Re: Nato warns of strike against cyber attackers

Military reply doesn't have to mean bombs and guns. There is nothing keeping it form mean offensive cyber counter attacks. This would mean manage the battlefields :) On Tue, Jun 8, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Gadi Evron g...@linuxbox.org wrote: On 6/9/10 12:50 AM, Marshall Eubanks wrote: What any of

Re: NANOG Digest, Vol 30, Issue 50

This tread is starting to sound less and less operational, or maybe I'm just old and jaded and its to out to care. You wonder if maybe his legal dept or own moral views felt its wasn't worth the risk of some joker doing something BAD with the info so that the FBI could get involved. On Mon,

Re: off-topic: summary on Internet traffic growth History

CIP went with BT (Concert) I still clearly remember the very long concall when we separated it from it BIPP connections. :) -jim On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Chris Boyd cb...@gizmopartners.com wrote: On Aug 11, 2010, at 1:13 PM, John Lee wrote: MCI bought MFS-Datanet because MCI had the

Re: AS11296 -- Hijacked?

WOW full of yourself much. Many of us use gmail and others to manage the load of mail we received from various lists. I doubt we anyone needs your sympathies, Good luck getting assistance from the list in the future, but I doubt you need it, you see to be able to do everything on your own.

Re: router lifetime

If you can do a business case to support replacing routers every 3years you doing much better then most. IMO a router should last 5 yrs on the book, but I expect to get more life then then from it. You core today is tomorrow's edge. I've seen more then one network with 10 yo kit still being

Re: 2010.10.06 NANOG50 day 3, Wednesday morning notes

+1 On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Guerra, Ruben ruben.gue...@arrisi.comwrote: Thanks for the notes Matt! :) -Original Message- From: Matthew Petach [mailto:mpet...@netflight.com] Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 10:54 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: 2010.10.06 NANOG50 day 3,

Re: Internet in DPRK / North Korea

and his 3g's and his wifi's? :) On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 8:38 PM, John R. Levine jo...@iecc.com wrote: 175.45.179.68/ once senses that the potential successor wants his twitters and facebooks...

Re: U.S. officials deny technical takedown of WikiLeaks

+1 On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 8:24 PM, Bret Clark bcl...@spectraaccess.com wrote: On 12/04/2010 06:03 PM, Ken Gilmour wrote: Now Sarah Palin is suggesting Wikileaks are terrorists and should be taken offline with technical capabilities  http://www.golem.de/1012/79848.html or for anyone who

Re: Over a decade of DDOS--any progress yet?

+1 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Drew Weaver drew.wea...@thenap.com wrote: Yes, but this obviously completes the 'DDoS attack' and sends the signal that the bully will win. -Drew -Original Message- From: alvaro.sanc...@adinet.com.uy [mailto:alvaro.sanc...@adinet.com.uy] Sent:

Re: Routing Suggestions

What Joe Said. Static with 1918 space. If they NEED global space, explain 1918 space will work and tell them to use it. -jim On Wed, Jan 12, 2011 at 9:02 PM, Joe Hamelin j...@nethead.com wrote: There are two companies, Company A and Company B, that are planning to continuously exchange a

Re: Connectivity status for Egypt

iMCI or WCOM? :) On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Alastair Johnson a...@sneep.net wrote: For instance, our corporate WAN links into Cairo are still up (UUNET PIP). cough that's the MCI PIP/cough...

Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things

I know that I should know better then comment on networks others then my own, ( and I know to never comment on my own publicly :) ) But here goes, 210x the size of normal really? 210% I'd have a hard time believing. Did anyone else anywhere see a route leak equal to larger then the entire

Re: max-prefix and platform tcam limits: they are things

2012 21:05:07 -0300, jim deleskie said: But here goes, 210x the size of normal really? 210% I'd have a hard time believing. Did anyone else anywhere see a route leak equal to larger then the entire Internet that day, anywhere else that could of caused this? If the device was only expecting

Re: NSA and the exchanges

If your talking the NSA I doubt anyone would tell you. That being said: it would mean the US gov't breaking Canadian law I suspect. Now in Canada it is quite possible that the Canadian Fed gov't monitors traffic but I would also say no one would tell you because telling you would also be in

Re: Google Public DNS having issues.

reachable from eastern canada On Thu, Feb 7, 2013 at 1:41 PM, Blair Trosper blair.tros...@gmail.com wrote: ...seems to be having trouble as reported by Systems Watch: https://twitter.com/systemswatch/status/299572918936039424 Indeed, it's inaccessible to me from Minneapolis, Tampa, SJC, and

Re: Minnesota to block online gambling sites?

Not only do we create less usable v4 address space, if these guys had a clue, and what ever you think of them with $$ envolved clue will be found... they will just add more IP's from diffrent block, further 'wasting' IP space. -jim On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Martin Hannigan

Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband

I agree we should all be telling the FCC that broadband is fiber to the home. If we spend all kinds of $$ to build a 1.5M/s connection to homes, it's outdated before we even finish. On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Fred Bakerf...@cisco.com wrote: If it's about stimulus money, I'm in favor of

Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband

And 640k is enough. When I started in this game 15 or so yrs back the 'backbone' in Canada was a 56k figure 8 loop, running frame relay. We moved to T1 a yr or so later. Buy the time I left Canada to work for internetMCI a yr later, we're @ DS3's in Canada. Technology evolves quickly. Just

Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband

Why should I person be disadvantage from another in the same country, maybe its the Canadian in me, but isn't there something in the founding documents of the US that define's all men as being equal. I though it was Orewell that made some more equal then others. :) -jim On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at

Re: FCCs RFC for the Definition of Broadband

Wrong analogy, you have no way to use all 6 lanes @ once. The highway is an aggregation device not access method. Unless you have 6 lanes into your driveway :) On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:11 PM, Chris Adamscmad...@hiwaay.net wrote: Once upon a time, jim deleskie deles...@gmail.com said: Why

Re: Upstream BGP community support

Here is the problem as I see it. Sure some % fo the people using BGP are bright nuff to use some upstreams communities, but sadly many are not. So this ends up breaking one or more networks, who in turn twist more dials causing other changes.. rinse, wash and repeat. But like Randy said who am

Re: Upstream BGP community support

Agree'd :) On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote: Here is the problem as I see it.  Sure some % fo the people using BGP are bright nuff to use some upstreams communities, but sadly many are not.  So this ends up breaking one or more networks, who in turn twist more

Re: Vancouver, BC providers

I'd expect you could find, Rogers, Telus, Shaw and Bell all there. -jim On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Ravi Pina r...@cow.org wrote: Hi, I was looking for some metro-e options in Vancouver, BC CA specifically in the Downtown/Gastown area.  I'm finding the area isn't the most built up so

Re: Manage an enterprise network? Please fill out my survey - for Science! :-)

A quick look at her web pg shows her undergad @ UWash On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:23 PM, Adefisayo Adegoke afis...@gmail.com wrote: Hello Justine, I find it interesting, to say the least, that all of the communication that you have about a Berkeley research program while your email came

Re: Looking for a Tier 1 ISP Mentor for career advice.

What Chris said Get a job in the industry.. work like crazy learning as much as you can to learn, get involved in the industry to make connections. -jim On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Tyler Haske

Re: ISPs and full packet inspection

Asking for legal advice on NANOG is probably a REALLY REALLY bad idea. Talk to a lawyer in the area(s) you do business. -jim On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 9:50 AM, not common notcommonmista...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, I am looking for some guidance on full packet inspection at the ISP level. Is

Re: Industry practice for BGP costs - one time or fixed/monthly?

IMHO the only reason(s) would be to discourage people from asking for it, or as a $$ grab. -jim On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Anurag Bhatia m...@anuragbhatia.com wrote: Hello everyone I have been aggressively looking for deals in servers in Europe for anycasting. One thing which

Re: Penetration Test Assistance

A complete diagram makes their life easier, may make for a more complete test, but they are working for you, so if you don't have it, you don't have. I'm not a big fan of having a single diagram with everything laid out anyway, but I'm from the old shcool. -jim On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 11:52 AM,

Re: very confusing.

Accidental, he didn't mean to get caught :) On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 7:10 PM, Richard Golodner rgolod...@infratection.com wrote: On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 07:05 +0900, ACCIDENTAL email How can my company get six accidental emails? Not even an idiot sends six emails by mistake. Spammertechnology

Re: job screening question

Pascal's wager.. almost :) On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 7:25 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Fri, 06 Jul 2012 15:07:51 -0700, goe...@anime.net said: This is what baffles me. People keep putting stuff on their resume that they simply don't know anything about. TCP/IP expert, yet they don't

Re: /. Terabit Ethernet is Dead, for Now

That problem IMO will only be worse with a 4x speed multiplier over 100G what premium will anyone be willing to spend to have a single 400G pipe over 4 bonded 100G pipes? -jim On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote: On Sep 27, 2012, at 8:58 AM, Darius

Re: cnn.com - Homeland Security seeks cyber counterattack system (Einstein 3.0)

There is no need to attack the attacking computers.. this would be a mostly useless process and you'd always miss some. if the 'attacks' could not be filtered the 'external' to that nations links would be 'cut' the internet would be segmented and would could all go back to our regularly planed

Re: Revealed: The Internet's well known BGP behavior

Announcing a smaller bit of one of you block is fine, more then that most everyone I know does it or has done and is commonly accepted. Breaking up someone else' s block and making that announcement even if its to modify traffic between 2 peered networks is typically not looked as proper. Modify

Re: Revealed: The Internet's well known BGP behavior

I'm afraid of the answer to that question On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 11:25 PM, Adrian Chadd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Aug 29, 2008, jim deleskie wrote: Announcing a smaller bit of one of you block is fine, more then that most everyone I know does it or has done and is commonly accepted

Re: Revealed: The Internet's well known BGP behavior

True but I can still believe in a warm and fuzzy internet if I try really hard Then my cell phone rings and back to the real world. -jim On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Patrick W. Gilmore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 29, 2008, at 22:41, jim deleskie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm

Re: Revealed: The Internet's well known BGP behavior

opened but blown apart. -jim On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 2:55 AM, Florian Weimer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * jim deleskie: Announcing a smaller bit of one of you block is fine, more then that most everyone I know does it or has done and is commonly accepted. Breaking up someone else' s block

Re: Force10 Gear - Opinions

I've recently seen Cisco, loose an approx ~$1MM deal at an all Cisco shop to Force10 Cisco wouldn't better mid 40's discount. On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 2:23 PM, Rubens Kuhl Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And 60 points off Cisco is possible, even for small shops with some negotiating ability.

Re: D/DoS mitigation hardware/software needed.

What Roland said, I've seen people do this, no rules in place, still was able to kill the box (firewall) with a single CPU server. -jim On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Dobbins, Roland rdobb...@arbor.net wrote: On Jan 5, 2010, at 4:25 AM, Jeffrey Lyon wrote: Use a robust firewall such as a

Re: Location of upstream connections BGP templates

Border/Core/Access is great thinking when your a sales rep for a vendor that sells under power kit. No reason for it any more. -jim On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.com wrote: --- st...@ibctech.ca wrote: From: Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca layered. My

Re: Location of upstream connections BGP templates

I've done it much larger then small networks. Dependency is much more related to gear used then network size. -jim On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 8:46 PM, Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.com wrote: --- deles...@gmail.com wrote: From: jim deleskie deles...@gmail.com Border/Core/Access is great

Re: Location of upstream connections BGP templates

Of course all designs are limited to the budget you have to build the network :) On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:20 PM, Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca wrote: On 2010.02.17 19:41, jim deleskie wrote: Border/Core/Access is great thinking when your a sales rep for a vendor that sells under power kit

Re: Location of upstream connections BGP templates

Absolutely. I've worked on networks where I'm was amazed on someday we held it all together, but that is truly when you learn the most. -jim On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 9:46 PM, Steve Bertrand st...@ibctech.ca wrote: On 2010.02.17 20:45, jim deleskie wrote: Of course all designs are limited

Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook?

If I leave all boxes checked to send mail/notices/app requests to everyone in my list, or if I give FB my gmail password to pull all my contacts and send them an invite, its pure @ my request, sure FB is happy I do it, but it is no way spam. Its like calling 5 ICMP packets a DDoS. -jim On Thu,

Re: Spamcop Blocks Facebook?

I'm not going to both on this thread anymore.. waste of time. Sorry for the bulk mail/spam generated by my replies to nanog. I'll stop feeding the trolls now. -jim On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Rich Kulawiec r...@gsp.org wrote: On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 03:16:25PM -0400, jim deleskie wrote

Re: CRS-3

Thats funny, not sure if Cisco sells one or not but back in the day, I worked @ Avici, and we did in fact have a special jack used to move the chassis around :) -jim On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 10:30 PM, Steve Meuse sme...@mara.org wrote: Paul Ferguson expunged (fergdawgs...@gmail.com):

Re: Posting from freebie E-mail Accounts

I'm betting more then a few of use free mail accts to keep this separate from our work mail. If your really having that much issue, config your mail server to drop it yourself or unsub Seriously -jim yes posted from gmail acct. On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:42 AM, Andrew D Kirch

Re: New Linksys CPE, IPv6 ?

I'm a real life user, I know the difference and I could careless about v6. most anything I want I is on v4 and will still be there long after ( when ever it is) we run out of v4 addresses. If I'm on a content provider and I'm putting something new online I want everyone to see, they will find

Re: legacy /8

Must resist urge to bash v6... must start weekend... must turn off computer for my own good. On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Charles N Wyble char...@knownelement.com wrote: Hmmm... it is 2pm on a Friday afternoon. I guess it's the appropriate time for this thread. *grabs popcorn and sits

Re: legacy /8

Just like 640k or memory :) On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote: IPv6 as effectively reindroduced classful addressing. but it's not gonna be a problem this time, right?  after all, 32^h^h128^h^h^h64 bits is more than we will ever need, right? randy

Re: legacy /8

I'm old but maybe not old nuff to know if this was discussed before or not, but I've been asking people last few months why we don't just do something like this. don't even need to get rid of BGP, just add some extension, we see ok to add extensions to BGP to do other things, this makes at least

Re: legacy /8

on an RFC?  Or, has someone done so for this already? - Original Message - From: jim deleskie deles...@gmail.com To: nanog@nanog.org Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 9:17 PM Subject: Re: legacy /8 I'm old but maybe not old nuff to know if this was discussed before or not, but I've been

Re: legacy /8

Not sure the IETF looked at it or not, but personally I'm one of those people that has never accepted a solution just because, its the only option there. I haven't always won my battles, but never just give in :) -jim On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 3:47 AM, Jim Burwell j...@jsbc.cc wrote: On 4/2/2010

Re: legacy /8

that road yet. If we do though, this is the kind of input we'd need. -jim On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 5:08 AM, James Hess mysi...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Apr 2, 2010 at 9:17 PM, jim deleskie deles...@gmail.com wrote: not, but I've been asking people last few months why we don't just do something like

Re: what about 48 bits?

I've seen duplicate addresses in the wild in the past, I assume there is some amount of reuse, even though they are suppose to be unique. -jim On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 11:53 AM, A.B. Jr. skan...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Lots of traffic recently about 64 bits being too short or too long. What

Re: comcast enterprise/carrier services

You might read it that way, I read it as looking for a sales droid recommendation. I'm sure Comcast has more then one. On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Scott Weeks sur...@mauigateway.com wrote: --- car...@race.com wrote: Looking for a sales contact for Comcast enterprise/carrier services for

Re: NANOG List Update - Moving Forward

+1 On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:32 AM, William Pitcock neno...@systeminplace.net wrote: On Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:50:38 +0100 (BST) Tim Franklin t...@pelican.org wrote: Thankfully, the current test has been a success. Including stopping non-members from posting to the list, and other anti-spam?

Re: NetFlix Down

Unreachable from eastern Canada as well 2011/7/17 kristopher.do...@gmail.com: Ipad app says Service Temporarily Unavailable at the moment. Netflix claims to be operating about 90% of their services out of aws and the only issue on the aws status page is a vpn end point issue from yesterday.

Re: OSPF vs IS-IS

Having run both on some good sized networks, I can tell you to run what your ops folks know best. We can debate all day the technical merits of one v another, but end of day, it always comes down to your most jr ops eng having to make a change at 2 am, you need to design for this case, if your

Re: OSPF vs IS-IS

. Thanks, -CJ On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 9:34 AM, jim deleskie deles...@gmail.com wrote: Having run both on some good sized networks, I can tell you to run what your ops folks know best.  We can debate all day the technical merits of one v another, but end of day, it always comes down to your

Re: [Nanog-futures] Admission for Committee Members

I have no problem with speakers getting in free. Speakers may or may not be active in the community and if you want to continue to draw quality speakers this is truly the least the community can do. Many conferences will pick up travel costs, or even token 'gifts' for speakers. As for

Re: [Nanog-futures] Admission for Committee Members

of people here, at most 1-2 per conference I suspect based on historical chats. Jared Mauch On Sep 2, 2011, at 11:27 AM, jim deleskie deles...@gmail.com wrote: If a members company is willing to pay anyway, then people always have the option of not accepting the free entrance.  As for people

Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics

While I can think of some corner cases for this, ie you have a satellite down link from one provider and fiber to anther. I expect this is not the norm for most networks/customers. -jim On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Randy Bush ra...@psg.com wrote: I have worked for more then one transit

Re: Do Not Complicate Routing Security with Voodoo Economics

Because routing to peers as a policy instead of customer as a matter of policy, outside of corner cases make logical sence. While many providers aren;t good at making money it is fact the purpose of the ventures. If I route to a customer I get paid for it. If I send it to a peer I do not. On

Re: Strange static route

Wouldn't it make more sense to filter in bound default? or use a single static default if you where worried about that? -jim On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Joel Maslak jmas...@antelope.net wrote: Protection against learning a bad default route through whatever routing protocol they are

Re: What hath god wrought?

Maybe my tinfoil isn't on tight enough, or maybe I give to much credit to a gov't, or perhaps I'm just feeding the trolls, but I have a very hard time believing that DHS, launched a DoS from their own machines. -jim On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 12:18 PM, David Conrad d...@virtualized.org wrote:

Re: PRISM: NSA/FBI Internet data mining project

Knowing its going on, knowing nothing online is secret != OK with it, it mealy understand the way things are. -jim On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:16 PM, goe...@anime.net wrote: On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, Matthew Petach wrote: Much less stress in life that way. ^_^ complacency is always the easiest

Re: net neutrality and peering wars continue

Botnets to help with peering ratio's could be a new business model? :) On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 1:00 PM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Neil Harris n...@tonal.clara.co.uk wrote: On 22/06/13 13:08, Matthew Petach wrote: That's easily

Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table?

I'm not going to even ask or look at who is accepting /26's -jim On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 2:29 PM, Paul Rolland r...@witbe.net wrote: Hello, On Fri, 21 Jun 2013 13:56:02 -0600 Michael McConnell mich...@winkstreaming.com wrote: As the IPv4 space get smaller and smaller, does anyone think

Re: Friday Hosing

I could support any of these services myself, and have guys that work me that can as well, but none of these are my core business, and my investors REALLY prefer me focusing on my core business, I suspect most of us have shareholders, investors, owners that feel the same way. I struggled with

Re: [Paper] B4: Experience with a Globally-Deployed Software Defined

At iMCI (pre-Worldcom) we had scripts that would build all our ATM VC's for a 400node mesh, would take all night to run :) -jim On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Avi Freedman freed...@freedman.net wrote: No, people never use *flow controllers* for anything. People have been doing SDN

Re: Internet Surveillance and Boomerang Routing: A Call for Canadian Network Sovereignty

Paul, I agree this is a problem, but its been a problem since at least 1994 ( my first exposure ) and I suspect longer, the issue is east we capacity in Canada is very $$, pushing traffic from Toronto east to points south to get it to Vancouver is much more cost effective. -jim On Sat, Sep

Re: The Making of a Router

I've recently pushed a large BSD box to a load of over 300, for more then an hour, while under test, some things slowed a little, but she kept on working! -jim On Thu, Dec 26, 2013 at 1:59 PM, Shawn Wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote: Totally agree that a routing box should be standalone for

Re: NSA able to compromise Cisco, Juniper, Huawei switches

There are many ways a backdoor could be used in a properly secured system. To think otherwise is a huge mistake. I can think of several ways, if tasked and given the resources of a large gov't that I would attack this problem. To assume that those tasked and focused only this type of solution

Re: Hackers hijack 300, 000-plus wireless routers, make malicious changes | Ars Technica

Why want to swing such a big hammer. Even blocking those 2 IP's will isolate your users, and fill your support queue's. Set up a DNS server locally to reply to those IP's Your customers stay up and running and blissfully unaware. Log the IP's hitting your DNS servers on those IP and have your

Re: [ PRIVACY Forum ] Critical crypto bug leaves Linux, hundreds of apps open to eavesdropping

Doing some serious adjusting of my tinfoil today over his :) -jim On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote: - Original Message - From: Leo Bicknell bickn...@ufp.org On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:07 PM, Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com wrote: Is this the *same*

Re: Canada and IPv6 (was: Ars Technica on IPv4 exhaustion)

Those all sounds like legit business questions. -jim On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 2:45 PM, William F. Maton Sotomayor wma...@ottix.net wrote: On Wed, 18 Jun 2014, Sadiq Saif wrote: On 6/18/2014 14:25, Lee Howard wrote: Canada is way behind, just 0.4% deployment. Any Canadian ISP folk in

Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix

So it sounds like your customers want to use the service being sold, but you can't afford to service them due to the pricing they are being charged...Sounds like you need to raise prices. While I haven't worked for a rural wireless ISP, I have work for wired ISP's in the days of modems, Large

Re: [OPINION] Best place in the US for NetAdmins

Rich, In principal I agree, and I've said this many times, for years I've telecommuted myself, mostly effectively. I'd work much longer hours, but not always worked as efficiently during all of those hours. When I started my own company, with $$ be in short supply like all start ups I I

Re: Facebook down?

From East coast of Canada down as well. On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Warren Bailey wbai...@satelliteintelligencegroup.com wrote: I¹m getting a ton done right now too.. Hasn¹t been working since my first attempt about 20 minutes ago. On 9/3/14, 12:45 PM, Marshall Eubanks

Re: Checkpoint IPS

mh, you know that forcing traffic to be symmetrical is evil, and while backbone traffic and inspection don't play nice, there are very legit reasons why, in many cases edge traffic must be open for inspection. I'm on my way to the office, feel free to ping me if you want to discuss. Or maybe I

Re: Large Ontario DC busted for hosting petabytes of child abuse material

Canadian and US laws are similar. But I'll leave it up to the lawyers to figure it all out, happily I'm no where near this, but it being a small industry here, I suspect I have friends that are dealing with some crap right now On Mon, Mar 2, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Mike A mi...@mikea.ath.cx wrote:

Re: Cisco/Level3 takedown

Just to add to the noise I think batman wears a black mask/helmet, but I've never considered it a mask. I didn't look at the details on this, but did L3 sink the routes at their border or did they expressly announce the route to sink it? -jim On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 3:35 PM, Randy Bush

Re: eBay is looking for network heavies...

Based on the number of certified people I've interviewed over the last 20yr, my default view lines up with Jared's 100% On Fri, Jun 5, 2015 at 10:38 PM, Mike Hale eyeronic.des...@gmail.com wrote: We need a pool on what percentage of readers just googled traceroute. On Jun 5, 2015 6:28 PM,

Re: eBay is looking for network heavies...

I remember you asking me who Jon was :) I have since added to my list of interview questions... sad but the number of people with clue is declining not increasing. On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 3:13 AM, Joe Hamelin j...@nethead.com wrote: Back in 2000 at Amazon, HR somehow decided to have me do the

Re: World's Fastest Internet™ in Canadaland

Its mostly marketing, a number of years ago I worked for a cable co, we knew if we increased BW X we'd see a Y speed increase in usage. We also has done the math on several future generations of upgrades, so we'd know if phone company increases to A we'd move to B. I know the guy that did the

Re: ARIN just subdivided their last /17, /18, /19, /20, /21 and /22. Down to only /23s and /24s now. : ipv6

I'd give it another 20 yrs of v4, v6 addressing and all those letters are to hard for us old folk, we'll find ways to make it make it work :) On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 11:54 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson swm...@swm.pp.se wrote: On Sat, 27 Jun 2015, Rafael Possamai wrote: How long do you think it will

Re: eBay is looking for network heavies...

There is a good reason there aren't LOTS of good neteng in the 30-35 or under 30 range with lots of experience. Its call the hell we went though for a while after 2000 working in this industry. Many of us lost jobs and couldn't find new ones. I know talented folks that had to go to delivering

Re: Open letter to Level3 concerning the global routing issues on June 12th

People from Big telcom should never reply to mailing lists from work addresses unless specifically allowed, which I suspect TATA doesn't either, based on some direct, buy old knowledge :) Filtering has been a community issue since my days @ MCI being AS3561, often discussed not often enough acted

Re: Open letter to Level3 concerning the global routing issues on June 12th

=459 :-) On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:53 AM, jim deleskie deles...@gmail.com wrote: People from Big telcom should never reply to mailing lists from work addresses unless specifically allowed, which I suspect TATA doesn't either, based on some direct, buy old knowledge :) indeed, people from

Re: [SECURITY] Application layer attacks/DDoS attacks

on the trusted networks only will make all interested ISPs be more trusted Ramy On Mon, May 25, 2015 at 5:01 AM, Christopher Morrow morrowc.li...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 9:12 PM, jim deleskie deles...@gmail.com wrote: However, the trusted network

Re: [SECURITY] Application layer attacks/DDoS attacks

While I don't think any ISP wants DDoS to make $$, I do based on experience believe that business cases have to be made for everything. With the prices pay for BW in most of the world now, ( or the last number of years) its going to be VERY hard to get anyone to allocated time/$$ or energy to do

Re: [SECURITY] Application layer attacks/DDoS attacks

To many pieces to answer on a weekend on NANOG, but those of us that work in the DDoS space the last number of years have seen huge growth in the application layer attacks. This does not mean a decrease in volumetric attack, just that now you have to worry about both and lots of each. FW's while

Re: net neutrality peering dispute between CenturyTel/Qwest and Cogent in Dallas

Tinka mark.ti...@seacom.mu wrote: On 15/Aug/15 19:32, jim deleskie wrote: In my 20+ yrs now of playing this game, everyone has had a turn thinking their content/eyeballs are special and should get free peering. That's why those tired of playing the game build their own networks to take out

Re: DDOS Simulation

If anyone offers to test your DDoS devices across a network that you do not 100% own, you are risking legal issues. If they offer to test it across your own network, make sure you have in writing from you upper management that they understand the risk and approve it. If you choose to do it

Re: net neutrality peering dispute between CenturyTel/Qwest and Cogent in Dallas

In my 20+ yrs now of playing this game, everyone has had a turn thinking their content/eyeballs are special and should get free peering. On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Mike Hammett na...@ics-il.net wrote: Arrogance is the only reason I can think of why the incumbents think that way. I'd be

Re: NetFlow - path from Routers to Collector

I've not read every reply, but let me add my voice as some who has worked on and ran SEVERAL large networks, in no case in the last long number of years have I had access to an OOB network that was sized to carry anything in large volume, and in fact like many others replied on a robust number of

Re: NetFlow - path from Routers to Collector

Adding VRFs/VLAN's/anything else to separate the traffic to reduce fate sharing is only adding complexity that will likely result in operator errors. While many of us have clue, even when we don't agree on the solutions, there are many more out there typing at routers at 2am, when even the

Re: Ear protection

Maybe I've always listened to my music to loud and spend the bulk of time via ssh, but I've never felt a need for hearing protection in a DC, is this generally an issue for people? On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 8:08 AM, Alex Rubenstein wrote: > Why not just build a Datacenter that

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

I don't suspect many folks that are outside of this list would likely have any idea how to set up a v6 tunnel. Those of us on the list, likely have a much greater ability to influence v6 adoption or not via day job deployments then Netflix supporting v6 tunnels or not. On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at

Re: Netflix VPN detection - actual engineer needed

Damian, I HIGHLY doubt regular folks are running into issues with this, I suspect its not even geeks in general having issues, I suspect 80% plus of those having issues spend most of their time complaining about something related to v6 and the rest of the geeks not loving them/it enough. -jim On

  1   2   >