On Tue, 31 Aug 2010, John Jason Brzozowski wrote:
Enabled two more 6to4 relays this morning. :)
Out of curiousity, what is the aggregate Mbps load on the relays?
Related question is the platform on which these are run.
--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet
is e.g. behind PPPoE, so...
--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oykingdom bleeds.
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
but not in the PA ranges. So the question is not
necessarily just about the prefix length used because it might vary by
the prefix.
--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oykingdom bleeds.
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin
people stop
advertising unnecessary more-specific routes?'.) I don't expect that
to change.
--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oykingdom bleeds.
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
Semi-OT:
You are now what we need you to be. A beaten, resentful people who
will have to rebuild, who will have to rely on our.. good graces. Who
can be used and.. guided as we wish to guide you. Perfect ground for
us to do our work.. Quietly, quietly.
Sorry.
be annoying to change all those static neighbor entries
when the interfaces fail, links must be migrated to another line cards
or you replace routers.
--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oykingdom bleeds.
Systems. Networks. Security
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Charles Mills wrote:
Is XO Communications a Tier 1 ISP?
...
Any help here? Thanks as always.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tier_1_network
--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oykingdom bleeds.
Systems
::/23 for /48 assignments; based on their web pages, they
have policies for at least multihoming, IXs and critical
infrastructure. But I couldn't find info which block these are from.
--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oykingdom bleeds
address is rfc1918) and prefer matching
label is checked before preference.
--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oykingdom bleeds.
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
? - http://www.bitwizard.nl/mtr/
FWIW, Mtr measures latency/delay and loss based on ICMP messages heard
back from the routers on path. As a result, in almost all cases, the
real hop-by-hop latency of actual end-to-end data packets is better
than it can report.
--
Pekka Savola You
On Tue, 2 Dec 2008, Antonio Querubin wrote:
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008, Pekka Savola wrote:
FWIW, Mtr measures latency/delay and loss based on ICMP messages heard
back from the routers on path. As a result, in almost all cases, the real
hop-by-hop latency of actual end-to-end data packets is better
). Actually, 5 years ago, you could see spot Cisco routers in
traceroute6 because they dropped the rate-limiter didn't respond to
the middle packet and it resulted in a star. The rate-limiter has
long since been fixed to be more lenient.
--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves
. Why is
plain-ethernet with each subscriber provisioned in a separate router's
vlan subinterface insufficient? There is no security issue because
each subscriber only sees its own traffic.
--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oy
immediately, rather than waiting for the
routes being BGP WITHDRAWn.
Loopback and n-h-s seems to always make sense for those interfaces
which are singlehomed to that router (no redundancy) -- otherwise you
may want to consider which one is best.
--
Pekka Savola You each name
.
That's what I've found, anyway. Might not always be true.
If you were to go to meetings, you would realize that it won't help in
gettings things changed significantly better than active mailing
list participation would... :-/
--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet
enough and may result in some nasty surprises
later on.
For example, Netscreens cannot presently filter IPv6 in transparent
(bridged) mode, only in routed mode. The feature is AFAIK in the
roadmap but over a year away.
--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet
if the interpretation is the second, the benefit of multiple
allocations is that they wouldn't need to route between all the
suballocations at least in one location in case someone is building
route filters so that it would reject more specifics.
--
Pekka Savola You each name
. But the above
feature dilutes the trustworthiness of RIPE DB slightly...
--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oykingdom bleeds.
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
(comments are also welcome.)
--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oykingdom bleeds.
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
tables
are changing.
--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oykingdom bleeds.
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
: we use feasible-paths strict uRPF on all customer and LAN
interface without exception. Multihomed ones as well, though it's a
bit more work.
--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oykingdom bleeds.
Systems. Networks. Security
AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like they found a new willing partner.
AS32335 PACIFICINTERNETEXCHANGE-NET - Pacific Internet Exchange LLC.
http://cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS27595
http://www.pacificinternetexchange.net/
Marc
--
Pekka Savola You each name
didn't purse this further.
--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oykingdom bleeds.
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
to filter packets except in simple scenarios.
--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oykingdom bleeds.
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
big ifs.
--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oykingdom bleeds.
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010, Chris Grundemann wrote:
SixXS maintains a list here:
http://www.sixxs.net/faq/connectivity/?faq=ipv6transit.
I think that list should also include TeliaSonera. TSIC does offer v6
transit, although their product sheet only mentions IPv4.
--
Pekka Savola
of
abovementioned draft.)
--
Pekka Savola You each name yourselves king, yet the
Netcore Oykingdom bleeds.
Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings
. The response was non-existent, or simply unfortunate,
so I'm trying other avenues.
Echo that.
IPv6 bgp peering for distributed looking glass has been down for some
6 months or so now. No responses via any channel.
It's sad because distributed looking glass has been very useful.
--
Pekka Savola
28 matches
Mail list logo