Made it to Slashdot too -
http://tech.slashdot.org/story/10/05/10/0056228/The-Status-of-Routing-Reform-mdash-How-Fragile-is-the-Internet
As usual I wouldn't recommend reading the comments unless you want your eyes
to bleed...
Scott.
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Franck Martin fra
I think the only one under support may be the Cisco AS series (AS5800 only
now?):
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/univgate/ps509/
The other platform I knew besides the TNT was the Nortel CVX but it is EOL
also.
-Scott
-Original Message-
From: Jerry Bonner [mailto:jbon
and the two sides negotiate then select the
lowest timer settings. The BGP session automatically hard resets on some
equipment when changing the timers, so be aware of that.
scott
rate. I'm sure it's minimal for a few BGP
peers, but I could imagine with a lot of peers it's a non-zero impact.
scott
--- matt...@walster.org wrote:
From: Matthew Walster matt...@walster.org
On 12 May 2010 02:36, Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.com wrote:
You set the timers on your side and the two sides negotiate then select the
lowest timer settings. The BGP session automatically hard resets on some
Mmm... Good question. Would it actually come back OUT in a
recognizable (de-encapsulated) manner?
I'll vote with packet loss, 'cause tunneling seems pretty gross. ;)
Scott
On 4/1/11 2:41 PM, Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
I was wondering which April 1st this would happen on. Now I
Isn't that what the uvula is for?
Oh... never mind wrong swallow. ;)
On 4/2/11 3:34 AM, Chad Dailey wrote:
Swallows have MTU issues.
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 8:27 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
On Apr 1, 2011, at 10:45 AM, Steven Bellovin wrote:
On Apr 1, 2011, at 8:41
Random re-encapsulation. Now there's an interesting protocol!
On 4/2/11 3:53 AM, Brandon Ross wrote:
On Fri, 1 Apr 2011, Owen DeLong wrote:
Not true.
The occupants of the aircraft survived. The aircraft did not.
Hm, in my recollection the payload made it to the
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 15:35, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:23:12 PDT, Jeroen van Aart said:
Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/
That RFC is the opposite of funny (to me). Just because rfc1149 is funny
that doesn't mean
No such luck: They want me to PAY FOR AN ENTIRE YEAR for
which I did NOT receive service and then for the current (upcoming
year). Sorry - I don't allow myself to be ripped off like that.
Hi John, this is actually a pretty common practice for service
subscription models where the software and
Connection closed by foreign host.
Closing the connection immediately after sending the 5xx is also not RFC
compliant. You MUST give the client the opportunity to close down the
connection with a quit command.
Scott
this space for them, but allocation of folks to IPv6 roll
out was minimal due the the upcoming IPTV roll out. I was the lone IPv6 voice
in the company for a long time, but when I left there was gaining interest in
IPv6 strategies. Not enough netgeeks and too many projects rolling out.
scott
Has this been discussed here? I did a quickie search and saw nothing. Other
than spam to a technical mailing list, do you guys care, or is it a non-issue?
scott
--- Begin forwarded message:
From: Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de
To: apnic-t...@lists.apnic.net
Subject: [apnic-talk
It's not specific for mobile, but this is one of the most well know VOIP
exchanges:
http://www.thevpf.com/
-Scott
-Original Message-
From: Santino Codispoti [mailto:santino.codisp...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 3:36 AM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Voice Peering
out there, especially in the
financial markets.
-Scott
-Original Message-
From: Martin Millnert [mailto:milln...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 3:26 PM
To: Scott Berkman
Cc: Santino Codispoti; nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Voice Peering?
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 1:00 PM
Have you tried looking for a Verizon routing or translations contact in the
LERG? This is the official way.
-Scott
-Original Message-
From: Tom Pipes [mailto:tom.pi...@t6mail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2011 4:43 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Carrier Contact
I ended
1.3.6.1.3.59.1.1.1.1.12
:-)
scott
as multicast will decrease (IMO) over time but the overall
volume will increase as total video content as IP greatly expands.
--
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ISP Alliance, Inc. DBA ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
. They do feel threatened by the increase in
unicast OTT video but multicast in large amounts without the layer 1/2
service provider being engaged is a long way off.
--
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ISP Alliance, Inc. DBA ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http
on-demand with your favorite unicast client
Charles
--
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ISP Alliance, Inc. DBA ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
the *real* problem
is that they set a 3 second timeout on the download - which basically means
that if you have to retransmit either the DNS query or the TCP SYN, you're
dead as far as the test is concerned.
--
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ISP Alliance, Inc. DBA ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 09:42, Leigh Porter
leigh.por...@ukbroadband.com wrote:
So are they basing this on you downloading it or on making it available for
others?
Without knowing the details, I wouldn't assume any such level of
competence or integrity. It could just be a broad witch hunt.
that is visible and significant. If
some machine's addresses are all down hard, that is no problem in this
scenario.
-Scott
IPv6 is not an impediment to itself.
-Scott
miss something in the
paper?
scott
--- valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: -
From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
On Tue, 17 May 2011 15:04:19 PDT, Scott Weeks said:
What about privacy concerns
Privacy is dead. Get used to it. -- Scott McNeely
--
It doesn't have
On May 17, 2011 6:26 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2011 15:04:19 PDT, Scott Weeks said:
What about privacy concerns
Privacy is dead. Get used to it. -- Scott McNeely
Forget that attitude, Valdis. Just because privacy is blown at one level
doesn't mean you give it away
--- joe...@bogus.com wrote:
From: Joel Jaeggli joe...@bogus.com
On May 17, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Scott Brim wrote:
On May 17, 2011 6:26 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Tue, 17 May 2011 15:04:19 PDT, Scott Weeks said:
What about privacy concerns
Privacy is dead. Get used to it. -- Scott
it in the past.
scott
Yes indeed. http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/slides/intarea-3.pdf
-- sent from a tiny screen
--- scott.b...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Scott Brim scott.b...@gmail.com
Yes indeed. http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/79/slides/intarea-3.pdf
-
Hm, that's a funny correlation to what I have been thinking and talking about
lately. I'll have to read
Still an IPv6 wussie... :-)
/disclaimer
Only if you design your network that way. EUI-64 isn't required.
scott
to get clean and get their lives back from all the ugly IPv4 troubleshooting.
;-)== evil grin
scott
On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:38, JC Dill jcdill.li...@gmail.com wrote:
The cynic in me wonders how they will track how many people I forwarded this
to. I plan to win the prize for the person who refers the survey to the
most number of people by forwarding it to millions of people. :-)
(I
have
seen folks spend way too much time trying to get it right from initial
estimates and totally blow it.
There is no substitute for empirical data!
scott
Since IPv6 is like a frozen turkey
Just make sure they remember to take the giblets out... Based on
personal... u... experience... that will drastically change
when something (if ever) gets done!
;)
Scott
On 5/28/11 4:21 PM, Greg Ihnen wrote:
I just got off the phone with a level
it.
-
There're about 52 peaks in a year on the timeline... :-)
scott
only makes your customers
have worse latencies and paths to other people, making the Internet
less healthy.
Thanks,
Rucas
PS: sorry if I sent this twice; client lagged a bit.
--
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ISP Alliance, Inc. DBA ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
That's because you're asking the wrong nameservers. The response you're
getting is pointing you to the correct nameservers (glb1/glb2.facebook.com)
which are defintely returning records for me :
$ dig +short www.facebook.com @glb1.facebook.com
2620:0:1c08:4000:face:b00c:0:3
Scott
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 09:47, Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
I'd go so far as to say user failure. If I wanted cable TV
(especially if I needed it at home as part of my job), I wouldn't
buy/rent/lease/whatever a home without checking that cable TV is
available at that location.
Yeah,
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 05:34, Jeroen van Aart jer...@mompl.net wrote:
Though it's nice to have why would one *need* 100 Mbps at home?
The essential point is: if people have the bandwidth, they fill it,
sometimes with uses we haven't dreamed up yet. In the USA at least,
creativity and
in some form or
other, as potentially do others.
Scott
Someone should tell the IB Times that Tsunami doesn't mean anything big
and destructive. Oh, and that popup ads are *s* 1997.
While you're at it you might want to let NASA know too...
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/stereo/news/solar_tsunami.html
Scott
--- santino.codisp...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Santino Codispoti santino.codisp...@gmail.com
Is there a nanogish group that covers AUS?
--
First hit on a search engine: australia network operator group.
www.ausnog.net
scott
/most
enterprises and the thought of trying to explain sub-par networking to
most business leaders makes my teeth hurt.
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ISP Alliance, Inc. DBA ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
Guessing some people here might be interested in this, but it seems to have
only been sent to APAC-based *NOGs...
Scott
-- Forwarded message --
From: Save Vocea save.vo...@icann.org
Date: Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 5:30 PM
Subject: [AusNOG] ICANN 41 - now underway
To: aus
2607:f9a0::f0c:0ff ;-)
scott
apps have and all mobile devices need
already -- sorry but I don't think ILNP is going to make it. You
can't just say the IETF should pay more attention. I've invited
people to promote it and nobody stepped up.
Scott
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 11:09, Fred Baker f...@cisco.com wrote:
I think ILNP is a great solution. My concern with it is that the needed
changes to TCP and UDP are not likely to happen.
I guess I should clarify: I think ILNP is elegant. But the real
Internet evolves incrementally, and only as
of the parallels like *nix and vendor
specifics (ie if you know Cisco IOS, many others follow this interface
like a standard) really comes in useful over time.
-Scott
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 00:28 +0300, Saku Ytti wrote:
On (2011-07-13 14:08 -0700), Larry Stites wrote:
Given what you know now
cookies, change your browser IDs regularly. What did I
miss? ;-)
scott
(who's still bristling from the last discussion about this where Valdis kept
saying Privacy is dead. Get used to it. I don't want to roll over and just
take it... ;-) )
--- valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:25:30 PDT, Scott Weeks said:
(who's still bristling from the last discussion about this where Valdis kept
saying Privacy is dead. Get used to it.
Man, leave one smiley off and it follows you for life
--- jer...@unfix.org wrote:
From: Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org
On 2011-07-27 03:25 , Scott Weeks wrote:
matt.addi...@lists.evilgeni.us wrote: -
[..] 1: http://panopticlick.eff.org/
All you need to do with what that site says is write a sh script that
deletes
protecting against what I
see as improper actions (bullying) by corpment drones. One can't hide
everything, but it doesn't help the internet overall to make it easy for them
to do these things.
scott
We were seeing issues here as well, we have BGP to Level 3 down until they
stabilize. We were seeing a number of sites as unreachable, but ping tests
from the Level3 IP address on that interface were working. Looks like
perhaps they stopped advertising our addresses or were advertising them
I did finally see a Level 3 network event posted about this in their portal.
Actually they list two separate ones:
A routing issue failure between Dallas, TX and Los Angeles, CA is impacting
IP services. Impacted for: 1 hour 29 minutes
A loss of connectivity to servers in Dallas, TX,
networking is going to be very hard to educate
past given that most users are comfortable with how it works today.
--
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ISP Alliance, Inc. DBA ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
addresses.
If you want to give your printers, etc. stable IPv6 addesses use ULAs.
Icky.
Better yet, just subscribe to an ISP that will give you a static prefix.
Owen
--
Scott Reed
Owner
NewWays Networking, LLC
Wireless Networking
Network Design, Installation and Administration
Mikrotik
On 8/2/2011 4:05 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Aug 2, 2011, at 12:46 PM, Scott Reed wrote:
And just how are you going to make all of us small ISPs, or the big ones for
that matter, do that?
Well, if you want my business, you'll do it.
If not, I'll route around you as damage. If enough customers
.
Owen
--
Scott Reed
Owner
NewWays Networking, LLC
Wireless Networking
Network Design, Installation and Administration
Mikrotik Advanced Certified
www.nwwnet.net
(765) 855-1060
(765) 439-4253
(855) 231-6239
handle layer 2 isolation already.
--
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ISP Alliance, Inc. DBA ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
--
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ISP Alliance, Inc. DBA ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
% for business accounts. I have visibility into access networks
around North America which gives me a sample size that is far larger
than required for statistical significance.
--
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ISP Alliance, Inc. DBA ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
a router is TR-069).
--
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ISP Alliance, Inc. DBA ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
in the address bar has become more common place, and
browser behavior to try and resolve first, fallback to search
for the same input field has both trained the humans to keep
doing this and made it possible for DNS query interlopers to
appear to be generic-search interlopers.
--
Scott Helms
Vice
/publications/2011-satin-netalyzr.pdf
http://newswire.xbiz.com/view.php?id=137208
--
-JH
--
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ISP Alliance, Inc. DBA ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
it in a meaningful and sufficiently automatic way as to be
applicable to Joe 6-Mac.
--
Scott Helms
Vice President of Technology
ISP Alliance, Inc. DBA ZCorum
(678) 507-5000
http://twitter.com/kscotthelms
2011, at 16:11, Scott Helms wrote:
Neither of these are true, though in the future we _might_ have deployable
technology that allows for automated routing setup (though I very seriously
doubt it) in the home. Layer 2 isolation is both easier and more reliable than
attempting it at layer 3
were not enough.
Owen
On Aug 10, 2011, at 11:43 AM, Scott Helms wrote:
Tim,
Hence the might. I worry when people start throwing around terms like routing in
the home that they don't understand the complexities of balancing the massive CPE installed base,
technical features, end user
head-end router? That seems like an oxymoron. Where
would such an animal live, in the home or the head end/central office?
Who is responsible for purchasing it and managing it in your mind?
Owen
On Aug 11, 2011, at 1:28 PM, Scott Helms wrote:
Owen,
The fact that you're immediately
did it this way!). What are they? How will they translate
to ISIS? Will they translate? Do you care?
THAT kind of thing makes a good design for your company.
HTH,
Scott
On 8/12/11 8:23 AM, CJ wrote:
You guys are making a lot of good points.
I will check into the Doyle book
On 8/11/2011 6:09 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
On Aug 11, 2011, at 2:53 PM, Scott Helms wrote:
On 8/11/2011 5:28 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:
You're talking about the front end residential gateway that you manage. I'm
talking about
the various gateways and things you might not yet expect to provide
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I still get out plenty, thanks! :) It's been years in the making, and
more than served its purpose!
But convenient to have... And heats the home nicely in the wintertime!
And someone said it was all about the toys!
Scott
On 8/12/11 8:29 PM
click those is beyond me.
Sometimes they're fun to 'wget' and run through 'strings'. Look for
nanog.exe... ;-)
scott
it is superior doesn't make it
the right choice.
Scott
In sort, wait... Once you're de-listed from SpamCop (which is owned by
IronPort and plays a non-trivial part in their SenderBase scoring) you
should find that your reputation increases fairly quickly - normally within
24 hours presuming that the spam has actually stopped.
Scott.
On Wed, Aug
I am wondering what some of you guys do when your home
ISP is down. At least those of you that don't give yourself internet.
If my primary connection is down, I switch to my backup. At one
office we have both Comcast cable and Verizon FiOS so if one is out,
we just switch to the other. It's
And it's over as of tomorrow night.
http://edition.cnn.com/2011/BUSINESS/08/20/verizon.strike/
Scott.
On Sat, Aug 6, 2011 at 10:14 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote:
As of midnight, 45,000 IBEW and CWA members are striking Verizon, as their
contract has expired.
http
Tmobile is back up in Ashburn, VA
On Aug 23, 2011, at 3:57 PM, Nitin Mehrotra nmehro...@riorey.com
wrote:
T-Mobile is completely out in Bethesda, MD. No voice or data signal
whatsoever.
- Original Message -
From: Jared Geiger ja...@compuwizz.net
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent:
Also, the quake on the east coast was much closer to the surface than
most west coast quakes, which could account for the feeling.
Scott (not a geologist)
On 8/23/11 6:13 PM, William Herrin wrote:
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Owen DeLong o...@delong.com wrote:
A 5.8 (or 5.9, I've seen
of damage.
So whilst it's not unusual for 5.x quakes to pass without causing any real
damage, there's a lot more to it than just the magnitude...
Even the 3.6 magnitude one in CA last night was enough to cause my mini-UPS
at home to jump onto battery for a few seconds.
Scott.
Did you have backup tomatoes?
On 8/26/11 10:05 PM, Chris wrote:
Irene is already past me. I'm outside of Jacksonville, Florida by the
coast. Irene snapped my tomato plant in half overnight Wednesday.
--- br...@bryanfields.net wrote:
From: Bryan Fields br...@bryanfields.net
I would love a world where engineering was consulted by marketing :(
-
WAKE UP You're dreaming out loud... ;-)
scott
---
How about (yelling again...)
WAKE UP You're Rumpelstiltskining :-)
scott
overheating issues in his datacenter, so it
may not be as easy as one would think... ;-)
scott
in my mouth just
writing the acronym ERX. Thank $deity that I don't have to work on those
anymore...
scott
Now just where would the fun in THAT be? ;)
Scott
On 9/14/11 11:00 AM, James Jones wrote:
Funny they forget to mention that Cisco doesn't have 100g any where.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sep 14, 2011, at 7:41 AM, Leigh Porter leigh.por...@ukbroadband.com
wrote:
-Original Message
else notice that?
scott
mainline that would simplify the Quagga development
community's lives considerably.
-Scott
://www.internap.com/business-internet-connectivity-services/route-optimi
zation-flow-control/
Good luck,
-Scott
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sundberg [mailto:esundb...@nitelusa.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2013 7:00 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Looking for Netflow analysis package
signature (see below!) to make sure he does
not get UCE from posting to NANOG. For any other sales folks out there
considering doing this, Brent's warning is a good one: It's a sure fire
way to get your company blacklisted among IT professionals.
scott
ps. WTF
On May 17, 2013 1:54 PM, John Starta j...@starta.org wrote:
On May 17, 2013, at 8:24 AM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
On Thu, 16 May 2013 15:16:22 -0700, Scott Weeks said:
He DOES NOT need a 260 word signature (see below!) to make sure he does
not get UCE from posting to NANOG
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Warren Bailey
wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote:
We talked about this the other day. I think the consensus was.. In San
Fran, you're best off to head over to Fry's.
The nearest Frys to SF is about 30 miles away in Palo Alto.
Scott
-and-regional/nsa-claims-know-how-to-ensure-no-illegal-spying/article_ec623964-d23a-53c6-aeb0-14bf325a7f3c.html
scott
|term3'
or cat /var/log/router.log | egrep -v 'term1|term2|term3' | less
;-)
scott
--- do...@dougbarton.us wrote:
From: Doug Barton do...@dougbarton.us
On 06/12/2013 05:13 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
cat /var/log/router.log | egrep -v 'term1|term2|term3' | less
Prototypical useless use of cat :)
-
What would you use
701 - 800 of 1666 matches
Mail list logo
