- Original Message -
> From: "Doug Barton"
> To: "Franck Martin"
> Cc: "Joe Abley" , nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Friday, 30 July, 2010 3:49:04 PM
> Subject: Re: Web expert on his 'catastrophe' key for the internet
> On 07/29
If it is a business, then accurate address does not seem to me an issue, if it
is a private address, I think a bit of fuzziness is helpful
- Original Message -
From: "ML"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, 4 August, 2010 11:07:47 AM
Subject: Question of privacy with reassigned resource
Nice to see this change
APAC has been obliged to pay the cost to peer with the US (long distance links
are expensive). Now that US wants to peer with Asia, pricing may become more
balanced...
- Original Message -
From: "David Ulevitch"
To: na...@merit.edu
Sent: Thursday, 12 August,
ss to the AP market at better cost?
- Original Message -
From: "Benson Schliesser"
To: "Joel Jaeggli" , "Franck Martin" ,
"nanog"
Sent: Thursday, 12 August, 2010 9:03:34 AM
Subject: Re: Cost of transit and options in APAC
On 11 Aug 10, at 2:53 PM
+10
Once you pass a threshold of affordability (by breaking the monopoly), then the
network use explodes and other issues can be worked out by more or less by
consumer pressure (and economies of scale)... You need to reach "Packet Storm"
level.
- Original Message -
From: "Patrick W. Gi
It always amaze me how the word de-regulated is so misused.
When there is a monopoly the regulation is in fact very very light: Acme co is
the monopoly and government cash in dividends/license fees and just check they
don't do anything really silly.
When there is competition this is when you ha
Funny!
On one hand people talk about ARIN providing IP allocation at nearly zero cost
and on the other hand talking that ARIN goes after companies that use their
allocation for abuse (which has a non trivial cost and potential expensive
lawsuits)...
Do you know what you want?
I have the feeling that the systems is not able to understand at all IPv6 for
geolocation therefore default to "foreign".
I'm not aware of anyone providing IPv6 geolocation at the moment? Anyone has
pointers?
- Original Message -
From: "Harry Strongburg"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Monda
I'm trying to debug a pesky PMTUD issue with IPv6 on Mac OS-X 10.6.
It happens only from home, on wireless, when connected to a mac aiport that
does an automatic tunnel (teredo) to IPv6 backbone. There are IPv6 web site
that I cannot browse until I lower the MTU to 1400. My Linux desktop in sim
What puzzles me, is that my linux machine on same network has no issues...
- Original Message -
From: "Jeroen Massar"
To: "Franck Martin"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, 21 August, 2010 9:34:23 AM
Subject: Re: IPv6 PMTUD and OS-X
On 2010-08-20 23:27, Franck
These are good news.
However, if Comcast provides native IPv6 to their customers, then the IPv6
native customers don't need these 6to4 relays?
Airport Extreme, Linksys and other user equipment, enable IPv6 by doing 6to4
tunnels, so what this press release says, is that there are many users who
As the 6to4 is an "default" option on Apple Airport Extreme to enable ipv6, I
would have thought that Apple would have provided a few gateways? Same for
Microsoft that has it in its OS?
Reminds me of the ntp servers issue built in on some devices...
Is there a list of 6to4 relays?
I'm curious.
Also, I'm also curious to know if ISPs in Europe (which are more advanced in
IPv6 deployment) have experienced the same issues?
found it:
http://www.bgpmon.net/6to4.php?week=4
Not what I call a big list, considering...
- Original Message -
From: "Franck Martin"
To: "John Jason Brzozowski"
Cc: "NANOG"
Sent: Tuesday, 31 August, 2010 9:21:58 AM
Subject: Re: Comcast enables 6to4 r
be a very good troubleshooting tool (once you know what
to do) and wish it would be on all OS, like traceroute and now tracepath is...
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Bates"
To: "Franck Martin"
Cc: "John Jason Brzozowski" , "NANOG"
Sent: Tu
Yes this is the list of visible relays as seen from the BGP backbone
monitoring...
If you don't offer your relays to the rest of the world, they won't show up
there...
- Original Message -
From: "John Jason Brzozowski"
To: "Franck Martin"
Cc: "NAN
nly one with this kind of troubles, I suspect most
just give up immediately...
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Bates"
To: "Franck Martin"
Cc: "John Jason Brzozowski" , "NANOG"
Sent: Tuesday, 31 August, 2010 10:14:39 AM
Subject: Re: Comcast enables
I think this http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nsp/ipv6/13537
may answer some of the questions on how to make it work correctly.
I like the fact the 6to4 gateway should be on a separate machine that BGP with
the main router. If the gateway dies, the routes are withdrawn and clients go
and l
Way to go! more! more! ;)
- Original Message -
From: "John Jason Brzozowski"
To: "NANOG"
Sent: Tuesday, 31 August, 2010 6:18:21 PM
Subject: UPDATED - Comcast enables 6to4 relays
Enabled two more 6to4 relays this morning. :)
John
- Original Message -
> From: "Mark Smith"
>
> To: "Simon Leinen"
> Cc: "Brzozowski" , "NANOG"
> , John
> Sent: Thursday, 2 September, 2010 9:50:28 AM
> Subject: Re: ICMPv6 rate limits breaking PMTUD (and traceroute) [Re: Comcast
> enables 6to4 relays]
> On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 23:18:55 +
Blocking outbound port 25 in certain conditions (mainly anything with a dynamic
IPv4), is a recommended practice from MAAWG.org and others, they have a few
useful documents for ISPs to deal with their network.
- Original Message -
From: "Owen DeLong"
To: "Zhiyun Qian"
Cc: "NANOG list"
Have you heard of the submission port?
Why Clients of an hotel would run a MTA anyhow?
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Bates"
To: "NANOG list"
Sent: Friday, 3 September, 2010 4:08:54 PM
Subject: Re: ISP port blocking practice
Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
>> We should be seeking to stop d
I asked around and got this presentation, but you can search for OP25B too:
http://www.anacom.pt/streaming/Honda.pdf?contentId=988141&field=ATTACHED_FILE
Some non-anecdotal data about the effectiveness of blocking port 25.
In many countries, the presence of bots consume a non-trivial amount of
bandwidth. In developing countries, this is a non trivial amount of $$$
(http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/10/09/05/1620212/UN-Tech-Group-Finds-Most-Expensive-Broadband)
Blocking port 25 allows to help identify which hosts ar
- Original Message -
> From: "Owen DeLong"
> To: "Jon Lewis"
> Cc: "NANOG list"
> Sent: Monday, 6 September, 2010 3:06:29 PM
> Subject: Re: ISP port blocking practice
> On Sep 5, 2010, at 6:18 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 5 Sep 2010, Claudio Lapidus wrote:
> >
> >>> If I block p
As for online experience, any action game with players 200ms away from each
others, is not really playable.
By the time you aim, shoot, and the info register on the server and other user
player PC, it has moved far away from the shot...
This is not what the Team Cymru Bogons list for?
http://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Bogons/
List bad ASNs after proper investigation?
It then depends if you trust Team Cymru or not, like you would trust or not
Spamhaus...
- Original Message -
From: "Heath Jones"
To: "Robert Bonomi"
C
-
From: "Heath Jones"
To: "Franck Martin"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, 29 September, 2010 5:22:02 PM
Subject: Re: AS11296 -- Hijacked?
> This is not what the Team Cymru Bogons list for?
> http://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Bogons/
I just had a very quic
Because the path was broken everytime the bgp session was established and
rewriting the routing table with more specific routes?
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Bush"
To: "North American Network Operators Group"
Sent: Thursday, 30 September, 2010 2:37:43 PM
Subject: Re: BGP next-hop
A yearly challenge response for legacy space contacts, could be useful. I think
there is a plan like this in some RIRs
- Original Message -
From: "Owen DeLong"
To: "George Bonser"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Friday, 1 October, 2010 4:03:56 PM
Subject: Re: ARIN Fraud Reporting Form ... Don
How long do you keep a router in production?
What is your cycle for replacement of equipment?
For a PC, you usually depreciate it over 3 years, and can make it last 5 years,
but then you are stretching the functionality, especially if you upgrade the
OS, tho it is not uncommon to see companie
feel that routing/network appliance equipment have a life cycle similar to
a PC, despite the fact as someone pointed out, they will run fine for many many
years.
- Original Message -
From: "Heath Jones"
To: "Franck Martin"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, 2 October
From: "Brandon Kim"
To: fra...@genius.com, nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Saturday, 2 October, 2010 6:22:27 PM
Subject: RE: router lifetime
Well a lot of routers even 3 years ago support IPv6. You can dual-stack pretty
much any router today if you have
the right IOS. But I do understand your con
Do like the Chinese if you want a feature put out a billion dollar
tender with the feature mandatory and they will rush to do it
Toute connaissance est une réponse à une question
On 5/04/2010, at 14:48, Christopher Morrow
wrote:
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 7:41 PM, joel jaeggli wrote:
On 4/
- "Valdis Kletnieks" wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Apr 2010 17:26:53 EDT, "Patrick W. Gilmore" said:
> > I'm 3COM, I made ISA 10Base2 / 10Base5 cards in the 90s. I run out
> of
> > MAC addresses. Instead of going to get more - if I even can! - I
> > recycle those MAC addresses
>
> There were severa
- Original Message -
> From: "Paul Graydon"
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Friday, 4 February, 2011 8:39:09 AM
> Subject: Re: External sanity checks
> On 02/03/2011 08:04 AM, Philip Lavine wrote:
> > To all,
> >
> > Does any one know a Vendor (NOT Keynote) that can do sanity checks
> > aga
The biggest complaint that I hear from ISPs, is that their upstream ISP does
not support IPv6 or will not provide them with a native IPv6 circuit.
Is that bull?
I thought the whole backbone is IPv6 now, and it is only the residential ISPs
that are still figuring it out because CPE are still n
Any relation?
http://mobile.slashdot.org/story/11/02/04/0043234/Verizon-To-Throttle-High-Bandwidth-Users
- Original Message -
From: "Joly MacFie"
To: "North American Network Operators Group"
Sent: Friday, 4 February, 2011 4:30:27 PM
Subject: Fwd: You Tube Problems
This was recently pos
This is dual stack, my recommendation is disable IPv6 on your servers (so your
clients will still talk to them on IPv4 only), and let your client goes IPv6
first. Once you understand what is happening, get on IPv6 on your servers.
Alternatively, use someone else network to understand IPv6. Atten
You missed the IPv6 hour at Nanog42:
http://www.civil-tongue.net/grandx/wiki/nanog42
https://wiki.tools.isoc.org/IETF71_IPv4_Outage
May be another one is needed?
- Original Message -
From: "Mike Lyon"
To: "Jack Bates"
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 10 February, 2011 7:30:55 AM
Sub
eople that develop your applications and configure the servers,
get them to be familiar with it, give them a sandbox, and then when everyone
stop to run like headless chicken, plan your transition.
- Original Message -
From: "William Herrin"
To: "Franck Martin"
Cc:
- Original Message -
> From: "Jason Bertoch"
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Thursday, 10 February, 2011 9:09:16 AM
> Subject: Re: Looking for an IPv6 naysayer...
> On 2011/02/09 2:44 PM, Jens Link wrote:
> No, IPv6 rollout is going to be extremely expensive and will likely
> put
> a numb
Looking at the recent exchange on the list re IPv6, it seems we are in the
"whose fault is it?"
• Denial (this isn't happening to me!)
• Anger (why is this happening to me ?)
• Bargaining (I promise I'll be a better person if ...)
• Depression (I don't care anymore)
• Acc
I like that tool: http://bgp.he.net/AS55327
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Bates"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thursday, 10 February, 2011 3:41:41 PM
Subject: Re: Is your ASN advertising v6 prefixes?
On 2/9/2011 8:21 PM, Fred Richards wrote:
> Mine is.
> Well?
>
http://www.cidr-report.org
- Original Message -
> From: "Charles N Wyble"
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Thursday, 10 February, 2011 3:57:23 PM
> Subject: Re: IPv6 status
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/09/2011 06:35 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
> &g
http://www.marketingvox.com/under-the-microscope-what-the-end-of-ipv4-means-for-marketers-048657/
I can hear people, say oh no
Interesting to see that marketers do not like CGNAT.
- Original Message -
> From: "Fred Baker"
> To: "Franck Martin"
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Saturday, 12 February, 2011 9:43:56 AM
> Subject: Re: IPv6 is on the marketers radar
> On Feb 11, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
>
- Original Message -
> From: "George Bonser"
> To: "Franck Martin" , "Fred Baker"
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Saturday, 12 February, 2011 10:31:42 AM
> Subject: RE: IPv6 is on the marketers radar
> > > They missed an importa
- Original Message -
> From: "Michael Dillon"
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Monday, 14 February, 2011 10:37:51 AM
> Subject: Re: IPv6 is on the marketers radar
> > It's bad that home gateways need replacing
>
> It's not neccessarily bad. There are a lot of older devices out there
> and
- Original Message -
> From: "Martin Millnert"
> To: "Marshall Eubanks"
> Cc: "North American Network Operators Group"
> Sent: Thursday, 17 February, 2011 8:28:22 AM
> Subject: Re: NYTimes: Egypt Leaders Found ‘Off’ Switch for Internet
> On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 9:09 AM, Marshall Eubank
- Original Message -
> From: "Joe Abley"
> To: "Doug Barton"
> Cc: "John Curran" , "NANOG"
> Sent: Thursday, 17 February, 2011 12:05:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [arin-announce] IN-ADDR.ARPA Zone Transfer Complete
> On 2011-02-16, at 17:33, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> > 2. Is there any objection t
- Original Message -
> From: "Randy Bush"
> To: "Fred Baker"
> Cc: "Franck Martin" , "North American Network Operators
> Group"
> Sent: Thursday, 17 February, 2011 2:37:02 PM
> Subject: Re: Local root zone (Was NYTimes: Egy
http://www.jetcafe.org/~npc/isp/large.html
If you take the 5 top US ISPs and get them to do dual stack IPv6, that's 50
million subscribers in the US only.
I think google and others will notice some serious traffic happening.
It took a market share of 10 to 20% of Mozilla for web developers to g
- Original Message -
> From: "Scott Helms"
> To: nanog@nanog.org
> Sent: Saturday, 19 February, 2011 8:07:54 AM
> Subject: Re: [arin-ppml] NAT444 rumors (was Re: Looking for an
> IPv6naysayer...)
> On 2/18/2011 1:53 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
> &g
You have products like a cell on wheels. A container containing a phone switch
and a mobile cell, easily installable. You place it at the center of the
disaster zone and all mobile phones start to work...
if you are worried about congestion, then only the "right" sims are
registered/enabled.
-
Yes I don't understand why we need DHCPv6, true RD did not have DNS information
to pass, but that is fixed, no?
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Palmer"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sunday, 27 February, 2011 4:06:29 PM
Subject: Re: Mac OS X 10.7, still no DHCPv6
On Sun, Feb 27, 2011 at
don't care between RD and DHCPv6, what I care, is that they should
be able to do their job correctly on their own.
- Original Message -
From: "Owen DeLong"
To: "Franck Martin"
Cc: "Matthew Palmer" , nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sunday, 27 February, 2011 6:
Don't forget there is no commission for the salesperson to enable IPv6 for you,
so definitively they are not interested and you asking them to deal with the
issue, will just lower their pay at the end of the month because they could not
use this valuable time to find customers with commissions..
- Original Message -
> From: "Jeroen Massar"
> To: "Franck Martin"
> Cc: "George Bonser" , "NANOG list"
> Sent: Tuesday, 1 March, 2011 1:41:45 PM
> Subject: Re: IPv6? Why, you are the first one to ask for it!
> On 2011-03-0
But do they route?
- Original Message -
From: "Randy Bush"
To: "NANOG Operators' Group"
Sent: Tuesday, 8 March, 2011 2:24:15 AM
Subject: the largest deployment of v6 in japan
http://avexnet.or.jp/v6/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/V6_%28band%29
+1
They know the challenges, aware of the issues and I have seen some progress.
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Atkins"
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, 23 March, 2011 9:56:20 AM
Subject: Re: SORBS contact?
On Mar 22, 2011, at 12:21 PM, Mike wrote:
> On 03/22/2011 12:14 PM, Paul
- Original Message -
> From: "Roland Dobbins"
> To: "nanog group"
> Sent: Friday, 25 March, 2011 9:33:27 AM
> Subject: Re: The state-level attack on the SSL CA security model
> On Mar 24, 2011, at 6:41 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> > Disclosure devalues information.
>
>
> I think th
On 3/26/11 15:36 , "Joe Sniderman" wrote:
>On 03/25/2011 11:12 PM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 25, 2011, at 12:19 52PM, Akyol, Bora A wrote:
>>
>>> One could argue that you could try something like the facebook
>>> model (or facebook itself). I can see it coming. Facebook web of
>>> t
And then you can have lens effects, where the waves reflections on the
coast, focus unto a point on the coastline.
On 3/28/11 14:34 , "Scott Howard" wrote:
>On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 6:28 PM, andrew.wallace <
>andrew.wall...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 1:59 AM, wrote:
>>
On 3/29/11 10:18 , "Wil Schultz" wrote:
>I'm attempting to find out information on the SEO implications of testing
>ipv6 out.
>
>
>3) ??? Any others that I haven't thought of ???
>
>So basically I'd love to set up some sites for ipv6.domain.com via 6to4
>as a phase one, and at some point in the
Well, you don't need to wait for .xxx you have things like
http://www.radio.co.ck/
On 3/30/11 3:25 , "Tony Finch" wrote:
>George Bonser wrote:
>>
>> What bothers me is that most companies are now going to be forced to
>> purchase .xxx domains simply to keep someone else from buying it and
>> su
Or http://www.budget.co.ck/ ..
On 3/30/11 3:25 , "Tony Finch" wrote:
>George Bonser wrote:
>>
>> What bothers me is that most companies are now going to be forced to
>> purchase .xxx domains simply to keep someone else from buying it and
>> sullying the company's image.
>
>Who is forcing them?
On 3/31/11 11:55 , "Wil Schultz" wrote:
>
>
>On Mar 30, 2011, at 4:39 PM, Alexander Harrowell
>wrote:
>
>> On Tuesday 29 Mar 2011 17:54:27 Wil Schultz wrote:
>>> On Mar 29, 2011, at 3:51 AM, Franck Martin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> A
Also remember, you would be serving Australia only from Australia. if I'm
not mistaken, the Australia backbone is more or less volume based
cahrged...
http://www.aarnet.edu.au/services/aarnet-charging.aspx
"AARNet3 charges are different for Shareholders (Members) and for Non
Shareholders (Associat
Don't forget the use for 911 type services.
On 4/12/11 8:10 , "Jeroen van Aart" wrote:
>http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20336-internet-probe-can-track-you-d
>own-to-within-690-metres.html
>"The new method zooms in through three stages to locate a target
>computer. The first stage measures
Recently, Microsoft Australia has been refused a temp allocation (like
they had every year) for one of their conferences.
On 4/15/11 9:01 , "Iljitsch van Beijnum" wrote:
>On 14 apr 2011, at 13:02, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>
>> Based on that file, APNIC still has 17.57 million regular + 2.27 M
What is the DKIM check result for those messages?
May be time to get nanog mailing list DKIM aware?
On 4/22/11 13:24 , "Bill Blackford" wrote:
>I've recently observed gmail dropping messages or not forwarding all
>messages/posts from the nanog list. This is rather annoying.
>
>Has anyone else
On 4/23/11 10:41 , "Alex Brooks" wrote:
>On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Franck Martin
>wrote:
>> What is the DKIM check result for those messages?
>
>Non existent, it's SPF only.
My point.
>
>This is what GMail sees:
>
>Received: fr
On 4/23/11 11:24 , "Lynda" wrote:
>On 4/22/2011 4:01 PM, Franck Martin wrote:
>>
>> On 4/23/11 10:41 , "Alex Brooks" wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:44 PM, Franck Martin
>>> wrote:
>>>> What is the DKIM check r
Zabbix allows to acknowledge events with a comment.
On 4/25/11 22:47 , "Payam Poursaied" wrote:
>Hi all
>May I have your recommendation regarding any outage management software
>and NOC log book(preferably open source) .
>I want to get fresh ideas about available software in this area.
>
>The b
http://help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/ipv6/general/ipv6-05.html
"Will IPv6 become a permanent change on June 8, 2011?
No. World IPv6 day is a 24-hour trial period in which we will publish our
content on both the IPv4 and IPv6 servers. Yahoo! is participating in order to
help prepare our services (as w
I think the yahoo test should just differentiate between no IPv6 and IPv6
is slow (test between 3s and 10s). Like:
We have detected that you have IPv6 and will be able to access our site on
IPv6 day, but your user experience may not be as good as with IPv4, you
may consider disabling IPv6.
http://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics/
Something is happening...
On 6/2/11 21:34 , "Hank Nussbacher" wrote:
>On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Cameron Byrne wrote:
>
>In that case can anyone explain why the number of IPv4 *only* systems is
>increasing rather than decreasing:
>http://server8.test-ipv6
This is quite a nice write up by a colleague of mine:
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/build-your-own-anycast-network-9-steps-samir-jafferali
Done.
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 2:48 PM, Irwin, Kevin
wrote:
> Hello, if there is anyone from LinkedIn on the board, can you please
> contact me offline?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kevin Irwin
> Network Engineer – Core Network Engineering
> Cincinnati Bell Telephone
>
> "It has been my observation that most
I think the next requirement for iOS apps: "We ran your app on an IPv6 only
network and it did not work. Your submission to the Apple store is
therefore denied."
You have dmarcian, returnpath and agari to process reports.
https://dmarcian.com/dmarc-status/
Will give you an idea who send aggregate reports. To state the obvious,
they will send you a report only if you send them email.
Allow 24 to 48 hours to get your first reports, if you don't get any, ch
101 - 182 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
