Fw: new message

Hey! New message, please read Frank Bulk - iName.com

Fw: new message

Hey! New message, please read Frank Bulk - iName.com

Fw: new message

Hey! New message, please read <http://hurricanedisasterphotos.com/return.php?sel30> Frank Bulk - iNAME

RE: Level3 tries cell-phone style billing scam on customers

At least they didn't label it a fuel surcharge. =) Frank -Original Message- From: Patrick Giagnocavo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, July 31, 2008 10:47 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Level3 tries cell-phone style billing scam on customers Today I looked at my most recent

RE: tacid.org

Nick: Leaving a domain and IP fallow for such a long time will end up looking like my garden did this year when I did the same thing -- overrun with weeds. Sending a blanket e-mail to NANOG is not going to get the attention of those who manage the e-mail flow (unless you domain belonged to a

RE: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's Box of new TLDs

You mean, you don't employ *any* spam mitigation techniques besides sorting? Because if you do anything, even as basic as RBLs, you're not being consistent with your stance. Frank -Original Message- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2008 3:08 PM

RE: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs

You do have a choice if you're not concerned about the deliverability of your e-mail. Remember, the Internet remains a group of service providers/organizations/subscribers that voluntarily work together and can choose what goes in or out. And so if they decide not to receive traffic from you,

RE: what problem are we solving? (was Re: ICANN opens up Pandora's Box of new TLDs)

One way to provide protection is too allow those who have the domain portion of any domain.(com|net|org|...) to have first dibs for the domain of any new gTLD. i.e. if nanog.org, nanog.com, nanog.net, etc. would have first dibs on nanog.thisisgreatstuff. Or is that too simplistic and fraught

RE: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's Box of new TLDs

Comments in-line. -Original Message- From: Phil Regnauld [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, June 28, 2008 1:02 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: Mail Server best practices - was: Pandora's Box of new TLDs [EMAIL PROTECTED] (michael.dillon) writes:

RE: Possible explanations for a large hop in latency

Did that satisfy you? I guess with MPLS they could tag the traffic and send it around the country twice and I wouldn't see it at L3. Frank -Original Message- From: John T. Yocum [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 7:04 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: nanog list

RE: Possible explanations for a large hop in latency

thought it was rather strange for them to do that. And, I've never seen that occur on any other network. Perhaps someone from ATT would like to chime in. --John Frank Bulk - iNAME wrote: Did that satisfy you? I guess with MPLS they could tag the traffic and send it around the country twice

RE: Possible explanations for a large hop in latency

never seen that occur on any other network. Perhaps someone from ATT would like to chime in. --John Frank Bulk - iNAME wrote: Did that satisfy you? I guess with MPLS they could tag the traffic and send it around the country twice and I wouldn't see it at L3. Frank -Original Message

RE: Cloud service [was: RE: EC2 and GAE means end of ip address reputation industry? (Re: Intrustion attempts from Amazon EC2 IPs)]

For the reason you stated, much to the chagrin of receivers. Easier to sell a service to customers downstream if it's being done in the network, without MX changing. Frank -Original Message- From: Ken Simpson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 8:38 AM To: [EMAIL

RE: easy way to scan for issues with path mtu discovery?

Look at mturoute: http://www.elifulkerson.com/projects/mturoute.php Frank -Original Message- From: Darden, Patrick S. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 9:28 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: easy way to scan for issues with path mtu discovery? Hi all, Does anyone

Cloud service [was: RE: EC2 and GAE means end of ip address reputation industry? (Re: Intrustion attempts from Amazon EC2 IPs)]

When I hear cloud services I think in the network even though it appears all these cloud services perform their work at a data center as an outsourced service. Is there a vendor that makes a product that perform spam/malware filtering literally in the network, i.e. as a service provider, can I

RE: SMTP no-such-user issues

: Steve Bertrand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 7:44 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Re: SMTP no-such-user issues Frank Bulk - iNAME wrote: Please share a packet capture of a working and not working SMTP exchange. In order to provide the highest

RE: [NANOG] Introducing latency for testing?

It's not free, but at a recent trade show I did see what appeared to be an affordable unit from Apposite Technologies (apposite-tech.com). And there's always PacketStorm. Frank -Original Message- From: Mike Lyon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, May 02, 2008 3:13 PM To: NANOG

RE: Power/temperature monitoring

Thanks. The TemPager doesn't appear to support identifying AC power failure, but that's in the Room Alert 7. The price point and features do seem reasonable. Frank From: Josh Fiske [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 9:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; nanog@nanog.org

RE: Power/temperature monitoring

This is basically the AKCP product, repackaged. =) Frank -Original Message- From: Kyle Duren [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2008 9:31 AM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: RE: Power/temperature monitoring We have had great luck, with Ravica Bitsight:

Re: [NANOG] would ip6 help us safeing energy ?

Dale: ESPN360 used to be something that internet subscribers paid for themselves, but now it's something that ISPs (most interesting to those who are also video providers) can offer. If you google around you can find a pretty good Wikipedia page on ESPN360. I looked into this for our operations