king on ways to manage spam in an IPv6 world since that's the
present reality.
Scott
e list it is many times
a VERY hard task convincing non-technical or minimally
technically oriented managers to let us have the time
and permission to roll it out. It's one thing that's
got me really grumpy about where I work. They just
don't (and don't want to) understand.
scott
rmance. Cisco 10Ks still have absolute caps on the amount of SNMP
they will allow and other manufacturers and models do different things that
limit what you can do.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscot
I get there with no problem.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Murat Kaipov <mkai...@outlook.com> wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
/20150909_Comcast_streams_onto_college_campuses.html
https://xfinityoncampus.com/login
Having said all of that, I'd agree that a good radio resource management
approach would benefit all of us, including the CableWiFi guys.
http://www.cablelabs.com/wi-fi-radio-resource-management-rrm/
Scott
OPM, as in Other People's Money? If that's what you meant I don't think
that's an accurate description since AFAIK Comcast didn't get any CAF money.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
transmitting protocol. LTE and LTE-U is a centrally scheduled protocol and
doesn't have a back off mechanism.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 12:03 PM
--- rdobb...@arbor.net wrote:
From: "Roland Dobbins" <rdobb...@arbor.net>
On 11 Sep 2015, at 2:38, Scott Weeks wrote:
> Anyone use or know how these work with the satellite networks?
All the features this supposedly has which makes it optimized for
constrained-bandwidth en
Anyone use or know how these work with the satellite
networks?
http://www.groundcontrol.com/BGAN_Optimized_Laptop.htm
Off list is fine...
scott
--- larryshel...@cox.net wrote:
From: Larry Sheldon <larryshel...@cox.net>
On 9/6/2015 14:18, Scott Weeks wrote:
> --- rdr...@direcpath.com wrote:
> From: Robert Drake <rdr...@direcpath.com>
>
> Maybe people could adopt an unofficial-official
> end-of-signature
ersome.
scott
licensed content. Cookies are used temporarily to maintain sessions in
IEEE Xplore and for no other purpose. The cookies will not persist after
a session ends.
Please change your browser settings to accept cookies before you access
IEEE Xplore.
scott
number. VLANS/VRFs are too easy not to do that.
scott
Ryan,
Most certainly, the charges varied some because of size and other factors
but it was around 25 cents monthly per Gmail box.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
but also less expensive
solutions that look more like traditional ISP email.
It really depended on how much the ISP thought their end users wanted the
Google like functionality.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com
and the business
offerings in functionality and pricing.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Matt Hoppes mhop...@indigowireless.com
wrote:
Which is odd
On 8/15/15 09:47, Glen Kent wrote:
Hi,
Is it fair to say that most traffic drops happen in the access layers, or
the first and the last miles, and the % of packet drops in the core are
minimal? So, if the packet has made it past the first mile and has
entered the core then chances are high
I'm in the same boat myself. One thing I can share is Juniper really
doesn't want to talk about the PTX1000 at all right now as it's not due to
be available until November. They're going to suggest you look at the
MX240/480 instead.
*[image: userimage]Scott Larson[image: los angeles]
https
Automation just means your mistake goes many more places more quickly.
On Aug 4, 2015 9:38 AM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Scott Helms khe...@zcorum.com wrote:
With the (large) caveat that heterogenous networks are more subject to
human
With the (large) caveat that heterogenous networks are more subject to
human error in many cases.
On Aug 4, 2015 9:25 AM, Joe Greco jgr...@ns.sol.net wrote:
So, you guys recommend replace Bind for another option ?
No. Replacing one occasionally faulty product with another occasionally
, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Scott Helms khe...@zcorum.com wrote:
Automation just means your mistake goes many more places more quickly.
and letting people keep poking at things that computers should be
doing is... much worse. people do
I was just thinking about my remaining Win 7 box _after_ I hit send and I
believe you're correct (I have one still to upgrade). Which means users
upgrading from 7 to 10 will need to create an ID, but users of 8 and 8.1
will use the one they already have.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
Justin,
That's true, but it takes effort for people to either set up a local
account or change to one, and very few consumers will do that or have.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
Since the requirement is that users are upgrading from Win 7, 8, or 8.1
they've already had to create at least a minimal MS ID which means either
creating an email account on Outlook.com or providing an existing email
address and a password for MS.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
It's downloading for me right now, though I did reserve my slot.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Justin Mckillican jus...@mckill.ca
Colton,
Pico is a decent solution, Harmonic has one too (
http://www.harmonicinc.com/product/cable-edge/nsg-exo). As for cable
specific lists, about the closest I know about is the SCTE mailing list.
http://www.scte.org/SCTE/Resources/SCTE_Lists.aspx
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
Aussie-Sixpack notify you that you
:: goofed, when you've blocked his IP range?
-
He doesn't. This is war and us amuricans're gonna
make them change their culture to fit our expectations,
too. ;-)
scott
If you have been keeping an eye on the ARIN IPV4 countdown, they allocated
their last /23 yesterday. There are only 400 /24s in the pool now.
https://www.arin.net/resources/request/ipv4_countdown.html
Robert D. Scottrob...@ufl.edu
Network Engineer 3 352-273-0113 Phone
UF
what I
have seen, government-oriented managers do
not do that. It's politics only. Not
technical. Not logical. Not actual
save/make money. Put it off until a later
date. Period.
scott
(work [close enough to gov't folks to be painful]
has got me feeling cynical today... :-)
?
---
Not one single problem. Yay! :-)
me: gives thanks to $deity/$deities) - Ku, Kane, Lono and Kanaloa
in Hawaiian
scott
On 6/29/15 20:17, Johnny Eriksson wrote:
Javier Henderson jav...@kjsl.org wrote:
Or XNS. On the other hand, people did have a nice career with
SNA...but they weren't trying to push packets over the
LAT
.daytime
Monday 29-Jun-2015 20:10:46
.pjob
Job 3 at ODEN User BYGG [10,335]
point where much of the Internet
begins to treat it as a second-class citizen that really matters. I would
suggest most people will not like ending up on the wrong side of that curve.
My perspective, anyway.
Scott
On 6/25/15 07:49, Jared Mauch wrote:
On Jun 25, 2015, at 10:08 AM, Phil Rosenthal p...@isprime.com wrote:
On Jun 25, 2015, at 9:32 AM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote:
geolocation is hard :(
If you would like to see how Google has your geolocation set, check:
curl
device's CLI. :-)
scott
and won't be.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 11:58 AM, Josh Luthman j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
wrote:
If anyone can message me off list
to emails, settings,
address books, or anything else since early in June and that's not from
lack of trying.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 12:32 PM
prevent you from ever connecting any
computer to any other, get in the way of architecting systems around
pragmatic and effective security.
non-sensical compliance Yeah, that. Pure, unmitigated insanity.
scott
?
-
As someone else said, you can't understand unless you've worked
around it. From the statements you're making, it can be seen
you haven't. The petition will not help and it's not just one
person's fault. Try to stop continental drift. You'd have a
better chance.
scott
(at a different level) this
is SOP, unfortunately. They just don't understand the
importance until catastrophic failure.
scott
On 6/10/15 08:36, Jeff McAdams wrote:
There is no
other rational way to interpret your statement than to be a statement
of Google's position.
False dichotomies suck.
and there is a firewall between them that is blocking
ICMP and nothing else. How would you complete a
traceroute to troubleshoot? (Use BSD or tcptraceroute,
for example) Then, it turns the questioning into
operational.
scott
There are alternative solutions. We're looking at using one from ABN for a
customer that perseveres all of the AAA functionality and supports IPoE
with the same integrationhooks as PPPoE and handles both at the same time
to make transition easier. The project is being staged right now but
anyone
of these certifications. :)
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Stephen Satchell l...@satchell.net
Date: Sunday, June 7, 2015 at 8:28 AM
To: joshua.riesenwe...@outlook.com, nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: eBay is looking for network heavies...
That said, certifications show that the candidate
that
the person cares, rather than just doing a job.
scott
ps. I never thought of RTFM as a protocol, but I like it.
It's a protocol between engineers. The conservative in
what you send part... :-)
--- j...@op-sec.us wrote:
From: John Fraizer j...@op-sec.us
Bonus points if you can
tell me about IPv8. (The old guard will get that joke.)
Long live Jim! U...Never mind...
:-)
scott
something
stupid and finally throwing up my hands in disgust knowing
I'm not going to get the date/job. :-) This happened to me
around 6-8 months ago.
scott
--- larryshel...@cox.net wrote:
From: Larry Sheldon larryshel...@cox.net
On 6/2/2015 00:27, Scott Weeks wrote:
Great article for the WP and they asked good questions from
the correct people, but I have to take issue with the lack
of network operator's participation comments:
: But getting
NANOG's AUP specifically
states Product marketing is prohibited. and Using list
as source for private marketing initiatives is prohibited.
[FIN, ACK, Seq=2many, Len=0]
scott
.
Product Evangelist
--
BLECH! I need a shower.
scott
, rather
than the important things until everyone's behind the 8-ball.
Then, all of the sudden, the mostly clueless managers are all
about it. But, by then it's too late. Farting in a hurricane
and hoping it makes a difference... ;-)
scott
- Original Message -
From: Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.com
--- n...@border6.com wrote:
From: Pawel Rybczyk n...@border6.com
platform where we included new feature called
That might be interesting for you.
---
This might be interesting
it unhashed
which is probably what you mean.
It may well be that they are storing it unencrypted, but you can't outright
say that without extra knowledge.
Scott
) it can be seen
that many are not implementing it. Those that care (NANOG type
folks) already have deployed it and those that don't care have
not and will not. I have met a lot of the latter in recent
years. Maybe I'm getting cynical?
scott
What's going on? Isn't everybody headed to the beach
Would a prototypical neteng suffice?
On 5/18/15 13:48, Christopher Morrow wrote:
if there's a canonical neteng/ops person around it'd be handy to get a
contact off-list :) I have a question to ask... about bgp and paths
and fun stuff such as that!
(probably a traceroute or 'show ip bgp' would
at puck.nether.net,
but it's a really low volume list. ALU
engineers hang out there.
scott
on NANOG... ;-)
scott
changes!)
scott
with limited bandwidth, handled automatically via auto-bw.
Preventing non-optimal tunnel paths. No transoceanic trombones,
please; MPLS link affinities designed into the network.
-Scott
From: Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:30:01PM -0700, Scott Weeks wrote:
From: Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org
The first rule in every firewall is of course
deny all and subsequent rulesets permit only
the traffic that is necessary
On 07.05.2015 08:30, Scott Weeks wrote:
--- r...@gsp.org wrote:
From: Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org
The first rule in every firewall is of course
deny all and subsequent rulesets permit only
the traffic that is necessary.
I think you got this backward
and keeping them running long term is an even bigger pain. Certain models
don't work well with specific DSLAMs and/or in specific plant combinations
so testing with your DSLAMs, modems, and in your plant is a must.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
On 4/15/15 07:28, Rod Beck wrote:
Hi,
As you all know, transit costs in the wholesale market today a few
percent of what it did in 2000. I assume that most of that decline is
due to a modified version of Moore's Law (I don't believe optics
costs decline 50% every 18 months) and the advent of
/mm86/JohnLeland1789/Funny/PopcornHugeBags.jpg
scott
bandwidth.
Good luck with all that inter-governmental cooperation
and whole-country culture change, so your blocks can be
removed and they can reach your customers. ;-)
scott
this is it a requirement that
I have to yell yolo? ;-)
One day I'm going to write that into the test plan. I
absolutely hate it when they do that...
scott
Schprokits was mentioned at NANOG63 but http://www.schprokits.com/
doesn't look too good.
What happened?
in their bandwidth usage and that trying to build a system off
of NNTP so that each broadband subscriber became in effect a Usenet server
wouldn't work well without significant modifications.
Third, if anyone cares the Usenet server we ran was news.america.net
Scott Helms
Vice President
/em shrug
I can't help it if you don't like real world data.
On Mar 3, 2015 2:25 PM, Barry Shein b...@world.std.com wrote:
Ok, then I no longer have any confidence that I understand what you
were asserting.
From: Scott Helms khe...@zcorum.com
Odd how the graphing for the top 1000 Usenet
--- tethe...@shwisp.net wrote:
From: Sam Tetherow tethe...@shwisp.net
Lat/Lng to Census Block via FCC
http://data.fcc.gov/api/block/2010/find?latitude=$latitudelongitude=$longitudeshowall=trueformat=JSON
--
---Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.com wrote
Are you trying to get the census tract for each customer? If so you can
get that from most of the gecoding services like Esri etc.
On Mar 3, 2015 5:38 PM, Jay Hennigan j...@west.net wrote:
The CFO here is working on FCC form 477 and tells me that he needs to
enter census tract and block
message Not Found
description The requested resource (Not Found) is not available.
Apache Tomcat/6.0.30
scott
San Jose is most certainly not a pure coax network and is HFC.
HSD does mean High Speed Data.
On Mar 2, 2015 3:26 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
Not so sure about that…
240.59.103.76.in-addr.arpa. 7200 IN PTR
c-76-103-59-240.hsd1.ca.comcast.net.
is most definitely a business class
Odd how the graphing for the top 1000 Usenet servers showed exactly the
pattern I predicted.
On Mar 2, 2015 3:46 PM, Barry Shein b...@world.std.com wrote:
Anything based on NNTP would be extremely asymmetric without significant
changes to the protocol or human behavior.
We ran
to in practice?
Statistically speaking, those might *be* symmetric.
On 03/02/2015 08:41 AM, Scott Helms wrote:
Daniel,
For the third or fourth time in this discussion we are tracking and
customer satisfaction for users who do have symmetrical bandwidth 24 mbps
and have for a number of years
/2015 08:09 AM, Scott Helms wrote:
That's not the norm for consumers, but the important thing to understand
is that for most of the technologies we use for broadband there simply is
less upstream capacity than downstream. That upstream scarcity means that
for DSL, DOCSIS, PON, WiFi, and LTE
less time.
It isn't about the averaged total, it's about how long each event takes,
and backing up 4GB of files off-site shouldn't have to take an hour.
On 02/27/2015 03:11 PM, Scott Helms wrote:
Daniel,
50MB/s might be tough to fill, but even at home I can get good use out
of the odd 25MB
That's certainly true and why we watch the trends of usage very closely and
we project those terms into the future knowing that's imperfect.
What we won't do is build networks based purely on guesses. We certainly
see demand for upstream capacity increasing for residential customers, but
that
Anything based on NNTP would be extremely asymmetric without significant
changes to the protocol or human behavior.
We ran significant Usenet servers with binaries for nearly 20 years and
without for another 5 and the servers' traffic was heavily asymmetric.
On Mar 1, 2015 9:11 AM, Miles Fidelman
to have as many server nodes as you're describing and
I'd imagine there's some nasty side effects if we tried get that many
active servers going as we have customers.
On Mar 1, 2015 10:25 AM, Miles Fidelman mfidel...@meetinghouse.net
wrote:
Scott,
Asymmetric measured where? Between client
:
On 02/28/2015 06:38 PM, Scott Helms wrote:
You're off on this. When PacketCable 1.0 was in development and it's
early deployment there were no OTT VOIP providers of note. Vonage at that
time was trying sell their services to the MSOs and only when that didn't
work or did they start going
, Michael Thomas m...@mtcc.com wrote:
On 02/28/2015 06:15 PM, Scott Helms wrote:
Michael,
You should really learn how DOCSIS systems work. What you're trying to
claim it's not only untrue it is that way for very real technical reasons.
I'm well aware. I was there.
Mike
On Feb 28, 2015
You mean CableLabs?
On Mar 1, 2015 11:11 AM, Michael Thomas m...@mtcc.com wrote:
On 03/01/2015 07:55 AM, Scott Helms wrote:
Michael,
Exactly what are you basing that on? Like I said, none of the MSOs or
vendors involved in the protocol development had any concerns about OTT.
The reason
uplink rates as long as we don't go below ~5 mbps on the uplink.
On Feb 28, 2015 10:46 AM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 02/27/2015 04:11 PM, Scott Helms wrote:
Daniel,
50MB/s might be tough to fill, but even at home I can get good use out of
the odd 25MB/s upstream burst for a few
You're off on this. When PacketCable 1.0 was in development and it's early
deployment there were no OTT VOIP providers of note. Vonage at that time
was trying sell their services to the MSOs and only when that didn't work
or did they start going directly to consumers via SIP.
The prioritization
Michael,
You should really learn how DOCSIS systems work. What you're trying to
claim it's not only untrue it is that way for very real technical reasons.
On Feb 28, 2015 6:27 PM, Michael Thomas m...@mtcc.com wrote:
On 02/28/2015 03:14 PM, Clayton Zekelman wrote:
You do of course realize
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asymmetric_digital_subscriber_line_2 (ADSL2),
ITU-T G.992.3, up to 12 Mbit/s and 3.5 Mbit/s
- Asymmetric digital subscriber line 2 plus
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asymmetric_digital_subscriber_line_2_plus
(ADSL2+),
ITU-T G.992.5, up to 24 Mbit/s and 3.5 Mbit/s
Scott Helms
Funny, but in my honest opinion, unprofessional. Poor PR.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Scott Fisher littlefish...@gmail.com wrote:
Funny, but in my honest opinion, unprofessional. Poor PR.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Larry Sheldon larryshel...@cox.net wrote:
http
AFC, the only shelf I worked on that would silently allow you to allocate
so much bandwidth to the ADSL cards that voice wouldn't work
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
This is true in our measurements today, even when subscribers are given
symmetrical connections. It might change at some point in the future,
especially when widespread IPv6 lets us get rid of NAT as a de facto
deployment reality.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
I am not arguing that they have a valid complaint. I just think their
method of doing so is a bit childish. It does get the point across,
just not in the method I respect. Just my opinion though.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 9:50 AM, Rob McEwen r...@invaluement.com wrote:
Scott Fisher,
I think
see any additions to that list.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Bruce H McIntosh b...@ufl.edu wrote:
On 2015-02-27 14:14, Jim
saying that we must/should have symmetrical connectivity simply
because we don't see the market demand for that as of yet.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
On Fri, Feb 27
and most of the time that extra connectivity isn't needed. BTW, the
operator in this example has plenty capacity inside their DOCSIS and FTTH
plant as well as plenty of capacity to two Tier 1 carriers.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
(mostly GPON), DOCSIS cable modems, and various flavors of DSL.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Daniel Taylor dtay...@vocalabs.com wrote
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Scott Brim scott.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Common term in mobile operators. A mobile site is one that is not
I mean a legal site. Sigh.
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:24 PM, Bruce H McIntosh b...@ufl.edu wrote:
On 2015-02-27 14:14, Jim Richardson wrote:
What's a lawful web site?
Now *there* is a $64,000 question. Even more interesting is, Who gets to
decide day to day the answer to that question? :)
Common term in mobile
in customer satisfaction with correlate with increases in
download speeds past ~30mbps before the correlation starts weakening.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
On Fri, Feb
do well. Any notion what has
prevented that from happening?'
They *are *the alternative operator in this market. What's keeping anyone
else from doing it better is that it's more expensive than customers will
pay to do it better.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
changes won't be in the near term. Downstream demand is
growing, in most markets I can see, much faster than upstream demand.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
, but I don't see any evidence in actual performance
stats or customers sentiment to show that it's going up as fast as
downstream demand.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
501 - 600 of 1661 matches
Mail list logo
