On Dec 11, 2008, at 10:44 PM, Robert Tarrall wrote:
...
Yeah, it's those types that I'm hoping to locate as well... Google
and Akamai were immediately noticed by the test users, and have also
responded very quickly (thanks, guys), but ideally we'd like to be
proactive and get as many of these
of maintaining your ATO. It's up to your DAA as to whether
they want to use IPv6 prior to equipment being certified under the
DoD IPv6 Profile.
/John
John Curran
EVP, COO, CTO
ServerVault Corp
On Feb 10, 2009, at 4:30 PM, TJ wrote:
But that is my point - Do any of the compliance frameworks /
requirements /
audit standards today address IPv6, or detail how it could be
implemented in
such a fashion as to 'pass' an audit (including the in-house /
consultant-specific audit
/
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
Acting CEO
ARIN
.
B) Technical standards for NAT NAPT are the IETF's job, not
ARIN's.
C) We've routinely lowered fees since inception, not raised them.
Thanks,
/John
John Curran
Acting CEO
ARIN
At 6:28 PM -0700 5/30/07, Randy Bush wrote:
well, you get two points for copping to it. i lay on the train tracks
and was squashed.
Well, I became a contentious objector... (RFC1669). One can
confirm a real sense of humor to the cosmos, because I now
get to be lead advocate for the very
Steve -
For the first end site that has to connect via IPv6,
it will be very bad if there is not a base of IPv6
web/email sites already in place.
While there are going to efforts to recover unused
IPv4 space, we're currently going through 10 to 12
blocks of /8 size
In the absence of global policy on this matter, the RIRs and IANA
try to work together in the tradition of the Internet in order to
keep things running as smoothly as possible. This is a *feature*
not a bug.
If you want formal policy in this area, it's very easy to submit a
proposal for
revision to be made available for all members. Email is
the best way to reach me, but I can also be tracked down
at my ARIN office number (+1 703 227 9850).
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
On Mar 26, 2010, at 5:45 PM, Jeremy Charles wrote:
Has anyone here had
On Apr 7, 2010, at 5:49 PM, David Conrad wrote:
On Apr 7, 2010, at 10:52 AM, William Pitcock wrote:
And when there are no eyeballs to look at your IPv4 content because your
average comcast user is on IPv6?
The chances of this actually occurring in our lifetime are so small as to be
as appropriate.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
for the ARIN Board in the
annual election process.
Thank you for raising this topic!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
fraudulent?
Potentially, yes.
Sincerely,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
in NRPM section 12 https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#twelve so ARIN
will do its best to enforce the policy as adopted.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
, it will be the community's discussion of your
proposal, and the AC Boards consideration of the discussion which will
decide the matter.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
On Apr 8, 2010, at 2:51 PM, Kevin Stange wrote:
On 04/08/2010 01:47 PM, Dorn Hetzel wrote:
If there was an automatic website that just handed out up to a /40 on
demand, and charged a one-time fee of $100, I don't think the space
would ever be exhausted, there isn't enough money.
I'd hate
by its policies.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
of aggregate address space held.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
participation (details attached).
My apologies for forwarding this message, but I would be remiss
to not bring these policy discussions to your attention.
Thank you!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
Begin forwarded message:
From: Member Services i...@arin.netmailto:i...@arin.net
Date: April 9
On Apr 9, 2010, at 1:26 PM, David Conrad wrote:
Doesn't end user PI assignment already do this? Note I'm not arguing against
end user PI assignment policy, rather just making the observation that given
IPv6 did not address routing scalability, the path we're heading down is
obvious, the
that
you
will find them in sections 8 and 12. The policy development role is open to
the
community, but specifically not the ARIN Board and Staff, so there is perhaps a
little more separation present than your email suggests.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
the opposite view
then there's very likely a significant body of procurement law which already
applies to property furnished in this manner and would be far more relevant
than any documentation that an address block recipient received at the time.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
On Apr 18, 2011, at 10:35 PM, David Conrad wrote:
To try to bring this back to NANOG (instead of PPML-light), the issue is that
since at least two alternative registries have apparently been established,
how are network operators going to deal with the fact that the currently
execrable
On Apr 19, 2011, at 12:16 PM, David Conrad wrote:
However, as far as I can tell, multiple registries isn't what is implicitly
being proposed. What appears to be eing proposed is something a bit like the
registry/registrar split, where there is a _single_ IPv4 registry and
multiple
and the upheaval also meant
no pesky policy constraints on your monetization efforts -
would you then view it as having some benefit? You just
might not have the right perspective to appreciate the
potential up$ide...
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
registrars. The main problem is one of timeliness. I
doubt the market is going to wait for IGF, ICANN, or even RIR processes. But
we'll see.
Quite true... it's very hard to complete in a timely manner something
that hasn't yet been started.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
On Apr 19, 2011, at 3:56 PM, David Conrad wrote:
On Apr 19, 2011, at 10:19 AM, Jeff Wheeler wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see how a bunch of different
entities providing fragmented post-allocation services is of any
benefit.
Some folks find competition in service
with that,
per se, but those in the community asking for the changes and perceived
benefits to be more clearly stated are being quite reasonable under
the circumstances.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
participate
in consideration of the merits. Perhaps you can elaborate how the Nanog
community can get involved and provide feedback on the proposal?
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
On Apr 23, 2011, at 7:45 AM, Rogelio wrote:
Is there any clear understanding of what supporting IPv6 means?
If you actually want to know what they do or don't support, you could ask
the vendor for a Supplier's Declaration of Conformity (SDOC) to the US
Government IPv4 profile -
Transfers of IPv4 address space beginning to heat up.
FYI,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
Begin forwarded message:
From: John Curran jcur...@arin.netmailto:jcur...@arin.net
Date: April 29, 2011 1:08:49 PM EDT
To: Public Policy Mailing List p...@arin.netmailto:p...@arin.net
Subject
This is a significant change that all NANOG folks should be aware of...
FYI,
/John
Begin forwarded message:
From: ARIN i...@arin.netmailto:i...@arin.net
Date: July 18, 2011 11:31:45 AM EDT
To: mailto:arin-annou...@arin.net
arin-annou...@arin.netmailto:arin-annou...@arin.net
Subject:
and supporting documentation as fraudulent
information can result in resource revocation.
Thank you,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
On Aug 6, 2011, at 6:31 PM, IPv4 Brokers wrote:
From: IPv4 Brokers ipv4brok...@gmail.com
Subject: Corporation for Sale with IPv4 Assets
Date: August 6
are not sufficiently accepted in peering to
be usable.
This is obviously a less than desirable situation, and it appears that it is
not trending
towards resolution at this time.
Thoughts?
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
to the record. Any address holder
can update their contact information (including legacy IPv4 resources); no fee
or contract is necessary to update your contact information.
Thanks,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
Begin forwarded message:
From: ARIN i...@arin.netmailto:i...@arin.net
everyone to take a moment and consider the slate of
candidates for both of these important elections. Voting will open
during the Joint NANOG/ARIN meeting in Philly on October 12th.
FYI ( thanks!)
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
://www.arin.net/participate/acsp/index.html.
If you have a particular suggestion for changing whois, please
feel free to submit it. If you'd prefer a different process
altogether for discussing changes, please let me know.
FYI,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
On Sep 16, 2011, at 10:17 AM, Leigh Porter wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Randy Bush [mailto:ra...@psg.com]
Sent: 16 September 2011 16:05
To: John Curran
Cc: NANOG list
Subject: Re: Disappointing ARIN - A great advertisement for the USA ?
If you have a particular suggestion
response some? I'm not certain I understand
whether an option would suffice, nor the pola reference. I do get
that we shouldn't be changing default output upon which scripts
rely.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
for adequate prior notice so that
folks can test and plan accordingly. Expect more information shortly.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
not certain how this is fairly difficult, but can have someone from the
ARIN Registration Services helpdesk contact you to work through your
circumstances. (please contact me directly if that's desired.)
FYI,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
.
Randy -
If that policy is an issue for many of your customers, can you
please come up with an alternative policy for consideration by
the community?
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
your choice.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
- If you wish to propose an alternative which accomplishes the mission
in a different manner, feel free to do so. The community has every opportunity
and right to accomplish unique Internet number administration as it sees fit.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
of the equation and the value delivered.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
On Sep 17, 2011, at 5:19 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
Strange... You seem to overcome it well enough to join in the
discussion on PPML, but not to actual propose changes to policy.
i believe you are mistaken. i am not knowingly a subscriber to ppml,
and am not, to the best of my knowledge,
not
matter to him a bit, I'll defend his (and anyone's else right) to critique
the quality and cost effectiveness of the job we're doing.
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
resource management is fulfilled, not the promotion any specific
organizational model for accomplishing the task.
FYI,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
requests which meet the policies get approved and
updated in the registry. ARIN does turn down transfer requests
which don't meet policy, and this potential is often understood
and covered in proposed sale documents for IP address blocks.
FYI,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
to change.
FYI,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
in your organization encourage them to do so) in
the upcoming ARIN election for the ARIN Advisory Council and the ARIN Board
of Trustee positions.
FYI,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
=== From
https://www.arin.net/announcements/2010/20101019_ElectionWinners.html
2010 VOTER
.
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
-
Can you send me specifics when you have a moment?
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
On May 24, 2013, at 2:34 AM, Andreas Larsen andreas.lar...@ip-only.se wrote:
If we continue to support and build tools around this geolocation based
ip-dravel, we give people a false notion that this is something we should
do.
...
Or just get rid of the whole idea and realize that the
incidental
use outside the region is appropriate. (This topic was also on this list on
26 April 2012 - see attached email from that thread) Policy proposals in
this area to bring further clarity in address management are encouraged.
FYI,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
===
Begin forwarded
than an hour remaining to do so!)
Thank you!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
Begin forwarded message:
From: ARIN i...@arin.netmailto:i...@arin.net
Subject: [arin-announce] ARIN Public Policy Consultation At NANOG 58 Today at
4:45 CDT
Date: June 4, 2013 9:08:38 AM CDT
To: arin-annou
On Jun 22, 2013, at 1:45 AM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
Yes… It will probably settle out somewhere around 100-125K routes.
Owen -
Can you elaborate some on this estimate? (i.e. what approximations
and/or assumptions are you using to reach this number?)
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
Begin forwarded message:
From: ARIN i...@arin.netmailto:i...@arin.net
Subject: [arin-announce] The 4th Global IPv6 Deployment Monitoring Survey is
Open Now
Date: July 1, 2013 8:00:32 AM EDT
To: arin-annou...@arin.netmailto:arin-annou...@arin.net
Dear Community
catch this on own, but
most reliable are reports from folks who know the email and/or phone abused
only occurs on their Whois entry.)
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
Membership for the $500/year. Details are
available here: https://www.arin.net/about_us/membership/ Many end-users
with IP addresses just want the registry to work, and not embedding these
costs in the annual end-user fees are they are only be $100/year/resource.)
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
period on the DNS Whois recommendations remains
open till 12 August 2013, and parties that have views on this matter
should make them known to the DNS directory services expert working
group which is drafting the recommendations.
FYI (and Thanks)!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
they employed) asking for James T Kirk or Diana Prince
then that would be a problem and should be logged.
There are some interesting non-obvious elements in the database for
such purposes and we do take action when they are triggered.
FYI,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
discussion in the meantime if the mailing list is otherwise
quiet. :-)
I hope this provides some insight - thank you for asking about it,
as it has been too long since any status update on this project
(I will work on that as well for the very near future.)
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
by the ICANN/RIR technical folks.)
FYI,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
questionnaire responses at:
http://teamarin.net/2013-elections/
You can learn more about the NRO NC at:
https://www.arin.net/participate/elections/nronumbercouncil.html
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
history of these blocks before
their return to ARIN.
We are going to see quite a bit more of reissued blocks as we get down
towards the bottom of the available pool in this region (i.e. over the
next 6 to 12 months)
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
On Sep 24, 2013, at 7:58 AM, John Curran jcur...@arin.net wrote:
On Sep 18, 2013, at 10:46 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
Which is irrelevent to removing a address block on the basis of a
RIR recording that the block has been reallocated. A reallocation
already goes through
for any given block size.)
FYI,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
On Sep 26, 2013, at 4:52 AM, bmann...@vacation.karoshi.com wrote:
sounds just like folks in 1985, talking about IPv4...
If there were ever were a need for an market/settlement model, it is with
respect
to routing table slots. As it is, we have no real feedback mechanism in the
present
On Sep 26, 2013, at 1:43 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
y'know, it's funny. there is a market in ipv4 space. there is no
market in routing table slots. perhaps this is not conspiracy but
rather the market is speaking.
That easily could be the case. So how well is has the current
On Sep 29, 2013, at 12:49 AM, Blake Dunlap iki...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I was lazy in most of the adaptation, but I think it serves a
good starting point for market based suggestions to the route slot
problem.
Your post advocates a
(X) technical ( ) legislative (X) market-based ( )
that your views
may be considered.
More information is available here -
https://www.arin.net/participate/meetings/ppc_nanog59/index.html
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
at each NANOG.
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
Begin forwarded message:
From: ARIN i...@arin.netmailto:i...@arin.net
Subject: [arin-announce] ARIN Meetings – Weigh In on Future Format
Date: October 8, 2013 8:31:13 AM MST
To: arin-annou...@arin.netmailto:arin-annou...@arin.net
25 October 2013.
See the attached announcement for more details!
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
Begin forwarded message:
From: ARIN i...@arin.netmailto:i...@arin.net
Subject: [arin-announce] ARIN Meetings – Weigh In on Future Format
Date: October 9, 2013 12:31:13 AM GMT+09
On Jan 30, 2014, at 10:20 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
I figure there will be similar problem for other business in other
countries and they will fight a similar battles. Eventually the
regulators will step in because it is bad for small businesses to
be shut out of the Internet.
to provide additional
policy text to staff.
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
NANOGers -
The folks at the Internet Society are looking for input into how network
operators are (or are not)
involved in IETF standards development. To that end, they've put together a
short survey for
network operators on this topic and are asking for help in getting the
message
On Feb 2, 2014, at 12:05 PM, Octavio Alvarez alvar...@alvarezp.ods.org wrote:
The survey has a problem: the 'Previous' link actually continues on or
submits the form. I could not correct a response and the form went on
incomplete. I browse without JavaScript so this may be related to the
On Feb 5, 2014, at 2:12 AM, Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:18:54 +1100, Mark Andrews said:
Now if we could get equipement vendors to stop shipping models
without the necessary support it would help but that also may require
government intervention.
...
A good
://www.arin.net/ppcnanog60
Thank you, and look forward to seeing everyone tomorrow!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
Begin forwarded message:
From: ARIN i...@arin.netmailto:i...@arin.net
Subject: [arin-announce] ARIN PPC Agenda for NANOG 60 Now Available
Date: February 4, 2014 at 2:08:08 PM EST
All NANOG Attendees are welcome!
/John
Begin forwarded message:
From: John Curran jcur...@arin.netmailto:jcur...@arin.net
Subject: ARIN PPC Agenda for NANOG 60 Tuesday AM session Now Available
Date: February 10, 2014 at 9:48:48 AM EST
To: NANOG list nanog@nanog.orgmailto:nanog@nanog.org
NANOG
and society is excellent idea that we should
be able to accommodate next time around.
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
, please bring it to their
attention!
For more information, see Betty's announcement here:
http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog-announce/2014-February/000215.html
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
/ntia/publications/qa_-_iana-for_web_eop.pdf -
NTIA will not accept a proposal that replaces the NTIA role with a government
or an inter-governmental organization solution.
FYI,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
that will actually matter.
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
on above, would you prefer the /24 space statistics as asked
(member/non-member) or rsa/lrsa/legacy-no-agreement?
o of the address holders in the arin region, what percentage are arin
members?
Will do.
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
if I gave you the impression that I disapproved of your question.
Steve
-Original Message-
From: Randy Bush [mailto:ra...@psg.com]
Sent: Sunday, March 23, 2014 10:52 PM
To: Naslund, Steve
Cc: John Curran; North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Re: arin representation
, but it is not automatic.
FYI,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
.
Folks who wish to discuss ARIN address holders and members, please
find an ARIN mailing list (such as ppml)
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
2014.
Please find attached the ARIN announcement covering this consultation process;
my
apologies for disturbing your inbox on a topic that may not be of interest to
the entire
community, but we'd prefer to be overly informative in matters such as these.
FYI,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
Of those: 4,520 (17%) are ARIN members
FYI,
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
p.s. Discussion of improvements to ARIN election process would probably
be best send over to ARIN-discuss or PPML (for sake of those here
who lack interest) but I'll leave that to this list to decide. I
would also recommend (for folks who have
thinking so that they
can provide insight into what they expect from the Internet
name and number registry system as conditions necessary for
USG/NTIA to effect a transition of its stewardship role to
these organizations collectively.
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
this to one of
the ARIN lists, or have a us setup a distinct list for this purpose,
or something else?
Thanks!
/John
John Curran
President and CEO
ARIN
On Mar 28, 2014, at 5:27 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
john,
i think your attemt to move the discussion to the arin ppml list
exemplifies one core of the problem.
Randy -
I offered ppml out of respect to the nanog subscribers, that is all...
/John
and this is aside from
And I would welcome discussion of how ARIN (and nanog) can be more like RIPE -
that is very much up to this community and its participation far more than
ARIN..
/John
On Mar 28, 2014, at 5:27 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
john,
i think your attemt to move the discussion to the
On Mar 28, 2014, at 6:04 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote:
i will refrain from characterizing the ppml list. needless to say, i do
not subscribe.
my point is that what arin does should be of interest to nanog
subscribers. in theory, the ops are the arin community, the registry
serves
201 - 300 of 710 matches
Mail list logo
