On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Octavio Alvarez
alvar...@alvarezp.ods.org wrote:
I wish my Debian mirror would just be the mirror.debian.net *service*
(not host), and the network could choose the best for me.
Try http.debian.net see: http://http.debian.net
-Jim P.
On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 11:00, Wade Peacock wade.peac...@sunwave.net wrote:
Greetings Brain Trust,
We have found ATT to be heavy handed with their email (spam) filtering.
Without warn all of our mail servers will be denied from delivering email to
their many domains (att.net, bellsouth.net,
2010/2/24 Alex H. Ryu r.hyuns...@ieee.org:
Today I jumped into one of our routers, and I found that 1.0.0.0/8 is
announced from AS237, which is MERIT.
IIRC, there was an email/wiki/announcement last month about 1/8
undergoing some testing soon.
-Jim P.
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 02:29, Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
That's funny, given that Mailman is the source of significant amounts
of backscatter.
Mailman is neither an MTA nor a MUA. Something before or after
Mailman is backscattering.
-Jim P.
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 10:53, Ken Gilmour ken.gilm...@gmail.com wrote:
So is this going to become like the great firewall of China
eventually? You can see in the letters that they are going to see how
it goes and then maybe start blocking more stuff if they are
successful. I can see a big
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 18:45, Simon Lyall si...@darkmere.gen.nz wrote:
The availability and operation of specific Internet site such as websites
and email services is off-topic unless:
(a) The problems are caused by network reachability rather than problems
at the site hosting the
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 18:04, Charles Wyble char...@thewybles.com wrote:
Seriously though I want to start some discussion around outside plant
protection. This isn't the middle of the ocean or desert after all.
I'll pipe in with this:
No amount of money can deter a determined entity. If there
On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 23:17, Joe Greco jgr...@ns.sol.net wrote:
Looking around Rockefeller Center generally isn't a crime.
Looking around where you're in my back yard and peeking in the windows
is, at a minimum, trespass, and if our local cops notice you doing it, you
can expect that you
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 13:26, JC Dill jcdill.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Many businesses could make out like a bandit if they don't have to
pay a penalty when they don't perform, but just give you your money back.
I'm curious, when traveling by car or by plane, do you often demand
imposition of
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 16:37, JC Dill jcdill.li...@gmail.com wrote:
When you have a confirmed reservation, airlines in the US and EU are
required to pay delayed boarding compensation when you are involuntarily
bumped, unless the reason is something completely outside their control
(such as
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 18:31, John Martinez jmarti...@zero11.com wrote:
So the most constructive answer that I received related to this thread
is that someone is using Comcast Ethernet services for $5.25/MB for a
500MB pipe.
I wonder how much 10MB synchronous would cost?
From:
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 02:44, Sharma, Kapeel
kapeel.sha...@mckesson.com wrote:
This is BS how narrow minded our providers are.
It is also BS how high the expectations are for the $$ spent. ;-)
-Jim P.
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 12:00, Steven King sk...@kingrst.com wrote:
I don't think the expectations are that high for the money spent. They
are promising a service for a particular price. They either deliver on
that service in a 100% working condition or its false advertising and
thus is not
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 20:00, Ted Cooper ml-nano...@elcsplace.com wrote:
As for how it ended up on the list ... I'd say that Ray Thom @ ATT may
have a compromised computer :P
FWIW, ATT employees don't use $n...@att.com email addresses, and ATT
customers have .net addrs.
-Jim P.
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 20:08, Suresh Ramasubramanian
ops.li...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 6:35 AM, Jim Popovitch jim...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 20:00, Ted Cooper ml-nano...@elcsplace.com wrote:
As for how it ended up on the list ... I'd say that Ray Thom @ ATT
Stop
the insanity.
(please)
On Thu, Jan 1, 2009 at 04:15, Simon Lockhart si...@slimey.org wrote:
On Wed Dec 31, 2008 at 04:53:57PM -0800, Wil Schultz wrote:
At which point my Solaris 10 v490's reboot in unison, lovely.
Anyone else see anything interesting?
I had a couple of Oracle servers (Solaris 10) reboot a couple
On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 17:17, Blake Pfankuch bpfank...@cpgreeley.com wrote:
It seems highly unlikely that a train derailment yesterday caused major
network issues today.
Have you ever seen cleanup efforts after a major accident. Cleanup
usually involves more backhoes, and other major
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 14:38, Nicolas Antoniello
nantonie...@antel.net.uy wrote:
How about US tourists in Chile trying to buy something with it's US
based credit card? :)
It just doesn't work.
-Jim P.
Coincidentally, this week I was asked to specify current and next-gen
equipment for a new network testbed at $DAYJOB. This lab would be
used to test software used to monitor large networks. Specifically I
need to setup an environment similar to that of large SPs, with
emphasis on MPLS, STP,
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 16:34, Steven M. Bellovin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HavenCo, which ran a datacenter on the nation of Sealand, is
no longer operating there:
Which is the same story for most (if not all) of these hype-driven
bullet-proof data centers.
I recall a .com CEO espousing the
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 18:52, Bill Woodcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Dean Anderson wrote:
A photo of Bill Woodcock's refused letter is at
http://www.av8.net/BillWoodcock.jpg
That's not a refused letter, that's a certified letter that hasn't yet
been mailed.
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 13:58, Chaim Rieger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
actually nobody has posted any info about this other than what you just
posted, no details/carrier/location etc.
Perhaps not on NANOG, but on the Outages list itself it was covered quite well.
On 21-June-2008, RLVaughn
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 09:06, Steven M. Bellovin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just no self-styled hockey moms, please...
You Maverick you. ;-)
-Jim P.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 10:40, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about moving the meta-nanog themes in this thread to
nanog-futures, instead of adding to the noise on the main list?
Because nobody reads it?
Try because nobody knows that NANOG has a website where you can
simple instructions to
It's in the email headers of every recent email from NANOG. ;-)
List-Unsubscribe: http://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog,
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hth,
-Jim P.
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 15:30, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do you unsubscribe from the list?
When I go to the
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 22:13, Jim Popovitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 21:06, Scott Weeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am hoping to confirm a short-duration prefix hijack of 72.234.0.0/15 (and
another of our
prefixes) by ASN 8997 (OJSC North-West Telecom in Russia
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 21:06, Scott Weeks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am hoping to confirm a short-duration prefix hijack of 72.234.0.0/15 (and
another of our
prefixes) by ASN 8997 (OJSC North-West Telecom in Russia) in using ASN 3267
(Russian Federal University Network) to advertise our
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 00:43, Hank Nussbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you running Skype? Have you become a supernode? There is now a
registry switch in 3.0 that allows you to disable supernode functionality.
No. Nothing is running on this host (my laptop) when initiating
etherape.
This is something has been bugging me lately Etherape is a Linux
tool that graphs packets arriving at your host, and shows paths of
connectivity. I captured the graphs, at the URL below, from my Linux
laptop connected to a Linksys wifi router that is hooked to a Comcast
cable modem. Why is
On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 19:14, Gadi Evron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008, Marc Sachs wrote:
Unless I'm mis-reading this (or perhaps GBLX read Kreb's story and said
good-bye to Atrivo/Intercage), it looks like they are no longer their
upstream:
On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Hank Nussbacher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wish Yahoo and Hotmail even had the ability of *reading* email via https:
http://www.interall.co.il/hotmail-yahoo-https.html
Hah! It was only a year ago that Yahoo even added SSL capabilities
for login. Six months
On Sun, Jul 6, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Nick Shank [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim,
ATM I have exchange set to dis-allow outbound mail
Hi Nick,
I (personally) don't think that is enough. If the box was rooted,
there could be bots (i.e. other processes) sending outbound email.
Those processes could be
On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Peter Beckman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let the search engines organize the web, not DNS.
OK, (assuming you believe that), why keep dns around. Why not go back
to just IP addrs and hosts files for those that need them.
-Jim P.
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 2:21 PM, Frank Bulk - iNAME [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FB The point is that those are able to create a valid rDNS entry likely
have more control of their infrastructure than those who don't. You must
admit, if you can't get a proper rDNS entry created for your domain,
Two years ago I posed the question here about the need for TLDs
(http://www.mcabee.org/lists/nanog/May-06/msg00110.html).
I summerizsed that companies IP (Intellectual Property) guidelines
would never allow domain.org to exist if they owned domain.com
(ibm.org vrs ibm.com).I felt that TLDs
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:24 PM, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
when was the last time you saw this prefix reachable?
i dont see anything announced from comcasts 73.0.0.0/8 allocation within the
past 2 weeks...
FYI: Internally within Comcast it does route:
$ mtr --report -c 1 73.0.0.1
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Martin Hannigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 10:35 PM, Jim Popovitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
18. po-10-ur01.burlington.nj.pan 0.0% 1 48.0 48.0 48.0 48.0 0.0
23 114 ms 122 ms 113 ms ge-0-1-ubr02
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 12:29 PM, Jason J. W. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm subscribed to both now. ;-) The advantage to the NANOG subject
header was obviously it was resilient to e-mail address changes for the
list. A nice attribute given e-mails now come in from both
nanog@nanog.org
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Jason J. W. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone else noticed that the [NANOG] prefix has been missing
intermittently from the list traffic over the last couple of days?
This was planned, and then announced approx 5 days ago. You are
subscribed to
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:35 PM, someone wrote:
Add me to the list of never-saw-that. In addition, I just checked the
nanog archives, and there isn't an announcement of that type in the
archives.
Below is the full email, with headers, from Monday. Hopefully it will
put this issue to rest
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 1:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps you are not that familiar with the world of Open Source,
Perhaps I am, perhaps you could have google'd my name. ;-) Perhaps I
run other mailinglists, perhaps I know Mailman intimately, as well as
blogging software. Perhaps I
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 6:19 PM, Sean Figgins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jim Popovitch wrote:
Some advice, once given to me by a NANOGer, is:
just use .procmailrc to change your headers as you see fit
Not everyone that reads NANOG runs their own mail servers, or have
access
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 4:57 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To echo an earlier comment, how much development work would be
involved in allowing list members to individually specify whether
they want:
Tags in the subject line,
Additional message footers,
Reply-to headers
Not as much as
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 9:01 AM, Dale Carstensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think Disney/ABC thinks they can get individual ISPs to pay them
to carry sports audio/video streams. I suppose that would be yet
another multicast stream method, assuming an ISP location had multiple
customers
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Keith O'Neill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am not sure why this is an issue. Someone asked a question about
multihoming and the way I see it if you don't want to respond to it or
don't want to read it than don't. Why does this have to be a major
issue. I
On Jan 29, 2008 12:58 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A general purpose host or firewall is NOTHING like a mail server.
There is no race condition in a mail server, because the server simply
waits until the DNS query is returned. No user is watching the mail
queue, if mail is
On Jan 25, 2008 12:17 PM, Tomas L. Byrnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've got a local peer with Cox for VPN users to co-lo. A VPN connection that
otherwise shows no issues just had their file transfer rate during a large
file transfer over the VPN go from 10Mbps to 43kbps, and stay there. This
On Wed, 2007-11-28 at 13:56 -0600, J Bacher wrote:
Absent an inability to have a private conversation as an admin, what do you
(all) suggest? An admin email to the list directed to that individual? Do
nothing, apply the three strikes you're out when applicable without any
notification?
On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 01:17 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:06:38 CST, J. Oquendo said:
In re: previous post
http://www.news.com/8301-10784_3-9823196-7.html
So much for self healing networks eh
Given that according to the link you provide, at some points,
On Fri, 2007-06-15 at 11:15 -0700, Scott Weeks wrote:
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:-
Members must do at least one of the following:
-Subscribe/post with your work email address
-Use your proper name in your email address
(i.e. Bob Smith [EMAIL
101 - 151 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
