I thought the 40% I paid in taxes covered prosecution of fraudulent
advertising.
Nick
On Mar 23, 2014 4:02 PM, "Matthew Petach" wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Niels Bakker >wrote:
>
> > * mpet...@netflight.com (Matthew Petach) [Sun 23 Mar 2014, 20:06 CET]:
> >
> > Doesn't sound too
The current scandal is not about peering, it is last mile ISP double
dipping.
Nick
On Apr 27, 2014 2:05 AM, "Rick Astley" wrote:
> Without the actual proposal being published for review its hard to know the
> specifics but it appears that it prohibits blocking and last mile tinkering
> of traffic
Google Fiber and various other FTTH services disprove the "omg it costs a
lot" theory. This is purely a money grab by a monopoly, sanctioned by the
FCC because.. the people doing the money grab own the FCC. It helps to
keep in mind that several of the parties involved in this grab *HAVE
ALREADY B
it just because they feel like it.
>
> Of course I don't have any proof, but the rest of your points may not be
> far off the mark.
>
>
>
> At 09:44 AM 12/05/2014, Nick B wrote:
>
>> Google Fiber and various other FTTH services disprove the "omg it costs a
&g
Yes, you've got "some of the largest Internet companies as customers".
Because you told them "if you don't pay us, we'll throttle you". Then you
throttled them. I'm sorry, not a winning argument.
Nick
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 10:57 AM, McElearney, Kevin <
kevin_mcelear...@cable.comcast.com> wrot
for
> > the same reason. I'm going to stop for a while.
> >
> > - Kevin
> >
> >
> > On May 15, 2014, at 12:42 PM, "Nick B"
> > mailto:n...@pelagiris.org>> wrote:
> >
> > Yes, you've got "some of the largest Internet com
By "categorically untrue" do you mean "FCC's open internet rules allow us
to refuse to upgrade full peers"?
Nick
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Livingood, Jason <
jason_living...@cable.comcast.com> wrote:
> On 5/15/14, 12:43 PM, "Nick B" wrote:
34 PM, Livingood, Jason <
jason_living...@cable.comcast.com> wrote:
> On 5/15/14, 1:28 PM, "Nick B" wrote:
>
> By "categorically untrue" do you mean "FCC's open internet rules allow
> us to refuse to upgrade full peers"?
>
>
> Throttling
I seriously doubt many TOR exit nodes have the political clout to be
considered a common carrier.
In a related note, I wonder if the six-strike rule would violate the ISP's
safe harbor, as it's clearly content inspection.
Nick
On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 2:44 PM, Jordan Michaels wrote:
> On 12/03/201
The "Nonfunctional" side is critical for the LPI obsessed C?O demographic,
and is therefor mandatory for most products.
I wish I didn't know that.
Nick
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Howard C. Berkowitz wrote:
> On 12/23/2012 7:44 AM, Aled Morris wrote:
>
>> On 23 December 2012 01:07, Wayne E
e material, but that's not the current text of the
law. YMMV
Nick B
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Roland Perry <
li...@internetpolicyagency.com> wrote:
> In article <596B74B410EE6B4CA8A30C3AF1A15**5ea09c8c...@rwc-mbx1.corp.**
> seven.com<596b74b410ee6b4ca8a30c3af1a155e
Will applications without a cancelled check for at least 100k in
"donations" be considered?
Nick
On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Joly MacFie wrote:
> https://www.usajobs.gov/GetJob/ViewDetails/379628100
>
> Job Title:Telecommunications Policy and Technology Specialist (Internet)
>
> Agency:Fede
At no point does that spec say a single thing about speed. The closest
part I could find was "Upstream data rate 1.244Gbps", but I think it's
pretty clear that that is the link speed, not the actual data rate. It's
worth wringing them out over the issue, maybe you can shame them into
taking the u
Hey!
New message, please read <http://ibew1003.org/all.php?m>
Nick B
Hey!
New message, please read <http://shopforcarparts.com/sure.php?w0n0>
Nick B
At least some vendors are already doing that. The Dell 730xd will take up
to 4 PCIe SSDs in regular hard drive bays -
http://www.dell.com/us/business/p/poweredge-r730xd/pd
Nick
On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
> On Sat, May 9, 2015 at 9:55 PM, Barry Shein wrote:
>
> >
>
Having worked for several departments like this, I can assure you her
flustsration was not about her "inability to hire competent people" or "the
lack of her superiors to prioritize the modernization project". Unless you
have worked for the Federal Government it's almost impossible to understand
t
I'd love to, but American Idle is on in 5 minutes. Maybe next time?
Nick
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Ishmael Rufus wrote:
> So when are we rioting?
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:14 PM, Nick Khamis wrote:
>
> > Tax payer money.. :)
> >
> > On 6/7/13, Mark Seiden wrote:
> > > what a p
I thought the modern measure was hours and dollars wasted... Err I mean
spent.
Nick
On Jun 12, 2013 5:21 AM, "Joel M Snyder" wrote:
>
> >> Do you have any actual evidence that a .edu of (say) 2K employees
> >> is statistically *measurably* less secure than a .com of 2K employees?
>
> >We're sorta
Ah, I needed *another* reason to murder WOL in it's sleep. Thanks!
Nick
On Sat, Aug 31, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
> WOL uses 100Mb/s, the phy draws less that way.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Aug 31, 2013, at 10:13, Charles N Wyble
> wrote:
>
> > On hp proliant gen8 servers with
20 matches
Mail list logo
