Please send the job spec..
On Fri, 4/24/15, Harry Hoffman hhoff...@ip-solutions.net wrote:
Subject: OT: Long term contract work in Boston/Cambridge area
To: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Date: Friday, April 24, 2015, 1:55 PM
Good
walter, i couldn't care less about your problem! get the message!
From: Walter Keen walter.k...@rainierconnect.net
To: James Wininger jwinin...@ifncom.net
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2012 5:14 PM
Subject: Re: Fiber only in DataCenters?
are you any good in Maths?
http://www.stanford.edu/~milgrom/publishedarticles/Advances%20in%20Routing%20Technologies%20and%20Internet%20Peering%20Agr.%202001.pdf
maybe a PhD will find a point in using this part of their self-development
how far can you go and what is your position in
) nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Simple Peering Agreement
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Jun 15, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Isabel Dias wrote:
are you any good in Maths?
http://www.stanford.edu/~milgrom/publishedarticles/Advances%20in%20Routin
g%20Technologies%20and%20Internet
MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Jun 15, 2012, at 10:36 AM, Isabel Dias wrote:
are you any good in Maths?
http://www.stanford.edu/~milgrom/publishedarticles/Advances%20in%20Routing%20Technologies%20and%20Internet%20Peering%20Agr.%202001.pdf
If you're good in maths, you'll realize that the simple
You are an excellent point of contact at China Telecoms. In fact you could try
the resident team in resourcing for huawei at your local university campus
they always turn up in exhibitions
From: Olivier CALVANO o.calv...@gmail.com
To: NANOG
are you a PhD? otherwise you are not making sence
From: Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com
To: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wednesday, March 7, 2012 3:17 PM
Subject: PLEASE don't feed the troll
Nuff said?
Cheers,
-- jra
--
Jay R. Ashworth
1- what do you mean by Licensed folks working in architecture and design?
2- You wrote IT isn't governed by the same hard (physical) rules as
traditional engineering, but you also can't be freely creative and
expect to come up with something that works. bolox!
As far as I'm aware you are not
Hi Tim, How long have you been on that position? IT Security Manager
are you self-employed or running your own limited company?
what areas of knowledge are you mostly interested in? where about are you
based? what do you think the role of an IT Security Manager is about?
From: David
ask your account manager if he has any agreement in place with any supplier
From: Matt Ryanczak ryanc...@gmail.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Monday, October 3, 2011 2:22 PM
Subject: Ashburn Va. Datacenter Movers
Can anyone recommend a vendor in the D.C. metro
IPv4? IPv6?
are you planning to do NAT or PAT?
Are you using a bogous ASN 64512 through 65534 to be used for private purposes?
/30 - 4 addresses/2 hosts - you can't do a mesh configuration w/ that subnet
mask..
--- On Wed, 6/15/11, James Grace ja...@cs.fiu.edu wrote:
From: James
i guess you have a lot of ibgp sessions ..:-)
bgp finite state model
http://www.inetdaemon.com/tutorials/internet/ip/routing/bgp/operation/finite_state_model.shtml
http://www.juniper.net/techpubs/software/erx/junose61/swconfig-routing-vol2/html/bgp-mpls-vpns-config15.html
http://fengnet.com/book/Definitive%20MPLS%20Network%20Designs/ch01lev1sec6.html
http://www.armware.dk/RFC/rfc/rfc4798.html
why would you do that for?
- Original Message
From: Daniel STICKNEY dstick...@optilian.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thu, April 7, 2011 10:27:01 AM
Subject: Implementations/suggestions for Multihoming IPv6 for DSL sites
Hello all,
I'm investigating how to setup multihoming for IPv6
how many ip addresses do you have ?
- Original Message
From: Daniel STICKNEY dstick...@optilian.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thu, April 7, 2011 10:27:01 AM
Subject: Implementations/suggestions for Multihoming IPv6 for DSL sites
Hello all,
I'm investigating how to setup multihoming
have you thought about taking a Cisco training course?
- Original Message
From: Daniel STICKNEY dstick...@optilian.com
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thu, April 7, 2011 10:27:01 AM
Subject: Implementations/suggestions for Multihoming IPv6 for DSL sites
Hello all,
I'm investigating how to
The only reason why you feel that way is cause you haven't been made aware and
your network of friends is not helping you at all so do speak up and make
yourself heard!
- Original Message
From: Leon Kaiser litera...@gmail.com
To: full-disclos...@lists.grok.org.uk; nanog@nanog.org;
how relevant is that information?
- Original Message
From: Eric Gauthier e...@roxanne.org
To: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Fri, February 25, 2011 1:52:44 PM
Subject: Re: A pragmatic issue with running out of v4 :)
I wonder if Skynet upgraded to v6...
Eric :)
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at
sure
From: Lee Howard l...@asgard.org
To: Owen DeLong o...@delong.com; david raistrick dr...@icantclick.org
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Sun, February 6, 2011 2:16:35 PM
Subject: RE: quietly
The end-to-end model is about If my packet is
do you have a satellite dish? what are your dish pointing coordinates..we
just need to find out what is going on the air interface ...
From: Ryan Wilkins r...@deadfrog.net
To: Jay Ashworth j...@baylink.com
Cc: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Fri, February 4,
who are you?
From: Steve Danelli the76po...@gmail.com
To: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tue, February 1, 2011 1:54:47 PM
Subject: Connectivity to Brazil
Hello all!!! First post here
Some carrier, somewhere between us and the service provider is
I still don't know where you are and the simulation you are doing .can you
be more specific ?
From: Kevin Hodle kevin.ho...@gmail.com
To: Steve Danelli the76po...@gmail.com
Cc: isabel dias isabeldi...@yahoo.com; nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tue
around the world
and also in the UK ..:-)
From: isabel dias isabeldi...@yahoo.com
To: Kevin Hodle kevin.ho...@gmail.com; Steve Danelli the76po...@gmail.com
Cc: nanog@nanog.org nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tue, February 1, 2011 4:16:42 PM
Subject: Re: Connectivity
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/routers/ps295/products_configuration_example09186a0080093e3b.shtml
http://s-tools1.juniper.net/solutions/literature/white_papers/200187.pdf
3rd party vendors might want to have me onboard :-) otherwise you can come up
w/
your own piece of kit, rfc' it
check the agreed maintenance windows as defined in the (SLA)section Maintenance
Plans - etc
- Original Message
From: Joel Jaeggli joe...@bogus.com
To: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Fri, December 10, 2010 6:48:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Operational] Internet Police
location?
- Original Message
From: Matt Disuko gourmetci...@hotmail.com
To: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Thu, December 9, 2010 3:02:59 PM
Subject: Global Crossing/GBLX tech needed - AS3549
Can a Global Crossing IP engineer please contact me off-list?
Thanks,
Matt
http://hen.cs.ucl.ac.uk/library/hardware/routers/procket/20fcs/routing_protocols/bgp.verify19.html
http://www.inetdaemon.com/tutorials/internet/ip/routing/bgp/operation/finite_state_model.shtml
http://www.cymru.com/Documents/barry2.pdf
I would check the latest version of the RFC and also the
same as in the HFC and QAM modulation values and so on and so forth .
services that are requiring a connection-oriented service such as a gaming
clan/cloud are highly affected when working in latency and jitter network based
environments such as the ethernet based ones and SMDS ...
Is cable better for gamming?
- Original Message
From: isabel dias isabeldi...@yahoo.com
To: Chris Boyd cb...@gizmopartners.com; NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tue, May 4, 2010 2:41:48 PM
Subject: Re: Emulating ADSL bandwidth shaping
same as in the HFC and QAM modulation values and so
CEO position - Did you know:
The majority of SP 500 CEOs are in their 50s
29% of SP 500 CEOs have an advanced degree other than an MBA
CEOs in the SP 401-500 group are more likely to have a shorter tenure with
his or her company than other SP 500 CEOs
60% of SP 500 CEOs have been in office
1- http://onlyv6.com is not resolving .
2- why would anyone be interested in buying bit-pipes from you if you don't
own fiber or ports in a switch?
3- why would anyone be interested in buying ip address space if they can do it
from SP's themselfs or apply for that ripe allocation?
4- ICIN
Godzilla vs. the Smog Monster
- Original Message
From: Dave Hart daveh...@gmail.com
To: Tim Franklin t...@pelican.org
Cc: NANOG nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Fri, April 23, 2010 12:57:47 PM
Subject: Re: Connectivity to an IPv6-only site
On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 11:38 UTC, Tim Franklin
I Just Don't Know What To Do With Myself
- Original Message
From: Jeroen Massar jer...@unfix.org
To: Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org
Cc: nanog@nanog.org; Richard E. Brown richard.e.br...@dartware.com
Sent: Fri, February 5, 2010 1:16:53 AM
Subject: Re: Regular Expression for IPv6 addresses
who's side are you on?
Just before answering think about the opportunities and threats before consider
having sex! You just need to know how to protect yourself. Not to everyone’s
taste but pregnancy can be prevented after intercourse by taking emergency
contraceptive pills (EC). Other chose
:-)
- Original Message
From: joel jaeggli joe...@bogus.com
To: Ron Bonica rbon...@juniper.net
Cc: nanog nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Wed, November 4, 2009 3:41:26 AM
Subject: Re: ip options
How about unused and/or private/local diffserve code points?
Ron Bonica wrote:
Folks,
I would
How many times more anyone will be lookin to ask the same questions. IX's
(peering) are there and most likely companies have presence either on the NY IX
or LINX so ask them around and peer w/ them locally. Transite is a costy
solution unless you want to load balance your traffic and have means
There is always a peering policy in place and I am sure you have a few
requirements in mind and you will be evaluating costs carefully as well as
options thoroughly before making a decision on which SP to go for. I am sure
technical teams are flexifle to accomodate some bespoke private peering
affecting whom? and who's network?
--- On Sun, 3/29/09, Ken Gilmour ken.gilm...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Ken Gilmour ken.gilm...@gmail.com
Subject: Fiber cut on Irish Sea
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Sunday, March 29, 2009, 4:55 PM
Hi There,
Since we use a vendor of the vendor of two
Irish
29, 2009, 5:04 PM
We received the report from Packet Exchange, however they
are not the
owners of the cable. I assume they just rent spectrum.
2009/3/29 isabel dias isabeldi...@yahoo.com:
affecting whom? and who's network?
--- On Sun, 3/29/09, Ken Gilmour
ken.gilm...@gmail.com wrote
received the report from Packet Exchange, however they are not the
owners of the cable. I assume they just rent spectrum.
2009/3/29 isabel dias isabeldi...@yahoo.com:
affecting whom? and who's network?
--- On Sun, 3/29/09, Ken Gilmour ken.gilm...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Ken Gilmour
Dave,
Your netblock might be a standard /19 or just a modest /30 :-) or you are just
deploying IPv6 and therefore applied for one of the most recent RIPE
assigments.
Do you have different AS private/public numbers running on your network?
filtering IGP routes part pf the OSPF design
Joe,
I take credit card payments and we can agree on a daily rate ...as after
all you are into IT Consultancy.
Just use the available search engine optimizers to build your knowledge based
by performing the black had v white hat searches :-)
I am here still what is your budget?
to participate in flame wars
d) You want to read flame wars
e) You want to denigrate those seeking to educate
themselves or others
You cant have your cake and eat it too.
Thanks but no thanks, I am going to avoid the pissing
contest.
Joe
isabel dias wrote:
Joe,
I take
Maybe the best way of addressing this is knowing exactly what we need to
measure- if IP traffic, services or processes. If the timescale of a process
(ie: MTTR's)and/or procedure or just data and/or voice traffic from point A to
B. Or just scoping the measurments as being the performance of
what do you mean?
--- On Wed, 2/11/09, Sutterfield, Brian bsutterfi...@theplanet.com wrote:
From: Sutterfield, Brian bsutterfi...@theplanet.com
Subject: XKL
To: nanog@nanog.org
Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2009, 5:33 PM
Does anyone have any experience using the DXM from XKL for
DWDM
Engineer 352-273-0113 Phone
CNS - Network Services 352-392-2061 CNS
Receptionist
University of Florida 352-392-9440 FAX
Florida Lambda Rail 352-294-3571 FLR NOC
Gainesville, FL 32611 321-663-0421 Cell
-Original Message-
From: isabel
Message-
From: isabel dias [mailto:isabeldi...@yahoo.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 11, 2009 12:15 PM
To: Robert D. Scott
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: XKL
What do you mean?
--- On Wed, 2/11/09, Robert D. Scott rob...@ufl.edu
wrote:
From: Robert D. Scott rob...@ufl.edu
Someone is basicly twicking the mail headers by sending messages like [EMAIL
PROTECTED]-who is?
OUI...yes, great topic! Now mind me asking but why would you need a private
OUI if the well-known (registed) list is quite public and everyone has a
reserved allocation? (vendors have)
and yes as
Raymondo .
I guess you are bringing everyone together on the achieving resilience and
efficient Load Balancing just in case the one path is temporarly unavailable
.. :-)
*commit/rollback
CISCO IOS
save a configuration to the NVRAM with the copy running-config startup -config
Patel,
I would suggest you to read a few things about the path selection
algoritmas if i understand your words you are asking for an issue on LSA
type 4 rather than multiple AS and therefore LSA type 5 /7-ASBR
prefer backbone intra-area paths over inter-area paths
Excerpted from RFC
chance to pick up a redundant connection.
Well, traffic will have chances to pick up an alternative AS path - mesh
peering (at the public IX). Also go via the redundant physical link if you have
one agreed w/ ure peering point, or just take the best egress path via the (or
one of the
question - beginning a small deployment of IPv6 now
even if its just for internal usage
Sure! there are plenty of reasons .most obvious one is to feel
confortable about ipv6
--- On Wed, 10/29/08, Steven King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Steven King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
everyone seems to have their saying from leting you wonder on what is the
problem to making assumptions to witty technical explanations and useless
question rephrased. For some reading this some are just non-technical
individuals posting messages. All can be done ..we all know the BGP
53 matches
Mail list logo
