, 2011 12:05:16 PM
Subject: Re: [arin-announce] IN-ADDR.ARPA Zone Transfer Complete
On 2011-02-16, at
- Original Message -
From: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com
To: Fred Baker f...@cisco.com
Cc: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com, North American Network Operators
Group nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 17 February, 2011 2:37:02 PM
Subject: Re: Local root zone (Was NYTimes: Egypt Leaders Found
http://www.jetcafe.org/~npc/isp/large.html
If you take the 5 top US ISPs and get them to do dual stack IPv6, that's 50
million subscribers in the US only.
I think google and others will notice some serious traffic happening.
It took a market share of 10 to 20% of Mozilla for web developers to
- Original Message -
From: Scott Helms khe...@ispalliance.net
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, 19 February, 2011 8:07:54 AM
Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an
IPv6naysayer...)
On 2/18/2011 1:53 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
http://www.jetcafe.org/~npc
You have products like a cell on wheels. A container containing a phone switch
and a mobile cell, easily installable. You place it at the center of the
disaster zone and all mobile phones start to work...
if you are worried about congestion, then only the right sims are
registered/enabled.
Yes I don't understand why we need DHCPv6, true RD did not have DNS information
to pass, but that is fixed, no?
- Original Message -
From: Matthew Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sunday, 27 February, 2011 4:06:29 PM
Subject: Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6
On
between RD and DHCPv6, what I care, is that they should
be able to do their job correctly on their own.
- Original Message -
From: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: Matthew Palmer mpal...@hezmatt.org, nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sunday, 27 February, 2011 6:08:28
Don't forget there is no commission for the salesperson to enable IPv6 for you,
so definitively they are not interested and you asking them to deal with the
issue, will just lower their pay at the end of the month because they could not
use this valuable time to find customers with
- Original Message -
From: Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org
To: Franck Martin fra...@genius.com
Cc: George Bonser gbon...@seven.com, NANOG list nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, 1 March, 2011 1:41:45 PM
Subject: Re: IPv6? Why, you are the first one to ask for it!
On 2011-03-01 22:16
But do they route?
- Original Message -
From: Randy Bush ra...@psg.com
To: NANOG Operators' Group nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, 8 March, 2011 2:24:15 AM
Subject: the largest deployment of v6 in japan
http://avexnet.or.jp/v6/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V6_%28band%29
+1
They know the challenges, aware of the issues and I have seen some progress.
- Original Message -
From: Steve Atkins st...@blighty.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, 23 March, 2011 9:56:20 AM
Subject: Re: SORBS contact?
On Mar 22, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Mike wrote:
On 03/22/2011
- Original Message -
From: Roland Dobbins rdobb...@arbor.net
To: nanog group nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Friday, 25 March, 2011 9:33:27 AM
Subject: Re: The state-level attack on the SSL CA security model
On Mar 24, 2011, at 6:41 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
Disclosure devalues
On 3/26/11 15:36 , Joe Sniderman joseph.snider...@thoroquel.org wrote:
On 03/25/2011 11:12 PM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
On Mar 25, 2011, at 12:19 52PM, Akyol, Bora A wrote:
One could argue that you could try something like the facebook
model (or facebook itself). I can see it coming.
And then you can have lens effects, where the waves reflections on the
coast, focus unto a point on the coastline.
On 3/28/11 14:34 , Scott Howard sc...@doc.net.au wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 6:28 PM, andrew.wallace
andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:59 AM,
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
