isc.org zone.
More detail to follow tomorrow once I've had some sleep...
Ray Bellis
Director of DNS Operations, ISC.
On 26/03/2020 06:29, Mark Andrews wrote:
> There should be a official report sometime tomorrow.
Our report is at:
<https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2020-March/102828.html>
Ray Bellis
Director of DNS Operations, ISC.
On 19/10/2021 13:29, Travis Garrison wrote:
> Yup, same here
and here.
For now we're just ignoring it, but if anyone wants to quote us (ISC, a
DNS root server operator) in the event of law enforcement action please
let me know.
Ray
On 16/02/2021 22:51, Compton, Rich A wrote:
> There was the outage in 2014 when we got to 512K routes.
> http://www.bgpmon.net/what-caused-todays-internet-hiccup/
There was a similar issue in 1998/9 or so when we got to 64K routes,
which broke the routing table index (which defaulted to a
On 22/10/2021 06:39, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote:
> \032 is not a space.
>
> Decimal 32 (0x20, \040) is a space.
> \032 is a Ctrl-Z (26 decimal, 0x1a)
In DNS zone files (and dig's presentation format) backslashed numbers
are in decimal, not octal - RFC 1035, §5.1.
Ray
Hi all,
I have transit donated from Zayo at Equinix SV8 (529 Bryant St, Palo
Alto) but it's so old that no-one at Zayo appears to know it exists and
they can't find records of it. It probably dates to the MFN /
Above.net days.
If you can assist with discussions about delivery of that
On 07/05/2022 02:18, Mukund Sivaraman wrote:
If zone enumeration was not a real concern, NSEC3 would not
exist. However, public DNS is a public tree and so we should have
limited expectations for hiding names in it.
A significant motivation was to help defend database copyright in the
> On 7 May 2022, at 17:37, Mel Beckman wrote:
>
> I don’t think copyright can enter into it, by dint of the fact that
> registry data, being purely factual and publicly available, cannot be
> copyrighted.
>
> On March 27, 1991, in a case that transformed the nascent online database
>
> Is there any case law where someone has asserted a database right for a DNS
> zone?
> It seems like a rather stupid thing to do. If someone asserted such a
> right, I would make sure not to infringe it by ensuring no entries
> from that database entered my DNS caches or other software.
It
On 16/01/2024 01:32, Mike Hammett wrote:
Someone I talked to while on scene today said their area got to 130 and
cooked two core routers.
We've lost one low-end switch. I'm very glad it wasn't two core routers!
We're still looking into what recourse we have against the datacenter
operator.
On 05/12/2023 20:08, Christopher Morrow wrote:
is the test framework documented where others could setup/run the
test(s)? :) (perhaps for mr hare I mean, or me! :) )
https://github.com/isc-projects/perflab
https://www.isc.org/docs/bellis-oarc-perflab.pdf
Are the tests for authoritative
On 05/12/2023 12:29, Michael Hare via NANOG wrote:
At quick glance following the ISC link I didn’t see the compute
infrastructure [core count] needed to get 1Mpps. There is an obvious
difference between 99% load of ~500rps and 1M, so we can maybe advise to
not undersize ADNS if that's an
On 27/02/2024 18:47, William Herrin wrote:
Then I'd write a script to monitor the local tftp server and stop frr
if it detects any problems with the tftp server.
There are other ways to achieve this without actually stopping the
routing daemon.
We have DNS servers where the anycast
On 18/05/2024 08:38, Bill Woodcock wrote:
L-root, ICANN, selective: https://www.dns.icann.org/imrs/
...
So, of the thirteen root nameservers, ten are potentially available
for interconnection, and of those, only two, Cogent and ICANN, don’t
have open peering policies.
IIUC, most of
14 matches
Mail list logo
