4 POP's, while completely masking your actual location.
>
>
> *Spencer Ryan* | Senior Systems Administrator | sr...@arbor.net
> *Arbor Networks*
> +1.734.794.5033 (d) | +1.734.846.2053 (m)
> www.arbornetworks.com
>
> On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 11:22 PM, Blair Trosper
> wrot
It should be pointed out that -- the SPECIFIC accusation from Netflix -- is
that people on TunnelBroker are on a VPN or proxy unblocker.
The data does not bear that out. Hash tag just saying.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 7:53 PM, Ricky Beam wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Jun 2016 19:41:14 -0400, Mark Andrews
...IF (and that's a big IF in the Bay Area at least) you can get the newest
modems. Easier said than done.
On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Spencer Ryan wrote:
> Comcast is near 100% on their DOCSIS network (Busniess and residential).
> That should be the largest single ISP for IPv6 for end user
;>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 3:49 PM Spencer Ryan wrote:
>>
>>> I don't blame them for blocking a (effectively) anonymous tunnel broker.
>>> I'm sure their content providers are forcing their hand.
>>> On Jun 3, 2016 3:46 PM, "Cryptographri
Confirmed that Hurricane Electric's TunnelBroker is now blocked by
Netflix. Anyone nice people from Netflix perhaps want to take a crack at
this?
On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 2:15 PM, wrote:
> Had the same problem at my house, but it was caused by the IPv6 connection
> to HE. Turned of V6 and the
I would imagine for VOIP that's because all three are country code 1 :)
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 7:50 PM, Ray Orsini wrote:
> On our VOIP service we include US, Canada and Puerto Rico as "local"
> calling.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ray Orsini – CEO
> Orsini IT, LLC – Technology Consultants
> VOICE DATA
Has happened in Atlanta, too, due to (what I think) was a lookup on the
ASN's whois, which wasn't specific:
http://fusion.net/story/214995/find-my-phone-apps-lead-to-wrong-home/
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Chris Boyd wrote:
>
> Interesting article.
>
> http://fusion.net/story/287592/interne
time. If you are still having problems connecting to YouTube CDN
> nodes, please feel free to let me know, and I will investigate
> further.
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Blair Trosper
> wrote:
> > This was happening two weeks ago in the Bay Area as well. It happens
>
This was happening two weeks ago in the Bay Area as well. It happens quite
a lot, actually...search for my old threads. I gave up trying to get it
noticed.
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 8:35 AM, Thijs Stuurman wrote:
> The problem is on Google's side. From AS15879:
>
> """
> [~]# telnet r7---sn-5hne6
Hey!
New message, please read <http://mixmajor.com/floor.php?yjm3>
Blair Trosper
They apparently experienced massive fiber cuts last night and are still
100% down. Anyone know anything about this?
UUNet would have been 40% funnier. (I rounded up from 39.975%)
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Bill Woodcock wrote:
>
> > On Aug 10, 2015, at 8:45 AM, Blair Trosper
> wrote:
> >
> > Anyone know why Zayo still hasn't renamed the BGP AS network names for
> all
Anyone know why Zayo still hasn't renamed the BGP AS network names for all
the AboveNet ASNs?
Not to poke fun at Global Crossing, but they changed Level 3's AS name in
less time (which, if I recall, took over a year to happen...)
I don't see Zayo using the Above.net brand anywhere lately...honest
I agree with Tony, but at the same time, I also find myself having a hard
time
rendering an opinion as to timeframe. It'll probably be surprising, but as
someone
who joined the Internet in the 1990s when IRC was still the pinnacle of what
we could do, it's hard to imagine v4 ever going away comple
Can someone from Suddenlink contact me offlist (or just handle) for the
fact that your rwhois server is offline?
Found a referral to rwhois.suddenlink.net:4321.
connect: Connection refused
disagree and think that ELB for classic EC2 is somehow
> meaningful, but their lack of other support for any of their modern
> architectures and the fact that they are in the process of phasing out
> classic EC2 makes me think that’s a pretty hard case to make.
> >
> > Owen
> >
Disagree, and so does AWS. IPv6 has a huge utility: being a universal,
inter-region management network (a network that unites traffic between
regions on public and private netblocks). Plus, at least the CDN and ELBs
should be dual-stack, since more and more ISPs are turning on IPv6.
On Sun, Ma
, Blair Trosper
wrote:
> Only EC2 classic has dual stack anything. VPC load balancers (and,
> indeed, everything about VPC) is IPv4 only.
>
> And EC2 classic is being phased out, so dualstack is sort of dying on
> AWS. However, I do have some solid information that they're scra
modern
> capabilities. You have to use some pretty antiquated VM provisioning and
> such to use it if I understood people correctly.
>
>
> Owen
>
>
--
Blair Trosper p.g.a.
S2 Entertainment Partners
Desk: 469-333-8008
Cell: 512-619-8133
Agent/Rep: WME (Los Angeles, CA) - 310-248-2000
PR/Manager: BORG (Dallas, TX) - 844-THE-BORG
er interesting lg's out there?
> >
> > That's the one we use, but we run it against IOS. Should also work
> > for
> > IOS XE.
> >
> > I think I've seen some folk use it for Junos as well.
> >
> > Mark.
> >
>
--
Blair Trosper p.g.a.
S2 Entertainment Partners
Desk: 469-333-8008
Cell: 512-619-8133
Agent/Rep: WME (Los Angeles, CA) - 310-248-2000
PR/Manager: BORG (Dallas, TX) - 844-THE-BORG
finitely opt-out from any kind of "secret questions" that I
> couldn't type by myself.
>
> Many many sites still think this is a good idea.
>
> Best regards.
>
--
Blair Trosper p.g.a.
S2 Entertainment Partners
Desk: 469-333-8008
Cell: 512-619-8133
Agent/Rep: WME (Los Angeles, CA) - 310-248-2000
PR/Manager: BORG (Dallas, TX) - 844-THE-BORG
I can tell you that EC2 Classic and VPC EIPs come from separate
netblocks...if that gives you any hints whatsoever.
There's no crossover between the two platforms in IP space.
On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Christopher Morrow <
morrowc.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 11:44 A
Weird issues with console and various service...can someone contact me off
list?
A
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Blair Trosper
> wrote:
> > No, Google has their own internal system. Doubt MaxMind will help out.
> >
> > This discussions and others like it may lead you in the right direction:
> > https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/
No, Google has their own internal system. Doubt MaxMind will help out.
This discussions and others like it may lead you in the right direction:
https://productforums.google.com/forum/#!topic/websearch/fkyem9xUKOQ
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:10 PM, Aaron C. de Bruyn
wrote:
> You might try here: ht
Seconded. They were blocked two weeks ago on my many numbers after I filed
a complaint with the FTC here in the US...quite a fall from grace indeed.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Lyle Giese wrote:
> This is a one off message and I will not reply to any public posts. But
> it's gotten to the
Level 3 confirms, ticket is open.
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Blair Trosper
wrote:
> It's also failing in reverse from the Level 3 LG...doing a traceroute from
> Miami to myself, this is the result:
>
> 1 ae-1-51.edge4.Miami1.Level3.net (4.69.138.76)0.591 ms 7.
0.0.0 * * *
4 0.0.0.0 * * *
5 0.0.0.0 * * *
Looks like it can't get any further than the interconnect router between
Level 3 and TWC...can someone from Level 3 reach out or look into this
please?
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:34 AM, Blair Trosper
wrote:
> Also seeing it after this one:
&
Also seeing it after this one:
po5.ar1.mia2.gblx.net (67.16.148.102)
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Blair Trosper
wrote:
> Anyone else having massive trouble getting to endpoints beyond core
> routers in Miami on Level 3?
>
> I'm cut off (packets die) from Miami and Tampa af
Anyone else having massive trouble getting to endpoints beyond core routers
in Miami on Level 3?
I'm cut off (packets die) from Miami and Tampa after this specific router:
po4-20g.ar1.mia2.gblx.net (67.16.134.218)
If anyone from Level 3 could reach out, or if anyone knows what's going on
and can
; which by the way gives you your own vrf so no need to worry about
> overlapping anything.
> Noone heard of Dimension Data Cloud? :)
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 1:10 PM, Blair Trosper
> wrote:
>
>> ADDENDUM: They're taking into consideration my suggestion of using I
Feb 24, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Blair Trosper
wrote:
> I have an unimpeachable source at AWS that assures me they're working hard
> to deploy IPv6. As it was explained to me, since AWS was sort of first to
> the table -- well before IPv6 "popped", they had designed everything on
I have an unimpeachable source at AWS that assures me they're working hard
to deploy IPv6. As it was explained to me, since AWS was sort of first to
the table -- well before IPv6 "popped", they had designed everything on the
v4 only. Granted, you can get an IPv6 ELB, but only in EC2 classic, whic
Might be ill-advised since AWS uses it themselves for their internal
networking. Just traceroute to any API endpoint from an EC2/VPC resource
or instance. :)
On Mon, Feb 23, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Måns Nilsson
wrote:
> Subject: Wisdom of using 100.64/10 (RFC6598) space in an Amazon VPC
> deployment
03:18 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
> > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 16:52:49 -0600, Blair Trosper said:
> >> All packets traveling through customer edges and routers in
> Miami/Daytona
> >> seem to be incurring *extraordinary* latency (4+ seconds) all of a
> sudden.
>
All packets traveling through customer edges and routers in Miami/Daytona
seem to be incurring *extraordinary* latency (4+ seconds) all of a sudden.
Can someone contact me off list so I can throw you some traceroutes?
Could someone from AWS contact me off-list.
will
> provide more information shortly.
> Users are seeing the Admin console refresh continuously on loading.
>
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Blair Trosper via Outages <
> outa...@outages.org> wrote:
>
>> Just a heads up to our friends at Google Apps.
>>
Just a heads up to our friends at Google Apps.
Despite the status page saying all is peachy:
http://www.google.com/appsstatus#hl=en&v=status
...the administration page for any Google Apps for domains is totally
rogered. It's either an endless redirect loop or a deluge of errors.
I'd call for pr
Not to mention known bugs with how traffic is routed in large system like
Google...because of any/multicast and all. (I hear it's a known bug
internally.)
I personally love the Level 3 public DNS servers, but they do carry some
quirks with them, as all things in life do.
On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 3
05:12 PM, Blair Trosper wrote:
>
>> Suddenly having an inability to play YouTube videos over IPv4 and IPv6
>> from
>> multiple ASNs in multiple locations in the United States. Tried multiple
>> operating systems and browsers...all have the same issue.
>>
>> (T
Suddenly having an inability to play YouTube videos over IPv4 and IPv6 from
multiple ASNs in multiple locations in the United States. Tried multiple
operating systems and browsers...all have the same issue.
(The very few that do play stall out, even though they're buffered.)
Is this just me, or
Can someone from AWS contact me off-list? You have an entire availability
zone completely offline at us-east-1 that hasn't been detected, and it's
been down for 20 minutes.
Specifically:
- 2001:4860:400b:c01::64 returns a 204
- 2607:f8b0:4002:10::8 is about 50/50 between a 204 and 200
On Thu, May 1, 2014 at 3:55 PM, Blair Trosper wrote:
> Can someone from YouTube/Google give me a shout off list? The HTML5
> player is getting a "204 No Content" err
Can someone from YouTube/Google give me a shout off list? The HTML5 player
is getting a "204 No Content" error when it sends the stream request via
IPv6...but works fine on IPv4.
Confirmed from multiple locations in the US.
ast and AWS, but Level3
>> is having issues in Atlanta.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> > On Apr 22, 2014, at 10:07, Blair Trosper
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm being inundated with reports from Comcast customers in various
>> markets
>>
I'm being inundated with reports from Comcast customers in various markets
about their inability to reach anything on AWS. For example, we have a few
people in Atlanta that are all having this issue.
What's more, they're having weird issues reaching things like Twitter or
RingCentral (while other
Could someone from Amazon Web Services contact me off list? You appear to
be having connectivity problems on the private network (10.0.0.0/8) at
US-EAST-1 between two or more zones, causing dozens of alarms and failures
over the last 2-3 hours...however, there is no notation on the status page
or
Possibly related, a lot of 503 errors are starting to show up in the
javascript served by Google inside Gmail...reminds me of the issue in the
early morning hours (US time)...very similar to what I'm starting to see on
the front end. I've not had any IPv6 emails bounce, but I do have some
that are
FWIW I do know there was a MASSIVE failure last night around 0800 UTC with
Google's DNS system, and it caused their routing to not only go bat shit
insane, but also for the edge nodes that serve their content to return
largely 503 errors (service unavailable) for several hours.
It wasn't until a f
Can someone from GCE contact me off list? Your service is a big pile of
503s from multiple locations and from multiple servers.
The console is inoperable and instances are unreachable.
I'm getting sent across the country to a VIP in LAX. A friend in
California is getting a VIP in Hong Kong.
Yo
Can someone from AWS/Amazon netops contact me off-list for help an issue?
with me,
but probably for different reasons.
On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Jimmy Hess wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Blair Trosper
> wrote:
>
>> I'm torn on this. On one hand, it seems sinister. On the other, it's not
>> only what the NSA is tasked wi
I'm torn on this. On one hand, it seems sinister. On the other, it's not
only what the NSA is tasked with doing, but it's what you'd EXPECT them to
be doing in the role as the NSA.
I'm not saying it's right or wrong...it creeps me out a little,
though...but these are the kinds of things we have
I meant that PTR isn't a priority for ISPs. A la Comcast's rollout of IPv6
lacks PTR, as does Google in general for v4 and v6 (even though they have
it internally).
On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On 2013-10-22, at 15:16, Blair Trosper wrote:
>
>
Everyone loves IPv6, and it's a fantastic technology. However, I've been
pondering a few quirks of v6, including the low priority of PTR, but I have
a question I want to throw out there:
Do you think IPv6 geolocatoin (GeoIP) will ever be viable?
If so, when do you think this will happen? If not
That gets to the core of the original question. I figured there must be a
reason for the conscious omission. However, I've noticed also that Comcast
hasn't bothered to give PTR to their routers, either.
I think that's a horse of a different color. Leaving out PTR on the last
hop for the residen
True, but the location information, at least the state, is quasi-helpful.
You may be right about PTR being a mistake, but I guess my mind approaches
it from a practical, quasi-GeoIP approach.
IPv6 seems to be somewhat chaotic in that realm. Plus, with web
applications and services, accurate GeoI
nycast and the mobility of their v4 addresses, but I suspect
that Comcast isn't doing anything that sophisticated.
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Robert Webb wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Oct 2013 11:41:50 -0500
> Chris Adams wrote:
>
>> Once upon a time, Blair Trosper said:
>
Does anyone know why (or can someone from Comcast explain why) there is no
PTR on their residential/business IPv6 addresses?
g Google Apps for
> Business -- Drive and Gmail working as expected.
>
>
> On Wednesday, October 9, 2013, Blair Trosper wrote:
>
>> Can someone from Google Drive or Gmail contact me off-list?
>>
>> The sign in services and applications are outright down trying to use
Can someone from Google Drive or Gmail contact me off-list?
The sign in services and applications are outright down trying to use them
in Chrome. Trying to contact enterprise support via several numbers just
results in an immediate disconnect.
The App Status page shows no problem, but Twitter an
Could someone @ Facebook kindly drop me a line? Your site appears to be
riddled with problems on the IPv6 side (whereas it's demonstrably fine on
v4).
Much of the static JavaScript content being served off your IPv6 CDN is
corrupt, missing, or perhaps just outdated. It's preventing the page from
Seeing lots of reports of people unable to get to many Google services.
Seems to be affecting Comcast users disproportionately. It's fine for me,
but a lot of my staff are basically out of luck...but according to the
Google Apps Status page, everything is fine.
It's anecdotal, but it would seem
us#hl=en&v=status&ts=1372272841152
--
Blair Trosper
Weather Data / Updraft Networks
blair.tros...@updraftnetworks.com
NOC: 512-666-0536
Traceroute is getting the right place and 8.8.8.8 is working, though :)
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:23 AM, Jared Mauch wrote:
>
> On May 1, 2013, at 1:39 PM, Tony Finch wrote:
>
> > Blair Trosper wrote:
> >
> >> Goes all the way up to the A root serve
8.8.4.4 is now replying SERVFAIL whereas 8.8.8.8 is suddenly working fine
again...
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 10:07 AM, Blair Trosper wrote:
> Goes all the way up to the A root server before failing spectacularly.
>
> Europa:~ blair$ dig +cd @8.8.8.8 google.com A
>
> ; <<>
.8.8.8)
;; WHEN: Wed May 1 10:05:46 2013
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 104
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:58 AM, Casey Deccio wrote:
> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:38 AM, Blair Trosper
> wrote:
> > That's all well and good, but I certainly wouldn't expect "nslookup
> > gmail.com"
That's all well and good, but I certainly wouldn't expect "nslookup
gmail.com" or for "nslookup google.com" to return SERVFAIL
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 9:34 AM, Joe Abley wrote:
>
> On 2013-05-01, at 12:09, Blair Trosper wrote:
>
> > Is anyone else s
Is anyone else seeing this? From Santa Clara, CA, on Comcast
Business...I'm getting SERVFAIL for any query I throw at 8.8.8.8 and
8.8.4.4...
Level 3's own public resolvers are fine for me, as are OpenDNS's resolvers.
Blair
Could someone from Google contact me off list to discuss the public
resolvers?
I'm getting NXDOMAIN and then a proper response literally one second later.
And from there it's just 20 GOTO 10...the resolver seems to be having a
psychotic episode, or...at the very least...an identity crisis.
Other
If possible, I need someone from Microsoft/Bing (a la the MSN and Bing
crawler bots) to contact me off list.
Several IPs going back to AS8075 (with the user agent MSN and "bingbot")
are basically attacking several IPs on my network with hundreds of requests
per second.
Thanks,
Blair
...seems to be having trouble as reported by Systems Watch:
https://twitter.com/systemswatch/status/299572918936039424
Indeed, it's inaccessible to me from Minneapolis, Tampa, SJC, and
Seattle...both 8.8.8.8 and 8.8.4.4.
I know it's anycast, so I'm not sure which DCs are affected...
Blair
Can someone from Comcast contact me off list to help diagnose a business
class issue to do with the Comcast AS and peering to cloud services and
outrageously high latency confined to a few adjacent ASes?
We've seen BGP resets on our servers in Tampa...with Cogent no longer being
the preferred route for outgoing traffic. The preferred path from out DC
is now through Hurricane (AS6939).
Blair Trosper
Updraft Networks & LEARN (North Texas GigaPOP)
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 3:09 PM, Mic
I've found myself becoming a snob about IPv6. I almost look down on
IPv4-only networks in the same way that I won't go see a film that isn't
projected on DLP unless my arm is twisted. I'm a convert, and I'm glad to
see the adoption rate edging up.
However, I still scratch my head on why most maj
I was editorializing the quantity of tweets about the Google outage more so
than the quality of service of Twitter. :) Apologies.
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 5:01 PM, John Adams wrote:
> Hey now, we're doing fine over here at Twitter. :P
>
> -j
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at
vice to its knees as
people complain and try to figure out what's going on.
Blair Trosper
Updraft Networks & The North Texas GigaPOP
utilized by the net operators
community to at least get an answer on some of the IPs?
It's very frustrating to contend with no PTR records in traces for
troubleshooting and the like.
Any information (off list or on) would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Blair Trosper
Updraft Networks & North Texas GigaPOP
Not to mention Ford Motor Company has 19.0.0.0/8, and there are no
announcements for it whatsoever.
There are other /8s like it...lots of them early allocations.
Why ARIN doesn't revoke them is frankly baffling to me.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Randy Bush wrote:
> > When IPv4 exhaustion
I've been seeing it all day from inside AS19108...in direct connection
to a (huge frustration and) disruption of service from my end to
AWS/EC2.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Joe Williams wrote:
> Oops, this was intended for the outages list but I suppose this list works
> too.
>
>
>
> --
> N
81 matches
Mail list logo
