that. Their
guidelines also state /56 for end-users. I am a big proponent of nibble
boundaries, too. I think if you are too big to use only a /32, you should get a
/28, /24, and so forth. It would make routing so much nicer to deal with. /31
and such is just nasty.
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President
John,
Can you tell us at what degree the bisection stops? i.e. does it keep going
until there are no spaces left, or will you leave some space in between each
one to leave some room for future needs for orgs that already have allocations?
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President
policy.
thanks,
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President, IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First Network Group, Inc.
| (419)739-9240, x1
- Original Message -
Randy -
We'll likely put that out to the ARIN community for consultation
at the point in time when becomes
John,
Thank you very much. That clarification helps out quite a bit.
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President, IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First Network Group, Inc.
| (419)739-9240, x1
- Original Message -
On Oct 18, 2010, at 3:42 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote
In Oz it costs real money to get IPv6 address space from the RIR
(APNIC). Around AUD$6K in the first year, around AUD$1100 each year
thereafter.
Your /48, according to the ARIN website, cost you US$625 this year,
will
cost US$937.50 next year, and $1250 every year thereafter.
.
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President, IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First Network Group, Inc.
| (419)739-9240, x1
- Original Message -
On 26/10/2010 17:23, Owen DeLong wrote:
He's talking about the bloat that comes from ISPs getting
slow-started and then
only
, they should be
getting their own addresses. Even if they aren't multihomed, they should
probably be getting their own addresses. Why would you be supplying them with
address space if they are an ISP?
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President, IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First
as a guideline for
the size of the customer base.
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President, IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First Network Group, Inc.
| (419)739-9240, x1
- Original Message -
I think APNIC has a policy that defines the minimum IPv6 allocation
based on your
provider (lets say
ProviderX), would Comcast try to get ProviderX to pay for traffic it was
sending?
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President, IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First Network Group, Inc.
| (419)739-9240, x1
And yet, I don't know of any location in the US with two cable
operators.
We have 2 separate cable providers in our town. One of them is a division of
the local telephone company, but it is still CATV plant. The telco also
operates a FTTH service with IPTV video as well.
The result is
to horrific. I would highly
recommend *not* looking at them.
I had not heard of the Commvault solution. We'll have to look into that.
I also be grateful for any other options that people are using.
thanks,
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President, IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First
,
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President, IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First Network Group, Inc.
| (419)739-9240, x1
- Original Message -
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 5:40 AM, Neil Robst neil.ro...@ioko.com
wrote:
Asigra?
http://www.asigra.com/
Regards
many people are familiar with them.
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President, IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First Network Group, Inc.
| (419)739-9240, x1
- Original Message -
Hello gents:
I wanted to put this out there for all of you. Our network consists
longer than a /48 to the outside world.
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President - IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First Network Group, Inc.
| (800)578-6381, Opt. 1
- Original Message -
Hi all,
What IPv6 prefix lengths are people accepting in BGP from
peers/customers
? If not, I would highly suggest not using those drives in
a RAID array. Stick with the RAID Edition drives for that. I have had a
multitude of issues with drives (particularly Western Digital) that were not
designed for RAID use.
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President - IT Services
| Red Hat
- Original Message -
On Tue, 25 Jan 2011 13:42:29 -0500, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com
wrote:
Seriously? Repetitively sweeping a /64? Let's do the math...
...
We've had this discussion before...
If the site is using SLAAC, then that 64bit target is effectively
48bits.
And I can
- Original Message -
On 1 feb 2011, at 23:33, Randy Carpenter wrote:
That's how I would do it. With the exception of LACNIC, each one
neighbors a block that is already allocated to that RIR.
But if they wanted to do that, why give 106/8 to APNIC?
I assume you mean 102/8
- Original Message -
Doesn't really matter who gets what
but conjecturebation is a key role of this mailing list
I literally LOLed at that. That single word more succinctly describes a concept
than most I have seen.
because no one is going to route anything larger than a /8
- Original Message -
Doesn't really matter who gets what, because no one is going to
route anything larger than a /8 anyway, particularly the RIR
allocations. Just kinda fun to think about :-)
-Randy
How about when HP/Compay/DEC buys Apple or the other way around ? ;-)
One of the things I find frustrating about this is the cost of the
space. We're a very small shop and to add IPv6 addresses for
testing now we're looking at paying another $2,200 a year ($1,700
in the first
Ooof. I didn't get that far - and hadn't realized the waiver was
expired.
From the main section on https://www.arin.net/fees/fee_schedule.html:
... ISPs with both IPv4 resources and IPv6 resources pay the larger of the
two fees.
It is not mentioned anywhere in the waiver stuff.
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President - IT Services
| Red Hat Certified
It didn't work too bad. Does anyone know why it was pretty much over at 9:30,
when they said it would start? Did they start a half-hour early or something?
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President - IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First Network Group, Inc.
| (800)578-6381, Opt
- Original Message -
On 2/2/2011 8:38 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
From the main section on
https://www.arin.net/fees/fee_schedule.html:
... ISPs with both IPv4 resources and IPv6 resources pay the larger
of the two fees.
It is not mentioned anywhere in the waiver stuff
The concept of v4 to v6 addressing scale doesn't match the pricing
scale, though. Generally, I expect to see most ISPs find themselves
1 rank higher in the v6 model compared to v4, which effectively
doubles your price anyways. :)
Jack
Actually, so far, most ISPs are finding
- Original Message -
My guesses as to who gets what:
102/8 - APNIC
103/8 - LACNIC
104/8 - AfriNIC
179/8 - RIPE NCC
185/8 - ARIN
I couldn't have been more wrong :-)
I guess alphabetical order won rather than neighboring blocks :-)
-Randy
- Original Message -
Well, since ssh is a straight up tcp socket protocol on a well know
port with no gimmicks needed like FTP, yeah, I would say it isn't a
hack. FTP over TLS/SSL is much worse. In some implementations you can
do an non-encrypted control channel and an encrypted data
IPv6 from both of my upstream providers has been coming soon for about a year
and a half.
One is a very major national provider, one is a regional which is connected to
numerous national carriers.
The major national provider is supposed to be swapping out equipment any day
now in order to
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Ryan Wilkins r...@deadfrog.net
wrote:
IPv6 from both of my upstream providers has been coming soon for
about a year and a half.
I'm getting ready to try to enable IPv6 natively with Above.net in
the Chicago area. Has anyone had any experience with them?
- Original Message -
I'll happily join Newnog/NANOG and pay my dues when I can reach the
web site to do so
on IPv6 rather than legacy IPv4.
Owen
I'd be happy if https://newnog.org/join.php loaded a page instead of an SSL
error.
-Randy
- Original Message -
I'd be happy if https://newnog.org/join.php loaded a page instead
of an SSL error.
Good to see that you have working v6 connectivity. :) This is being
worked on now, it is ironically only broken in v6.
John
Ahhh... that makes sense :-) Will check back
How does Juniper feel about used hardware?
~Seth
I love Juniper's hardware and software, and support. However, the way they deal
with used or second hand hardware is terrible. It is not possible to transfer
ownership at all. You can not resell anything, and hope to get any software
updates
Anyone know who to contact for issues with atdn.net? Their website is not
exactly a well of information.
All connections from my network to anything at atdn (AOL, etc.) are dying at
atdn's edge.
Traceroutes go out through xo.net. I have verified that both of my upstream
providers can get
Straight from the source:
http://standards.ieee.org/develop/regauth/oui/public.html
-Randy
- Original Message -
Is anyone on the list that knows about the Coffer MAC address vendor
database (http://www.coffer.com/mac_find/)?
I have used this resource for years and I am now
But, even one of the small MX80 bundles are about the price of 5 J4350s or 3
J6350s. Granted, if you need the throughput, it is very difficult to beat an
MX80, particularly one of the 5g or 10g bundles.
-Randy
- Original Message -
MX80 is perfect for this.. 5g 10g bundles are
--- jrh...@netconsonance.com wrote:
From: Jo Rhett jrh...@netconsonance.com
I've finally convinced $DAYJOB to deploy IPv6. Justification for the
IP space is easy, however the truth is that a /64 is more than we
need in all locations. However the last I heard was that you can't
- Original Message -
On Oct 11, 2012, at 2:28 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
so there really is no drawback from getting the /44, and having
enough space to not have to worry about it in the future.
It's only a worry if you can only route /48s, which was my question
- Original Message -
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Randy Carpenter
rcar...@network1.net wrote:
How many sites do you have? If less than 192, /44 is
perfect, unless some of those sites require more than
a /48. Then, it gets more complicated :-)
We're having a general math
My main requirements would be:
1. Something that is *not* network (ethernet or otherwise) (isn't that the
point of OOB?)
2. Something that is standard across everything, and can be aggregated easily
onto a console server or the like
I don't really see what is wrong with with keeping the
- Original Message -
Once upon a time, Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.net said:
Likewise OS vendors are increasingly dropping support for
installing OSes via serial port (RHEL, VMWare, etc.)
At leaset with RHEL, you can make your own boot image that gets rid
of the asinine
- Original Message -
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Randy Carpenter wrote:
My main requirements would be:
1. Something that is *not* network (ethernet or otherwise) (isn't
that the point of OOB?)
I don't understand this at all. Why can't an OOB network be ethernet
based towards
- Original Message -
On 1/15/13 9:31 AM, Bruce H McIntosh wrote:
On Tue, 2013-01-15 at 17:23 +, Warren Bailey wrote:
I still call a /24 a class c too.. :/ lol
More efficient that way - class c uses fewer syllables than
slash
twenty four :-)
You realize that class-c
We have recently been having some serious speed issues with YouTube on our home
connections, which are all Time Warner Cable.
Some searching on forums and such revealed a work around:
Block 206.111.0.0/16 at the router.
This makes speeds go from ~1 Mb/s to the full connection speed (30 Mb/s in
- Original Message -
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 3:11 PM, Randy Carpenter
rcar...@network1.net wrote:
We have recently been having some serious speed issues with YouTube
on our home connections, which are all Time Warner Cable.
Some searching on forums and such revealed a work around
I'm going to guess that this is not going to meet the OP's request for an XFP,
which would be 10GbE (and not an SFP).
thanks,
-Randy
- Original Message -
I am tearing my hair out with an issue, and I hope someone can point something
out to me that I am missing.
I am setting up 2-port LACP sets on a Cisco 2960G-24TS-L, which then need to be
802.1q trunk ports.
I have set it up as follows:
interface Port-channel1
switchport mode trunk
!
Thanks for all the suggestions.
I added the switchport mode trunk to the interfaces, and it did start working
properly after a reload of the switch.
Before the reboot, it would not work.
-Randy
- Original Message -
I am tearing my hair out with an issue, and I hope someone can
I have been getting some from vendors that already have my email, and/or
already have a relationship with. Nothing from someone I've never dealt with
before. If that is what you are getting, then that is pretty slimy.
-Randy
- Original Message -
I'm getting a rash of emails (as are
On the hotel network, I have also seen some issues beyond getting an address. I
can usually trace just fine, but applications, specifically web is extremely
slow, or non responsive. The hotel appears to be shoving all traffic through a
squid proxy, which does not appear to be big enough to
-Original Message-
From: Randy Bush [mailto:ra...@psg.com]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2011 9:44 AM
To: Randy Carpenter
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group
Subject: Re: meeting network
I would think that the contract with the hotel for the conference
would include
Very nice. I wonder if this is an option we could try to use in future
meetings. It makes sense, really, since we already have decent connectivity for
the conference areas, and we wouldn't be destroying the hotel's outside
connection (only their WiFi ;-) )
-Randy
- Original Message
Not sure about RIPE, but under ARIN, you would qualify for a /44 (or larger if
you have more than 12 sites), out of which you could announce the /48s
independently and as an aggregate, as you wish to do.
-Randy
- Original Message -
Hello,
Please advice what is the best practice
as the next-hop, but are unable to
get an ND entry for it, and thus cannot forward traffic to me.
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President - IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First Network Group, Inc.
| (800)578-6381, Opt. 1
We are using global addresses, but on the Cisco side, it is seeing the
Link-Local as the next-hop.
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President - IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First Network Group, Inc.
| (800)578-6381, Opt. 1
- Original Message -
When I am trying
BGP is working fine, it is when they are trying to forward the packets back to
me. They are seeing the Link-Local as the next-hop, which, for some reason,
they cannot get to.
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President - IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First Network Group, Inc
for that one.
-Randy
On Dec 7, 2011, at 17:53, Peter Rubenstein peter...@gmail.com wrote:
Try setting local-address in the bgp neighbor config on the Juniper side?
--Peter
On Dec 7, 2011, at 4:54 PM, Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.net wrote:
Does anyone have any suggestions on setting
- Original Message -
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Randy Carpenter
rcar...@network1.net wrote:
Tried that. I agree with others that it is an NDP issue. NDP for
the GUA is fine, but just not for the link local. Is there
something that would block only link local by default
?
When DHCPv6 with Prefix Delegation seems to be about the only way to deploy
IPv6 to end users in a generic device-agnostic fashion, I am wondering why it
is so difficult to find a working solution.
thanks,
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President - IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
for service providers?
-Randy
Original Message
From: Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.net
Sent: Tue, Jan 17, 2012 5:4 PM
To: Nanog nanog@nanog.org
CC:
Subject: How are you doing DHCPv6 ?
I am wondering how people out there are using DHCPv6 to handle
assigning
- Original Message -
On 1/17/12 6:37 PM, Daniel Roesen d...@cluenet.de wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 06:19:28PM -0500, Randy Carpenter wrote:
You might want to give this a read:
http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-redundancy-consider-02.txt
That doesn't
Same here. No idea who the intended recipient organization is, as it was sent
to our generic tech contact email address that is used for a bunch of ASes,
ARIN accounts, domains, etc. There are pretty much no details in the message.
-Randy
- Original Message -
AS2381 has also received
- Original Message -
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Randy Carpenter
rcar...@network1.net wrote:
We have a requirement for it to be a redundant server that is
centrally located. DHCPv6 will be relayed from each customer access
segment.
We have been looking at using ISC
:31, Jimmy Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 7:03 AM, Bjørn Mork bj...@mork.no wrote:
Randy Carpenter rcar...@network1.net writes:
Duplicate assignments are not a problem as long as you ensure that the
client is the same.
Duplicate assignments to different clients also
in a dual-stack
environment where IPv6 isn't considered necessary yet, but in the
near
future that will change.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Randy Carpenter
rcar...@network1.net wrote:
I am wondering how people out there are using DHCPv6 to handle
assigning prefixes to end
-0500, Randy Carpenter wrote:
We have also recently realized that the DUID is pretty much
completely
random, and there is no way to tie the MAC address to a client.
This
pretty much makes it impossible to manage a large customer base.
Not sure about that. The DUID is not random, at least
:
On Mon, 2012-01-23 at 17:26 -0500, Randy Carpenter wrote:
One major issue is that there is no way to associate a user's MAC
(for
IPv4) with their DUID. I haven't been able to find a way to
account
for this without making the user authenticate once for IPv4, and
then
again for IPv6
FUD than fact.
There _are_ things we need to address to make DHCPv6 easier to roll
out (mainly on the server side), but just making bogus nitpick
attacks
distracts from the real issues, IMHO.
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Randy Carpenter
rcar...@network1.net wrote
I like the Juniper EX2200C switches. They are only 12-port, but have 2 SFPs.
They are very low power, and have no fans.
However, I am still waiting (it has been several months) for them to send me
the correct rack mount brackets (which are a separate purchase).
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
Does anyone have any recommendation for a reliable cloud host?
We require 1 or 2 very small virtual hosts to host some remote services to
serve as backup to our main datacenter. One of these services is a DNS server,
so it is important that it is up all the time.
We have been using Rackspace
- Original Message -
On Feb 26, 2012, at 4:56 PM, Randy Carpenter wrote:
We have been using Rackspace Cloud Servers. We just realized that
they have absolutely no redundancy or failover after experiencing
a outage that lasted more than 6 hours yesterday. I am appalled
Pardon the weird question:
Is the DNS service authoritative or recursive? If auth, you can
solve this a few ways, either by giving the DNS name people point to
multiple (and A) records pointing at a diverse set of
instances.
Authoritative. But, also not the only thing that we are
We're seeing some strange issues with our fiber connection to TWC in Ohio.
Intermittent packet loss to/from some IPs.
It gets as specific as from a certain IP outside our network, packets to
a.b.c.10 are fine, but pings to a.b.c.50 (same subnet of same netblock) lose
~75% of the packets.
Any Juniper MX experts out there want to do some quick consulting for me (not
for free)?
I am working on implementing a couple of MX5 routers in a service provider
setting, and have run into some issues. I am pretty proficient at the SRX and
EX lines, but not as much with the MX. As the
Thanks everyone for all the responses. They were extremely helpful.
-Randy
- Original Message -
Any Juniper MX experts out there want to do some quick consulting for
me (not for free)?
I am working on implementing a couple of MX5 routers in a service
provider setting, and have
Not only does Verizon *not* have IPv6 on their LTE network, they also do *not*
have IPv4, except for double-NATed rfc1918 crap that changes your IP address
every couple minutes. The only way to get a stable connection is to pay them
$500 to get a static public IP address.
thanks,
-Randy
functionality. Head--Wall.
thanks,
-Randy
- Original Message -
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Randy Carpenter
rcar...@network1.net wrote:
Not only does Verizon *not* have IPv6 on their LTE network, they
also do *not* have IPv4, except for double-NATed rfc1918 crap that
changes
- Original Message -
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Randy Carpenter
rcar...@network1.net wrote:
I suppose they are selectively letting certain devices in some
areas. I get der duh, what? when I ask about it.
uhm... you asked someone at their kiosks/stores about ipvanything
minutes ago...
On May 23, 2012 2:58 PM, Frank Bulk - iName.com frnk...@iname.com
wrote:
Here's a screenshot from 15 months ago:
http://www.fix6.net/archives/2011/02/21/ipv6-live-on-verizons-lte-network/
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Randy Carpenter [mailto: rcar
Nope.
I signed up for the beta a long time ago, and have never heard anything about
IPv6 on the residential network. My company is one of the first (if not *the*
first) direct connect commercial customers that got IPv6 connectivity in Ohio.
I only see a few other ASNs that are directly
Appears to compile file on Mac OS X 10.7. The resulting programs run, but I
have not tried any real testing with actual data.
thanks,
-Randy
- Original Message -
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Folks,
I've posted a snapshot (tarball) of my working copy of the
Safari is definitely preferring IPv4.
In a happier note, if you tether a device via hotspot on an IOS6 iPad, the
clients get native IPv6. Strangely, they get addresses out of the same /64 as
the iPad's LTE interface. Anyone know how that is working? I would have thought
they would use
I've seen requests for a drawing of some sort, but never specifically and
exclusively visio.
If they insist on visio, I would send them a LART (at high velocity) instead.
-Randy
- Original Message -
Just got told by a Lightpath person that in order to do BGP on a
customer gig
Just make sure to name the scanned file VisioDi~1_vsd.png, and maybe they won't
notice.
-Randy
- Original Message -
As a person who often draws out + scans diagrams, I support this
message.
On 09/28/2012 01:18 PM, Seth Mattinen wrote:
Hand draw two squares, label them our AS
If you have a need for a 4-post rack, do not accomplish that by using 2 2-post
racks. You will likely find that rack rails that are designed for a 4-post rack
will not fit.
Get an open-frame 4-post rack. It will come unassembled. It will also likely be
no more costly that 2 2-post racks.
- Original Message -
If you have a need for a 4-post rack, do not accomplish that by
using 2 2-po=
st racks. You will likely find that rack rails that are designed
for a 4-pos=
t rack will not fit.
Why? With *any* rack, there are always scenarios where the rack
rails for
at the Juniper M or MX series (depending on your
needs) or, if you are wanting Cisco, the ASR series is what to look for. The
Juniper routers are going to be less expensive per performance.
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President - IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First Network
I'm getting v6 for facebook now.
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President - IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First Network Group, Inc.
| (800)578-6381, Opt. 1
- Original Message -
This is from Sweden.
$ dig any www.facebook.com @ns1.facebook.com
; DiG 9.7.3
I have an interesting situation at a business that I am working on. We
currently have the office set up with redundant connections for their mission
critical servers and such, and also have a (cheap) cable modem for general
browsing on client machines.
The interesting part is that the client
I guess I'm a little confused on the setup. You have a firewall with
a
connection to a local LAN, another connection to customer network(s),
and
a third connection to the Internet via cable modem?
You have NAT setup to NAT your Local LAN out to the Internet and to
the
customer network?
Prefix translation looks to be exactly what we need to do here. Thanks for all
of the replies.
-Randy
On Jun 12, 2011, at 2:42, Seth Mos seth@dds.nl wrote:
Op 12 jun 2011, om 03:50 heeft Randy Carpenter het volgende geschreven:
I have an interesting situation at a business that I
Does anyone know why the presentation slides keep going black after a few
minutes for each presenter on the video feed?
When a new presenter comes to the podium, their presentation appears, buy
always goes black after a while.
thanks,
-Randy
- Original Message -
The vastly better option is to obtain a prefix and ASN from ARIN and
merely trade BGP with your
upstream providers.
This is precisely what we are doing on the main network. We just want to keep
the general browsing traffic separated.
Prefix translation comes
Hi Ray,
There's a nuance here you've missed.
There are two main reasons for ULA inside the network:
1. Address stability (simplifies network management)
2. Source obfuscation (improves the depth of the security plan)
Option 1: Obfuscation desired.
ULA inside. NAT/PAT at both
Why do people insist on creating solutions where each host has
exactly one IPv6
address, instead of letting each host have *three* (in this case) - a
ULA and
two provider-prefixed addresses?
How does the upstream router control which address/path the client host use to
route?
-Randy
ATT serves some entire states out of a single POP, as far as
layer-3
termination is concerned.
Are any of the states with populations larger than Philadelphia
among
them?
Yes, for example, Indiana. Pretty much every state in the former
Ameritech service territory.
Does
I heard at one time that hardware manufacturers were likely to route in
hardware only down to a /64, and that any smaller subnets would be subject to
the slow path as ASICs were being designed with 64-bit address tables. I have
no idea of the validity of that claim. Does anyone have any
or the bill that goes with that!
-Randy
--
| Randy Carpenter
| Vice President - IT Services
| Red Hat Certified Engineer
| First Network Group, Inc.
| (800)578-6381, Opt. 1
- Original Message -
All of the speculation and comment on this thread has been something
to watch, but, it's not actually all that accurate.
https://www.arin.net/policy/nrpm.html#four2
NRPM 4.2 provides several ways in which an ISP can qualify for space
As has been mentioned
I have a small ISP customer who is not multi-homed, and is using
about a /21 and a half of space, and is expanding. Their upstream
is refusing to give them more space, so they wanted to get their
own, and give back the space to the upstream, with the possible
exception of a small block
- Original Message -
On Tue, 20 Sep 2011 07:59:00 EDT, harbor235 said:
Curious if anyone out there is acting as an independent contractor,
consultant, or small business,
if so do you use professional liability insurance?
I don't consult myself, but is *anybody* crazy enough to
The reality is that with the mega-insurance companies able to set
whatever crazy premiums they feel like, and raise them every
other month, the cost of being fully insured is sometimes more
than what you can charge as a consultant.
This is just not true. Insurance companies are
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
