The BGP Visibility Scanner now for IPv6 prefixes

2013-08-09 Thread Andra Lutu
Dear all, In November 2012 we have released the *BGP Visibility Scanner*, a tool that checks the visibility of IPv4 prefixes at the interdomain level. We are now happy to further make available the *visibility query for IPv6 prefixes*. Back in February 2013 we have presented the BGP

Re: /25's prefixes announced into global routing table?

2013-06-24 Thread Andra Lutu
Hi, From public routing data we can see a total of 2,419 /25s prefixes announced from at least one of the monitors active in RIPE RIS and RouteViews. None of the /25s are actually advertised by all these monitors i.e. the /25s reach some but not all the ASes which take part in these projects.

The BGP Visibility Scanner

2013-05-15 Thread Andra Lutu
Dear all, We have built a tool that checks the visibility of IPv4 prefixes at the interdomain level. The tool is available at *http://visibility.it.uc3m.es/* and you can use it to retrieve the Limited Visibility Prefixes (LVPs) (i.e., prefixes that are not present in all the global routing

Re: The BGP Visibility Scanner

2013-05-15 Thread Andra Lutu
is there ? /-- / /*Jason Hellenthal*/ IST Services Professional Inbox: /jhellent...@dataix.net mailto:jhellent...@dataix.net/ JJH48-ARIN On May 15, 2013, at 6:22, Andra Lutu andra.l...@imdea.org mailto:andra.l...@imdea.org wrote: Dear all, We have built a tool that checks

RIS raw data

2012-01-19 Thread andra . lutu
Hi all, I am working on getting a better grasp on what data we have in the RIS project from RIPE. To this end, I am checking the export policies of the ASes peering with RIPE AS12654 at different IXPs. I am wondering if anybody knows what these ASes actually announce to the RIPE repositories?

Re: RIS raw data

2012-01-19 Thread andra . lutu
Hi Randy, Thank you for your reply. I do, however, have one more question, please find it bellow. In some cases I saw the export policy ANNOUNCE ANY, is this consistent with a particular AS behaving like the RIPE AS was its customer? well, if i was to take that literally, that would