On 7/19/21, 9:04 AM, "Stephen Satchell" wrote:
On 7/19/21 5:41 AM, Feldman, Mark wrote:
> What you propose is not outlandish; some ISPs have been dual stack
> and providing some combination of these services for years. They
> already provide IPv6 ip6.arpa
What you propose is not outlandish; some ISPs have been dual stack and
providing some combination of these services for years. They already provide
IPv6 ip6.arpa delegations should their business customers want them. Some even
provide at least a /56 so customers can have multiple /64 subnets.
Another one for the list... We're working on fielding our quad-255
(255.255.255.255) DNS. It's currently pingable but not yet providing
resolution. We're aiming for an April 1st release. One of the most
widley-distributed quads out there. We're thinking about calling it QUAdFF --
drink it
If folks from xtube.com/ultradns/dynect are on the list, it appears that
there’s a discrepancy in the xtube.com zone being served by the some auths. At
least one of the CNAMEs required for resolution is missing from the zone being
served by at least some ultra instances. No idea where the
If someone responsible for or with connections to those running the
state.nj.us/nj.gov auth name servers would contact me off list, it would be
appreciated. We're having some resolution issues that appear to be due to
DNS/network config at or near those auths.
Mark
Comcast T Core Network
If there's anyone from 1and1 (specifically, someone involved with
apps-1and1.com), please contact me off list. We're running across a DNS
resolution issue from some places on our network and would like to discuss.
Thanks.
Mark
Comcast T Core Network Services
Can someone from Google Fiber contact me off list? Thanks.
Mark
Comcast T Core Network Services
Can someone from Go Daddy contact me off-list about a shared customer issue?
Mark
Comcast DNS
8 matches
Mail list logo
