It is really nice that folks where able to put records on their
websites for only 24 hours, but they forgot to put in the glue on their
nameservers.
As such, for the folks testing IPv6-only, a lot of sites will fail
unless they use a recursor that does the IPv4 for them.
The root is there,
On 2011-Jun-08 13:40, Jamie Bowden wrote:
Thanks to HE's tunnel broker service, I've got fully functional dual
stack at home (well, mostly, like most folks, VZ gives me a single
address and I live behind that with NATv4, but otherwise, I loves me
some FiOS) and yesterday went by for me without
On 2011-Jun-08 16:09, Owen DeLong wrote:
[..]
World IPv6 day is today. It started at UTC June 8 and goes to
just before UTC June 9. As I write this, there are approximately
10 hours remaining in world IPv6 day.
I think it is quite obvious that nothing serious broke anywhere ;)
(read:
On 2011-Jun-08 17:26, STARNES, CURTIS wrote:
Typical long trip via a sixxs.net tunnel. Unlike Hurricane Electric
(tunnelbroker.net), Sixxs has no US peering that I know of so
everything has to hit overseas before returning back.
psst.. there is no such thing as SixXS peering.
Each PoP
On 2011-Jun-09 10:39, Saku Ytti wrote:
On (2011-06-09 00:55 -0700), Owen DeLong wrote:
To be an IPv6 TIer 1, one has to peer with other IPv6 Tier 1s. HE has
aggressively tried to improve the situation through promiscuous peering
in every way possible. If you are interested in peering with HE
On 2011-Jun-10 02:18, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Richard A Steenbergen r...@e-gerbil.net
wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 06:26:01PM -0500, Jimmy Hess wrote:
You seem to have missed it, so I will say again: IPv6 is not IPv4.
First you seem to have missed the point
On 2011-07-10 17:56 , David Miller wrote:
[..]
+1
The lack of will on the part of the IETF to attract input from and involve
operators in their processes (which I would posit is a critical element in
the process).
Eh ANYBODY, including you, can sign up to the IETF mailing lists and
I am fairly sure that the fake Western Union message and various other
spams that are dripping through are from real subscribers...
Also, as somebody decided to drop mailman and replace it by 'bulk_mailer
v1.13' maybe one should start fixing that software also to add the
List-* headers aka RF2369
On 2011-07-12 15:59 , Michael K. Smith - Adhost wrote:
Hello All:
We're back on the old configuration for now. I will send an update later
this afternoon once I speak with AMS about the issues we experienced over
night.
What is the reason for dropping mailman btw?
The IETF, which is also
On 2011-07-13 23:08 , Larry Stites wrote:
Given what you know now, if you were 21 and just starting into networking /
communications industry which areas of study or specialty would you
prioritize?
Google.
Greets,
Jeroen
On 2011-07-23 17:44 , Paul Ebersman wrote:
ryan We keep running into problem with our IPv6 roll out. I just
ryan confirmed today that Exchange does not fully support IPv6
[...]
ryan Yes sorry Exchange 2010 - OCS, Lync, Exchange UM - these require
ryan IPv4
It's a hack (but all ipv6
On 2011-07-26 16:58 , JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
Hi all,
I will like to know, from those deploying IPv6 services to residential
customers, if you are planning to provide static or dynamic IPv6 prefixes.
Just to be clear, I'm for static prefix delegation to residential
customers, however
On 2011-07-27 03:25 , Scott Weeks wrote:
matt.addi...@lists.evilgeni.us wrote: -
[..] 1: http://panopticlick.eff.org/
All you need to do with what that site says is write a sh script that
deletes and then creates the same user.
And there you sprung into a trap.
On 2011-07-27 20:27 , Scott Weeks wrote:
--- jer...@unfix.org wrote:
From: Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org
On 2011-07-27 03:25 , Scott Weeks wrote:
matt.addi...@lists.evilgeni.us wrote: -
[..] 1: http://panopticlick.eff.org/
All you need to do with what
On 2011-08-09 20:47 , Joe Pruett wrote:
as i'm rolling v6 into my world, i'm not sure which way to go with
reverse dns conventions. for forward i'm doing things like:
foo.example.coma1.1.1.1
foo.example.com1000::1.1.1.1
foo.v4.example.coma1.1.1.1
On 2011-08-10 15:02 , Owen DeLong wrote:
[..]
Why do I want my appliance network's multicast packets getting tossed
around on the guest wireless?
Even wikipedia knows the answer to that:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IGMP_snooping
which is the first hit for IGMP snooping, which is generally a
On 2011-08-13 16:53 , John Levine wrote:
Backups remain a tricky problem to get right.
Yeah. I've been using external USB terabyte disks, which work OK but
are irritatingly flaky.
I keep thinking that this is what tape is for, but every time I look
at AIT or LTO tapes and jukeboxes, they
On 2011-09-12 17:40 , Always Learning wrote:
Dear person who is to scared to setup a regular email account in his own
full name.
[..]
The Internet was created in North America. Many people around the world
would appreciate your help in getting ARIN to revert to normal WHOIS
displays. ARIN
And to end this thread as this effectively ends Diginotar troubles for
the Interwebz:
Dutch official statement:
http://www.opta.nl/nl/actueel/alle-publicaties/publicatie/?id=3469
English Summary OPTA revokes Diginotar License as TTP:
On 2013-05-25 14:09, James Bensley wrote:
Hello everyone,
I am performing some research on networking at present and want the
input of the community and industry at large. I have created a small
on-line survey and would be very grateful to anyone that could give 3
minutes to fill it out.
On 2013-06-07 06:50, Dan White wrote:
[..]
A nice 'it is Friday' kind of thought
OpenPGP and other end-to-end protocols protect against all nefarious
actors, including state entities.
If you can't trust the entities where your data is flowing through
because you are unsure if and where
On 2013-06-13 13:01, david peahi wrote:
Apologies for making what could be construed as an off topic, political
comment, but doesn't everyone in the USA know by now that the PRC
represents a dagger aimed at the economic and national security of America?
A military invasion in slow motion as it
On 2013-06-13 14:28, david peahi wrote:
Last I heard NANOG stands for North American Network Operators Group.
Anti-American comments are not welcome here..
(IMHO there was nothing 'anti-american' about my statement, though I
guess it completely depends on what the definition of that would be;
On 2013-06-19 12:14, Owen DeLong wrote:
You are, of course, free to criticize as you wish, but ideally, you
should at least direct your criticism at those responsible.
Indeed, you should point out the simple fact that anybody with a budget
can simply buy their time to sound like they belong
[several replies in one (hence cc's) to not clutter the list with
non-really-nanog stuff, but it kinda deserves a reply, reply-to set to
where these things should be going in the first place]
[TLDR: contact = i...@sixxs.net, mail queue is long, human time is
limited, if you have lots of users
On 2013-07-02 16:51 , Steven Bellovin wrote:
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/07/ipmi/
Capsule summary: watch out!
Indeed! But it is should be logical, as IPMI is supposed to be for OOB
access right? :)
Anybody not putting them behind a properly restricted firewall and/or
VLAN is asking
On 2013-07-02 17:54 , Jamie Bowden wrote:
From: Jeroen Massar [mailto:jer...@massar.ch]
On 2013-07-02 16:51 , Steven Bellovin wrote:
http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/07/ipmi/
Capsule summary: watch out!
Indeed! But it is should be logical, as IPMI is supposed to be for OOB
access
On 2013-09-23 15:41 , Glen Kent wrote:
BTW Linux distributions are available to download via bittorrent,
I am very sure that you will be happy to see your customer's UPSTREAM
links filled with that traffic... next to you having a shiny CDN and
then having to do traffic to ISPs who do not have
On 2013-11-12 16:58, Jonas Björklund wrote:
Hello,
We got often abuse reports on hosts that has been involved in DDOS attacks.
We contact the owner of the host help them fix the problem.
I also would like to start send these abuse report to the ISP of the
source.
Are there any
On 2013-12-18 17:11 , Cliff Bowles wrote:
I accidentally sent this to nanog-request yesterday. I could use some
feedback from anyone that can help, please.
Question: will carriers accept IPv6 advertisements smaller than /48?
Our org was approved a /36 based on number of locations.
In GRH
On 2013-12-25 00:16, Sam Moats wrote:
Hello Nanog community,
I would like to enlist your help with understanding this latency I'm
seeing.
You are likely seeing the effects of asymmetric routing.
[..]
Tracing route to xxx.yyy.ie [193.1.x.x]
www.heanet.ie by chance? :)
Though you could use
For everybody who wants to dabble in politics that people on this list
actually care about ;)
Greets,
Jeroen
Original Message
Subject:Deadline TOMORROW to Apply to Represent the Technical
Community at the Brazil Meeting and in 1Net
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2014 16:04:01
On 2014-01-16 23:11, Nick Hilliard wrote:
On 16/01/2014 21:22, Jon Lewis wrote:
Also, at least of the ones I've dealt with, there is no verification of
records as they're entered.
on the RIPE IRRDB, there is validation, so you can't just go in and
register route: objects for someone else's
On 2014-03-24 13:49, greg whynott wrote:
[..]
4 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 58.229.66.9
5 2 ms 1 ms 1 ms 58.229.66.105
6 7 ms 5 ms 3 ms 58.229.119.149
Seems you mean 58 instead of 59.
Greets,
Jeroen
On 2014-04-24 10:29 , Michael DeMan wrote:
Hi All,
Sorry being a bit off-topic and having a boring subject, but we really should
clean up whatever has been going on with so much spam hitting this mailing
list.
NO - I am complaining about people who post things I disagree with or on
On 2014-04-25 15:23 , Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
[..]
While it is probably true that the gov't had a hand in the fact I
have exactly one BB provider at my home, I am not even closed to
convinced that a purely open market would not have resulted in the
same problem. But thanx for pointing out an
On 2014-05-02 16:36, Matthew Galgoci wrote:
[..]
Is there anything else I've missed? A few folks here really seem to like
nfsen/nfdump.
For OSS that is pretty much it that really matters (maybe you could add
Argus if you really want though).
For a long long list, check out Simon Leinen's site:
On 2014-06-02 14:10, Randy Bush wrote:
so how to folk protect yet access ipmi? it is pretty vulnerable, so 99%
of the time i want it blocked off. but that other 1%, i want kvm
console, remote media, and dim sum.
currently, i just block the ip address chunk into which i put ipmi at
the
On 2014-06-02 14:23, Paul S. wrote:
[..]
On most ATEN chip based BMC boards from Supermicro, it includes a UI to
iptables that works in the same way.
You could put it on a public net, allow your stuff and DROP 0.0.0.0/0.
But unless you have servers with those, I think the best way to go is
On 2014-06-02 19:32, Nikolay Shopik wrote:
On 02/06/14 20:56, Christopher Morrow wrote:
so... as per usual:
1) embedded devices suck rocks
2) no updates or sanity expected anytime soon in same
3) protect yourself, or suffer the consequences
seems normal.
So I wonder why
On 2014-06-02 21:54, Brian Rak wrote:
On 6/2/2014 3:47 PM, shawn wilson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 3:19 PM, Nikolay Shopik sho...@inblock.ru wrote:
Java only used for mouting images. KVM is transfered via VNC protocol
iirc.
They're not re-inventing the wheel, but I think KVM is
On 2014-06-17 22:36, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
On 2014-06-17 22:13, David Conrad wrote:
On Jun 17, 2014, at 12:55 PM, Grzegorz Janoszka grzeg...@janoszka.pl
wrote:
There are still applications that break with subnet smaller than /64,
so all VPS providers probably have to use /64 addressing.
On 2014-06-17 23:48, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Jun 17, 2014, at 5:41 PM, Lee Howard l...@asgard.org wrote:
[..]
Can't tech news sites *please* run dual stack while they're
spouting end-of-IPv4 stories?
wishful thinking=on
I would love to see a few more properties do IPv6 by default, such as
On 2014-06-18 00:02, Matthew Petach wrote:
[..]
I tried to configure my FreeBSD box at home to
use a /120 subnet mask. It consistently crashed
with a kernel panic.
Where is the bug report?
I am fairly confident that that really should not be an issue, with the
BSD stack being one of the
On 2014-06-18 12:31, Grzegorz Janoszka wrote:
On 17/06/14 23:13 , Jeroen Massar wrote:
Thus, can you please identify these applications so that we can hammer
on the developers of those applications and fix that problem?
I haven't done extensive testing. I have just tried to divide a /64
On 2014-08-20 16:55, Ryan Shea wrote:
Just one man's experience, but my YouTube performance over my Hurricane
Electric tunnel has been strikingly poor lately
Instead of saying that something is poor, you might want to do the
operational/technical[1] thing and include things like:
- IPv4
On 2014-08-20 17:28, Ryan Shea wrote:
I was attempting to determine the lowest-time-cost path to happy wife.
Does your wife care it is IPv4 or IPv6 or just funny cat videos?
I think your answer should be clear from that perspective.
As somebody eager to post on NANOG though one would think it
On 2014-08-20 18:21, Ryan Shea wrote:
IRC is a good suggestion, thanks. They'll likely be helpful.
I see no indication of any throttling from my ISP - I can blast data at
full speed to my home from my server and work (with native v6
connections).
Does that path between your $home and
On 2014-09-20 16:18, Matthew Crocker wrote:
[..]
IOS (tm) GS Software (GSR-P-M), Version 12.0(30)S3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc2)
[..]
gsr8-1 uptime is 9 years, 9 weeks, 2 days, 8 hours, 39 minutes
Thank you for finally taking a vulnerable system of the Internet!
Greets,
Jeroen
Ignoring the fact that Akamai IPv6 is broken on random nodes, thus you
get either a working response or not from the same IP as some of the
nodes are borked and thus just hang the connection.. (could be pmtu,
hard to say without peeking inside the cluster) see amongst others:
On 2014-11-08 23:55, Pete Carah wrote:
[..]
Symptom with akamai is that it connects immediately then data transfer
times out.
With google, symptom involves both slow connection, and data transfer
timing out.
See amongst others:
https://forums.he.net/index.php?topic=3281.0
On 2014-11-09 23:00, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Jeroen Massar jer...@massar.ch wrote:
Google does not seem to be home.
Note that you skipped the rest:
Google does not seem to be home. They used to have a handy
i...@google.com address, but alas, that does
On 2014-11-10 09:10, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 12:51 AM, Jeroen Massar jer...@massar.ch wrote:
There used to be a handy ipv6@google address for reporting things. This
nowadays bounces.
yes, it changed to noc@ I think.
Thus, in case of an IPv6 issue, contacting n
MTU Flow-label (related to
draft-v6ops-pmtud-ecmp-problem-01)
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2014 11:31:52 +0100
From: Jeroen Massar jer...@massar.ch
Organization: Massar
To: i...@ietf.org, v6...@ietf.org
Hola folks (and folks in BCC ;),
With the recent Google and Akamai outages (latter still ongoing afaik
On 2014-11-10 15:20, Joe Greco wrote:
Hey,
VPN setup is not really a viable option (for us) in this scenario.
Honestly, I'd prefer to just call it done already and have a VPN but due to
certain restraints, we have to go down this route.
Without explaining the restraints, this kinda boils
On 2014-11-10 15:35, Rob Seastrom wrote:
While short and to the point, what Fletcher said is likely to be the
best advice in this thread.
Getting someone on staff who understands *both* outside plant
architecture and balance sheets... and can co-develop a business
model that involves the
On 2014-11-19 16:13, David Hubbard wrote:
We have some customers unable to access their websites, seeing this on
the way to them:
What would be the source and destination?
You got a nice routing loop there.
Greets,
Jeroen
On 2014-12-03 17:57, Max Tulyev wrote:
Hello!
Could someone advice a good contact inside Google?
n...@google.com is where this stuff has to go. They claim to read it (and
mostly they do in time).
I'm operating a IPv6 tunnel broker http://tb.netassist.ua/
Now there are a number of
On 2014-12-11 03:35, Jeroen van Aart wrote:
Grear – a paralegal – and her daughter claim the Xfinity hotspot is an
unauthorized intrusion into their private home, places a vast burden
on electricity bills, opens them up to attacks by hackers, and
degrades their bandwidth.
LibertyGlobal
On 2014-12-11 19:12, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 18:04:20 +, Livingood, Jason said:
Right, so user name password + MAC address. As more devices support
things like Passpoint, this will get more sophisticated.
OK, so it *does* do .1x authentication with the
On 2014-12-22 14:30, Song Li wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm searching for a list of IXPS which contains the information of the
ASN of the IXP. Some resources are good:
https://prefix.pch.net/applications/ixpdir/?show_active_only=0sort=trafficorder=desc
On 2014-12-22 15:45, Song Li wrote:
在 2014/12/22 22:26, Nick Hilliard 写道:
On 22/12/2014 13:50, Jeroen Massar wrote:
IXs themselves do not have ASNs, as they are Layer 2 providers.
most modern IXPs will have an ASN for their route server, and possibly a
separate asn for their mgmt
On 2014-12-24 19:27, Ken Chase wrote:
(mtr|lft|traceroute) xmas.futile.net
Welcome to the end of 2014.
If you are going to do a silly traceroute thing that has been done
thousands of times before, at least use this new fangled thing called:
IPv6
Here is the Wikipedia page for you to get
On 2015-04-08 13:31, Max Tulyev wrote:
We operate IPv6 tunnel broker tb.netassist.ua, so /48 from our /32 is
spread all around the world.
Google change geo of our WHOLE /32 from time to time to another cute
random place ;) One time Google decided we are in IRAN and block a lot
of content as
On 2019-03-26 08:56, Elmar K. Bins wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I hope this is only slightly off-topic...
>
> I'm looking for the correct address for AS112, 1...@root-servers.org
> keeps bouncing whatever I try.
>
> If anybody can drop me a line...much appreciated.
You can subscribe/post to:
On 2019-03-03 11:31, Mark Tinka wrote:
[..]
> Across the 6-in-4 tunnel, the tested MTU is 1,232 for IPv6.
IPv6 requires a minimum MTU of 1280.
If you cannot transport it, then the transport (the tunnel in this case) needs
to handle the fragmentation of packets of 1280 down to whatever does fit
On 2019-03-03 20:13, Mark Tinka wrote:
>
>
> On 3/Mar/19 18:05, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>
>> IPv6 requires a minimum MTU of 1280.
>>
>> If you cannot transport it, then the transport (the tunnel in this case)
>> needs to handle the fragmentation of packets o
On 2019-03-08 14:45, Brandon Martin wrote:
> On 3/8/19 8:38 AM, Saku Ytti wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>>> now for UDP, I don't know yet how does things like QUIC can be handled
>>> ...
>>
>> Unfortunately the magic answer you were hoping does not exist, what
>> they do is they just send smaller
On 2019-05-07 15:55, William Waites wrote:
> On 05/03, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>>
>> IPv6 is not a darknet, you won't find something hidden and unique there.
>
> The Dancing Kame, surely.
That Kame has been liberated and made available over IPv4 so long ago that the
On 2019-05-03 17:14, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to make a case (to old fuddy-duddies, which is why I even
> need to actually make a case) for IPv6 for my own selfish reasons. :-)
>
> I wonder if anyone has any references to interesting/useful/otherwise
> resources on are only
Hi Folks,
While in the US soon all Firefox users will *NOT* use your DNS Recursives
configured using DHCP anymore
(NXDOMAIN use-application-dns.net to avoid that[1]).
Next to that, it seems some of the root operators are now creating instances in
the same networks that offer these kind of
On 2019-09-18 12:24, Brian J. Murrell wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-09-18 at 09:15 +0200, Jeroen Massar wrote:
>> Hi Folks,
>
> Hi.
>
>> While in the US soon all Firefox users will *NOT* use your DNS
>> Recursives configured using DHCP anymore
>> (NXDOMAIN use
On 2019-10-01 10:08, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 09:55:54AM +0200,
> Jeroen Massar wrote
> a message of 26 lines which said:
>
>>> (Because this canary domain contradicts DoH's goals, by allowing
>>> the very party you don't trus
On 2019-10-01 09:38, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 11:56:33PM -0400,
> Brandon Martin wrote
> a message of 10 lines which said:
>
>> It's use-application-dns.net. NXDOMAIN it, and Mozilla (at least)
>> will go back to using your local DNS server list as per usual.
>
>
controlling the browser bad
for the Internet.
- Use a VPN if you do not trust your network provider.
- Use Tor if you really want 'privacy'.
On 2019-10-01 11:57, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 10:35:31AM +0200,
> Jeroen Massar wrote
> a message of 29 lines w
On 2019-10-01 15:22, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 01, 2019 at 12:11:32PM +0200,
> Jeroen Massar wrote
> a message of 101 lines which said:
>
>> - Using a centralized/forced-upon DNS service (be that over DoT/DoH
>> or even plain old Do53
>
> Yes,
On 2019-10-01 23:03, Damian Menscher wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 1:22 PM Jeroen Massar <mailto:jer...@massar.ch>> wrote:
>
> On 2019-10-01 21:38, Damian Menscher wrote:
>
> > Could someone provide a reference of Google saying they'll change the
>
On 2019-10-01 21:38, Damian Menscher wrote:
> Could someone provide a reference of Google saying they'll change the default
> nameserver? Without that, I think all of Jeroen's arguments fall apart?
While I stated:
>> Moving only your DNS to Cloudflare or Google does not solve the security
>>
On 2021-06-02 15:47, Bjørn Mork wrote:
Jeroen Massar via NANOG writes:
For many organisations DNSSEC is 'scary' and a burden as it feels
'fragile' for them.
For "many"? Can you name one that doesn't feel like that?
Large organisations with 24/7 NOC teams where at least a few
> On 20210601, at 15:15, Moritz Müller via NANOG wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> DANE for SMTP is not deployed on large scale. Together with researchers from
> Seoul National University, Virginia Tech and the University of Twente, we
> would like to understand which challenges operators face when
[
The kicker about DNSSEC is in the dnsviz links, enjoy ;)
TLDR: As long as the very big providers don't demand DNSSEC / DANE, why bother
as a small network (just, be prepared to deploy when it starts affecting spam
scoring or your search rankings), but small networks do benefit unlike the
On 2021-09-01 01:13, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
You just broke 99% of the smart television sets in people’s homes,
unfortunately.
If only everybody would not get a separate box, be that a AppleTV, a
Playstation, a XBox, Chromecast, ... or many other options.
Fun part being that it is
On 2021-08-29 23:29, Sean Donelan wrote:
Netblocks is reporting connectivity in New Orleans LA is at 72% of
normal as Hurricane Ida makes landfall.
https://twitter.com/netblocks/status/1432038858460442625
There are per-incident things, like the outages mailing list and
downdetector.com. And
> On 20210909, at 21:55, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
>> [..]
>> Awful lot of red spots even in the top 100. Hell, even amazon.com
>> isn't IPv6 yet. And the long tail is going to be the death of a thousand
>> cuts for the call center unless you have a way to deal with those sites.
>
> This
On 2021-09-10 18:27, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Sep 10, 2021, at 01:39 , Jeroen Massar wrote:
On 20210909, at 21:55, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
[..]
Awful lot of red spots even in the top 100. Hell, even amazon.com
isn't IPv6 yet. And the long tail is going to be the death of a thousand
> On 20210904, at 22:26, Grant Taylor via NANOG wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone have any recommendation for a viable IPv6 tunnel broker /
> provider in the U.S.A. /other/ /than/ Hurricane Electric?
SixXS shut down 4 years ago, to get ISPs to move their butts... as long as
there are tunnels,
On 2021-09-04 23:02, Ryan Hamel wrote:
Jeroen,
> You people keep on giving money to ISPs that are not providing the
service you want.
Not everyone has the luxury of picking their ISP,
But this list is NANOG Network Operators. We are the ISPs
and the common consumer doesn't know
> On 20210916, at 11:15, John Curran wrote:
>
> On 14 Sep 2021, at 3:46 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
>> ….
>> There is no evidence that any other design choices on the table at the time
>> would have gotten us transitioned any faster, and a lot of evidence and
>> analysis that the exact opposite
On 2021-10-19 13:39, Hank Nussbacher wrote:
Can anyone recommend a geo-location service with high city accuracy?
Maxmind, for most countries (broadband, which does move) is below 50%
accuracy (they claim 68% accuracy for USA cities):
On 2021-09-29 01:03, Tim Harman via NANOG wrote:
[..]
{11:58}~ ➭ dig @194.0.41.1 test.tk
; <<>> DiG 9.11.5-P4-5.1+deb10u5-Debian <<>> @194.0.41.1 test.tk
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
A traceroute with a source IP would be sooo
> On 20211027, at 09:26, Lukas Tribus wrote:
>
> On Wed, 27 Oct 2021 at 08:47, Mark Tinka wrote:
>>
>> On 10/27/21 01:58, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> my old DRL RP instances produce MRTG graphs etc of the CA
>>> fetching side, though nothing on the rpki-rtr side.
>>
>> Randy, I actually have an
> On 20220225, at 23:45, Matt Harris wrote:
>
> Hey folks,
> I'm looking at an ASN 394183 and I can't find any whois or other contact data.
First stop for info: bgp.tools!
https://bgp.tools/as/394183#whois
But yes, as others commented, looks like a ARIN-expired ASN... as long as one
pay
Hi Dan,
Hope the rest of the world is treating you decently!
There are a lot of bits and bobs that one has to get right for mail to flow,
amongst which:
- IP -> PTR lookup -> that hostname lookup, and match to IP again
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward-confirmed_reverse_DNS)
- SPF
-
> On 3 Apr 2022, at 00:29, Michael Thomas wrote:
>
>
> On 4/2/22 3:23 PM, Jeroen Massar via NANOG wrote:
>> Hi Dan,
>>
>> Hope the rest of the world is treating you decently!
>>
>> There are a lot of bits and bobs that one has to get right for mai
> On 19 Oct 2023, at 02:09, Justin Kilpatrick wrote:
>
> Our ipv6 subnet 2602::FBAD::/40 is
You likely mean 2602:FBAD::/40, as the one above is not a valid IPv6 address ;)
BGP wise it seems only 2602:fbad:8::/45 and 2602:fbad:10::/45 are announced as
per
> On 16 May 2023, at 06:46, Matthew Petach wrote:
> [..]
> I admit, I'm perhaps a little behind on the latest netflow whiz-bangs,
> but I've never seen a netflow record type that included HTTP cookies
> or PCAP data before.
Take your pick from the "latest" ~2009 IPFIX Information Elements:
201 - 296 of 296 matches
Mail list logo
