On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 10:28 AM Eric Kuhnke wrote:
> Method 2 (backwards compatible, possibly an improvement): Treat the 255
> character sysLocation field as a rudimentary three column CSV file with pipe
> delimiters. Put the standard human readable description of the node location
> in the fi
On Thu, Nov 30, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Romeo Czumbil
wrote:
>
> So do we have any Arista L3 people out here that can share some negatives
or positives?
We're using the Arista 7280R with Jericho(+) chips as PE routers.
We're happy with them.
Stable operation, no serious issues so far.
Feature wise they
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Jeroen Wunnink
wrote:
> Flexopitix allows 3rd party vendor rebranding by buying credits for the
> branding box/account.
AFAIK you have to buy their transceivers, then you can use their
FlexBox to change the programming of the transceivers to be compatible
with $ve
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
> Freddy,
>
> So are you saying if you order enough from Fiberstore.com they will give you
> a programmer? That seems like the best solution.
Yes, the magic number seems to be 3 USD for fiberstore.
I looked into this compatibility magic s
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 8:02 PM, Colton Conor wrote:
> What options are out there for re-programmable SFP and SFP+ transceivers?
> So far I have found both
> https://www.flexoptix.net/en/flexbox-v3-transceiver-programmer.html and
> http://solid-optics.com/tools/multi-fiber-tool/so-multi-fiber-tool
Hello Brian,
you might want to consider joining the nlnog ring (https://ring.nlnog.net/).
You can request access to a full mesh smokeping for all hosts too.
Besides the ring host RIPE Atlas anchors (
https://atlas.ripe.net/anchors/list/) might be another option for hosts to
add to your list.
Am 0
rarely and handle the switching, etc.
via SNMP you should be fine.
If you have any probelm try their their forum (Their normal ticketing
system support is really bad).
Best Regards,
Frederik Kriewitz
On Wed, Dec 2, 2015 at 12:57 AM, Craig Tomkow wrote:
> APC PDUs have been good. Their HTTP
is, albeit with obvious security concerns.
We've build a small tool which watches the dhcpd6 lease file for
changes and injects the PD routes using exabgp (iBGP session with
corresponding IA_NA address as next-hop for the IA_PD prefix).
Best Regards,
Frederik Kriewitz
Hello,
is someone from GBLX/Level 3/Telia around?
It looks like there's a problem with one of your peerings/LAGs.
The problem exists since 00:36 UTC
working path:
traceroute from 71.80.34.222 to 151.248.24.61 (151.248.24.61), 30 hops
max, 40 byte packets
1 192.168.30.1 (192.168.30.1) 0.416 ms
ak times.
I really wouldn't recommend a sysadmin to use a geo stationary
satellite based connection for your daily work unless there's no other
way - simply due to the latency. You'll notice a significant
productivity impact.
Best Regards,
Frederik Kriewitz
On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 8:38 PM, Chaim Rieger wrote:
> Freddy, did you get your test up ?
Finally had some time to setup a lab environment and do some basic
testing regarding the fully transparent approach mentioned in the
initial email.
My biggest concern was that the cisco wouldn't like packets
ol to completely stop malware in your
network.
On the other hand there was no complain due to a false positive (a
couple of years ago we had one complain due to a false positive on the
EDROP list).
Best Regards,
Frederik Kriewitz
Hello Dave,
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 1:49 AM, Dave Taht wrote:
> I have had a piece long on the spike on how we implemented bcp38 for
> linux (openwrt) devices using the ipset facility.
>
> We had a different use case (preventing all possible internal rfc1918
> network addresses from escaping, whi
ail/nanog/2015-April/074425.html
Depending on whether you're RIB and/or FIB limited there are a couple
of options.
Regards,
Frederik Kriewitz
Hello,
At the beginning of this year we started to roll out IPv6 for a large
part of our customer base.
Everything was working perfectly fine until mid February when google
decided to geo locate our entire 2a00:e60::/32 IPv6 net to Iran.
We expected that it would be done for /48 to /64 blocks (On
Thank you very much for all your responses.
First of all, the problems we see are really RIB (Processor memory)
and CPU related.
The TCAM/FIB limits are properly configured. From the FIB capacity
view they should last a couple of more years. Software routing doesn't
cause the problem.
The most ext
Hello,
We've a lot of customers with Cisco 6500 routers (mostly with SUP720
supervisors) in operation. They are very popular with smaller ISPs in
Africa/middle east due to their cheap price on the used marked and
their fully sufficient routing performance for the given tasks. In
practice the bigge
17 matches
Mail list logo