available now at PAIX.
Interface specifics at: http://www.peeringdb.com/view.php?asn=6447 ]
Thanks,
---
John Kemp (k...@routeviews.org)
RouteViews Engineer
NOC: h...@routeviews.org
http://www.routeviews.org
to route-views.eqix.routeviews.org
Thanks,
John Kemp (k...@routeviews.org)
NeighborVAS MsgRcvd MsgSent TblVer InQ OutQ Up/Down
State/PfxRcd
206.126.236.10 4 4589 0 0000 never
Active
206.126.236.12 4 2914 0 0000
if others concur?
--
John Kemp (k...@routeviews.org)
RouteViews Engineer
NOC: n...@routeviews.org
MAIL: h...@routeviews.org
WWW: http://www.routeviews.org
Session is up on telnet:route-views.routeviews.org
username rviews
John Kemp (k...@routeviews.org)
On 12/28/2012 2:23 AM, Peter Ehiwe wrote:
I normally use the 3rd one you mentioned but they seem to be down at the
moment.
Rgds Peter,
Sent from my Asus Transformer Pad
On Dec 28, 2012 1:51
Not sure if anyone mentioned Aaron's presentation on this topic
from way back... Here's the link:
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog47/presentations/Wednesday/Hughes_Kosters_fundamentals_N47_Wed.pdf
John Kemp (k...@routeviews.org)
On 1/26/13 1:26 AM, Pavel Dimow wrote:
Hi,
I have read
Uh,
I'm looking at this in the source below in sysdep/unix/log.c
and it looks like it is there. I assume you want mrtdump protocols
messages
The manual for Global options it says this:
mrtdump filename
Set MRTdump file name. This option must be specified to allow MRTdump
feature. Default: no
[[for] prefix|IP] [table sym] [filter f|where c]
[(export|preexport) p] [protocol p] [options]
/jgk
On 2/22/13 12:56 AM, John Kemp wrote:
Uh,
I'm looking at this in the source below in sysdep/unix/log.c
and it looks like it is there. I assume you want mrtdump protocols
messages
The manual
are as close to your true platform as you can get. So I would
also be interested in hearing if you find existing client code
to parse the BMP.
John Kemp (k...@routeviews.org)
project is still in its infancy. BMP seems to be a good solution but I've
not found a working client implementation
|
Allocated | AS Name
5459| 195.66.241.146 | 195.66.240.0/22 | GB | ripencc |
1997-12-01 | LINX-AS London Internet Exchange Ltd.
$ dig +short 146.241.66.195.peer.asn.cymru.com TXT
1299 2914 3257 10310 | 195.66.240.0/22 | GB | ripencc | 1997-12-01
--
John Kemp (k...@routeviews.org
differently. If that's the
case, I may need to move off of 195.66.240.0/22.
Thanks,
John Kemp (k...@routeviews.org)
On 4/3/13 4:20 PM, Yang Yu wrote:
I noticed it too this morning from a AS3549 customer. Level 3 LG shows
no route for 195.66.232.0/22 on North American sites.
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 6
On 12/20/11 4:09 AM, Andy Davidson wrote:
On 20 Dec 2011, at 12:02, Stephen Strowes wrote:
I pinged John Kemp at uoregon.edu, but unsure if he is the correct contact
for this.
I beeped Dave Meyer, who acknowledged, so I think someone is on it.
Andy
Dave jumped on it and got it taken care
.6watch.net or
http://cyclops.cs.ucla.edu
John Kemp (k...@routeviews.org)
, that appears to be the model they show in their
setup documents.
John Kemp (k...@routeviews.org)
this service.
I would also add that I'm happy to see the historical BGPLAY at RIPE
offered as a
service. Nice work there.
We will continue make a solid effort to support our instance of bgplay.
--
John Kemp (k...@routeviews.org)
RouteViews Engineer
NOC: n...@routeviews.org
MAIL: h...@routeviews.org
WWW
@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/msg00505.html
John Kemp (k...@routeviews.org)
On 09/20/2012 12:34 AM, John Kemp wrote:
On 9/19/12 5:29 AM, Phil Regnauld wrote:
Joseph M. Owino (jpmuga) writes:
Hi,
Hope you are all well. I work at an exchange point and was seeking any
assistance on how to implement a software based route server as currently we
are using a Cisco
a replacement
for this piece of hardware.
NOTE: this outage will not affect the other routeviews collectors,
or the data archive. Your patience during this time is appreciated.
--
John Kemp
RouteViews Engineer
k...@network-services.uoregon.edu
541-346-1714
URL. So yeah, still sad, but there
is some potential there.
---
John Kemp (k...@routeviews.org)
RouteViews Engineer
NOC: h...@routeviews.org
http://www.routeviews.org
...)
The data source is the route-views2 collector.
Data downloads of routing updates happen at :10 after each hour.
---
John Kemp (k...@routeviews.org)
RouteViews Engineer
NOC: h...@routeviews.org
http://www.routeviews.org
://bgpmon.netsec.colostate.edu/index.php/documentation
---
John Kemp (k...@routeviews.org)
RouteViews Engineer
NOC: h...@routeviews.org
http://www.routeviews.org
scripts.
Questions and comments are welcome. We do intend to retain
the Cisco CLI on the original route-views router for the
forseeable future.
---
John Kemp (k...@routeviews.org)
RouteViews Network Engineer
h...@routeviews.org
Not much there yet, but we are operational
and would love to get a few more peers.
Serbian Open eXchange
http://www.routeviews.org/soxrs.html
Thanks,
--
John Kemp (k...@routeviews.org)
RouteViews Engineer
NOC: n...@routeviews.org
MAIL: h...@routeviews.org
WWW: http://www.routeviews.org
I know Carlos did a bunch of work to build this
into Netdot, i.e. discover L2, draw usable graphs.
Here's a link to the last NANOG presentation:
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog49/presentations/Tuesday/Vicente-netdot-presentation-nanog49.pdf
John Kemp
On 10/15/08 7:18 PM, Dale W. Carder
Ah, sorry. Resurrected an old one there...
;-/
/jgk
On 11/15/13 2:41 PM, John Kemp wrote:
I know Carlos did a bunch of work to build this
into Netdot, i.e. discover L2, draw usable graphs.
Here's a link to the last NANOG presentation:
http://www.nanog.org/meetings/nanog49
Someone asked me for the link...
http://routeviews-mirror.cert.org/
John Kemp
h...@routeviews.org
...@routeviews.org. For general BGPmon questions,
bgp...@netsec.colostate.edu.
The RouteViews Instances are considered a test platform.
So while we do monitor, we are still debugging and doing
updates. Feel free to ask if you have questions or comments.
John Kemp
RouteViews Network Engineer
h
Just brought online Details at:
http://www.routeviews.org/nwax.html
We would welcome a few more NWAX peers
at this point.
Thanks to NWAX and IOVATION,
--
John Kemp
RouteViews Engineer
NOC: n...@routeviews.org
MAIL: h...@routeviews.org
WWW: http://www.routeviews.org
I believe ThousandEyes would be
another example.
/jgk
On 6/4/14 10:39 AM, Paul S. wrote:
Two 'established' options are,
0. Noction IRP (As mentioned)
1. Internap FCP
Everyone appears to either be using one of these, or have gone full
custom.
On 6/4/2014 午後 10:52, Tassos
You are probably testing with different sites in Oregon.
La Grande is different than Portland/Salem/Corvallis, etc.
I would expect traffic to eastern Oregon to be slow.
/jgk
On 2/16/2015 11:06 PM, Eygene Ryabinkin wrote:
Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:47:04AM +0530, Glen Kent wrote:
I have a server
Just started on SFMIX.
(We're also working on getting into PHLIX, FLIX, and CoreSite...)
--
John Kemp
RouteViews Engineer
NOC: n...@routeviews.org
MAIL: h...@routeviews.org
WWW: http://www.routeviews.org
.
John Kemp
h...@routeviews.org
On 12/8/15 8:24 AM, Kurt Kraut via NANOG wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> For the past couple of months I've been attempting to add new Autonomous
> Systems to the RouteViews project and got no response. Talking to other AS
> in my area, I wasn't able
That's the normal Monday morning maint window
for UO, when they all too frequently make us
disappear... :(
/jgk
On 4/25/16 5:03 AM, Randy Bush wrote:
> nfs0.dfw.rg.net:/root# ping 128.223.51.20
> PING 128.223.51.20 (128.223.51.20) 56(84) bytes of data.
> From 4.69.145.11 icmp_seq=1 Time to
Just to note, the route-views4 collector has a pretty diverse set
of global multi-hop views. telnet://route-views4.routeviews.org/
http://www.routeviews.org/peers/peering-status.html
http://www.routeviews.org/peers/route-views4.routeviews.org.txt
John Kemp
On 5/20/16 8:46 AM, Matthew Huff
the help of our hosts
and the exchanges, so thanks to all.
--
John Kemp
RouteViews Network Engineer
h...@routeviews.org
same room at the same time for the same purpose, usually
pretty useful.
2 cents,
John Kemp
On 2/6/17 9:17 PM, Dave Temkin wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> This was inadvertent and we will bring this back for NANOG 70.
>
> Regards,
>
> -Dave
>
> On Feb 6, 2017, 6:58 PM -0500, Bo
, sydney, linx, eqix, saopaulo, sg... instead.
John Kemp
h...@routeviews.org
On 11/24/2016 06:46 AM, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
> Hello everyone
>
>
>
> Was wondering if anyone is aware of mrt dump link for IPv6 dumps of Oregon
> route views?
>
> I see on the
We're looking at it now. Thanks.
John Kemp
On 12/16/16 9:21 AM, Marty Strong via NANOG wrote:
> Looks like somebody didn’t renew the domain
>
> $ whois routeviews.org
> Domain Name: ROUTEVIEWS.ORG
> Domain ID: D48496876-LROR
> WHOIS Server:
> Referral URL: http://www
It's back/renewed as of...
Domain Name: ROUTEVIEWS.ORG
Domain ID: D48496876-LROR
WHOIS Server:
Referral URL: http://www.networksolutions.com
Updated Date: 2016-12-16T18:41:42Z
Creation Date: 2000-12-14T23:05:47Z
John Kemp
On 12/16/16 9:44 AM, John Kemp wrote:
>
> We're looking at
Scheduling question: I assume this is the slot on the agenda that say:
"NANOG 70 Peering Coordination Forum"
I'm not seeing it on the schedule. Has a lot been assigned?
John Kemp
On 4/17/17 6:03 AM, Bevan Slattery wrote:
> Hi! Love the interconnection track. Great stuff. But
39 matches
Mail list logo
