Re: New addresses for b.root-servers.net

2023-06-18 Thread Cynthia Revström via NANOG
Naturally C root is fine on HE over IPv4, the issue is with IPv6. 2001:500:2::c is not reachable over HE. -Cynthia On Sun, Jun 18, 2023 at 8:10 PM wrote: > > * na...@as397444.net (Matt Corallo) [Sun 18 Jun 2023, 19:12 CEST]: > >If its not useful, please describe a mechanism by which an average

Re: .bv ccTLD

2021-12-04 Thread Cynthia Revström via NANOG
It does seem like the rest of the story to me. If the government said no, then that is pretty much it, that is the end of the story regardless of what reason given. (Assuming that it was done correctly and that laws regarding it don't change that is) -Cynthia On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 5:35 PM Jay

Re: .bv ccTLD

2021-12-04 Thread Cynthia Revström via NANOG
On Sat, Dec 4, 2021 at 5:03 PM Carsten Bormann wrote: > > On 2021-12-04, at 16:18, Cynthia Revström via NANOG wrote: > > > > I think pretty much all codes ending in an X is because there were no > > better ones available. (I am not certain on this part though) > &

Re: .bv ccTLD

2021-12-04 Thread Cynthia Revström via NANOG
Hi, Not only is the ISO 3166-1 alpha-2 code assigned but the ccTLD is delegated to NORID's nameservers. NORID also makes it pretty clear that they are not interested in selling the TLD, and I suspect that might very well mirror the position of the Norwegian government. While something like

Re: OT: Re: Younger generations preferring social media(esque) interactions.

2021-03-27 Thread Cynthia Revström via NANOG
(Not speaking for all younger people of course) I often enjoy learning about issues in the past or why some decision was made the way it was. Often this is best conveyed by people who have the context from having been involved at the time. I have asked some people in the past for context to

Re: OT: Re: Younger generations preferring social media(esque) interactions.

2021-03-23 Thread Cynthia Revström via NANOG
I often feel like the more casual conversational chat format is easier than emails and this is the case for many of my friends as well. -Cynthia On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 9:38 AM Mark Tinka wrote: > > > > On 3/23/21 08:22, Cynthia Revström via NANOG wrote: > > > Using a chat

Re: OT: Re: Younger generations preferring social media(esque) interactions.

2021-03-23 Thread Cynthia Revström via NANOG
for other purposes. -Cynthia On Tue, Mar 23, 2021, 07:38 Karl Auer wrote: > On Tue, 2021-03-23 at 07:22 +0100, Cynthia Revström via NANOG wrote: > > Because Discord is proprietary, you can't host your own instance > > For reasons of confidentiality we implemented a MatterMost server fo

Re: Reinventing the wheel on a path to deeper learning

2021-03-23 Thread Cynthia Revström via NANOG
This is good! I really appreciate it when younger people get attention for actually also knowing things like this. If I recall correctly according to Mark Kosters at ARIN, I was the first person to successfully setup delegated RPKI in ARIN (in production) at the start of 2020 at age 18. This is

Re: OT: Re: Younger generations preferring social media(esque) interactions.

2021-03-23 Thread Cynthia Revström via NANOG
Hi, As someone from a "younger generation" (2001) who does use mailing lists, semi-actively participates in RIPE mailing lists but also created a network community on Discord, I want to chime in here. > Are they willing to use a (traditional) forum (of sorts) that is dedicated to the venue? Or

Re: DoD IP Space

2021-01-20 Thread Cynthia Revström via NANOG
I believe the DoD space might be a bit of a difficult one, because (correct me if I am wrong here) due to it being so massive and unused for so long, certain large corporations that have run out of RFC1918, etc. space have started using it internally. So my take on it is, don't consider it as a