* milln...@gmail.com (Martin Millnert) [Fri 12 Jun 2015, 12:54 CEST]:
Also, possible explanation for why nobody's fixing it:
https://twitter.com/TMCorp/status/609167065300271104 :)
https://scontent-sea1-1.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xat1/t31.0-8/10914977_10152809997716851_748171875526832420_o.jpg
Is
* goe...@sasami.anime.net (Dan Hollis) [Wed 27 Jul 2016, 20:21 CEST]:
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016, b...@theworld.com wrote:
There isn't even general agreement on whether (or what!) Cloudfare
is doing is a problem.
aiding and abetting. at the very least willful negligence.
I hope the armchairs y'all
* sur...@mauigateway.com (Scott Weeks) [Wed 13 Jun 2018, 02:17 CEST]:
Turns out that it's only the "Re: IPv6
faster/better proof?" thread I can't reply to.
I still can't. All I wanted to say was:
Then perhaps that thread was killed by the moderators. Please heed
the list charter.
Also,
* l...@satchell.net (Stephen Satchell) [Sun 27 May 2018, 23:17 CEST]:
On 05/27/2018 12:54 PM, niels=na...@bakker.net wrote:
You have this the wrong way around. You'll need permission to
store their IP address in logs that you keep and to inform third
parties about their visits to your site.
* h...@efes.iucc.ac.il (Hank Nussbacher) [Fri 01 Jun 2018, 06:56 CEST]:
The entire whois debacle will only get resolved when some hackers attack
www.eugdpr.org, ec.europa.eu and some other key .eu sites. When the
response they get will be "sorry, we can't determine who is attacking
you since
* l...@satchell.net (Stephen Satchell) [Fri 01 Jun 2018, 14:51 CEST]:
How does your shop, Niels, go about making contact with an operator
that is hijacking one of your netblocks, or is doing something weird
with routing that is causing your customers problems, or has broken
BGP?
The same as
* o...@delong.com (Owen DeLong) [Sun 27 May 2018, 21:42 CEST]:
The way GDPR is written, if you want to collect (and store) so much
as the IP address of the potential customer who visited your
website, you need their informed consent and you can’t require that
they consent as a condition of
* na...@ics-il.net (Mike Hammett) [Wed 26 Sep 2018, 13:14 CEST]:
I recommend that eyeball networks don't run any external recursive
server for optimal CDN performance. Yes, some CDNs support other
methods, but not all. If not all do, then the requirement remains.
+1
* thomasam...@gmail.com (Tom Ammon) [Tue 08 Jan 2019, 17:59 CET]:
There are a fair number of open source BGP implementations now. It
would require additional effort to test all of them.
In the real world, doing the correct thing is often harder than doing
an incorrect thing, yes.
* valdis.kletni...@vt.edu (valdis.kletni...@vt.edu) [Tue 08 Jan 2019, 18:06
CET]:
(Personally, I'd never heard of FRR before)
Martin Winter of OSR/FRR has attended many a NANOG, RIPE and other
industry meetings, so it's not for their lack of trying
-- Niels.
Hi Saku,
After seeing this initial result I'm wondering why the researchers
couldn't set up their own sandbox first before breaking code on the
internet. I believe FRR is a free download and comes with GNU autoconf.
We probably should avoid anything which might demotivate future good
guys
* cu...@dcc.ufmg.br (Italo Cunha) [Tue 08 Jan 2019, 17:42 CET]:
[A] https://goo.gl/nJhmx1
For the archives, since goo.gl will cease to exist soon, this links to
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1U42-HCi3RzXkqVxd8e2yLdK9okFZl77tWZv13EsEzO0/htmlview
After seeing this initial result I'm
Kind of bad netiquette to repost a private email to the list
-- Niels.
Apologies, it was in reply to a list mail. Just bad threading.
* niels=na...@bakker.net (niels=na...@bakker.net) [Tue 19 Mar 2019, 16:51 CET]:
Kind of bad netiquette to repost a private email to the list
* m...@beckman.org (Mel Beckman) [Thu 05 Sep 2019, 14:17 CEST]:
I don’t think this is a reasonable understanding of Nanog. Nanog
members ask each other for operational tool recommendations all the
time, and since these products are right up the alley of Nanog’s
mission — network operations —
* r...@tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) [Thu 19 Sep 2019, 10:05 CEST]:
I never like to generalize to entire populations, and I will
therefore refrain from suggesting any endemic or widespread defect
in the Dutch national psyche, but I cannot help but note that, as
pointed out in the
* r...@tristatelogic.com (Ronald F. Guilmette) [Fri 20 Sep 2019, 00:50 CEST]:
Leaving aside the minor quibble that "Dutch" is not, as far as I am
aware, a "race" per se, I do apologize for having improperly and
quite wrongly generalized the apparent confluence of of certain
events and actions
* fohdee...@gmail.com (Jon Sands) [Thu 05 Mar 2020, 23:50 CET]:
Not sure when it happened, but our BGP session to HE via NYIIX is
dead, can't even ping them anymore. Can hit all our other NYIIX
peers without issue
Did your email client accidentally autocomplete 'n...@he.net' (quite
* e...@netstyle.io (Elad Cohen) [Wed 13 May 2020, 15:46 CEST]:
Ronald was called an antisemitic and a racist person here on Nanog in the
following two links, by people which are not related to me:
https://imgur.com/AQCmZlk
Since you're quoting me here, let me reiterate that I was out of line
* clin...@scripty.com (Clinton Work) [Wed 17 Jun 2020, 17:31 CEST]:
I'm struggling to determine which CDN owns the servers in
CenturyLink prefix 8.240.0.0/12. During the Call of Duty Season 4
update on June 11th from 06:00 UTC until 08:30 UTC, we had 240 Gbps
of traffic steaming into our
* bdant...@medline.com (Dantzig, Brian) [Thu 07 Jan 2021, 18:07 CET]:
When you send a DNS query to 8.8.8.8 it goes to the “nearest”
resolver. Not nearest in terms of location since 8.8.8.8 is an
anycast address and exists in many locations. It’s the BGP path to
8.8.8.8 that determines nearest.
* sro...@ronan-online.com (sro...@ronan-online.com) [Sun 10 Jan 2021, 14:46
CET]:
While Amazon is absolutely within their rights to suspend anyone
they want for violation of their TOS, it does create an interesting
problem. Amazon is now in the content moderation business, which
could
* w...@typo.org (Wayne Bouchard) [Sun 10 Jan 2021, 16:40 CET]:
On Sun, Jan 10, 2021 at 04:32:29PM +0100, niels=na...@bakker.net wrote:
* sro...@ronan-online.com (sro...@ronan-online.com) [Sun 10 Jan 2021, 14:46
CET]:
While Amazon is absolutely within their rights to suspend anyone
they want
* iz...@setec.org (Izaac) [Mon 11 Jan 2021, 00:22 CET]:
Got links?
Your message arrived like five times here but I did the google for you:
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/johnpaczkowski/amazon-parler-aws
| On Parler, reaction to the impending ban was swift and outraged, with
| some
* n...@foobar.org (Nick Hilliard) [Mon 11 Jan 2021, 13:56 CET]:
Eric S. Raymond wrote on 11/01/2021 00:00:
Yes, it would. This was an astonnishingly stupid move on AWS's part;
I'm prett sure their counsel was not conmsulted.
this is quite an innovative level of speculation. Care to provide
$ whois AS16589
No match found for a 16589.
* li...@benappy.com (Michel 'ic' Luczak) [Tue 02 Feb 2021, 14:48 CET]:
whois -r AS16589 # perhaps?
aut-num:AS16589
as-name:ELV-ANYCAST-NET
You skipped the most important line:
source: RIPE-NONAUTH
In other words, this
* mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta) [Sun 17 Oct 2021, 11:17
CEST]:
Jay Hennigan wrote:
Neutral backbone providers don't peer with access/retail ISPs.
They sell transit to them.
FYI, that is called paid peering.
Can you please please please stop posting nonsense?
--
* mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta) [Sat 16 Oct 2021, 15:50
CEST]:
Access/retail ISPs have no problem by peering with neutral backbone
providers.
Getting strong Marie-Antoinette vibes here.
-- Niels.
* Owen DeLong [Sat 28 Oct 2023, 01:00 CEST]:
If it’s such a reasonable default, why don’t any of the public
resolvers (e.g. 1.1.1.1, 8.8.8.8, 9.9.9.9, etc.) do so?
It's generally a service that's offered for money. Quad9 definitely
offer it: https://www.quad9.net/service/threat-blocking
* morrowc.li...@gmail.com (Christopher Morrow) [Tue 03 Oct 2023, 21:50 CEST]:
I'm sure telling dave shaeffer: "Hey, your sales droids are being
rude" is going to end as well as sending him ED pill emails.
Such outreach to technical contacts is counterproductive anyway. Which
is more likely,
* morrowc.li...@gmail.com (Christopher Morrow) [Tue 03 Oct 2023, 18:29 CEST]:
this sort of thing (provider X scrapes Y and mails Z for sales leads)
every ~18 months.
the same outrage and conversation happens every time.
the same protection mechanisms are noted every time.
Is there a reason
* nanog@nanog.org (Laura Smith via NANOG) [Tue 24 May 2022, 22:22 CEST]:
Its 2022. Do we really still need a consultation on why mandatory
2FA is a good thing ? Even more so for something like ARIN ?
To many of us in 2022 it's clear that SMS 2FA isn't necessarily a good
way to protect
* g...@toad.com (John Gilmore) [Sat 17 Sep 2022, 04:14 CEST]:
Now that markets exist for IP addresses, all that IP addresses need is a
deed-registry to discourage fraud, like a county real-estate registrar's
office.
Are IP addresses like houses, though? Aren't they more like other
* na...@as397444.net (Matt Corallo) [Sun 18 Jun 2023, 19:12 CEST]:
If its not useful, please describe a mechanism by which an average
recursive resolver can be protected against someone hijacking C root
on Hurricane Electric (which doesn't otherwise have the announcement
at all, last I heard)
* nanog@nanog.org (Cynthia Revström via NANOG) [Sun 18 Jun 2023, 20:52 CEST]:
Naturally C root is fine on HE over IPv4, the issue is with IPv6.
2001:500:2::c is not reachable over HE.
You're absolutely correct. Maybe their LG defaulting to IPv6 made my
brain short-circuit. (Their looking
35 matches
Mail list logo
