On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:35:37PM -0400, William Herrin wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm looking for a way to do wireline access to send and receive
cellular phone short message service (SMS) messages. Despite all my
google-fu, I have had limited luck finding anyone that meets my needs,
so I'm hoping
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 06:17:26PM -0400, William Herrin wrote:
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 6:13 PM, Ray Van Dolson rvandol...@esri.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:35:37PM -0400, William Herrin wrote:
Alternately, I can also consider a wireless carrier that can provide
two SIM-based phones
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 01:10:08PM -0700, Zachary McGibbon wrote:
With all of Apple's updates today (MacOS, iOS, Apps, etc) we saw a big
increase on one of our links to our ISP at 1pm Eastern.
Did anyone else notice significant traffic jumps on their networks?
That's an impressive jump. Do
On Mon, Nov 07, 2011 at 07:04:19AM -0800, Peter Pauly wrote:
Gizmodo is reporting problems at Time Warner Telecom we're suffering
from it too and calls to the NOC have not been answered so far... does
anyone have any further information?
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 09:50:00AM -0700, Brian Keefer wrote:
On Apr 7, 2012, at 4:41 PM, TR Shaw wrote:
As for SORBS, most competent mail admins dropped its use a long
time ago. I thought when Proofpoint took it over things would
change (I actually thought they would dump the SORBS
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 04:39:04PM +, Blake Pfankuch wrote:
We are the same way. Phones going nuts ringing as we are an MXLogic
partner. I am slowly getting email with about a 2-3 hour delay right
now. Anyone know any more?
-Original Message-
From: Duane Toler
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 02:57:36PM -0400, Andrew D Kirch wrote:
I really wish people would get over themselves and get to work.
Work is a place where things get done, not where people piss and
moan about every single perceived slight they can come up with.
Andrew
I only wish you had used
Looking for a DNS/hostmaster contact for fbi.gov for troubleshooting a
DNSSEC issue[1].
Have tried the usual hostmaster alias with no luck.
Thanks,
Ray
[1] https://lists.isc.org/pipermail/bind-users/2013-July/091142.html
On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:27:36PM +, John Levine wrote:
I don't claim to be a big DNSSEC expert, but this looks just plain
wrong to me, and unbound agrees, turning it into a SERVFAIL.
Here's a lookup that succeeds, an A record for mail.ic.fbi.gov:
$ dig @ns1.fbi.gov mail.ic.fbi.gov a
Seeing pretty consistent packet loss to/from instances in EC2 East
(54.80 IPs) from various vantage points.
Working through normal support channels, but looking for a contact to
help expedite.
Thanks,
Ray
My municipality (Loma Linda, CA) doesn't offer anything free, but does
provide fiber connectivity (Layer 3) to residents in some portions of
the city. There were plans at one point to make it available more
broadly, but nearly eight years later I still am not in an area which
has access nor do I
I'm short some important details on this one, but hopefully can fill in
more shortly.
We're seeing poor performance (very slow download speeds --
100KB/sec) to certain EC2 instances via our Verizon hosted circuits.
The issue is reproducible on both our production Gigabit circuit as
well as a
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:41:25AM +0700, Roland Dobbins wrote:
On Jul 22, 2014, at 10:31 AM, Ray Van Dolson rvandol...@esri.com wrote:
We're seeing poor performance (very slow download speeds --
100KB/sec) to certain EC2 instances via our Verizon hosted
circuits.
Have you tried
!
-Tim
On Jul 21, 2014 8:34 PM, Ray Van Dolson rvandol...@esri.com wrote:
I'm short some important details on this one, but hopefully can fill in
more shortly.
We're seeing poor performance (very slow download speeds --
100KB/sec) to certain EC2 instances via our Verizon
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 08:47:36PM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:41:25AM +0700, Roland Dobbins wrote:
On Jul 22, 2014, at 10:31 AM, Ray Van Dolson rvandol...@esri.com wrote:
We're seeing poor performance (very slow download speeds --
100KB/sec) to certain
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:54:59PM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
Others appear to be having similar issues. Seems like Verizon is
pointing at AWS:
https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?messageID=558094
Ray
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 08:56:27PM -0700, Tim Heckman wrote:
Realized I
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 05:29:55PM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:54:59PM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
Others appear to be having similar issues. Seems like Verizon is
pointing at AWS:
https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?messageID=558094
Ray
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 07:40:26PM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 05:29:55PM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:54:59PM -0700, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
Others appear to be having similar issues. Seems like Verizon is
pointing at AWS:
https
We're seeing issues deliving email to certain .mil domains. MX hosts
for these domains are not responding on port 25 and have verified from
off-network as well.
Anyone else seeing the same or can point me to a technical POC to start
with?
navy.mil, usmc.mil, uscg.mil are just a few that seem to
wrote:
You sure it's not a DNS issue? I've had problems resolving various
*.disa.mil sites today. Google DNS claims they don't exist.
Chuck
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Ray Van Dolson
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 1:52 PM
To: nanog
On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 10:43:34AM -0400, Chuck Church wrote:
-Original Message-
From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Alain Hebert
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2014 9:14 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: .mil postmaster Contacts?
Might be related to the
Hi all;
Looking to improve cell reception for mixed ATT/Verizon users on the
first floor of one of our buildings.
Starting to dig into this and coming across items like this one at
Amazon[1], but thought some of you out there might have recommendations
for something that has worked well for you
Hopefully not too far off topic for this list.
Am looking for options to deploy DNS caching resolvers at remote
locations where there may only be minimal infrastructure (FW and Cisco
equipment) and limited options for installing a noisier, more power
hugnry servers or appliances from a vendor.
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 11:04:06AM -0400, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 6:21 AM, Simon Brilus sbri...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
Hi - I have a PCIDSs requirement to encrypt VoIP over a 3rd party VPLS
network. Has anyone dealt with this. I'd really not use VPN's over the VPLS
Had a BGP blip with our Verizon circuit around 1620 PDT.
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 08:40:16PM -0400, Bill Patterson wrote:
Seems to be a pretty widespread Verizon issue along the west coast and
majority of the eastern US, at least according to down detector.
On May 28, 2015 8:12 PM, James Laszko
green; don't print this email.
-Original Message-
From: Jameson, Daniel [mailto:daniel.jame...@tdstelecom.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2015 3:11 PM
To: Ray Van Dolson; Graham Johnston
Cc: 'nanog@nanog.org'
Subject: RE: SAS Drive Enclosure
What are you thinking for connectivity
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 07:19:59PM +, Graham Johnston wrote:
I am looking for information about SAS drive enclosures, is there a
list like NANOG that covers that area of IT?
I am specifically looking for an enclosure that can handle 12 or more
drives, I am looking to create a clustered
Anyone familiar with how Akamai does its geolocation? Presumably they
do more than Maxmind/WHOIS, but I suppose one or both of those could
factor in?
For those of you with ARIN IP space, do you typically SWIP things to
yourself to help clarify the locations where the IP space physically
resides
I don't believe anyone is either. We looked at it as well and after
reviewing logs from our authoritative DNS server responsible for our
in-addr.arpa zones, we saw zero queries for LOC records.
Ray
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:43:13AM -0400, Clay Curtis wrote:
> I don't believe anyone is actually
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 09:41:42PM -0400, William Herrin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Ian Clark wrote:
> > Where do GeoIP companies get their data, if not whois records?
>
> I would assume that they query whois for one of their sources. They
> don't have to
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 08:47:56PM -0400, William Herrin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 7:29 PM, Roland Dobbins wrote:
> > On 25 Sep 2015, at 5:58, Ian Clark wrote:
> >> Any advice would be awesome!
> > There is no inherent correlation between IP addressing and geopolitical
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 01:22:27PM -0400, Ken Chase wrote:
> and of course the second I post it all fixes itself. NANOG works! Thanks!
>
> (was going on for about 10-15 min)
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 01:21:47PM -0400, Ken Chase said:
> >
> >From toronto - something odd - mtr to google.com
One of our external hide NATs has been blocked by the census.gov WAF.
Would someone contact me off-list about this or help point me to the
proper POC? Am thinking responsibility may lie at the higher .gov
level...
TIA,
Ray
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__hub.dyn.com_dyn-2Dblog_dyn-2Dstatement-2Don-2D10-2D21-2D2016-2Dddos-2Dattack=DQIBAg=n6-cguzQvX_tUIrZOS_4Og=r4NBNYp4yEcJxC11Po5I-w=iGvkbfzRJPqKO1A6YGa-c1m0RBLNkRk03hCjvVGTH3k=bScBNFncB3kt_cG0L3iys0mfXBmwwUR7A8rIDmi94D4=
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at
On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 01:52:15PM -0800, Paul B. Henson wrote:
> > From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2017 6:49 AM
> >
> > Even if nothing else happens, calling in and reporting the problem *does*
> > (or at least it *should*) set the clock running for any SLA-related
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 12:06:26PM -0400, Cary Wiedemann wrote:
> All,
>
> Our AT BVOIP service is down nationwide. Our account managers are
> frantically looking into it but we don't have an official statement yet.
>
> Symptoms vary from no ringing (sourced from MegaPath), ring then drop
>
On Sun, Dec 03, 2017 at 02:39:27PM +, Christopher J. Wolff wrote:
> I've about reached my limit with the dumpster fire that is Cisco's
> Identity Service Engine. Are there any reliable alternatives that do
> endpoint classification, central web auth, and .1x auth?
What version of ISE are you
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 10:57:49AM -0800, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> Looking at doing a one-off extension over RG6 and have these devices in
> hand. Anyone know if they're HPNA? Manual I have found doesn't
> specify, but frequency ranges don't appear to be MoCA (but also don't
> appea
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amazon.com_GefenTV-2DEthernet-2DExtender-2DDiscontinued-2DManufacturer_dp_B0013LYMQ8=DwIBAg=n6-cguzQvX_tUIrZOS_4Og=r4NBNYp4yEcJxC11Po5I-w=MLZzcgCKfcPGBwKCi3lSUygoJ78g6KFaevQZoryCq9s=HwKmGRftJEcyn2of9m9-zXwj2WV33LsB0QM-dB4cgWU=
Looking at
Anecdotally, we had staff feeding off of both AT and VZW IP-based
metrocells get the alert message.
Ray
On Wed, Oct 03, 2018 at 12:53:57PM -0700, mike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
> Iphone, vzw, silicon valley, rcvd.
>
> Interesting question though... I wonder if people on micro-cells
> and/or wifi
On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 01:25:32PM -0800, Nick Bogle wrote:
> A quick question for you guys;
>
> If you had a single dry pair (pair of copper wires originally for
> phones) to a remote site that was around 6 miles away, what would you
> use? We currently are just extending a T1 line to this
Getting issues from west-coast US clients trying to access services
like O365, Yahoo, GMail, etc. east-coast US doesn't seem to have the
same issue.
DNS servers are:
208.67.222.222
208.67.220.220
Switching to Google (8.8.8.8) fixes the issue.
Anyone else seeing this?
Ray
PS: Also posted to
On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 03:45:17AM -0400, Valdis Klētnieks wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Apr 2019 23:53:06 -0700, Ben Cannon said:
> > A 100/100 enterprise connection can easily support hundreds of desktop
> > users
> > if not more. It???s a lot of bandwidth even today.
>
> And what happens when a
Have been through something similar recently with CenturyLink extending fiber
service to a residence where only 3Mbps DSL was available previously.
Total costs ended up being in the mid five figures range (though I don’t know
how far they needed to extend fiber). We amortized over a multi-year
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__twitter.com_facebook_status_1106229690069442560=DwIGaQ=n6-cguzQvX_tUIrZOS_4Og=r4NBNYp4yEcJxC11Po5I-w=IHR1veHNjVYVktL31OQ_tgBUNHO5Uf3ACrvIVAW5cho=zrKUWVShQdFllKTGbJE5kITG87q7KNJHo0bD6aETBBk=
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Luke Guillory
Sent:
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 02:28:39PM -0500, Jason Canady wrote:
> We use rtg2, which stores data in MySQL. I use PHP to calculate
> percentiles. It allows for most flexibility.
>
> >
> > On Dec 10, 2020, at 13:29, Mehmet Akcin wrote:
> >
> > hi there,
> >
> > i have asked about this in the
I think this is essentially the bill:
https://www.congress.gov/bill/117th-congress/house-bill/69/text
Not finding anything about 15 degrees.
Ray
-Original Message-
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Mel
Beckman
Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 12:19 PM
To: Jay R. Ashworth
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Infrapedia says there is Zayo fiber across the street to the south. Guessing a
DIA circuit might be a budget buster though.
From: NANOG On Behalf Of Matthew
Petach
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2022 4:47 PM
To: Josh Luthman
Cc: NANOG
Subject: Re: New minimum speed for US broadband
On Tue, 05 Mar 2024 12:17 -0700, Michael Rathbun wrote:
>> What I found intriguing was that I was logged out by Google Docs at
>> the same moment FB logged me out. Downdetector showed a number of
>> other supposedly unrelated services with large outage report spikes
>> at roughly the same
49 matches
Mail list logo