RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: Microsoft is hacking my Asterisk??? O_o

Sorry, why is this useless? -Original Message- From: NANOG On Behalf Of Gary E. Miller Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2020 12:06 PM To: Christian Kuhtz via NANOG Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: Microsoft is hacking my Asterisk??? O_o Yo Christian! On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 20:02:06 + Christian

RE: Microsoft is hacking my Asterisk??? O_o

https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/resources/knowledge-center/how-do-i-report-a-security-incident-or-abuse/ How do I report a security incident or abuse? To report suspected security issues or abuse of Azure, please contact the cert.microsoft.com

Re: Contacts wanted: OVH, DigitalOcean, and Microsoft (Deutschland)

: Contacts wanted: OVH, DigitalOcean, and Microsoft (Deutschland) In message , Christian Kuhtz wrote: >we are asking Microsoft CDOC to investigate. Thank you. I am not at all sure who the mysterious "we" is intended to represent in that sentence. Perpahs it is just intended as

Re: Contacts wanted: OVH, DigitalOcean, and Microsoft (Deutschland)

Ronald, we are asking Microsoft CDOC to investigate. You can find a variety of ways to report issues at their website as well: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/msrc/cdoc Thanks, Christian From: NANOG on behalf of Ronald F. Guilmette Sent: Monday, March 18,

Re: MSFT reverse IP failure?

Hah. Thanks. :) Yes, it's a big shop.. From: Hank Nussbacher <h...@efes.iucc.ac.il> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 11:38:10 PM To: Christian Kuhtz; Ken Chase; nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: MSFT reverse IP failure? On 27/02/2018 01:25, Christian Kuhtz via

RE: MSFT reverse IP failure?

Ken, A little difficult to say what this without knowing what 13.67.59.89 actually is. If this is an Azure deployment, ReverseFqdn needs to be populated on the Public IP address resource. Please take a look here https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/dns/dns-reverse-dns-for-azure-services

Re: MSN/Azure

Joe, Happy to help get you to the right person. Please reply direct with details. Thanks, Christian From: Joe Carroll Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2:14 PM Subject: MSN/Azure To: nanog@nanog.org Anyone have a clueful contact at Azure/MSN? We have a block of recently acquired address space

Re: Microsoft peering - no response

Thanks everyone. Problem was on our end and has been fixed. Thanks, Christian From: Kaiser, Erich Sent: Sunday, August 6, 2:43 PM Subject: Microsoft peering - no response To: NANOG list We have been trying to complete our peering with Microsoft at Equinix Ashburn for over a month, keep

RE: Clueful contact at Microsoft needed

William, I just got word from an internal team I had reached out to yesterday, and they told me they've just sent you an email to see how to resolve. Hope that gets you on the path to resolution. Best regards, Christian -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org]

RE: Microsoft Skype for Business Contact - Broken PMTUD

Hi Reuben, I've responded offline. Thanks, Christian -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Reuben Farrelly via NANOG Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 6:15 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Microsoft Skype for Business Contact - Broken PMTUD Hi, Can

Re: Binge On! - And So This is Net Neutrality?

I don't know if this is NN or not, but the concept is ancient. Even back in the dark ages of mobile, zero rating and associated rev share were very common. Whether this is relevant to NN or not is for lawyers. Christian > On Nov 20, 2015, at 7:47 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > >

Re: Zero rating implentation strategies

Inline.. On Sep 1, 2015, at 10:13 AM, Jean-Francois Mezei <jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca<mailto:jfmezei_na...@vaxination.ca>> wrote: On 15-09-01 12:36, Christian Kuhtz wrote: Zero rating is not a new concept. It has existed in the mobile world since the days of the dumb

Re: Zero rating implentation strategies

Zero rating is not a new concept. It has existed in the mobile world since the days of the dumb phone. Got a reference to why this was killed by the regulator in Canada? Mobile networks typically use their packet core (and prior iterations of the same termination, rating, billing, management

RE: mpls over microwave

Not doing anymore, but I have in a previous life. It works. What's more important is how you engineered your radios and what you're using... Best regards, Christian -Original Message- From: NANOG [mailto:nanog-boun...@nanog.org] On Behalf Of Scott Weeks Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2015

RE: Office 365 Expert - I am not. I have a customer that...

I don't belong to the O365 product group, but did you look at this? https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh852542.aspx and a blog article to go along with that: http://blogs.technet.com/b/educloud/archive/2013/08/20/do-you-have-any-bandwidth-calculators-for-office-365.aspx There's a

Re: DNS issues?

To Vladis' point, how do you know that you couldn't reach the roots vs the roots not being able to reach you? -- Sent from my BlackBerry. -Original Message- From: Erik Amundson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 14:39:37 Cc:nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: DNS issues? I

Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6

Until there's a practical solution for multihoming, this whole discussion is pretty pointless. -- Sent from my BlackBerry. -Original Message- From: Andy Davidson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:27:33 To:Donald Stahl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc:nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re:

Re: The Choice: IPv4 Exhaustion or Transition to IPv6

multihoming is simple, you get an address block and route it to your upstreams. the policy surrounding that is another debate, possibly for another group this thread is discussing how v4 to v6 migration can operate on a network level Steve On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 01:37:23PM +, Christian Kuhtz