+1 for Accedian
If you're looking for more of a homemade solution, I've used the perfSONAR
software suite on some cheap-ish servers running CentOS for 10gig testing.
It's highly configurable. I had it set up to do scheduled tests so we
could see how the network behaved over time. The results
I've been testing IPInfusion OcNOS running on Dell Z9100 and S4048. I've
run a couple of test cases using MPLS LDP signaled port based and VLAN
based VPWS (pseudowire / e-line / xconnect / Juniper CCC) and VPLS (e-lan)
over an OSPFv2 IGP. It's working well between Dell/IPI to Dell/IPI boxes.
We
+1 for Route Explorer
On Thu, Apr 5, 2018 at 2:49 AM, Andy Davidson wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On 29/03/2018, 00:22, Andy Litzinger
> wrote:
> >
> >> The root cause is that the our prefix is not being adequately
> >> re-distributed globally by the
No sure if this link has been provided yet, but this is how I learned BFD -
https://supportforums.cisco.com/t5/service-providers-documents/bfd-support-on-cisco-asr9000/ta-p/3153191
My only experience with BFD has been with short paths using grey optics and
interstate DWDM spans. I found 3x50ms
this
has more to do with the behavior of IRB in general on Juniper as I don't
see any of the IRB MAC addresses present in the table, even for IRBs not
used on the VPLS circuit. It's entirely possible I'm using the wrong
commands. :)
-ben
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 4:27 PM, Ben Bartsch <uwca
xe2
262148 2/Up 7 LDP Active
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Ben Bartsch <uwcable...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Absolutely! I'm running a eBGP session over this ATM. We are going to
> try to backhaul our customers through a Dell whitebox running IPI OcNOS
n(s)? I've stiched a L2 PW using
> lt-interfaces.
>
> Thanks.
>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 11:51:36AM -0500, Ben Bartsch wrote:
> > I want to thank everyone who contacted me on and off list on this
> request.
> > I now have two methods to land a layer 3 endpoint on a laye
at a future
NANOG meeting. Thanks again!
-ben
On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Ben Bartsch <uwcable...@gmail.com> wrote:
> When we had Cisco ASR 920/903 and ASR9k, I could attach a layer 2
> pseudowire endpoint on that device to a layer 3 BDI/BVI. I'm trying to do
> the same thing on a
When we had Cisco ASR 920/903 and ASR9k, I could attach a layer 2
pseudowire endpoint on that device to a layer 3 BDI/BVI. I'm trying to do
the same thing on a Juniper MX 480/960 and it does not appear to be
supported (for LDP at least - MP-BGP might be supported). We could do
either VPWS or
We are a small transit provider with a Juniper backbone running
multi-topology IS-IS in a single area with a very small number of JunOS
devices (less than 15 devices). We are attempting to integrate some 100
Gbps top of rack Dell (Force10) switches to do some backhaul in our metro
areas. The end
Get in touch with your Cisco SE or partner. Cisco SE's have access to a
conversion tool that takes in an IOS config and spits out an XR config.
It's usually about 80-95% correct. It even shows you sections that are not
in use and can be removed.
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 5:39 AM, Nick Hilliard
NANOG - Are any of you running a console server to access your network
equipment via a serial connection at a remote site? If so, what are you
using and how much do you like it? I have a project where I need to stand
up over 100 remote sites and would like a backdoor to the console just to
be
Consultant here...
We used StatSeeker at a large state government WAN (my last gig before
turning consultant) and I personally loved it for graphs and to point
customers to (you can easily set up user accounts where they can log in via
a web portal and they can see the graphs you assign them). I
Hey!
New message, please read
<http://tutorialsforinternetmarketing.com/servant.php?8xxh5>
Ben Bartsch
Hey!
New message, please read <http://mixmajor.com/having.php?7bot>
Ben Bartsch
Hey!
New message, please read <http://jordanhand.com/and.php?7>
Ben Bartsch
Hey!
New message, please read <http://google-adwords.com.co/than.php?hnf80>
Ben Bartsch
Hey!
New message, please read <http://www.swconsortium.com/indeed.php?ldjzy>
Ben Bartsch
We are seeing Akamai traffic up about 100-300% since noon CDT. Seeing
similar increased from our participants - colleges and universities mainly.
AS32440
-ben
On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Tassos Chatzithomaoglou
ach...@forthnetgroup.gr wrote:
We also noticed an interesting spike (+
Did anyone else notice that the path changed from 65332 to 65332 65331
earlier today?
We certainly did when we starting advertising all the bogons to our ISP
peers. Probably should have had an inbound AS path filter on that cymru
peering...
perfSONAR-PS project - http://www.perfsonar.net/
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 12:58 PM, Tomasz Rola rto...@ceti.pl wrote:
On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Michael Shuler wrote:
On 08/22/2013 12:06 PM, Stefan wrote:
I've been toying with Live distros (CD, then USB) for many years, in
support of
Hi all:
I am curious what you RENs out there are using for BGP (and IGP) route
recording. We did a demo of Packet Design's Route Explorer. While I loved
the functionality and ease of use, we simply can not afford it. I am
attracted to iBGPlay since we use the BGPlayer at routeviews all the
We lost our peering with them in Baton Rouge (Houston) but not in Jackson
MS (Atlanta). It was less than 10 minutes. No advanced notification.
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 10:06 AM, 2asx1y...@sneakemail.com wrote:
I acknowledge sliding past the maintenance window, and we're seeing
similar bumps,
Greetings:
I work for a REN and we are looking for advice on a route recorder. We
have been working with Packet Design and I absolutely love their product
RouteExplorer (well, everything except the price tag). I was wondering if
anyone out there in NANOG land had any suggestions or
http://lg.level3.net/ is online from Baton Rouge, LA. Any official word
from Level3?
-bb
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Siegel, David dave.sie...@level3.comwrote:
Hi Folks,
The site is offline as a result of some security issues that were
discovered. As soon as we've got it patched we'll
AS 13703 were suspect
AS 13703 for isolating the issue and fixing it
NANOG is a great community and I hope to see y'all in NOLA next year.
-Ben
AS 32440
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 8:02 AM, Ben Bartsch uwcable...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi:
Is there anyone here who can help us with a possible prefix hijacking
http://bgplay.routeviews.org/bgplay/
gives a good idea of what happened
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:44 PM, Eric Osterweil eosterw...@verisign.comwrote:
As for the, ``what is a leak'' question, a few of us just put a draft
together to describe it, in the IETF:
Hi:
Is there anyone here who can help us with a possible prefix hijacking
situation through ATDN? Please contact me off list if you (or you know
somebody) that can help us. I've tried the ATDN NOC and Vikas, but they
have been no help whatsoever.
The hijacked prefix appears to be sent to AS
use this:
http://www.team-cymru.org/Services/Bogons/bgp.html
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Jared Mauch ja...@puck.nether.net wrote:
On Oct 5, 2012, at 11:07 AM, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 8:29 AM, joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com wrote:
by all accounts this has
y'all
youse
ye
do not use 'gals'.i've been told that is offensive here in the south
(i'm a yankee transplant)
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Kevin Carmical kev...@uca.edu wrote:
So say we all.
Kevin Carmical
Network Support
UCA
BBA 107
501-450-3107 deles...@gmail.com 9/27/2012
I am trying to add a /40 prefix to be accepted by a couple of TWTC circuits
we have in Louisiana (Shreveport and Baton Rouge). My only options
available are /32, /48, /56, /64 in the web portal. Is there somebody from
TWTC that could contact me off list?
Thanks.
-bb
mturoute.exe works great
http://www.elifulkerson.com/projects/mturoute.php
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Justin M. Streiner strei...@cluebyfour.org
wrote:
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012, Andrew K. wrote:
Besides routing protocol convergence is there any service issues with
running mismatched
Temporary Fix + It Works = Permanent Fix
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Pedersen, Sean sean.peder...@usairways.com
wrote:
What's the bubble-wrap for? Protection in case of bird collision?
Looks like they borrowed from Qwest's repair manual. We have a lot of
pedestals around the city that
This one is very strange...
Has anyone seen this behavior with BGP IPv6 between Juniper (owned by Level
3, advertising routes correctly, sending default ::/0) and Cisco (6509
running 12.2.58.SXI6 advipservices, receiving all routes fine except
default, hearing ::/3)? I worked with Level 3 and
on intermapper, simply right click the link, select 'status window' and you
will get all kinds of nice info. be sure to use the bandwidth command on
the interface if you are not using the default 10/100/1000/10gig. also,
the links turn yellow and orange as the line becomes more saturated (and
35 matches
Mail list logo