Re: list blockchain

:-) mh Le 2018-01-28 05:52, Randy Bush a écrit : why is no one exploring converting this mailing list to a blockchain? major missed opportunity. randy

Re: Best practices on logical separation of abuse@ vs dmca@ role inboxes

Le 2018-08-06 16:03, Jérôme Nicolle a écrit : Hi Jack, Le 05/08/2018 à 21:51, na...@jack.fr.eu.org a écrit : By "appropriate place", you mean "the trash bin" ? Nope, that would eat-up storage and IOs. The proper destination is /dev/null, unless they provide you with the required informations

Re: A Deep Dive on the Recent Widespread DNS Hijacking

Le 2019-02-26 11:04, Sander Steffann a écrit : Op 26 feb. 2019, om 10:56 heeft Bill Woodcock het volgende geschreven: We need to get switched over to DANE as quickly as possible, and stop wasting effort trying to keep the CA system alive with ever-hackier band-aids. +1 Sander +1 mh

Re: AT/as7018 now drops invalid prefixes from peers

Le 2019-02-12 20:56, Nick Hilliard a écrit : Matthew Walster wrote on 12/02/2019 19:27: I'm actually of the opinion that the whole "PKI" part of RPKI is the bit that really needs to die. I'll claim a de-facto godwin if anyone mentions the word "blockchain". Nick

Re: Bgpmon alternatives?

RIS Live API is a choice for this. mh Le 16 juin 2019 à 13:21, à 13:21, Brian Kantor a écrit: >That would be wonderful. Thank you! > - Brian > > >On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 03:59:29AM -0700, Mike Leber wrote: >> I'm sure if it doesn't do exactly that already, we can add it >shortly. >> >>

Re: Centurylink having a bad morning?

While conserving connectivity?  De : Shawn L via NANOG Envoyé : mercredi 2 septembre 2020 13:15 À : nanog Objet : Re: Centurylink having a bad morning? We once moved a 3u server 30 miles between data centers this way.  Plug redundant psu into a ups and 2

Re: cloud automation BGP

Hi Shared appreciation!! (and observation). Cheers, mh 29 septembre 2020 17:16 "Simon Leinen" a écrit: > Randy Bush writes: > >> have folk looked at https://github.com/nttgin/BGPalerter > > We use it, and have it configured to send alerts to the NOC team's chat > tool (Mattermost). Seems

Re: Perhaps it's not time to think about enhancements to the NANOG list...?

I agree. mh 20 mars 2021 19:57 "John Levine" a écrit: > It appears that Mike Hammett said: > >> -=-=-=-=-=- >> >> That seems like a reasonable proposal. NANOG-OffTopic, NANOG-Discuss, >> NANOG-BizDev, NANOG-xyz, >> something (more more than one something). > > Having been around this barn

Re: Telecommunications network drafting software

TikZ ?  mh De : Etienne-Victor Depasquale via NANOG Envoyé : mercredi 1 septembre 2021 20:30 À : NANOG Objet : Telecommunications network drafting software Hello folks, Would you care to share some pointers to drafting software which you use to draw up

Re: The role of Internet governance in sanctions

+1 mh 10 mars 2022 16:34 "jim deleskie" mailto:deles...@gmail.com?to=%22jim%20deleskie%22%20)> a écrit: I respect the people and goals here, but strongly echo Mel's statement. This is a much larger hammer then mail filtering lists. -jim On Thu, Mar 10, 2022, 11:26 AM Mel Beckman

Re: emily postnews

You sure :-)^oo mh 28 octobre 2023 19:32 "Jay R. Ashworth" a écrit: > - Original Message - > >> From: "Randy Bush" >> >> another old dog doing a search wrote to tell me they really appreciated >> that i still had some antique advice up. i had long forgotten this one. >> but found it

Re: [Nanog-futures] Moving Forward - What kind of NANOG do we want?

://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures -- michael hallgren, mh2198-ripe ___ Nanog-futures mailing list Nanog-futures@nanog.org https://mailman.nanog.org/mailman/listinfo/nanog-futures

<    1   2