may be accurate, but
I'll pretend I'm an engineer for a moment and ask for something to back up
allegations before I believe them. Even with the internet's stellar reputation
for accuracy via intuition.
---
Keith Tokash, CCIE #21236
Network blah blah blah, Myspace.com
-Original
may be
replacing our old ones with. Hopefully nothing serious. :)
Keith Tokash
_
Windows Live: Keep your friends up to date with what you do online.
http://windowslive.com/Campaign/SocialNetworking?ocid=PID23285::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en
want to be that guy who puts
something in place and is cursed for a decade.
Thanks,
Keith Tokash
Hi *, sorry if this has been answered, I did look.
Is there an industry standard regarding how much bandwidth an inter-carrier
circuit should guarantee? Specifically I'm thinking of a sub-interface on a
shared physical interface. I've not thought much about it but if there's a
more
: Wed, 29 Oct 2014 19:02:53 -0400
CC: nanog@nanog.org
On Wed, 29 Oct 2014 15:24:46 -0700, keith tokash said:
Is there an industry standard regarding how much bandwidth an inter-carrier
circuit should guarantee?
How are you going to come up with a standard that covers both the uplink
I'm willing to recommend to sales people that they advertise the size of the
*usable* tube as well as the tube overall, but I'm fairly sure they won't care.
Ben rightly stated the order of operations: BS quote disappointment mea
culpa/level setting.
If that fails I'll at least make sure no
6 matches
Mail list logo