See this is my point. People always dismiss these issues and say they could
easily get service. Then, when someone comes in with an actual request for said
service, the answer we get is about structured deals with HOA/property
management. What about for a single customer? A single customer who
Out of pure curiosity, let’s assume they COULD put an antenna on the roof…
What is the service? Bandwidth, latency expectation, cost?
Note that in almost every condominium or apartment complex I have heard of,
they do NOT allow roof builds. This is why satellite TV in those areas require
> Is that fair to the guy in a 150+ person apartment building? One gets
> solitude and fiber internet, the other has to deal with neighbors and gets
> fiber internet.
They both get fiber internet and chose where to live, so sure why not? Why are
so many of us in the US so against something
You respond as if fiber installations were all decided by people rolling dice
during a tabletop gaming session.
Places with fiber got invested into by the providers of those areas, and that
should be constantly expanded. Maybe companies unwilling to do so shouldn’t be
getting subsidies. Maybe
While I agree, one thing to remember is the lack of any urgency to build out
that infrastructure with the standards as low as they are in the last decade.
It’s already not really being extended with haste, I doubt raising the
definition will be the straw that breaks the camels back here. Seems
On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:42 PM, Sean Donelan wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Feb 2021, Cory Sell via NANOG wrote:
>> adoption. Sure, wind isn’t perfect, but looks like solution relied on failed
>> in a massive way.
>
> Strange the massive shortages and failures are only in one state.
Ercot has already released actual documentation of the outputs. Wind is NOT the
biggest loss here. Even if wind was operating at 100% capacity, we’d be in the
same boat due to gas and fossil fuel-related generation being decimated.
Estimated 4GW lost for wind doesn’t make up for the 30GW+
I saturate my 1G connection most during game downloads, file downloads/uploads,
full backup uploads, etc.
I also self-host a lot of services for personal use and having that peak speed
is really nice when you need it. It also had no traffic limit per month which
is my biggest complaint about
Just because nobody is mentioning it - you can always build a
pfSense/VyOS/Vyatta box in whatever form factor you’d prefer. Even can run
within a VM if you really want to.
Regards,
Cory
On Fri, Dec 25, 2020 at 11:45 AM, Bryan Fields wrote:
> On 12/25/20 4:52 AM, Mark Tinka wrote:
>> For the
Might be worth disabling each AP to see if there's one out there having an
issue playing nice with the MacBook. Also try different combinations of two APs
working together. It's possible the MacBook is flip flopping because the power
levels are fighting each other.
Does the Mac have this issue
10 matches
Mail list logo
