Re: bloomberg on supermicro: sky is falling

2018-10-08 Thread Daniel Taylor
osure with HTTPS are exactly the same as the risks of having one end or the other of your VPN compromised. As it is, VPN means trusting the network admins at your peer company. On 10/08/2018 12:15 PM, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote: On Mon, 08 Oct 2018 08:53:55 -0500, Daniel Taylor said: Especially

Re: bloomberg on supermicro: sky is falling

2018-10-08 Thread Daniel Taylor
From: Eric Kuhnke >many contractors *do* have sensitive data on their networks with a gateway out to the public Internet. -- Daniel Taylor VP OperationsVocal Laboratories, Inc. dtay...@vocalabs.com http://www.vocalabs.com/(612)235-5711

Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality

2015-03-02 Thread Daniel Taylor
: Daniel, The sold speeds are all actually less than the actual speeds. The PON customers are slightly over provisioned and the DOCSIS customers are over provisioned a bit more. On Mar 2, 2015 10:01 AM, "Daniel Taylor" <mailto:dtay...@vocalabs.com>> wrote: What do

Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality

2015-03-02 Thread Daniel Taylor
bandwidth >24 mbps and have for a number of years. We see customer usage patterns and satisfaction being statically the same on 25/25 and 25/8 accounts. The same is true when we look at 50/50 versus 50/12 accounts. On Mar 2, 2015 9:22 AM, "Daniel Taylor" <mailto:dtay...@voca

Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality

2015-03-02 Thread Daniel Taylor
more while clients are putting out ~250 milliwatts and with 0 antenna gain. On Mar 2, 2015 8:58 AM, "Daniel Taylor" <mailto:dtay...@vocalabs.com>> wrote: Personally? If the price were the same, I'd go with 50/50. That way my uploads would take even less

Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality

2015-03-02 Thread Daniel Taylor
tion with the fastest top-line bandwidth number because marketers don't know how to sell upstream bandwidth (or don't care to). -- Daniel Taylor VP OperationsVocal Laboratories, Inc. dtay...@vocalabs.com http://www.vocalabs.com/(612)235-5711

Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality

2015-03-02 Thread Daniel Taylor
-- http://twitter.com/kscotthelms ---- -- Daniel Taylor VP OperationsVocal Laboratories, Inc. dtay...@vocalabs.com http://www.vocalabs.com/(612)235-5711

Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality

2015-02-27 Thread Daniel Taylor
tomers sentiment to show that it's going up as fast as downstream demand. Scott Helms Vice President of Technology ZCorum (678) 507-5000 http://twitter.com/kscotthelms ---- On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Daniel Taylor <mailto:d

Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality

2015-02-27 Thread Daniel Taylor
n download speeds past ~30mbps before the correlation starts weakening. Scott Helms Vice President of Technology ZCorum (678) 507-5000 http://twitter.com/kscotthelms ---- On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Daniel Taylor <mailto:dtay..

Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality

2015-02-27 Thread Daniel Taylor
- On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Daniel Taylor <mailto:dtay...@vocalabs.com>> wrote: But by this you are buying into the myth of the mean. It isn't that most, or even many, people would take advantage of equal upstream bandwidth, but that the few who would need

Re: Verizon Policy Statement on Net Neutrality

2015-02-27 Thread Daniel Taylor
en Naslund Chicago IL -- Daniel Taylor VP OperationsVocal Laboratories, Inc. dtay...@vocalabs.com http://www.vocalabs.com/(612)235-5711

Re: gmail spam help

2015-02-13 Thread Daniel Taylor
dnsbl filtering on by default, and also defaulting to shady no name blocklists? I have yet to see a case where turning this sort of thing on first and kicking self later wasn't because of a clueless sysadmin. On Feb 13, 2015 7:36 AM, "Daniel Taylor" <mailto:dtay...@vocalab

Re: gmail spam help

2015-02-12 Thread Daniel Taylor
nning entirely self-contained. On 02/12/2015 07:04 PM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote: Please. Gmail isn't ever likely to use long dead hobbyist block lists. On Feb 12, 2015 9:38 PM, "Daniel Taylor" <mailto:dtay...@vocalabs.com>> wrote: Possibly related: http://www.

Re: gmail spam help

2015-02-12 Thread Daniel Taylor
n" mailto:a...@corp.nac.net><mailto:a...@corp.nac.net<mailto:a...@corp.nac.net>>> wrote: Is there anyone on-list that can help me with a world -> gmail email issue, where email is being considering spam by gmail erroneously? Thanks. -- Daniel Taylor VP Opera

Re: The FCC is planning new net neutrality rules. And they could enshrine pay-for-play. - The Washington Post

2014-04-25 Thread Daniel Taylor
state for the Internet. -- Daniel Taylor VP OperationsVocal Laboratories, Inc. dtay...@vocalabs.com http://www.vocalabs.com/(612)235-5711

Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP

2014-03-26 Thread Daniel Taylor
On 03/26/2014 08:05 AM, rw...@ropeguru.com wrote: On Wed, 26 Mar 2014 07:45:06 -0500 Daniel Taylor wrote: On 03/25/2014 11:18 PM, John Levine wrote: 3. Arguing about IPv6 in the context of requirements upon SMTP connections is playing that uncomfortable game with one�s own combat boots

Re: IPv6 isn't SMTP

2014-03-26 Thread Daniel Taylor
r a problem than IPv4, it just means that we're going to *have* to reject mail that comes in from IPv6 addresses that don't have clean DNS. -- Daniel Taylor VP OperationsVocal Laboratories, Inc. dtay...@vocalabs.com http://www.vocalabs.com/(612)235-5711

Re: What to expect after a cooling failure

2013-07-10 Thread Daniel Taylor
Another failure I've seen connected to overheating events is AC power supply failures. On 07/09/2013 10:28 PM, Erik Levinson wrote: As some may know, yesterday 151 Front St suffered a cooling failure after Enwave's facilities were flooded. One of the suites that we're in recovered quickly but

Re: [SHAME] Spam Rats

2013-01-10 Thread Daniel Taylor
Anything that's obvious won't work. It isn't a complete solution by itself, but SPF hardly breaks a sweat with IPv6 and helps with maintaining domain-name based blacklists. -- Daniel Taylor VP Operations Vocal Laboratories, Inc dtay...@vocalabs.com

Re: The End-To-End Internet (was Re: Blocking MX query)

2012-09-05 Thread Daniel Taylor
On 09/05/2012 03:01 PM, Michael Thomas wrote: On 09/05/2012 12:50 PM, Daniel Taylor wrote: On 09/05/2012 10:19 AM, Michael Thomas wrote: On 09/05/2012 05:56 AM, Daniel Taylor wrote: On 09/04/2012 03:52 PM, Michael Thomas wrote: On 09/04/2012 09:34 AM, Daniel Taylor wrote: If you are

Re: The End-To-End Internet (was Re: Blocking MX query)

2012-09-05 Thread Daniel Taylor
On 09/05/2012 10:19 AM, Michael Thomas wrote: On 09/05/2012 05:56 AM, Daniel Taylor wrote: On 09/04/2012 03:52 PM, Michael Thomas wrote: On 09/04/2012 09:34 AM, Daniel Taylor wrote: If you are sending direct SMTP on behalf of your domain from essentially random locations, how are we

Re: The End-To-End Internet (was Re: Blocking MX query)

2012-09-05 Thread Daniel Taylor
On 09/04/2012 03:52 PM, Michael Thomas wrote: On 09/04/2012 09:34 AM, Daniel Taylor wrote: If you are sending direct SMTP on behalf of your domain from essentially random locations, how are we supposed to pick you out from spammers that do the same? Use DKIM. You say that like it

Re: The End-To-End Internet (was Re: Blocking MX query)

2012-09-04 Thread Daniel Taylor
x27;s ok to rant and stomp our feet about the end-to-end architecture and how critical it is to support in order to diss NAT, but we're required to ignore it when discussing SMTP? I'm not sure I'm following, there. Cheers, -- jra -- Daniel Taylor VP Operations